Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Shakespeare’s Middle Comedies: A Generation of Criticism
- ‘Perfect Types of Womanhood’: Rosalind, Beatrice and Viola in Victorian Criticism and Performance
- The Stage Representation of the ‘Kill Claudio’ Sequence in Much Ado About Nothing
- As You Like It Adapted: Charles Johnson’s Love in a Forest
- Social Relations and the Social Order in Much Ado About Nothing
- Sexual Disguise in As You Like It and Twelfth Night
- Twelfth Night and the Myth of Echo and Narcissus
- ‘Smiling at grief’: Some Techniques of Comedy in Twelfth Night and Così Fan Tutte
- ‘My Lady’s a Catayan, we are politicians, Maluolios a Peg-a-ramsie’ (Twelfth Night II, iii, 77-8)
- The Importance of Being Marcade
- A Hebrew Source for The Merchant of Venice
- The Marriage Contracts in Measure for Measure: A Reconsideration
- Richard III: Antecedents of Clarence’s Dream
- Deep Plots and Indiscretions in ‘The Murder of Gonzago’
- ‘What is’t to leave betimes?’ Proverbs and Logic in Hamlet
- The Tempest: Language and Society
- Pictorial Evidence for a Possible Replica of the London Fortune Theatre in Gdansk
- A Year of Comedies: Stratford 1978
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study: 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Index
- Plate section
The Stage Representation of the ‘Kill Claudio’ Sequence in Much Ado About Nothing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2007
- Frontmatter
- Shakespeare’s Middle Comedies: A Generation of Criticism
- ‘Perfect Types of Womanhood’: Rosalind, Beatrice and Viola in Victorian Criticism and Performance
- The Stage Representation of the ‘Kill Claudio’ Sequence in Much Ado About Nothing
- As You Like It Adapted: Charles Johnson’s Love in a Forest
- Social Relations and the Social Order in Much Ado About Nothing
- Sexual Disguise in As You Like It and Twelfth Night
- Twelfth Night and the Myth of Echo and Narcissus
- ‘Smiling at grief’: Some Techniques of Comedy in Twelfth Night and Così Fan Tutte
- ‘My Lady’s a Catayan, we are politicians, Maluolios a Peg-a-ramsie’ (Twelfth Night II, iii, 77-8)
- The Importance of Being Marcade
- A Hebrew Source for The Merchant of Venice
- The Marriage Contracts in Measure for Measure: A Reconsideration
- Richard III: Antecedents of Clarence’s Dream
- Deep Plots and Indiscretions in ‘The Murder of Gonzago’
- ‘What is’t to leave betimes?’ Proverbs and Logic in Hamlet
- The Tempest: Language and Society
- Pictorial Evidence for a Possible Replica of the London Fortune Theatre in Gdansk
- A Year of Comedies: Stratford 1978
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study: 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Index
- Plate section
Summary
In the stage production of Much Ado About Nothing the subtle interplay of emotions, and the delicate tonal balance in the dialogue between Benedick and Beatrice at the end of the church scene, have always proved testing to the players. An examination of a range of English productions of Much Ado between Garrick and the mid–1950s highlights some of the principles of the dramatic organisation of this sequence, illustrating both the variety of legitimate interpretation which it admits, and the extent to which it has sometimes been falsified in the theatre.
The first point to emerge in the study is that the plausibility of the sequence depends to a large extent on the players' success in establishing a sense of continuity between the emotions aroused in the first part of the church scene, and the reactions of Benedick and Beatrice in their concluding dialogue. In the more sensitive performances, Beatrice and Benedick have shown in their solicitude for Hero at the altar1 a depth of sympathy sufficient to give their later confessions of love the degree of inevitability and seriousness which the text (despite its latent comic undertones) demands.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare Survey , pp. 27 - 36Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1980
- 1
- Cited by