Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- map
- 0 Introduction
- 1 Linguistic evolution, genetic affiliation and classification
- 2 Socio-historical evolution
- 3 Phonology
- 4 Morphophonology
- 5 Morphology: inflexion
- 6 Syntactic categories and morphosyntax
- 7 Sentence structure
- 8 Word formation
- 9 Lexis
- 10 Dialects
- 11 Sociolinguistic issues
- Appendix A: Abbreviations
- Appendix B: Orthography and transliteration
- Appendix C: Slavic linguistics: resources
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- map
- 0 Introduction
- 1 Linguistic evolution, genetic affiliation and classification
- 2 Socio-historical evolution
- 3 Phonology
- 4 Morphophonology
- 5 Morphology: inflexion
- 6 Syntactic categories and morphosyntax
- 7 Sentence structure
- 8 Word formation
- 9 Lexis
- 10 Dialects
- 11 Sociolinguistic issues
- Appendix A: Abbreviations
- Appendix B: Orthography and transliteration
- Appendix C: Slavic linguistics: resources
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Slavic Languages , pp. 603 - 620Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
Albijanić, A. 1982. ‘San Pedro revisited: language maintenance in the San Pedro Yugoslav community’. In Sussex (ed.): 11–22
1970. ‘The creation of the Slaveno-Serbski literary language’. Slavonic and East European Review 48: 483–491Google Scholar
1992. Lexical semantics: user's guide to contemporary Russian vocabulary. Ann Arbor, MI: KaromaGoogle Scholar
1984. Slovoobrazovanie i formoobrazovanie suščestvitel′nyx v istorii russkogo jazyka. Moscow: NaukaGoogle Scholar
Aronson, H. I.1985. ‘Form, function and the “perfective” in Bulgarian’. In Flier and Timberlake (eds.): 274–285
1964–1976. Urslavische Grammatik. Einführung in das vergleichende Studium der slavischen Sprachen. Bd. I: Einleitung, Lautlehre, Vokalismus. Bd. 2: Konsonantismus. Heidelberg: Carl Winter VerlagGoogle Scholar
(editor-in-chief) 1994. The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
Atlas slovenského jazyka. 1968–1984. Vols. 1–4. Bratislava: SAV
Atlas ukrajins′koji movy. 1984–1988. Akademija nauk Ukrajins'koji RSR, Instytut movoznavstva im. O. O. Potebny, Instytut suspil′nyx nauk. 2 vols. Kiev: Naukova Dumka
1953. ‘The evolution of literary Slovak’. Transactions of the Philological Society. 143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1961. ‘Dialect, koine and tradition in the formation of literary Slovak’. Slavonic and East European Review 39: 339–345Google Scholar
1963. ‘The formation of the Slovene literary language against the background of the Slavonic national revival’. Slavonic and East European Review 41: 391–402Google Scholar
Auty, Robert1972. ‘Sources and methods of lexical enrichment in the Slavonic language-revivals of the early nineteenth century’. In Worth (ed.). 41–56
1973. ‘The role of purism in the development of the Slavonic literary languages’. Slavonic and East European Review 51: 335–343Google Scholar
Auty, Robert1977. ‘The Russian language’. In Auty and Obolensky (eds.): 1–40
Auty, Robert1980. ‘Czech’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 163–182
and (eds.) 1977. The companion to Russian studies. 2: An introduction to Russian language and literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) 1986. Dialektologičeskij atlas russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Glav. upr. geodezii i kartografii pri Sovete Ministrov SSSRGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) 1962. Voprosy obrazovanija vostočno-slavjanskix nacional′nyx jazykov. Moscow: AN SSSRGoogle Scholar
et al. 1989. Sovremennyj russkij jazyk v sopostavlenii so slovackim. Morfologija. Bratislava: SPNGoogle Scholar
Bălgarska Akademija na Naukite/Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. 1980. The unity of the Bulgarian language in the past and today. Sofia: BAN
Banac, Ivo 1984. ‘Main trends in the Croat language question’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. I: 189–259
Barnet, Vladimir 1985. ‘Toward a sociolinguistic interpretation of the origins of the Slavonic literary languages’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 13–20
and 1972. Grammaire de la langue slovaque. Paris: Institut d'Etudes Slaves and Bratislava: Matica SlovenskáGoogle Scholar
, , and 1961. ‘K voprosu ob “obixodnorazgovornom” češskom jazyke i ego otnošenie k literaturnomu češskomu jazyku’. Voprosy jazykoznanija 10(1): 44–51Google Scholar
2002. ‘Konkurencija vidov, vežlivost′ i ètiket v russkom imperative’. Russian Linguistics 26: 149–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. ‘Word-order change in progress: the case of Slovenian and Serbo-Croat and its relevance for Germanic’. Journal of Linguistics 23: 269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. Dictionary of Russian personal names: with a revised guide to stress and morphology. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1998. Standard English–SerboCroatian, SerboCroatian–English dictionary: a dictionary of Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian standards. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1974. Očerk sravnitel′noj grammatiki slavjanskix jazykov: Čeredovanija: imennye osnovy. Moscow: NaukaGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1978. Nacional′noe vozroždenie i formirovanie slavjanskix literaturnyx jazykov. Moscow: NaukaGoogle Scholar
1998. Slavic prosody: language change and phonological theory. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibliographie linguistique de l'année (1939–). Utrecht: Spectrum
1969. A morpho-syntactic characterization of the modern Slavic languages. Pittsburgh: University Center for International Studies, University of PittsburghGoogle Scholar
1970. The Slavic languages – their external history. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Center for International StudiesGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1969a. Sučasna ukrajins′ka literaturna mova. Vstup, fonetika. Kiev: Naukova dumkaGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1973a. Sučasna ukrajins′ka literaturna mova. Leksyka i frazeolohija. Kiev: Naukova dumkaGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, H., 1966. ‘The dialects of Common Slavic’. In and (eds.), Ancient Indo-European dialects. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 153–197Google Scholar
[1975] 1979. Common Slavic. Progress and problems in its reconstruction. Columbus, OH: SlavicaGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, H.1985. ‘The Slavonic language community as a genetic and typological class’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 21–28
and 1983. Advances in the reconstruction of Common Slavic (1971–1982). Columbus, OH: SlavicaGoogle Scholar
and 1985–1986. Belaruskaja hramatyka. 1. Fanalohija. Arfaèpija. Marfalohija. Slovaŭtvarènne. Nacisk. (1985). 2. Sintaksis. (1986). Minsk: Instytut movaznaŭstva AN BSSRGoogle Scholar
, and 1981. Kommentierte Bibliographie zur slavischen Soziolinguistik. Berne: Peter Lang VerlagGoogle Scholar
1961–1969. Slavische Sprachwissenschaft. I: Einleitung, Lautlehre. II/III: Formenlehre. Berlin: Walter de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, Richard D. 1985. ‘The form and function of aspect in Russian’. In Flier and Brecht (eds.): 9–34
and (eds.) 1974. Slavic transformational syntax. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic PublicationsGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1991. International encyclopedia of linguistics. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and 1961. ‘Address in American English’. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62: 373–385. Reprinted in John Laver and Sandy Hutcheson (eds.) 1972. Communication in face to face interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 128–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. 1960. ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’. In (ed.), Style in language, Cambridge, MA: Technology Press of M.I.T.: 253–276. Reprinted in Giglioli, Pier Paolo (ed.) 1972. Language and social context. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 252–282Google Scholar
Browne, E. Wayles. 1974. ‘On the problem of enclitic placement in Serbo-Croatian’. In Brecht and Chvany (eds.): 36–52
Browne, E. Wayles.1993. ‘Serbo-Croat’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 306–387
Browne, E. Wayles and Alt, Teresa (n.d.) A handbook of Bosnian, Serbian and Croatian. Retrieved (22 August 2004) from: http://www.seelrc.org:8080/grammar/mainframe.jsp?nLanguageID=1
Browne, E. Wayles and McCawley, James D. 1973. ‘Serbo-Croatian accent’. In (ed.), Phonology: selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 330–335Google Scholar
Brozović, D.1991. ‘Serbo-Croatian as a pluricentric language’. In Clyne (ed.): 347–380
and 1988. Jezik srpskohrvatski/hrvatskosrpski, hrvatski ili srpski. Izvadak iz II izdanija Enciklopedije Jugoslavije. Zagreb: Jugoslavenski leksikografski zavodGoogle Scholar
1982. One step back, two steps forward: on the language policy of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the national republics. Boulder, CO: East European Monographs. Distributed by Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
1886–1900. Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. 5 vols. Strassburg: K. J. TrübnerGoogle Scholar
1990. Introduction to the phonological history of the Slavic languages. Columbus, OH: SlavicaGoogle Scholar
and 1976. Solzhenitsyn's peculiar vocabulary: Russian–English glossary. Mt Vernon, ME: Technical Dictionaries CompanyGoogle Scholar
Channon, Robert 1980. ‘On PLACE advancements in English and Russian’. In Chvany and Brecht (eds.): 114–137
Chvany, Catherine V. 1988. ‘Distance, deixis and discreteness in Bulgarian and English verb morphology’. In (ed.) American Contributions to the Tenth International Congress of Slavists (Sofia). Linguistics. Columbus, OH: Slavica: 69–90Google Scholar
(ed.) 1991. Pluricentric languages. Differing norms in different nations. Berlin and New York: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael G.1991a. ‘Introduction’. In Clyne (ed.): 1–9
Clyne, Michael G.1991b. ‘Epilogue’. In Clyne (ed.): 455–465
1976. Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1978. ‘Genitive-accusatives in Slavic: the rules and their motivation’. International Review of Slavic Linguistics 3: 27–42Google Scholar
, and 1996. The Russian language in the twentieth century. Oxford: The Clarendon Press (2nd rev. edn. of Comrie and Stone 1978)Google Scholar
1989. ‘Russian underworld slang and its passage into the standard language’. Australian Slavonic and East European Studies 3(2): 61–89Google Scholar
1979. Predicate agreement in Russian. Birmingham: Dept. of Russian, University of BirminghamGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.1980. ‘Animacy in Russian and other Slavic languages: where syntax and semantics fail to match’. In Chvany and Brecht (eds.): 43–61
1983. Hierarchies, targets and controllers. Agreement patterns in Slavic. London and Canberra: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.1987. ‘Serbo-Croat’. In Comrie (ed.): 391–409
1982. ‘On the “empty” prefixes in Russian’. Russian Language Journal 36, 123–124: 12–30Google Scholar
1987. ‘Syllabic [r̥] in the Slavonic languages: a computer-based investigation’. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 35/36: 7–28Google Scholar
(ed.) 1971. Linguistic diversity in Canadian society. Edmonton and Champaign: Linguistic Research, IncGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M. 1999. ‘Clitics in the Slavic languages’. In van Riemsdijk (ed.): 83–122
(Dobrovský) 1822. Institutiones lingua slavicae dialecti veteris. 2nd edn. Vienna: SchmidGoogle Scholar
1938. Język polski w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Warsaw: Prace Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego, Wydział 1, Nr. 15Google Scholar
1988. ‘Is there a tendency towards analyticity in Russian?’ Slavonic and East European Journal 66: 169–183Google Scholar
Ďurovič, Ľ. 1980. ‘Slovak’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 211–228
1983. ‘The case systems in the language of diaspora children’. In ‘Lingua in diaspora: studies in the language of the second generation of Yugoslav immigrant children in Sweden.’ Slavica Lundensia 9: 21–94Google Scholar
1992. Word order in the simple Bulgarian sentence: a study in grammar, semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam, Atlanta, GA: RodopiGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1993. Varieties of Czech: studies in Czech sociolinguistics. Amsterdam, Atlanta: RodopiGoogle Scholar
1976. ‘The definite article in Bulgarian and Macedonian’. Slavic and East European Journal 20: 273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1981. Grammatik der obersorbischen Schriftsprache der Gegenwart. Morphologie. Bautzen: DomowinaGoogle Scholar
Feldstein, Ronald F. (n.d.) A concise Polish grammar. Retrieved (22 August 2004) from: http://www.seelrc.org:8080/grammar/mainframe.jsp?nLanguageID=4
1993. The semantics and pragmatics of verbal categories in Bulgarian. Lewiston: Edwin MellenGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1982. The English element in European languages. Vol. 2. Zagreb: Institute of Linguistics, University of ZagrebGoogle Scholar
1990. Anglicizmi u hrvatskom ili srpskom jeziku: poreklo – razvoj – značenje. Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, Razred za filološke znanosti, knj. 70Google Scholar
and (eds.) 1985. Issues in Russian morphosyntax. Los Angeles: UCLA Slavic Studies 10. Distributed by SlavicaGoogle Scholar
1988. Language policy in Yugoslavia (with special reference to Croatian). Paris: Nouvelles Editions LatinesGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor A.1993. ‘Macedonian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 249–305
Friedman, Victor A.(n.d.) Macedonian. Retrieved (22 August 2004) from: http://www.seelrc.org:8080/grammar/mainframe.jsp?nLanguageID=6
Friedrich, Paul 1966. ‘Structural implications of Russian pronominal usage’. In (ed.), Sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton: 214–259Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul1972. ‘Social context and semantic feature: the Russian pronominal usage’. In and (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston: 270–300Google Scholar
Fryščák, M. 1978. ‘The two official languages of Czechoslovakia’. In Schmalstieg and Magner (eds.): 343–352
1972. Soviet prison camp speech: a survivor's glossary. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin PressGoogle Scholar
1959. ‘The standard language problem: concepts and methods’. Anthropological Linguistics 1: 28–31Google Scholar
1976. Stilistika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka. Leksika. Fonetika. Moscow: Vysšaja školaGoogle Scholar
1978b. Variantnost′ slova i jazykovaja norma. Na materiale sovremennogo russkogo jazyka. Leningrad: NaukaGoogle Scholar
2003. ‘Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin’. Nature 426, 27 January 2003: 435–439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, J. H. 1969. ‘Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics’. In (ed.), Substance and structure of language. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 147–203Google Scholar
(eds.) 1978. Universals of human language. 4 vols. Stanford: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
1980. Tone and accent in standard Serbo-Croatian (with a synopsis of Serbo-Croatian phonology). Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar
1991. The genesis of the modern Bulgarian literary language. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Slavica Upsaliensia 30Google Scholar
1953. The Norwegian language in America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar
1936. ‘Vývoj spisovného jazyka českého’. Československá vlastivěda III, 2: Spisovný jazyk český a slovenský. Prague: Sfinx: 1–144Google Scholar
1963. ‘Funkce spisovného jazyka. Vliv funkce spisovného jazyk na fonologickou a gramatickou strukturu spisovné češtiny. Úkoly spisovného jazyka a jeho kultura. K funkčnímu rozvrstvení spisovného jazyka’. Studie o spisovném jazyce. Prague: ČSAV: 11–68Google Scholar
Henzl, V. M. 1982. ‘American Czech: a comparative study of linguistic modifications in immigrant and young children speech’. In Sussex (ed.): 33–46
1973. ‘The role of the Matica and similar societies in the development of the Slavonic literary languages’. Slavonic and East European Review 51: 368–386Google Scholar
Herrity, P.1985. ‘France Prešeren and the Slovene Literary Language’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 147–159
Hill, Peter 1982. ‘Different codifications of a language’. In (ed.), Slavistische Linguistik 1981. Referate des VII Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens (Slavistische Beiträge 160). Munich: Sagner: 48–63Google Scholar
Hill, Peter1986. ‘Das Bulgarische’. In Rehder (ed.): 20–32
and (eds.) 1988. Standard language in the Slavic world. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner (Slavistische Beiträge 235)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. An introduction to the study of the Slavonic languages. Translated from the Czech [Horálek 1962] and amended by Peter Herrity. Nottingham: Astra PressGoogle Scholar
and 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, David 1993. ‘Old Church Slavonic’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 125–187
Illič-Svityč, V. M. 1971–1976. Opyt sravnenija nostratičeskix jazykov: semitoxamitskij, kartvel′skij, indoevropejskij, ural′skii, dravidijskij, altajskij. [Ed. ]. Moscow: NaukaGoogle Scholar
[1963] 1979. Nominal accentuation in Baltic and Slavic. Translated by Richard L. Leed and Ronald F. Feldstein. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Iovine, Micaela S. 1984. ‘The “Illyrian” language’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.): 101–156
Isačenko. See also Issatschenko
1958. ‘Kakova specifika literaturnogo dvujazyčija v istorii slavjanskix narodov?’ Voprosy jazykoznanija 9(3): 42–45Google Scholar
1968. Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Teil I: Formenlehre. Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer VerlagGoogle Scholar
1976. Opera selecta. Russische Gegenwartssprache, russische Sprachgeschichte, Probleme der slavischen Sprachwissenschaft. Munich: Fink Verlag (Forum Slavicum 45)Google Scholar
Issatschenko, see also Isačenko
1975. Mythen und Tatsachen über die Entwicklung der russischen Literatursprache. Vienna: Sitzungsberichte (Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, 298. Bd., Abh. 5)Google Scholar
Issatschenko, A. V.1980. ‘Russian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 119–142
1985. Dijalektologija srpskohrvatskog jezika: uvod u štokavsko narečje. 2nd edn. Beograd: Matica SrpskaGoogle Scholar
1986. ‘Funkcionalna nosivost prozodijskih sistema u kajkavskim govorima’. Filologija 14: 129–144Google Scholar
[1958] 1991b. Srpskohrvatski dijalekti: njihova struktura i razvoj. Sremski Karlovci: Izd. Knjiž. Zorana StojanovićaGoogle Scholar
1973. ‘Zur sozialen Implikation des Gebrauches von Anredepronomen (mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Russischen)’. Zeitschrift für slavische Philologie 37: 343–355Google Scholar
1978. Wortbildung und ihre Modellierung: Anhand des Serbokroatischen Verbalbereiches. Wiesbaden: HarrassowitzGoogle Scholar
1929. Remarques sur l’évolution phonologique du russe comparée à celle des autres langues slaves. Prague: TCLP (Klaus Reprint 1968)Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman1936. ‘Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus’. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6. Reprinted in translation as: ‘Contribution to the general theory of case: general meanings of the Russian cases’, in Jakobson 1984: 59–103
Jakobson, Roman1948. ‘Russian conjugation’. Word4: 155–167. Also in , Russian and Slavic grammar. Studies 1931–1981. Berlin: Mouton, 1984: 15–26Google Scholar
1955. Slavic languages. A condensed survey. Columbia University, New York: King's Crown PressGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman1984. Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981. Berlin, New York: Mouton. Edited by and Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. and Townsend, Charles E.(n.d.) Czech. Retrieved (22 August 2004) from: http://www.seelrc.org:8080/grammar/mainframe.jsp?nLanguageID=2
1983. The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1985. ‘Attitudes toward Serbo-Croatian language varieties’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 52: 93–109Google Scholar
2002. Podstawowe struktury składniowe języka polskiego. Warsaw: Slawistyczny Ośrodek WydawniczyGoogle Scholar
1955. Belorusy. Jazyk belorusskogo naroda. Moscow: AN SSSR. Originally published in Warsaw, 1908–1912. Belarusian version 1992Google Scholar
Katičić, R. 1984. ‘The making of standard Serbo-Croat’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. I: 261–295
Keipert, H. 1985. ‘Old and new problems of the Russian literary language (arguments for a new kind of Russian linguistic history)’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 215–224
1963–1975. Russische historische Grammatik. Band I: Die Entwicklung des Lautsystems (1963); Band II: Die Entwicklung des Formensystems (1967); Band III: Entwicklung des Wortschatzes (1975). Heidelberg: Carl Winter Verlag. (Translation of Band I by J. I. Press: Russian Historical Grammar, Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1979.)Google Scholar
(ed.) 1989. Language planning in the Soviet Union. London: Macmillan and School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
, and 1981. Gramatyka historyczna języka polskiego. 4th edn Warsaw: PAN. (1st edn. 1955)Google Scholar
1967. ‘“Abstand languages” and “ausbau languages”’. Anthropological Linguistics 9: 29–41Google Scholar
1998. Slovotvirna morfemika sučasnoji ukrains′koji literaturnoji movy. Kiev: Inst. movoznavstva NANGoogle Scholar
[1961–1966] 1967–1981. Gramatika na makenskiot literaturen jazik. So srpskohrvatski tolkuvanja. 2nd edn. Skopje: KulturaGoogle Scholar
1968. The Macedonian language in the development of the Slavonic literary languages. Translated by I. Kovilovska-Poposka and G. W. Reid. Skopje: KulturaGoogle Scholar
Koneski, B.1980. ‘Macedonian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 53–63
1983. A historical phonology of the Macedonian language. With a survey of the Macedonian dialects and a map by B. Vidoeski. Translated by Victor A. Friedman. Heidelberg: Carl WinterGoogle Scholar
and 1973. ‘Glottometričeskij podxod k voprosu o blizosti slavjanskix jazykov’. Slavjanskaja filologijavyp. 9: 238–260Google Scholar
1986. Argo russkoj gomoseksual′noj subkul′tury. Materialy k izučeniju. Benson, VT: Chalidze PublicationsGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1982. The changing status of Russian in the Soviet Union. The Hague etc.: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Kreindler, I.1985. ‘The non-Russian languages and the challenge of Russian: the eastern versus the western tradition’. In Kreindler (ed.) 1985: 345–367
(ed.) 1985. Sociolinguistic perspectives on Soviet national languages: their past, present and future. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1958. ‘Inquiry into coexistent phonemic systems in Slavic languages’. In American contributions to the Fourth International Congress of Slavists (Moscow). The Hague: Mouton: 169–189Google Scholar
Kučera, H.1984. ‘Aspect in negative imperatives’. In Flier and Timberlake (eds.): 118–128
1987. Science et perversion idéologique: Marr, marrisme, marristes. Paris: Institut du monde soviétique et de l'Europe Centrale et Orientale, Cultures et sociétés de l'est, 8Google Scholar
and 1963. Accent in Serbo-Croatian: an experimental study. Ann Arbor, MI: University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
1955. Edinstvo i nacionalno svoeobrazie na slavjanskite ezici v texnija osnoven rečnikov fond. Sofia: BANGoogle Scholar
Lencek, Rado L.1984. ‘The modern Slovene language question: an essay in sociolinguistic interpretation’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. I: 297–317
Lencek, Rado L.1985. ‘On sociolinguistic determinants in the evolution of Slavic literary languages’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 39–52
and (eds.) 1976. The dilemma of the melting pot. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania University Press. (General Linguistics 16: 2–3)Google Scholar
2001. ‘Metod rekonstrukcii i problema vozniknovenija slovackogo literaturnogo jazyka’. Australian Slavonic and East European Studies 15: 5–19Google Scholar
Lingua in Diaspora. 1983. Studies in the Language of the Second Generation of Yugoslav Immigrant Children in Sweden. (Slavica Lundensia 9)
1963. ‘Das Problem der obersorbisch-niedersorbischen Sprachgrenze’. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 8: 172–183Google Scholar
1952. Grammar of the Macedonian literary language. Skopje: Državno Knigoizdatelstvo na NR MakedonijaGoogle Scholar
[1955] 2001. Old Church Slavonic grammar. 7th rev. edn. Berlin, New York: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillin, Arnold 1980. ‘Belorussian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 105–117
Magner, Thomas F.1978. ‘Diglossia in Split’. In Schmalstieg and Magner (eds.) 400–436
1991. Introduction to the Croatian and Serbian language. Rev. edn. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press (1st edn. 1956)Google Scholar
and 1971. Word-accent in modern Serbo-Croatian. University Park, Pennsylvania and London: Pennsylvania State University PressGoogle Scholar
Magocsi, Paul R. 1984. ‘The language question among the Subcarpathian Rusyns’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. II: 65–86
1992. ‘The birth of a new nation, or the return of an old problem? The Rusyns of East Central Europe’. Canadian Slavonic Papers 34(3): 199–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. Non-inflected parts of speech in the Slavonic languages: syntactic characteristics. Warsaw: Wyd. EnergeiaGoogle Scholar
1989. In search of the Indo-Europeans: language, archaeology and myth. New York: Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation; a synchronic-diachronic approach. Munich: C. H. Becksche VerlagsbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
Marszk, Doris 1988. ‘On the linguistic character of the Russian prostorečie’. In Hill and Lehmann (eds.): 58–79
1979. Prehistoric Slavic contraction. (trans W. Gray). University Park, PA, and London: Pennsylvania State University PressGoogle Scholar
Mathesius, V. [1929] 1964. ‘Functional linguistics’. In (ed.) A Prague school reader in linguistics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press: 121–142Google Scholar
Mathiesen, Robert 1984. ‘The Church Slavonic language question: an overview (IX–XX centuries)’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. I: 45–65
Mayo, P. J. 1982. ‘The Byelorussian language: its rise and fall and rise and …’. In and (eds.), Papers in Slavonic Linguistics, vol. I. Birmingham: University of Aston in Birmingham: 163–184
Mayo, P. J.1993. ‘Belorussian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 887–946
1967. The Indo-European dialects. (trans. by S. N. Rosenberg of Les dialectes indo-européens, 1908). University of Alabama: University of Alabama PressGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1966. Vstup do porivnjal′no-istoryčnoho vyvčennja slov'jans′kyx mov. Kiev: Naukova dumkaGoogle Scholar
1969. ‘Interference in prepositional phrases: immigrant Slovak in America’. Lingua 22: 63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micklesen, Lew R. 1978. ‘Czech sociolinguistic problems’. In Schmalstieg and Magner (eds.): 437–455
1875–1883. Vergleichende Grammatik der slavischen Sprachen. 2nd edn. Vienna: W. BraumüllerGoogle Scholar
Mistrík, J.1985. ‘The modernisation of contemporary Slovak’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 71–76
Mluvnice češtiny 1986–1987. 1: Fonetika, fonologie, morfonologie a morfemika, tvoření slov. Ed. , , , and . 2: Tvarosloví. Ed. , , and (1986). 3: Skladba. Ed. , and (1987). Praha: AcademiaGoogle Scholar
1995. A history of the Croatian language: toward a common standard. Zagreb: Globus (translation of 1993 original)Google Scholar
2001. Grammatičeskie kategorii glagola v sovremennyx slavjanskix literaturnyx jazykax. Moscow: Inst. slavjanovedenija RANGoogle Scholar
[1891] 1965. Historische und vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der niedersorbischen (niederlausitzisch-wendischen) Sprache: mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der Grenzdialekte und des Obersorbischen. Leipzig: Zentral-Antiquariat der Deutschen Demokratischen RepublikGoogle Scholar
1976. ‘Social distribution of forms of address in contemporary Russian’. International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1(1): 79–118Google Scholar
Naylor, Kenneth E. 1980. ‘Serbo-Croatian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 65–83
1999. Ètničeskij jazyk: opyt funkcional′noj differenciacii: na materiale sopostavitel′nogo izučenija slavjanskix jazykov. Munich: SagnerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obratnyj slovar′ russkogo jazyka. 1974. Moscow: “Sovetskaja Ènciklopedija” Obščeslavjanskij lingvisticeskij atlas: materialy i issledovanija 1985–1987. Sbornik naučnyx trudov. Ed. V. V. Ivanov. Moscow: Nauka. 1989
1976. ‘Praslovanský základ slovenčiny v slovnej zásobe’. Studia academica Slovaca 5: 295–316Google Scholar
2000. A study of the lexico-semantic and grammatical influence of English on the Polish of the younger generation of Poles (19–35 years of age). Warsaw: DialogGoogle Scholar
1991a. Die slavischen Sprachen in Gegenwart und Geschichte: Sprachstrukturen und Verwandtschaft. Frankfurt an Main: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
1988. ‘Colloquial Russian and urban substandard speech: an overview’. Russian Language Journal 42: 133–144Google Scholar
Perelmuter, Joanna 1976. ‘Substandard usage: Russian and Polish lexicographical attitudes’. In Magner (ed.): 94–111
Picchio, Riccardo 1984. ‘Guidelines for a comparative study of the language question among the Slavs’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. I: 1–42
and (eds.) 1984. Aspects of the Slavic language question. 2 vols. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Concilium on International and Area Studies. (Yale Russian and East European Publications, distributed by Slavica Publishers)Google Scholar
Pinto, Vivian 1980. ‘Bulgarian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 37–51
Polański, K. 1980. ‘Sorbian (Lusatian)’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 229–245
Polański, K.1993. ‘Polabian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 795–824
1984. ‘Upotreba jednine i množine ličnih zamenica u obraćanju sagovorniku u savremenom srpskohrvatskom jeziku’. Naučni sastanak slavista u Vukove dane 13: 185–195Google Scholar
1983. ‘On “drift” in Indo-European gender systems’. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11: 339–363Google Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S.1993. ‘Slovenian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 388–451
Rappaport, Gilbert 1990. ‘Sytuacja językowa Amerikanów polskiego pochodzenia w Texasie’. In Miodunka (ed.): 159–178
1978. ‘Structuralism and after: notes on the current Soviet linguistic scene’. Slavica Hierosolymitana 2: 257–283Google Scholar
(ed.) 1986. Einführung in die slavischen Sprachen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche BuchgesellschaftGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, R. 1976. ‘Kultura języka in twentieth century Poland and her neighbours’. In Magner (ed.): 58–81
Rothstein, Robert A. 1980. ‘Gender and reference in Polish and Russian’. In Chvany and Brecht (eds.): 79–97
Rothstein, Robert A.1993. ‘Polish’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 686–758
Saint-Jacques, B. 1979. ‘The languages of immigrants: sociolinguistic aspects of immigration in Canada’. In (ed.), The languages of Canada. Ottawa: Didier: 207–225Google Scholar
Šanskij, see also Shanskii
1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Trans. by Roy Harris and published as Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth, 1983Google Scholar
Scatton, Ernest A.1993. ‘Bulgarian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 188–248
1997. A historical phonology of the upper and lower Sorbian languages. Heidelberg: WinterGoogle Scholar
Schenker, Alexander M.1980. ‘Polish’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 195–210
Schenker, Alexander M.1993. ‘Proto-Slavonic’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 60–121
and (eds.) 1980. The Slavic literary languages: formation and development. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Concilium on International and Area Studies. Distributed by SlavicaGoogle Scholar
1871. Laut- und Formenlehre der polabischen Sprache. St Petersburg: Commissionäre der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Eggers and Co. (reprint Wiesbaden, 1967)Google Scholar
and (eds.) 1978. Sociolinguistic problems in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania and Yugoslavia. Columbus, OH: SlavicaGoogle Scholar
Schuster-Šewc. See also Šewc
1959. ‘Sprache und ethnische Formation in der Entwicklung des Sorbischen’. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 4: 577–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. Grammar of the Upper Sorbian language: phonology and morphology. Translation of Šewc, 1968 by Gary H. Toops. Munich, Newcastle: LincomGoogle Scholar
(Shevelov, G.) 2002. Istorična fonolohija ukrajins′koji movy. Kharkov: Akta (trans. of Shevelov, 1979)Google Scholar
, , and 1992. Variation in language: code switching in Czech as a challenge for sociolinguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanskii, N. M. 1969. Russian lexicology. Trans. by B. S. Johnson and ed. by Oxford, New York: Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
1968. Russian phonetic variants and phonostylistics. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Shevelov, see also Ševel'ov
(Šerex, Ju.) 1979. A historical phonology of the Ukrainian language. Heidelberg: Carl Winter VerlagGoogle Scholar
Shevelov, George Y.1980. ‘Ukrainian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 143–160
1989. The Ukrainian language in the first half of the 20th century (1900–1941). Its state and status. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Shevelov, George Y.1993. ‘Ukrainian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 947–998
Short, David 1993a. ‘Czech’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 455–532
Short, David1993b. ‘Slovak’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 533–592
Short, David1996. ‘The westernization of Czech and Estonian in commerce and advertising since the “Velvet” and “Singing” revolutions’. In , Essays in Czech and Slovak language and literature, London: SSEES, University of London: 193–211
and (eds.) 1997. Problemy izučenija otnošenij èkvivalentnosti v slavjanskix jazykax. Moscow: Dialog-MGUGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1997. Tendencija internacionalizacii v sovremennyx slavjanskix jazykax. Moscow: InstitutGoogle Scholar
2001. Neologizmy we wspó′czesnej leksyce polskiej. Cracow: Wyższa Szkoła Humanistyczna, w Pu′tuskuGoogle Scholar
1979. Culture and education in a plural society. Canberra: Curriculum Development CentreGoogle Scholar
1965. ‘Neutralizacja rodzaju nijakiego w dialektach słowieńskich’. Studia z filologii polskiej i słowiańskiej 5: 179–187. Reprinted as ‘The fate of the neuter in the Slovenian dialects’. In Stankiewicz, 1986: 143–152Google Scholar
1968a. Declension and gradation of Russian substantives in contemporary standard Russian. The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
1968b. ‘The grammatical genders of the Slavic languages’. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 11: 27–41Google Scholar
(tr. and ed.) 1972. A Baudouin de Courtenay anthology. Bloomington, IN, and London: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
1979. Studies in Slavic morphophonemics and accentology. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, E.1980. ‘Slovenian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 85–102
1993. The accentual patterns of the Slavic languages. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
2003. Das Russinische: Kulturhistorische und soziolinguistische Aspekte. Munich: SagnerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, W. A. 1968. ‘A sociolinguistic typology for describing national multilingualism’. In (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language, The Hague: Mouton: 531–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1930. ‘Z zagadnień podziałów dialektycznych grupy zachodnio-słowiańskiej’. Lud Słowiański 1: 212–245Google Scholar
1969–1973. Zarys gramatyki porównawczej języków słowiańskich. I. Fonologia; II. zesz. 1: Fleksja imienna; II. zesz. 2: Fleksja werbalna. Warsaw: PWNGoogle Scholar
and 2001. English words. History and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.) 1984. Language and literary theory: in Honor of Ladislav Matejka. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Department of Slavic Languages and LiteraturesGoogle Scholar
1972. The smallest Slavonic nation. The Sorbs of Lusatia. London: University of London, The Athlone PressGoogle Scholar
1977. ‘Address in the Slavonic languages’. Slavonic and East European Review 55: 491–505Google Scholar
Stone, Gerald1985. ‘Language planning and the Lower Sorbian literary language’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 99–104
Stone, Gerald1986. ‘Das Ober- und Niedersorbische’. In Rehder (ed.): 96–102
Stone, Gerald1993a. ‘Sorbian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 593–685
Stone, Gerald1993b. ‘Cassubian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 759–794
and (eds.) 1985. The formation of the Slavonic literary languages. Proceedings of a conference held in memory of Robert Auty and Anne Pennington at Oxford, 6–11 July 1981. Los Angeles: UCLA Slavic Studies 11. Distributed by SlavicaGoogle Scholar
1994. The revenge of the past. Nationalism, revolution, and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1983. Leksičeskaja tipologija slavjanskix jazykov. Minsk: Izd-vo Belorusskogo universitetaGoogle Scholar
1976. ‘A new grammatical category of determiners in Polish?’ International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1(2): 307–325Google Scholar
(ed.) 1982. The Slavic languages in émigré communities. Carbondale, Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1984. The maintenance of the Slavonic languages abroad. (Melbourne Slavonic Studies18)Google Scholar
1994. ‘On the language-hood of Sorbian’. Australian Slavonic and East European Studies 8(2): 59–80Google Scholar
and (eds.) 1985. Culture and Nationalism in Nineteenth-Century Eastern Europe. Columbus, OH: Slavica, and Canberra: Humanities Research Centre, Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar
et al. (eds.) 1970. Grammatika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka. Moscow: NaukaGoogle Scholar
1976. Position of objective personal pronouns: a study of word order in modern Russian. Stockholm: University and Almqvist & WiksellGoogle Scholar
1952. Grammatik der niedersorbischen Sprache. 2. Aufl., bearb. und hrsg. von Dr Frido Mětšk. Bautzen: Domowina-VerlagGoogle Scholar
1928. ‘Stanowisko języka łużyckiego’. In Symbolae grammaticae in honorem Joannis Rozwadowski, II. Cracow: Gebethner & Wolff: 127–138Google Scholar
(ed.) 1990. Verbal aspect in discourse: contributions to the semantics of time and temporal perspective in Slavic and non-Slavic languages. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: J. BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1977. The languages and literatures of the non-Russian peoples of the Soviet Union. Hamilton, Ontario: Interdepartmental Committee on Communist and East European Affairs, McMaster UniversityGoogle Scholar
1989. ‘The role of diglossia in the development of the Slavonic literary languages’. Slavistična revija 37(1–3): 273–282Google Scholar
1991. Linguistic purism. London, New York: Longman. (Studies in language and linguistics)Google Scholar
1953. Czechoslovakia in European history. 2nd edn. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Tomić, O. M. 1991. ‘Macedonian as an Ausbau language’. In Clyne (ed.): 437–454
Topolińska, Zuzanna 1980. ‘Kashubian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 183–194
Toporišič, J.1978. ‘A language of a small minority in a multilingual state’. In Schmalstieg and Magner (eds.): 480–486
Townsend, Charles E.1984. ‘Can aspect stand prosperity?’ In Flier and Timberlake (eds.): 286–295
and 1996. Common and comparative Slavic: phonology and inflection. With special attention to Russian, Czech, Serbo-Croatian, Bulgarian. Columbus, OH: SlavicaGoogle Scholar
1932. ‘Le calque dans les langues slaves littéraires’. Revue des Etudes Slaves 12: 19–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1950–1977. Grammaire comparée des langues slaves. Paris: IAC (Vols. 1–2), and Paris: Klincksieck (Vols. 3–5)Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, H. 1999. ‘Clitics: a state-of-the-art report’. In H. van Riemsdijk (ed.): 1–30
(Fasmer) 1964–1973. Ètimologičeskij slovar′ russkogo jazyka. 4 vols. Trans. and suppl. by O. N. Trubačev. Moscow: ProgressGoogle Scholar
2003. Bălgarska ezikova politika (v svetlinata na teorijata na knižovnite ezici): cikăl lekcii. Sofia: Meždunarodno sociolingvističesko družestvoGoogle Scholar
[1992] 2000. A comprehensive Russian grammar. 2nd rev. edn. Oxford, Malden, MA: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
1975. The Slavophile controversy: history of a conservative utopia in nineteenth-century Russian thought. Trans. by H. Andrews-Rusiecka, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
1982. Philosophy and romantic nationalism: the case of Poland. Oxford: Clarendon Press and New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
1974. Purism and language. A case study of modern Ukrainian and Belorussian nationalism (1840–1967). Bloomington, IN: Indiana UniversityGoogle Scholar
1979. ‘The rise (and fall) of the modern Belorussian literary language’. Slavonic and East European Review 57: 481–508Google Scholar
1975. ‘Was there a “literary language” in Kievan Rus’?’ Russian Review 34(1): 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albijanić, A. 1982. ‘San Pedro revisited: language maintenance in the San Pedro Yugoslav community’. In Sussex (ed.): 11–22
1970. ‘The creation of the Slaveno-Serbski literary language’. Slavonic and East European Review 48: 483–491Google Scholar
1992. Lexical semantics: user's guide to contemporary Russian vocabulary. Ann Arbor, MI: KaromaGoogle Scholar
1984. Slovoobrazovanie i formoobrazovanie suščestvitel′nyx v istorii russkogo jazyka. Moscow: NaukaGoogle Scholar
Aronson, H. I.1985. ‘Form, function and the “perfective” in Bulgarian’. In Flier and Timberlake (eds.): 274–285
1964–1976. Urslavische Grammatik. Einführung in das vergleichende Studium der slavischen Sprachen. Bd. I: Einleitung, Lautlehre, Vokalismus. Bd. 2: Konsonantismus. Heidelberg: Carl Winter VerlagGoogle Scholar
(editor-in-chief) 1994. The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
Atlas slovenského jazyka. 1968–1984. Vols. 1–4. Bratislava: SAV
Atlas ukrajins′koji movy. 1984–1988. Akademija nauk Ukrajins'koji RSR, Instytut movoznavstva im. O. O. Potebny, Instytut suspil′nyx nauk. 2 vols. Kiev: Naukova Dumka
1953. ‘The evolution of literary Slovak’. Transactions of the Philological Society. 143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1961. ‘Dialect, koine and tradition in the formation of literary Slovak’. Slavonic and East European Review 39: 339–345Google Scholar
1963. ‘The formation of the Slovene literary language against the background of the Slavonic national revival’. Slavonic and East European Review 41: 391–402Google Scholar
Auty, Robert1972. ‘Sources and methods of lexical enrichment in the Slavonic language-revivals of the early nineteenth century’. In Worth (ed.). 41–56
1973. ‘The role of purism in the development of the Slavonic literary languages’. Slavonic and East European Review 51: 335–343Google Scholar
Auty, Robert1977. ‘The Russian language’. In Auty and Obolensky (eds.): 1–40
Auty, Robert1980. ‘Czech’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 163–182
and (eds.) 1977. The companion to Russian studies. 2: An introduction to Russian language and literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) 1986. Dialektologičeskij atlas russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Glav. upr. geodezii i kartografii pri Sovete Ministrov SSSRGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) 1962. Voprosy obrazovanija vostočno-slavjanskix nacional′nyx jazykov. Moscow: AN SSSRGoogle Scholar
et al. 1989. Sovremennyj russkij jazyk v sopostavlenii so slovackim. Morfologija. Bratislava: SPNGoogle Scholar
Bălgarska Akademija na Naukite/Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. 1980. The unity of the Bulgarian language in the past and today. Sofia: BAN
Banac, Ivo 1984. ‘Main trends in the Croat language question’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. I: 189–259
Barnet, Vladimir 1985. ‘Toward a sociolinguistic interpretation of the origins of the Slavonic literary languages’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 13–20
and 1972. Grammaire de la langue slovaque. Paris: Institut d'Etudes Slaves and Bratislava: Matica SlovenskáGoogle Scholar
, , and 1961. ‘K voprosu ob “obixodnorazgovornom” češskom jazyke i ego otnošenie k literaturnomu češskomu jazyku’. Voprosy jazykoznanija 10(1): 44–51Google Scholar
2002. ‘Konkurencija vidov, vežlivost′ i ètiket v russkom imperative’. Russian Linguistics 26: 149–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. ‘Word-order change in progress: the case of Slovenian and Serbo-Croat and its relevance for Germanic’. Journal of Linguistics 23: 269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. Dictionary of Russian personal names: with a revised guide to stress and morphology. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1998. Standard English–SerboCroatian, SerboCroatian–English dictionary: a dictionary of Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian standards. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1974. Očerk sravnitel′noj grammatiki slavjanskix jazykov: Čeredovanija: imennye osnovy. Moscow: NaukaGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1978. Nacional′noe vozroždenie i formirovanie slavjanskix literaturnyx jazykov. Moscow: NaukaGoogle Scholar
1998. Slavic prosody: language change and phonological theory. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibliographie linguistique de l'année (1939–). Utrecht: Spectrum
1969. A morpho-syntactic characterization of the modern Slavic languages. Pittsburgh: University Center for International Studies, University of PittsburghGoogle Scholar
1970. The Slavic languages – their external history. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Center for International StudiesGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1969a. Sučasna ukrajins′ka literaturna mova. Vstup, fonetika. Kiev: Naukova dumkaGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1973a. Sučasna ukrajins′ka literaturna mova. Leksyka i frazeolohija. Kiev: Naukova dumkaGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, H., 1966. ‘The dialects of Common Slavic’. In and (eds.), Ancient Indo-European dialects. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 153–197Google Scholar
[1975] 1979. Common Slavic. Progress and problems in its reconstruction. Columbus, OH: SlavicaGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, H.1985. ‘The Slavonic language community as a genetic and typological class’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 21–28
and 1983. Advances in the reconstruction of Common Slavic (1971–1982). Columbus, OH: SlavicaGoogle Scholar
and 1985–1986. Belaruskaja hramatyka. 1. Fanalohija. Arfaèpija. Marfalohija. Slovaŭtvarènne. Nacisk. (1985). 2. Sintaksis. (1986). Minsk: Instytut movaznaŭstva AN BSSRGoogle Scholar
, and 1981. Kommentierte Bibliographie zur slavischen Soziolinguistik. Berne: Peter Lang VerlagGoogle Scholar
1961–1969. Slavische Sprachwissenschaft. I: Einleitung, Lautlehre. II/III: Formenlehre. Berlin: Walter de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecht, Richard D. 1985. ‘The form and function of aspect in Russian’. In Flier and Brecht (eds.): 9–34
and (eds.) 1974. Slavic transformational syntax. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic PublicationsGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1991. International encyclopedia of linguistics. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
and 1961. ‘Address in American English’. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62: 373–385. Reprinted in John Laver and Sandy Hutcheson (eds.) 1972. Communication in face to face interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 128–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. 1960. ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’. In (ed.), Style in language, Cambridge, MA: Technology Press of M.I.T.: 253–276. Reprinted in Giglioli, Pier Paolo (ed.) 1972. Language and social context. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 252–282Google Scholar
Browne, E. Wayles. 1974. ‘On the problem of enclitic placement in Serbo-Croatian’. In Brecht and Chvany (eds.): 36–52
Browne, E. Wayles.1993. ‘Serbo-Croat’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 306–387
Browne, E. Wayles and Alt, Teresa (n.d.) A handbook of Bosnian, Serbian and Croatian. Retrieved (22 August 2004) from: http://www.seelrc.org:8080/grammar/mainframe.jsp?nLanguageID=1
Browne, E. Wayles and McCawley, James D. 1973. ‘Serbo-Croatian accent’. In (ed.), Phonology: selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 330–335Google Scholar
Brozović, D.1991. ‘Serbo-Croatian as a pluricentric language’. In Clyne (ed.): 347–380
and 1988. Jezik srpskohrvatski/hrvatskosrpski, hrvatski ili srpski. Izvadak iz II izdanija Enciklopedije Jugoslavije. Zagreb: Jugoslavenski leksikografski zavodGoogle Scholar
1982. One step back, two steps forward: on the language policy of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the national republics. Boulder, CO: East European Monographs. Distributed by Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
1886–1900. Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. 5 vols. Strassburg: K. J. TrübnerGoogle Scholar
1990. Introduction to the phonological history of the Slavic languages. Columbus, OH: SlavicaGoogle Scholar
and 1976. Solzhenitsyn's peculiar vocabulary: Russian–English glossary. Mt Vernon, ME: Technical Dictionaries CompanyGoogle Scholar
Channon, Robert 1980. ‘On PLACE advancements in English and Russian’. In Chvany and Brecht (eds.): 114–137
Chvany, Catherine V. 1988. ‘Distance, deixis and discreteness in Bulgarian and English verb morphology’. In (ed.) American Contributions to the Tenth International Congress of Slavists (Sofia). Linguistics. Columbus, OH: Slavica: 69–90Google Scholar
(ed.) 1991. Pluricentric languages. Differing norms in different nations. Berlin and New York: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael G.1991a. ‘Introduction’. In Clyne (ed.): 1–9
Clyne, Michael G.1991b. ‘Epilogue’. In Clyne (ed.): 455–465
1976. Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1978. ‘Genitive-accusatives in Slavic: the rules and their motivation’. International Review of Slavic Linguistics 3: 27–42Google Scholar
, and 1996. The Russian language in the twentieth century. Oxford: The Clarendon Press (2nd rev. edn. of Comrie and Stone 1978)Google Scholar
1989. ‘Russian underworld slang and its passage into the standard language’. Australian Slavonic and East European Studies 3(2): 61–89Google Scholar
1979. Predicate agreement in Russian. Birmingham: Dept. of Russian, University of BirminghamGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.1980. ‘Animacy in Russian and other Slavic languages: where syntax and semantics fail to match’. In Chvany and Brecht (eds.): 43–61
1983. Hierarchies, targets and controllers. Agreement patterns in Slavic. London and Canberra: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.1987. ‘Serbo-Croat’. In Comrie (ed.): 391–409
1982. ‘On the “empty” prefixes in Russian’. Russian Language Journal 36, 123–124: 12–30Google Scholar
1987. ‘Syllabic [r̥] in the Slavonic languages: a computer-based investigation’. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 35/36: 7–28Google Scholar
(ed.) 1971. Linguistic diversity in Canadian society. Edmonton and Champaign: Linguistic Research, IncGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M. 1999. ‘Clitics in the Slavic languages’. In van Riemsdijk (ed.): 83–122
(Dobrovský) 1822. Institutiones lingua slavicae dialecti veteris. 2nd edn. Vienna: SchmidGoogle Scholar
1938. Język polski w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Warsaw: Prace Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego, Wydział 1, Nr. 15Google Scholar
1988. ‘Is there a tendency towards analyticity in Russian?’ Slavonic and East European Journal 66: 169–183Google Scholar
Ďurovič, Ľ. 1980. ‘Slovak’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 211–228
1983. ‘The case systems in the language of diaspora children’. In ‘Lingua in diaspora: studies in the language of the second generation of Yugoslav immigrant children in Sweden.’ Slavica Lundensia 9: 21–94Google Scholar
1992. Word order in the simple Bulgarian sentence: a study in grammar, semantics and pragmatics. Amsterdam, Atlanta, GA: RodopiGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1993. Varieties of Czech: studies in Czech sociolinguistics. Amsterdam, Atlanta: RodopiGoogle Scholar
1976. ‘The definite article in Bulgarian and Macedonian’. Slavic and East European Journal 20: 273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1981. Grammatik der obersorbischen Schriftsprache der Gegenwart. Morphologie. Bautzen: DomowinaGoogle Scholar
Feldstein, Ronald F. (n.d.) A concise Polish grammar. Retrieved (22 August 2004) from: http://www.seelrc.org:8080/grammar/mainframe.jsp?nLanguageID=4
1993. The semantics and pragmatics of verbal categories in Bulgarian. Lewiston: Edwin MellenGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1982. The English element in European languages. Vol. 2. Zagreb: Institute of Linguistics, University of ZagrebGoogle Scholar
1990. Anglicizmi u hrvatskom ili srpskom jeziku: poreklo – razvoj – značenje. Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, Razred za filološke znanosti, knj. 70Google Scholar
and (eds.) 1985. Issues in Russian morphosyntax. Los Angeles: UCLA Slavic Studies 10. Distributed by SlavicaGoogle Scholar
1988. Language policy in Yugoslavia (with special reference to Croatian). Paris: Nouvelles Editions LatinesGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor A.1993. ‘Macedonian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 249–305
Friedman, Victor A.(n.d.) Macedonian. Retrieved (22 August 2004) from: http://www.seelrc.org:8080/grammar/mainframe.jsp?nLanguageID=6
Friedrich, Paul 1966. ‘Structural implications of Russian pronominal usage’. In (ed.), Sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton: 214–259Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul1972. ‘Social context and semantic feature: the Russian pronominal usage’. In and (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston: 270–300Google Scholar
Fryščák, M. 1978. ‘The two official languages of Czechoslovakia’. In Schmalstieg and Magner (eds.): 343–352
1972. Soviet prison camp speech: a survivor's glossary. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin PressGoogle Scholar
1959. ‘The standard language problem: concepts and methods’. Anthropological Linguistics 1: 28–31Google Scholar
1976. Stilistika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka. Leksika. Fonetika. Moscow: Vysšaja školaGoogle Scholar
1978b. Variantnost′ slova i jazykovaja norma. Na materiale sovremennogo russkogo jazyka. Leningrad: NaukaGoogle Scholar
2003. ‘Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin’. Nature 426, 27 January 2003: 435–439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, J. H. 1969. ‘Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics’. In (ed.), Substance and structure of language. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press: 147–203Google Scholar
(eds.) 1978. Universals of human language. 4 vols. Stanford: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
1980. Tone and accent in standard Serbo-Croatian (with a synopsis of Serbo-Croatian phonology). Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar
1991. The genesis of the modern Bulgarian literary language. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Slavica Upsaliensia 30Google Scholar
1953. The Norwegian language in America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar
1936. ‘Vývoj spisovného jazyka českého’. Československá vlastivěda III, 2: Spisovný jazyk český a slovenský. Prague: Sfinx: 1–144Google Scholar
1963. ‘Funkce spisovného jazyka. Vliv funkce spisovného jazyk na fonologickou a gramatickou strukturu spisovné češtiny. Úkoly spisovného jazyka a jeho kultura. K funkčnímu rozvrstvení spisovného jazyka’. Studie o spisovném jazyce. Prague: ČSAV: 11–68Google Scholar
Henzl, V. M. 1982. ‘American Czech: a comparative study of linguistic modifications in immigrant and young children speech’. In Sussex (ed.): 33–46
1973. ‘The role of the Matica and similar societies in the development of the Slavonic literary languages’. Slavonic and East European Review 51: 368–386Google Scholar
Herrity, P.1985. ‘France Prešeren and the Slovene Literary Language’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 147–159
Hill, Peter 1982. ‘Different codifications of a language’. In (ed.), Slavistische Linguistik 1981. Referate des VII Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens (Slavistische Beiträge 160). Munich: Sagner: 48–63Google Scholar
Hill, Peter1986. ‘Das Bulgarische’. In Rehder (ed.): 20–32
and (eds.) 1988. Standard language in the Slavic world. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner (Slavistische Beiträge 235)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. An introduction to the study of the Slavonic languages. Translated from the Czech [Horálek 1962] and amended by Peter Herrity. Nottingham: Astra PressGoogle Scholar
and 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, David 1993. ‘Old Church Slavonic’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 125–187
Illič-Svityč, V. M. 1971–1976. Opyt sravnenija nostratičeskix jazykov: semitoxamitskij, kartvel′skij, indoevropejskij, ural′skii, dravidijskij, altajskij. [Ed. ]. Moscow: NaukaGoogle Scholar
[1963] 1979. Nominal accentuation in Baltic and Slavic. Translated by Richard L. Leed and Ronald F. Feldstein. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Iovine, Micaela S. 1984. ‘The “Illyrian” language’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.): 101–156
Isačenko. See also Issatschenko
1958. ‘Kakova specifika literaturnogo dvujazyčija v istorii slavjanskix narodov?’ Voprosy jazykoznanija 9(3): 42–45Google Scholar
1968. Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Teil I: Formenlehre. Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer VerlagGoogle Scholar
1976. Opera selecta. Russische Gegenwartssprache, russische Sprachgeschichte, Probleme der slavischen Sprachwissenschaft. Munich: Fink Verlag (Forum Slavicum 45)Google Scholar
Issatschenko, see also Isačenko
1975. Mythen und Tatsachen über die Entwicklung der russischen Literatursprache. Vienna: Sitzungsberichte (Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, 298. Bd., Abh. 5)Google Scholar
Issatschenko, A. V.1980. ‘Russian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 119–142
1985. Dijalektologija srpskohrvatskog jezika: uvod u štokavsko narečje. 2nd edn. Beograd: Matica SrpskaGoogle Scholar
1986. ‘Funkcionalna nosivost prozodijskih sistema u kajkavskim govorima’. Filologija 14: 129–144Google Scholar
[1958] 1991b. Srpskohrvatski dijalekti: njihova struktura i razvoj. Sremski Karlovci: Izd. Knjiž. Zorana StojanovićaGoogle Scholar
1973. ‘Zur sozialen Implikation des Gebrauches von Anredepronomen (mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Russischen)’. Zeitschrift für slavische Philologie 37: 343–355Google Scholar
1978. Wortbildung und ihre Modellierung: Anhand des Serbokroatischen Verbalbereiches. Wiesbaden: HarrassowitzGoogle Scholar
1929. Remarques sur l’évolution phonologique du russe comparée à celle des autres langues slaves. Prague: TCLP (Klaus Reprint 1968)Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman1936. ‘Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus’. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6. Reprinted in translation as: ‘Contribution to the general theory of case: general meanings of the Russian cases’, in Jakobson 1984: 59–103
Jakobson, Roman1948. ‘Russian conjugation’. Word4: 155–167. Also in , Russian and Slavic grammar. Studies 1931–1981. Berlin: Mouton, 1984: 15–26Google Scholar
1955. Slavic languages. A condensed survey. Columbia University, New York: King's Crown PressGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman1984. Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981. Berlin, New York: Mouton. Edited by and Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. and Townsend, Charles E.(n.d.) Czech. Retrieved (22 August 2004) from: http://www.seelrc.org:8080/grammar/mainframe.jsp?nLanguageID=2
1983. The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1985. ‘Attitudes toward Serbo-Croatian language varieties’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 52: 93–109Google Scholar
2002. Podstawowe struktury składniowe języka polskiego. Warsaw: Slawistyczny Ośrodek WydawniczyGoogle Scholar
1955. Belorusy. Jazyk belorusskogo naroda. Moscow: AN SSSR. Originally published in Warsaw, 1908–1912. Belarusian version 1992Google Scholar
Katičić, R. 1984. ‘The making of standard Serbo-Croat’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. I: 261–295
Keipert, H. 1985. ‘Old and new problems of the Russian literary language (arguments for a new kind of Russian linguistic history)’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 215–224
1963–1975. Russische historische Grammatik. Band I: Die Entwicklung des Lautsystems (1963); Band II: Die Entwicklung des Formensystems (1967); Band III: Entwicklung des Wortschatzes (1975). Heidelberg: Carl Winter Verlag. (Translation of Band I by J. I. Press: Russian Historical Grammar, Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1979.)Google Scholar
(ed.) 1989. Language planning in the Soviet Union. London: Macmillan and School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
, and 1981. Gramatyka historyczna języka polskiego. 4th edn Warsaw: PAN. (1st edn. 1955)Google Scholar
1967. ‘“Abstand languages” and “ausbau languages”’. Anthropological Linguistics 9: 29–41Google Scholar
1998. Slovotvirna morfemika sučasnoji ukrains′koji literaturnoji movy. Kiev: Inst. movoznavstva NANGoogle Scholar
[1961–1966] 1967–1981. Gramatika na makenskiot literaturen jazik. So srpskohrvatski tolkuvanja. 2nd edn. Skopje: KulturaGoogle Scholar
1968. The Macedonian language in the development of the Slavonic literary languages. Translated by I. Kovilovska-Poposka and G. W. Reid. Skopje: KulturaGoogle Scholar
Koneski, B.1980. ‘Macedonian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 53–63
1983. A historical phonology of the Macedonian language. With a survey of the Macedonian dialects and a map by B. Vidoeski. Translated by Victor A. Friedman. Heidelberg: Carl WinterGoogle Scholar
and 1973. ‘Glottometričeskij podxod k voprosu o blizosti slavjanskix jazykov’. Slavjanskaja filologijavyp. 9: 238–260Google Scholar
1986. Argo russkoj gomoseksual′noj subkul′tury. Materialy k izučeniju. Benson, VT: Chalidze PublicationsGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1982. The changing status of Russian in the Soviet Union. The Hague etc.: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Kreindler, I.1985. ‘The non-Russian languages and the challenge of Russian: the eastern versus the western tradition’. In Kreindler (ed.) 1985: 345–367
(ed.) 1985. Sociolinguistic perspectives on Soviet national languages: their past, present and future. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1958. ‘Inquiry into coexistent phonemic systems in Slavic languages’. In American contributions to the Fourth International Congress of Slavists (Moscow). The Hague: Mouton: 169–189Google Scholar
Kučera, H.1984. ‘Aspect in negative imperatives’. In Flier and Timberlake (eds.): 118–128
1987. Science et perversion idéologique: Marr, marrisme, marristes. Paris: Institut du monde soviétique et de l'Europe Centrale et Orientale, Cultures et sociétés de l'est, 8Google Scholar
and 1963. Accent in Serbo-Croatian: an experimental study. Ann Arbor, MI: University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
1955. Edinstvo i nacionalno svoeobrazie na slavjanskite ezici v texnija osnoven rečnikov fond. Sofia: BANGoogle Scholar
Lencek, Rado L.1984. ‘The modern Slovene language question: an essay in sociolinguistic interpretation’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. I: 297–317
Lencek, Rado L.1985. ‘On sociolinguistic determinants in the evolution of Slavic literary languages’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 39–52
and (eds.) 1976. The dilemma of the melting pot. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania University Press. (General Linguistics 16: 2–3)Google Scholar
2001. ‘Metod rekonstrukcii i problema vozniknovenija slovackogo literaturnogo jazyka’. Australian Slavonic and East European Studies 15: 5–19Google Scholar
Lingua in Diaspora. 1983. Studies in the Language of the Second Generation of Yugoslav Immigrant Children in Sweden. (Slavica Lundensia 9)
1963. ‘Das Problem der obersorbisch-niedersorbischen Sprachgrenze’. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 8: 172–183Google Scholar
1952. Grammar of the Macedonian literary language. Skopje: Državno Knigoizdatelstvo na NR MakedonijaGoogle Scholar
[1955] 2001. Old Church Slavonic grammar. 7th rev. edn. Berlin, New York: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillin, Arnold 1980. ‘Belorussian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 105–117
Magner, Thomas F.1978. ‘Diglossia in Split’. In Schmalstieg and Magner (eds.) 400–436
1991. Introduction to the Croatian and Serbian language. Rev. edn. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press (1st edn. 1956)Google Scholar
and 1971. Word-accent in modern Serbo-Croatian. University Park, Pennsylvania and London: Pennsylvania State University PressGoogle Scholar
Magocsi, Paul R. 1984. ‘The language question among the Subcarpathian Rusyns’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. II: 65–86
1992. ‘The birth of a new nation, or the return of an old problem? The Rusyns of East Central Europe’. Canadian Slavonic Papers 34(3): 199–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. Non-inflected parts of speech in the Slavonic languages: syntactic characteristics. Warsaw: Wyd. EnergeiaGoogle Scholar
1989. In search of the Indo-Europeans: language, archaeology and myth. New York: Thames & HudsonGoogle Scholar
1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation; a synchronic-diachronic approach. Munich: C. H. Becksche VerlagsbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
Marszk, Doris 1988. ‘On the linguistic character of the Russian prostorečie’. In Hill and Lehmann (eds.): 58–79
1979. Prehistoric Slavic contraction. (trans W. Gray). University Park, PA, and London: Pennsylvania State University PressGoogle Scholar
Mathesius, V. [1929] 1964. ‘Functional linguistics’. In (ed.) A Prague school reader in linguistics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press: 121–142Google Scholar
Mathiesen, Robert 1984. ‘The Church Slavonic language question: an overview (IX–XX centuries)’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. I: 45–65
Mayo, P. J. 1982. ‘The Byelorussian language: its rise and fall and rise and …’. In and (eds.), Papers in Slavonic Linguistics, vol. I. Birmingham: University of Aston in Birmingham: 163–184
Mayo, P. J.1993. ‘Belorussian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 887–946
1967. The Indo-European dialects. (trans. by S. N. Rosenberg of Les dialectes indo-européens, 1908). University of Alabama: University of Alabama PressGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1966. Vstup do porivnjal′no-istoryčnoho vyvčennja slov'jans′kyx mov. Kiev: Naukova dumkaGoogle Scholar
1969. ‘Interference in prepositional phrases: immigrant Slovak in America’. Lingua 22: 63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micklesen, Lew R. 1978. ‘Czech sociolinguistic problems’. In Schmalstieg and Magner (eds.): 437–455
1875–1883. Vergleichende Grammatik der slavischen Sprachen. 2nd edn. Vienna: W. BraumüllerGoogle Scholar
Mistrík, J.1985. ‘The modernisation of contemporary Slovak’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 71–76
Mluvnice češtiny 1986–1987. 1: Fonetika, fonologie, morfonologie a morfemika, tvoření slov. Ed. , , , and . 2: Tvarosloví. Ed. , , and (1986). 3: Skladba. Ed. , and (1987). Praha: AcademiaGoogle Scholar
1995. A history of the Croatian language: toward a common standard. Zagreb: Globus (translation of 1993 original)Google Scholar
2001. Grammatičeskie kategorii glagola v sovremennyx slavjanskix literaturnyx jazykax. Moscow: Inst. slavjanovedenija RANGoogle Scholar
[1891] 1965. Historische und vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der niedersorbischen (niederlausitzisch-wendischen) Sprache: mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der Grenzdialekte und des Obersorbischen. Leipzig: Zentral-Antiquariat der Deutschen Demokratischen RepublikGoogle Scholar
1976. ‘Social distribution of forms of address in contemporary Russian’. International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1(1): 79–118Google Scholar
Naylor, Kenneth E. 1980. ‘Serbo-Croatian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 65–83
1999. Ètničeskij jazyk: opyt funkcional′noj differenciacii: na materiale sopostavitel′nogo izučenija slavjanskix jazykov. Munich: SagnerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obratnyj slovar′ russkogo jazyka. 1974. Moscow: “Sovetskaja Ènciklopedija” Obščeslavjanskij lingvisticeskij atlas: materialy i issledovanija 1985–1987. Sbornik naučnyx trudov. Ed. V. V. Ivanov. Moscow: Nauka. 1989
1976. ‘Praslovanský základ slovenčiny v slovnej zásobe’. Studia academica Slovaca 5: 295–316Google Scholar
2000. A study of the lexico-semantic and grammatical influence of English on the Polish of the younger generation of Poles (19–35 years of age). Warsaw: DialogGoogle Scholar
1991a. Die slavischen Sprachen in Gegenwart und Geschichte: Sprachstrukturen und Verwandtschaft. Frankfurt an Main: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
1988. ‘Colloquial Russian and urban substandard speech: an overview’. Russian Language Journal 42: 133–144Google Scholar
Perelmuter, Joanna 1976. ‘Substandard usage: Russian and Polish lexicographical attitudes’. In Magner (ed.): 94–111
Picchio, Riccardo 1984. ‘Guidelines for a comparative study of the language question among the Slavs’. In Picchio and Goldblatt (eds.), vol. I: 1–42
and (eds.) 1984. Aspects of the Slavic language question. 2 vols. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Concilium on International and Area Studies. (Yale Russian and East European Publications, distributed by Slavica Publishers)Google Scholar
Pinto, Vivian 1980. ‘Bulgarian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 37–51
Polański, K. 1980. ‘Sorbian (Lusatian)’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 229–245
Polański, K.1993. ‘Polabian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 795–824
1984. ‘Upotreba jednine i množine ličnih zamenica u obraćanju sagovorniku u savremenom srpskohrvatskom jeziku’. Naučni sastanak slavista u Vukove dane 13: 185–195Google Scholar
1983. ‘On “drift” in Indo-European gender systems’. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11: 339–363Google Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S.1993. ‘Slovenian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 388–451
Rappaport, Gilbert 1990. ‘Sytuacja językowa Amerikanów polskiego pochodzenia w Texasie’. In Miodunka (ed.): 159–178
1978. ‘Structuralism and after: notes on the current Soviet linguistic scene’. Slavica Hierosolymitana 2: 257–283Google Scholar
(ed.) 1986. Einführung in die slavischen Sprachen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche BuchgesellschaftGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, R. 1976. ‘Kultura języka in twentieth century Poland and her neighbours’. In Magner (ed.): 58–81
Rothstein, Robert A. 1980. ‘Gender and reference in Polish and Russian’. In Chvany and Brecht (eds.): 79–97
Rothstein, Robert A.1993. ‘Polish’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 686–758
Saint-Jacques, B. 1979. ‘The languages of immigrants: sociolinguistic aspects of immigration in Canada’. In (ed.), The languages of Canada. Ottawa: Didier: 207–225Google Scholar
Šanskij, see also Shanskii
1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Trans. by Roy Harris and published as Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth, 1983Google Scholar
Scatton, Ernest A.1993. ‘Bulgarian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 188–248
1997. A historical phonology of the upper and lower Sorbian languages. Heidelberg: WinterGoogle Scholar
Schenker, Alexander M.1980. ‘Polish’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 195–210
Schenker, Alexander M.1993. ‘Proto-Slavonic’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 60–121
and (eds.) 1980. The Slavic literary languages: formation and development. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Concilium on International and Area Studies. Distributed by SlavicaGoogle Scholar
1871. Laut- und Formenlehre der polabischen Sprache. St Petersburg: Commissionäre der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Eggers and Co. (reprint Wiesbaden, 1967)Google Scholar
and (eds.) 1978. Sociolinguistic problems in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania and Yugoslavia. Columbus, OH: SlavicaGoogle Scholar
Schuster-Šewc. See also Šewc
1959. ‘Sprache und ethnische Formation in der Entwicklung des Sorbischen’. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 4: 577–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. Grammar of the Upper Sorbian language: phonology and morphology. Translation of Šewc, 1968 by Gary H. Toops. Munich, Newcastle: LincomGoogle Scholar
(Shevelov, G.) 2002. Istorična fonolohija ukrajins′koji movy. Kharkov: Akta (trans. of Shevelov, 1979)Google Scholar
, , and 1992. Variation in language: code switching in Czech as a challenge for sociolinguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanskii, N. M. 1969. Russian lexicology. Trans. by B. S. Johnson and ed. by Oxford, New York: Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
1968. Russian phonetic variants and phonostylistics. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Shevelov, see also Ševel'ov
(Šerex, Ju.) 1979. A historical phonology of the Ukrainian language. Heidelberg: Carl Winter VerlagGoogle Scholar
Shevelov, George Y.1980. ‘Ukrainian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 143–160
1989. The Ukrainian language in the first half of the 20th century (1900–1941). Its state and status. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Shevelov, George Y.1993. ‘Ukrainian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 947–998
Short, David 1993a. ‘Czech’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 455–532
Short, David1993b. ‘Slovak’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 533–592
Short, David1996. ‘The westernization of Czech and Estonian in commerce and advertising since the “Velvet” and “Singing” revolutions’. In , Essays in Czech and Slovak language and literature, London: SSEES, University of London: 193–211
and (eds.) 1997. Problemy izučenija otnošenij èkvivalentnosti v slavjanskix jazykax. Moscow: Dialog-MGUGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1997. Tendencija internacionalizacii v sovremennyx slavjanskix jazykax. Moscow: InstitutGoogle Scholar
2001. Neologizmy we wspó′czesnej leksyce polskiej. Cracow: Wyższa Szkoła Humanistyczna, w Pu′tuskuGoogle Scholar
1979. Culture and education in a plural society. Canberra: Curriculum Development CentreGoogle Scholar
1965. ‘Neutralizacja rodzaju nijakiego w dialektach słowieńskich’. Studia z filologii polskiej i słowiańskiej 5: 179–187. Reprinted as ‘The fate of the neuter in the Slovenian dialects’. In Stankiewicz, 1986: 143–152Google Scholar
1968a. Declension and gradation of Russian substantives in contemporary standard Russian. The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
1968b. ‘The grammatical genders of the Slavic languages’. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 11: 27–41Google Scholar
(tr. and ed.) 1972. A Baudouin de Courtenay anthology. Bloomington, IN, and London: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
1979. Studies in Slavic morphophonemics and accentology. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, E.1980. ‘Slovenian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 85–102
1993. The accentual patterns of the Slavic languages. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
2003. Das Russinische: Kulturhistorische und soziolinguistische Aspekte. Munich: SagnerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, W. A. 1968. ‘A sociolinguistic typology for describing national multilingualism’. In (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language, The Hague: Mouton: 531–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1930. ‘Z zagadnień podziałów dialektycznych grupy zachodnio-słowiańskiej’. Lud Słowiański 1: 212–245Google Scholar
1969–1973. Zarys gramatyki porównawczej języków słowiańskich. I. Fonologia; II. zesz. 1: Fleksja imienna; II. zesz. 2: Fleksja werbalna. Warsaw: PWNGoogle Scholar
and 2001. English words. History and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.) 1984. Language and literary theory: in Honor of Ladislav Matejka. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Department of Slavic Languages and LiteraturesGoogle Scholar
1972. The smallest Slavonic nation. The Sorbs of Lusatia. London: University of London, The Athlone PressGoogle Scholar
1977. ‘Address in the Slavonic languages’. Slavonic and East European Review 55: 491–505Google Scholar
Stone, Gerald1985. ‘Language planning and the Lower Sorbian literary language’. In Stone and Worth (eds.): 99–104
Stone, Gerald1986. ‘Das Ober- und Niedersorbische’. In Rehder (ed.): 96–102
Stone, Gerald1993a. ‘Sorbian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 593–685
Stone, Gerald1993b. ‘Cassubian’. In Comrie and Corbett (eds.): 759–794
and (eds.) 1985. The formation of the Slavonic literary languages. Proceedings of a conference held in memory of Robert Auty and Anne Pennington at Oxford, 6–11 July 1981. Los Angeles: UCLA Slavic Studies 11. Distributed by SlavicaGoogle Scholar
1994. The revenge of the past. Nationalism, revolution, and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
1983. Leksičeskaja tipologija slavjanskix jazykov. Minsk: Izd-vo Belorusskogo universitetaGoogle Scholar
1976. ‘A new grammatical category of determiners in Polish?’ International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1(2): 307–325Google Scholar
(ed.) 1982. The Slavic languages in émigré communities. Carbondale, Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1984. The maintenance of the Slavonic languages abroad. (Melbourne Slavonic Studies18)Google Scholar
1994. ‘On the language-hood of Sorbian’. Australian Slavonic and East European Studies 8(2): 59–80Google Scholar
and (eds.) 1985. Culture and Nationalism in Nineteenth-Century Eastern Europe. Columbus, OH: Slavica, and Canberra: Humanities Research Centre, Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar
et al. (eds.) 1970. Grammatika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka. Moscow: NaukaGoogle Scholar
1976. Position of objective personal pronouns: a study of word order in modern Russian. Stockholm: University and Almqvist & WiksellGoogle Scholar
1952. Grammatik der niedersorbischen Sprache. 2. Aufl., bearb. und hrsg. von Dr Frido Mětšk. Bautzen: Domowina-VerlagGoogle Scholar
1928. ‘Stanowisko języka łużyckiego’. In Symbolae grammaticae in honorem Joannis Rozwadowski, II. Cracow: Gebethner & Wolff: 127–138Google Scholar
(ed.) 1990. Verbal aspect in discourse: contributions to the semantics of time and temporal perspective in Slavic and non-Slavic languages. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: J. BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1977. The languages and literatures of the non-Russian peoples of the Soviet Union. Hamilton, Ontario: Interdepartmental Committee on Communist and East European Affairs, McMaster UniversityGoogle Scholar
1989. ‘The role of diglossia in the development of the Slavonic literary languages’. Slavistična revija 37(1–3): 273–282Google Scholar
1991. Linguistic purism. London, New York: Longman. (Studies in language and linguistics)Google Scholar
1953. Czechoslovakia in European history. 2nd edn. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Tomić, O. M. 1991. ‘Macedonian as an Ausbau language’. In Clyne (ed.): 437–454
Topolińska, Zuzanna 1980. ‘Kashubian’. In Schenker and Stankiewicz (eds.): 183–194
Toporišič, J.1978. ‘A language of a small minority in a multilingual state’. In Schmalstieg and Magner (eds.): 480–486
Townsend, Charles E.1984. ‘Can aspect stand prosperity?’ In Flier and Timberlake (eds.): 286–295
and 1996. Common and comparative Slavic: phonology and inflection. With special attention to Russian, Czech, Serbo-Croatian, Bulgarian. Columbus, OH: SlavicaGoogle Scholar
1932. ‘Le calque dans les langues slaves littéraires’. Revue des Etudes Slaves 12: 19–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1950–1977. Grammaire comparée des langues slaves. Paris: IAC (Vols. 1–2), and Paris: Klincksieck (Vols. 3–5)Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, H. 1999. ‘Clitics: a state-of-the-art report’. In H. van Riemsdijk (ed.): 1–30
(Fasmer) 1964–1973. Ètimologičeskij slovar′ russkogo jazyka. 4 vols. Trans. and suppl. by O. N. Trubačev. Moscow: ProgressGoogle Scholar
2003. Bălgarska ezikova politika (v svetlinata na teorijata na knižovnite ezici): cikăl lekcii. Sofia: Meždunarodno sociolingvističesko družestvoGoogle Scholar
[1992] 2000. A comprehensive Russian grammar. 2nd rev. edn. Oxford, Malden, MA: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
1975. The Slavophile controversy: history of a conservative utopia in nineteenth-century Russian thought. Trans. by H. Andrews-Rusiecka, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
1982. Philosophy and romantic nationalism: the case of Poland. Oxford: Clarendon Press and New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
1974. Purism and language. A case study of modern Ukrainian and Belorussian nationalism (1840–1967). Bloomington, IN: Indiana UniversityGoogle Scholar
1979. ‘The rise (and fall) of the modern Belorussian literary language’. Slavonic and East European Review 57: 481–508Google Scholar
1975. ‘Was there a “literary language” in Kievan Rus’?’ Russian Review 34(1): 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar