Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:01:40.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Language of Social Justice for Children and Young People

Key Terms and Guiding Principles

from Part I - Social Justice and Human Rights for Children and Young People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

By
Becca McBride
Edited by
Caroline S. Clauss-Ehlers ,
Aradhana Bela Sood  and
Mark D. Weist
Caroline S. Clauss-Ehlers
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Aradhana Bela Sood
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Mark D. Weist
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Get access

Summary

A framework that incorporates children as stakeholders in the social justice process should be rooted in a foundational understanding of the political structures, dynamics, and language around advocacy for children both within countries and across the international system. This chapter provides that foundation by identifying how the complex interaction of state governments and the international human rights regime shapes potential for child advocacy. Additionally, it clarifies key child rights and areas of conflict between articulated rights. Finally, it demonstrates the overlapping roles and responsibilities of the various levels of actors responsible for child advocacy internationally.

Keywords

child advocacyinternational human rights regimechild rightsConvention on the Rights of the Child
Type
Chapter
Information
Social Justice for Children and Young People
International Perspectives
 , pp. 20 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barone, F. (2015). A cross-cultural perspective on childhood. Human relations area files: Cultural information for education and research. New Haven, CT: Yale University. hraf.yale.edu/a-cross-cultural-perspective-on-childhood/Google Scholar
Cohen, C. P. (1998). Role of the United States in drafting the Convention on the Rights of the Child: Creating a new world for children. Loyola Poverty Law Journal, 4, 9ff.Google Scholar
Fearon, J. D. (1998). Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation. International Organization, 52(2), 269–305.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Tsutsui, K. (2005). Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1373–1411.Google Scholar
Hague Conference for Private International Law (1993). Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect to Intercountry Adoption.Google Scholar
Hathaway, O. A. (2007). Why do countries commit to human rights treaties? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(4), 588–621.Google Scholar
Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Transnational activist networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mattes, M., & Rodriguez, M. (2014). Autocracies and international cooperation. International Studies Quarterly, 58(3), 527–538.Google Scholar
McBride, B. (2016). The globalization of adoption: Individuals, states, and agencies across borders. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (2000). The origins of human rights regimes: Democratic delegation in postwar Europe. International Organization, 54(2), 217–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyton, N., & Jahateh, L. (2018, January 23). With newfound democracy, Gambia faces resurgence in FGM and child marriage. Reuters, Thomson Reuters Foundation. www.reuters.com/article/us-gambia-women-fgm/with-newfound-democracy-gambia-faces-resurgence-in-fgm-and-child-marriage-idUSKBN1FC0XAGoogle Scholar
Powell, E. J., & Staton, J. K. (2009). Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. International Studies Quarterly, 53(1), 149–174.Google Scholar
Simmons, B. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, B. (2010). Treaty compliance and violation. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 273–296.Google Scholar
Smolin, D. M. (2006). Overcoming religious objections to the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Emory International Law Review, 20, 81–110.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. (2010). After Haiti quake, the chaos of U.S. adoptions. New York Times, August 3, 2010. www.nytimes.com/2010/08/04/world/americas/04adoption.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (1990). Convention on the Rights of the Child.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2001). Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2001). Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Use of Children in Armed Conflict.Google Scholar
United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF). (2013). Female genital mutilation/cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. New York: United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund.Google Scholar
Von Stein, J. (2005). Do treaties constrain or screen? Selection bias and treaty compliance. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vreeland, J. R. (2008). Political institutions and human rights: Why dictatorships enter into the United Nations Convention against Torture. International Organization, 62(1), 65–101.Google Scholar
Wallace, S. R. (2003). International adoption: The most logical solution to the disparity between the numbers of orphaned and abandoned children in some countries and families and individuals wishing to adopt in others. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 20, 689–724.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×