Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:22:43.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Social Justice and School Discipline

Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)

from Part II - International Social Justice Issues That Have an Impact on Children and Young People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

By
Jessica Swain-Bradway ,
Satish Moorthy  and
Milaney Leverson
Edited by
Caroline S. Clauss-Ehlers ,
Aradhana Bela Sood  and
Mark D. Weist
Caroline S. Clauss-Ehlers
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Aradhana Bela Sood
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Mark D. Weist
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Get access

Summary

Exclusionary discipline practices, in US public schools, have a historic, disproportionate, negative impact on black and Hispanic American youth, in particular those receiving special education services. Use and overuse of exclusionary discipline limits students’ ability to access academic and social success. At its root, exclusionary discipline is a civil and human rights issue. Beginning in the mid-twentieth century, social justice movements internationally and in the United States served an important means to achieve and sustain civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights of individuals. This chapter provides a broad context for these civil, disability and human rights-based movements and connects to current social justice approaches in education, schoolwide positive behavioral support (SWPBIS) and the potential for SWPBIS to act as a vehicle for social justice in school discipline. Over twenty years of evidence document that SWPBIS is an empirically valid systems approach to reducing exclusionary discipline. Recent adaptations to SWPBIS align with recommendations from 2014 guidelines from the federal Department of Education to explicitly address disciplinary equity. The result has been state, district, and regional impact on disciplinary equity, and decreases in the social and academic gap between black, Hispanic, students with individualized education programs, and their white peers.

Keywords

schooldisciplineequitySWPBISstatewidedisproportionatesuspensionsexpulsions
Type
Chapter
Information
Social Justice for Children and Young People
International Perspectives
 , pp. 211 - 227
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-faki, I. M., & Siddiek, A. G (2013). The role of background knowledge in enhancing reading comprehension. World Journal of English Language, 3(4), 42–66.Google Scholar
Algozzine, B., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., et al. (2010). Evaluation blueprint for school-wide positive behavior support. Eugene, OR: National Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavior Interventions and Support.Google Scholar
Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Armendariz, F., & Umbreit, J. (1999). Using active responding to reduce disruptive behavior in a general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balfanz, R., Byrnes, V., & Fox, J. H. (2015). Sent home and put off track. Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion, 17–30. http://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/childrenatrisk/vol5/iss2/13Google Scholar
Betters-Bubon, J., Brunner, T., & Kansteiner, A. (2016). Success for all? The role of the school counselor in creating and sustaining culturally responsive positive behavior interventions and supports programs. Professional Counselor, 6(3), 263–277. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115904.pdfGoogle Scholar
Biglan, A. (1995). Translating what we know about the context of anti-social behavior into a lower prevalence of such behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 479–492.Google Scholar
Bishaw, A., & Fontenot, K. (2012). Poverty: 2010 and 2011. American community survey briefs US Census. www2.census.gov/library/publications/2012/acs/acsbr11-01.pdfGoogle Scholar
Boneshefski, M. J., & Runge, T. J. (2014). Addressing disproportionate discipline practices within a school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports framework: A practical guide for calculating and using disproportionality rates. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16(3), 149–158.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, C., Waasdorp, T., & Leaf, P. (2012). Examining the variation in the impact of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Pediatrics, 10(5), 1136–1145.Google Scholar
Chaparro, E. A., Helton, S., & Sadler, C. A. (2016). Oregon Effective Behavioral and Instructional Support Systems initiative: Implementation from district and state level perspectives. In McIntosh, K & Goodman, S (eds.), Multi-tiered systems of support: Integrating academic RTI and school-wide PBIS (pp. 267–286). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Chaparro, E. A., Nese, R. N. T., & McIntosh, K. (2015). Examples of engaging instruction to increase equity in education. Eugene, OR: Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. University of Oregon. www.pbis.org/resource/examples-of-engaging-instruction-to-increase-equity-in-education.Google Scholar
Colvin, G., Sugai, G., Good, R., & Lee, Y-Y. (1987). Using active supervision and precorrection to improve transition behaviors in an elementary school. Education & Treatment of Children, 20, 209–222.Google Scholar
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., & Cox, W. T. L. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1267–1278.Google Scholar
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58.Google Scholar
Ferguson, P. V. (1896). 163 US 537 (1896). Jurisdiction: United States of America, Supreme Court Date of Decision, 18.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206.Google Scholar
Education Commission of the States (2018). Policy snapshot: Suspension and expulsion. www.ecs.org/wp-content/uploads/Suspension_and_Expulsion.pdf.Google Scholar
Endrew, F. v. Douglas County School District, 798 F. 3d 1329 (10th Cir. 2015). www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15–827_0pm1.pdf.Google Scholar
Esteves, K. J., & Rao, S. (2008). The evolution of special education. Principal, 88(2), 1. www.naesp.org/sites/default/files/resources/1/Principal/2008/N-Oweb2.pdf.Google Scholar
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116.Google Scholar
Green, A. L., Nese, R. N. T., McIntosh, K., et al. (2015). Key elements of policies to address disproportionality within SWPBIS: A guide for district and school teams. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. www.pbis.org.Google Scholar
Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59–68. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5e29/3a4598fece049e2e33b1254dd46d73106780.pdf.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Haydon, T., Mancil, G., & Van Loan, C. (2009). Using opportunities to respond in a general education classroom: A case study. Education & Treatment of Children, 32, 267–278.Google Scholar
Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (2015). School-wide PBIS: An example of applied behavior analysis implemented at a scale of social importance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8(1), 80–85. doi:10.1007/s40617-015-0045-4Google Scholar
Horner, R., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., et al. (2009). A randomized control trial of school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11(3), 113–144.Google Scholar
Hunt, P., Farron-Davis, F., Beckstead, S., Curtis, D., & Goetz, L. (1994). Evaluating the effects of placement of students with severe disabilities in general education versus special classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19(3), 200–214.Google Scholar
Illinois PBIS Network (2014, May). Quarterly report.Google Scholar
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (2006 & Supp. V. 2011).Google Scholar
Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 503–516.Google Scholar
Klingner, J. K., Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E., et al. (2005). Addressing the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education through culturally responsive educational systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(38), 1–40.Google Scholar
Ladson-Billings, G. (1992). Liberatory consequences of literacy: A case of culturally relevant instruction for African American students. Journal of Negro Education, 61(3), 378–391.Google Scholar
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.Google Scholar
Lai, C. K., Hoffman, K. M., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Reducing implicit prejudice. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 315–330.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. J., Barrett, S., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2010). Blueprint for school-wide positive behavior support training and professional development. Eugene, OR: National Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavior Interventions and Support.Google Scholar
Lhamon, C. E. (2014). United States Department of Education Office for Civil Rights, Dear Colleague Letter, October 1, 2014. www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-resourcecomp-201410.pdf.Google Scholar
Losen, D. (2018). Disabling punishment: The need for remedies to the disparate loss of instruction experienced by Black students with disabilities. The Center for Civil Rights Remedies at the Civil Rights Project. www.schooldisciplinedata.org/ccrr/docs/disabling-punishment-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Losen, D., & Gillespie, J. (2012). Opportunities suspended: The disparate impact of disciplinary exclusion from school. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED534178Google Scholar
McIntosh, K., Ellwood, K., McCall, L., & Girvan, E. J. (2018). Using discipline data within a PBIS framework to enhance equity in school discipline. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53, 146–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, K., Gion, C., & Bastable, E. (2018). Do schools implementing SWPBIS have decreased racial and ethnic disproportionality in school discipline? OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.Google Scholar
McIntosh, K., Girvan, E. J., Horner, R. H., Smolkowski, K., & Sugai, G. (2014). Recommendations for addressing discipline disproportionality in education. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports.Google Scholar
McIntosh, K., Girvan, E. J., Horner, R. H., Smolkowski, K., & Sugai, G. (2018). A 5-point intervention approach for enhancing equity in school discipline. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.Google Scholar
McIntosh, K., Sadler, C., & Brown, J. A. (2012). Kindergarten reading skill level and change as risk factors for chronic problem behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(1), 17–28. www.researchgate.net/profile/Jacqueline_Brown9/publication/233942516_Kindergarten_Reading_Skill_Level_and_Change_as_Risk_Factors_for_Chronic_Problem_Behavior/links/5508aa540cf2d7a2812ae83f.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, S. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Amodio, D. M. (2010). Reducing the expression of implicit stereotypes: Reflexive control through implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 512–523. doi:10.1177/0146167210362789Google Scholar
Monshipouri, M., & Welch, C. E. (2001). The search for international human rights and justice: Coming to terms with the new global realities. Human Rights Quarterly, 23(2), 370–401.Google Scholar
Morgan, E., Salomon, N., Plotkin, M., & Cohen, R. (2014). The school discipline consensus report: Strategies from the field to keep students engaged in school and out of the juvenile justice system. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.Google Scholar
Noguera, P. A. (2003). Schools, prisons, and social implications of punishment: Rethinking disciplinary practices. Theory into Practice, 42(4), 341–350.Google Scholar
OSEP National Technical Assistance Center on PBIS (2018). Brief introduction and frequently asked questions about PBIS. www.pbis.org/school/swpbis-for-beginners/pbis-faqsGoogle Scholar
Payno-Simmons, R., & Hill, B. (2019). Practices for systematically reducing disproportionality in discipline. Washington, DC: Association for Positive Behavior Supports. www.apbs.org/sites/default/files/conference-2016/presentations/a4-payno-simmons_hill-apbs-2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Petersen, T., & Togstad, T. (2006). Getting the offer: Sex discrimination in hiring. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 24, 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, L. F. Jr. (1981). Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District, Westchester County v. Rowley. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15–827_0pm1.pdf.Google Scholar
Reddy, L. A., Fabiano, G. A., Dudek, C. M., & Hsu, L. (2013). Instructional and behavior management practices implemented by elementary and general education teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 683–700.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, J. (2018). Educational and criminal justice outcomes 12 years after school suspension. Youth & Society, I -33, Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X17752208.Google Scholar
Rosenshine, B. (1995). Advances in research on instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 262–268.Google Scholar
Rowe, D., & Rayford, L (1987). Activating background knowledge in reading comprehension assessment. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 160–176.Google Scholar
Rumberger, R. W., & Losen, D. J. (2016). The high cost of harsh discipline and its disparate impact. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/85m2m6sjGoogle Scholar
Simmons, D. C., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Mathes, P., & Hodge, J. P. (1995). Effects of explicit teaching and peer tutoring on the reading-achievement of learning-disabled and low-performing students in regular classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 95, 387–408.Google Scholar
Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C., et al. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40, 85–107.Google Scholar
Smolkowski, K., Girvan, E. J., McIntosh, K., Nese, R. N. T., & Horner, R. H. (2016). Vulnerable decision points in school discipline: Comparison of discipline for African American compared to White students in elementary schools. Behavioral Disorders, 41, 178–195.Google Scholar
Stein, M., Carnine, D., & Dixon, R. (1998). Direct instruction: Integrating curriculum design and effective teaching practice. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 227–234.Google Scholar
Steinberg, M. P., & Lacoe, J. (2017). What do we know about school discipline reform? Education Next, 17(1), 44–53.Google Scholar
Swain-Bradway, J., Gulbrandson, K., Galston, A., & McIntosh, K. (2019). Do Wisconsin schools implementing an integrated academic and behavior support framework improve equity in academic and school discipline outcomes? Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. www.pbis.org/resource/do-wisconsin-schools-implementing-an-integrated-academic-and-behavior-support-framework-improve-equity-in-academic-and-school-discipline-outcomesGoogle Scholar
Tobin, T., Horner, R. H., Vincent, C. G., & Swain-Bradway, J. (2013). If discipline referral rates for the school as a whole are reduced, will rates for students with disabilities also be reduced? www.pbis.org/common/cms/files/pbisresources/Evalu_Brief_revised_IEP_ODR_Nov25.pdfGoogle Scholar
United States (1975). Public Law 94–142: Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US Department of Education (2016). Fact Sheet: Equity in IDEA. www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/fact-sheet-equity-ideaGoogle Scholar
US Department of Education (2015). Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015. Pub. L. 89–10. https://legcounsel.house.gov/Comps/Elementary%20And%20Secondary%20Education%20Act%20Of%201965.pdfGoogle Scholar
US Office of the Press Secretary (2016). White House Report: The continuing need to rethink discipline. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/12/09/white-house-report-continuing-need-rethink-disciplineGoogle Scholar
Warren, C. J. E. (1954). Brown v. Board of Education. United States Reports, 347(1954), 483. www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/347/483Google Scholar
Wehmeyer, M. L., Lattin, D. L., Lapp-Rincker, G., & Agran, M. (2003). Access to the general curriculum of middle school students with mental retardation: An observational study. Remedial and Special Education, 24(5), 262–272. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/5904/AGC6_AGC%20of%20Middle%20School.pdf?sequence=1Google Scholar
Wisconsin RTI Network (2016). Annual report. www.wisconsinrticenter.org/assets/Annual-Report-15–16-web.pdfGoogle Scholar
Yell, M. L., & Drasgow, E. (1999). A legal analysis of inclusion. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 43(3), 118–123.Google Scholar
Yell, M. L., & Drasgow, E. (2000). Litigating a free appropriate public education: The Lovaas hearings and cases.Journal of Special Education, 33(4), 205–214.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×