Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:34:45.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meditation 9 - The bounds of (non)sense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Friedrich Kratochwil
Friedrich Kratochwil
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The upshot of the last Meditation was neither that rights work as simple trumps, nor that a “theory” of rights is coextensive with morality, nor that a theoretical “foundation” can be given for law and its practice, as certain paradoxes appear. Paradoxes are not simply perverse effects resulting from unintended consequences or from aggregation problems, but are rooted in logical impasses, as for example Russell has shown. This realization has disturbing implications for getting at the “truth” of any matter, as “truth” is neither a simple matching operation, as we have seen, nor is it unequivocally guaranteed by logic. Thus we usually take for granted that at least the “truths” contained in analytical statements (bachelors are unmarried men) are reliable, closely followed by those that derive conclusions from premises via rigorous deductions. But our confidence seems somewhat misplaced.

Consider the status of analytical truths, as in the example of the bachelor who is an unmarried man. It is not as clear-cut as it appears. Suppose we deal with a man who is living with a woman, perhaps even having a child with her. We might not consider him a bachelor, although “technically” speaking he might be if the legal system does not recognize a common law marriage. Thus the distinction between analytic and synthetic statements itself is problematic, as Quine pointed out.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Status of Law in World Society
Meditations on the Role and Rule of Law
 , pp. 261 - 291
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arfi, Badredine, Rethinking International Relations Theory via Deconstruction (London: Routledge, 2012): 39Google Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman, “The Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” The Philosophical Review, vol. 60 (1951), 20–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, 1962)Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Science of Science and Reflexivity, transl. by Richard Nice (Cambridge: Polity, 2004)Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno and Wolgar, Steve, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Los Angeles: Sage, 1979)Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin, The Manufacture of Knowledge (Oxford: Pergamon, 1981)Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth, “The Optimum Utilization of Knowledge: Some Central Concepts,” in Boulding, Kenneth and Senesh, Lawrence (eds.), The Optimum Utilization of Knowledge (Boulder: Westview, 1983): 1–19 at 6Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François and Thébaud, Jean-Loup, Just Gaming, trans. Godzick, Wlad (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Bennington, Geoff and Massumi, Brian (Manchester University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean François, The Differend: Phrases in Dispute, trans. Abbeele, Georges Van Den (Manchester University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Bauer, Harry and Brighi, Elisabetta (eds.), Pragmatism in International Relations Theory (London: Routledge, 2009), 11–25Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula, “Consequences of a Closed, Token-Based Semantics History and Philosophy of Logic,” History and Philosophy of Logic, vol. 25 (2004), 95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, Oren, “Law in the Air. A Prologue to the World of Legal Paradoxes,” in Perez, Oren and Teubner, Gunther (eds.), Paradoxes and Inconsistencies of the Law (Oxford: Hart, 2006), 3–39 at 9Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, On Grammatology (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974)Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, On Violence (New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovic, 1970), 51–3Google Scholar
Fraassen, Bas C. Van, The Scientific Image (Oxford: Clarendon, 1980), 156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 1972), 11Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Habermas, Juergen, “Reconciliation through the Use of Reason: Remarks of Rawls’s Political Liberalism,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92 (1995), 109–31Google Scholar
Rawls, John, “Reply to Habermas,”Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92 (1995), 132–80Google Scholar
Azmanova, Albena, The Scandal of Reason (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), 102Google Scholar
Harsany, John and Selden, Richard, A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Gray, John, “Social Contract, Community and Ideology,” in Gray, John, Liberalism: Essays in Political Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1991), Chapter 3 at 32Google Scholar
Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples (New York: Basic Books, 1993)Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond, “Neither History nor Praxis,” in Geuss, Raymond, Outside Ethics (Princeton University Press, 2005), 29–39 at 39Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1961)Google Scholar
North, Douglas, “Economic Performance through Time,” American Economic Review, vol. 84 (June 1994), 359–69 at 367Google Scholar
Adrianopoulos, Stefan, “The Invisible Hand: Supranatural Agency in Political Economy and Gothic Novel,” English Literary History, vol. 66, no. 3 (1999), 739–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary, The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (University of Chicago Press, 1976)Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles, Complex Organizations (New York: McGraw Hill, 1986)Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoît, “The Variation of Certain Other Speculative Prices,”The Journal of Business (Jan 1967), 393–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoît and Hudson, Richard, The (Mis)-behavior of Markets: A Fractal View of Risk, Ruin and Rewards (New York: Basic Books, 1974)Google Scholar
Vogl, Joseph, Das Gespenst des Kapitals, 4th edn. (Zurich: Diaphanes, 2010), Chapter 6Google Scholar
Shin, Hyun Song, Risk and Liquidity (Oxford University Press, 2010), 1–6Google Scholar
Minsky, Hyman, Stabilizing an Unstable Economy (New Haven: Yale, 1986)Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton and Friedman, Rose, Free to Choose (London: Secker and Warburg, 1980)Google Scholar
Black, Fischer and Scholes, Myron, “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,”Journal of Political Economy, vol. 81 (1973): 637–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene, “The Behavior of Stock Market Prices,” Journal of Business, vol. 38 no. 1 (1965): 34–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene and Miller, Merton, The Theory of Finance (New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1972)Google Scholar
Shiller, Robert, The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21st Century (Princeton University Press, 2003): 1–2Google Scholar
Hetzer, Wolfgang, Finanz Mafia (Frankfurt: Wochenend, 2011), Chapter 4Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago Press, 1962), 1Google Scholar
Kuttner, Robert, Everything for Sale (University of Chicago Press, 1996), 41Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert, The Passion and the Interests (Princeton University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya, “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 6, no. 4 (1977), 317–44Google Scholar
Margolies, Howard, Paradigms as Barriers: How Habits of Mind Govern Science Beliefs (University of Chicago Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Schafer, H. B. and Schoenberger, A., “Strict Liability vs. Negligence,” in Boukoukaert, B. and De Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000), 598Google Scholar
Gilles, Stephen G., “The Invisible Hand Formula,”Virginia Law Review, vol. 80 (1994), 1015–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlisk, John, “Why Bounded Rationality?,”Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 34, no. 2 (1996), 669–700 at 690Google Scholar
Posner, Richard, “An Economic Theory of Criminal Law,” Columbia Law Review, vol. 85 (October 1985), 1193–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (Oxford University Press, 1996): 15Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C., The Economics of Welfare, 4th edn. (New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 2002)Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald, “The Problem of Social Costs,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 3 (1960), 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard, “Natural Monopoly and its Regulation,” Stanford Law Review, vol. 21, no. 3 (1969), 546–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H., “Coase on Posner on Coase,”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 149 (1993), 96–98 at 96Google Scholar
Posner, Richard, “The New Institutional Economics Meets Law and Economics,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 149, no. 1 (1993), 73–87 at 73Google Scholar
Posner, Richard, Overcoming Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995), Chapter 21Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis, Through the Looking Glass (London: Penguin, 1994), 100Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A., A Failure of Capitalism: The Crisis of ’08 and the Descent into Depression (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design (Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, David, “Prescribing Institutions without Ideal Theory,” Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 20, no. 1 (2012), 45–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alex, “Driving with the Rearview Mirror. On Rational Science and Institutional Design,” International Organization, vol. 55 (Autumn 2001), 1019–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert, Models of Man (New York: Wiley, 1957)Google Scholar
Lancaster, K. and Lisey, R. G., “The General Theory of the Second Best,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 24, no. 1 (1956), 11–32Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya, The Idea of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, Essays in Positive Economics (University of Chicago Press, 1953)Google Scholar
Drenzer, Daniel, The Sanction Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations (Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, Meghan L., Shrewd Sanctions (Washington DC: Brookings, 2003)Google Scholar
Baldwin, David, “Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends vs. Old Tendencies,” World Politics, vol. 31 (1979), 161–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragin, Charles and Becker, Howard (eds.), What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry (Cambridge University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles, Fuzzy Set Social Science (University of Chicago Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Dewey, John, Liberalism and Social Action (Amherst: Prometheus Books, (1925) 2000), Chapter 2 passimGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Michael, March, James and Olsen, Johan, “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 5 (1972), 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Oliver and Werner, Wouter, “Extrajudicial Killing as Risk Management,” Security Dialogue, vol. 39 (2008), 289–308 at 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry, Law, Morality and the Relations of States (Princeton University Press, 1983), 13Google Scholar
Hinchman, Lewis P. and Hinchman, Sandra (eds.), Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays (Albany: SUNY Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Villa, Dana, Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political (Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan, “Rationality and Psychology in International Politics,” International Organization, vol. 59, no. 1 (2005), 77–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan, “Emotional Beliefs,”International Organization, vol. 64, no. 1 (2010), 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattern, Janice Bially, “A Practice Theory of Emotion for International Relations,” in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The bounds of (non)sense
  • Friedrich Kratochwil, European University Institute, Florence
  • Book: The Status of Law in World Society
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583930.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The bounds of (non)sense
  • Friedrich Kratochwil, European University Institute, Florence
  • Book: The Status of Law in World Society
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583930.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The bounds of (non)sense
  • Friedrich Kratochwil, European University Institute, Florence
  • Book: The Status of Law in World Society
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583930.013
Available formats
×