Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:59:57.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Theory of Colloidal Suspension Structure, Dynamics, and Rheology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2021

Norman J. Wagner
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Jan Mewis
Affiliation:
KU Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Summary

Chapter 2 introduces the statistical physics description of the rheology of concentrated colloidal suspensions at low Reynolds number. While the solvent is a Newtonian fluid, the suspension exhibits viscoelasticity and non-Newtonian rheology. After explaining the hydrodynamic interactions between Brownian particles mediated by the intervening solvent flow, two theoretical methods for describing the suspension rheology are discussed. In the Langevin Equation method, stochastic particle trajectories are considered under the influence of direct and hydrodynamic interactions, and solvent-induced fluctuating forces. This method is fundamental to simulation schemes where the macroscopic suspension stress is calculated from time-averaging the microscopic stress over representative trajectories. The main focus is on the second so-called generalized Smoluchowski equation (GSmE) method invoking a many-particles diffusion-advection equation for the configurational probability density of Brownian particles in shear flow. Based on the GSmE, real-space and Fourier-space schemes are discussed for calculating rheological properties including the shear stress relaxation function and steady state and dynamic viscosities. Starting from exact Green-Kubo relations for the shear stress relaxation function, the linear mode coupling theory (MCT) and its non-linear extension, termed Integration Through Transients (ITT), are introduced as versatile Fourier-space schemes. They allow for studying the rheology of concentrated suspensions close to glass and gel transitions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dhont, JKG. An Introduction to Dynamics of Colloids, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, DA. Statistical Mechanics. New York: Harper & Row; 1976.Google Scholar
Graham, MD. Microhydrodynamics, Brownian Motion, and Complex Fluids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018.Google Scholar
van Kampen, NG. Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, 3rd ed. Amsterdam: North Holland; 2007.Google Scholar
Gardiner, CW. Handbook of Stochastic Methods, 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2004.Google Scholar
Risken, H. The Fokker-Planck Equation, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 1996.Google Scholar
Nägele, G. Brownian Dynamics simulations. In Blügel, S, Gompper, G, Koch, E, Müller-Krumbhaar, H, Spatschek, R, Winkler, RG (eds.) Computational Condensed Matter Physics, vol. 32 of Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich. Jülich, Germany: Forschungszentrum Jülich; 2006; pp. B4.1B4.34.Google Scholar
Lionberger, RA, Russel, WB. A Smoluchowski theory with simple approximations for hydrodynamic interactions in concentrated dispersions. Journal of Rheology. 1997;41(2):399425.Google Scholar
Lionberger, RA, Russel, WB. Microscopic theories of the rheology of stable colloidal dispersions. Advances in Chemical Physics. 2000;111:399474.Google Scholar
Götze, W. Complex Dynamics of Glass-Forming Liquids. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
Hansen, JP, McDonald, IR. Theory of Simple Liquids, 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2006.Google Scholar
Schweizer, KS, Saltzman, EJ. Entropic barriers, activated hopping, and the glass transition in colloidal suspensions. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2003;119(2):11811196.Google Scholar
Saltzman, EJ, Schweizer, KS. Transport coefficients in glassy colloidal fluids. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2003;119(2):11971203.Google Scholar
Kobelev, V, Schweizer, KS. Strain softening, yielding, and shear thinning in glassy colloidal suspensions. Physical Review E. 2005;71(2):021401.Google Scholar
Yeomans-Reyna, L, Campa, HA, de Jesús Guevara-Rodríguez, F, Medina-Noyola, M. Self-consistent theory of collective Brownian Dynamics: Theory versus simulation. Physical Review E. 2003;67(2):021108.Google Scholar
Chávez-Rojo, MA, Medina-Noyola, M. Self-consistent generalized Langevin equation for colloidal mixtures. Physical Review E. 2005;72(3):031107.Google Scholar
Juárez-Maldonado, R, Medina-Noyola, M. Theory of dynamic arrest in colloidal mixtures. Physical Review E. 2008;77(5):051503.Google Scholar
Brader, JM. Nonlinear rheology of colloidal dispersions. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2010;22(36):363101.Google Scholar
Fuchs, M. Nonlinear rheological properties of dense colloidal dispersions close to a glass transition under steady shear. Advances in Polymer Science. 2010;236(6):55115.Google Scholar
Voigtmann, Th. Nonlinear glassy rheology. Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science. 2014;19(6):549560.Google Scholar
Russel, WB, Saville, DA, Schowalter, WR. Colloidal Dispersions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israelachvili, JN. Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2011.Google Scholar
Guazzelli, E, Morris, JF. A Physical Introduction to Suspension Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
Happel, J, Brenner, H. Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics: With Special Applications to Particulate Media. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1973.Google Scholar
Kim, S, Karrila, SJ. Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications. Series in Chemical Engineering. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991.Google Scholar
Pusey, PN. Colloidal suspensions. In Hansen, JP, Levesque, D, Zinn-Justin, J (eds.) Liquids, Freezing and Glass Transition. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1991; pp. 765942.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, DJ, Onishi, Y. Calculation of the resistance and mobility functions for two unequal rigid spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1984;139:261290.Google Scholar
Cichocki, B, Felderhof, BU. Short-time diffusion coefficients and high frequency viscosity of dilute suspensions of spherical Brownian particles. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1988;89(2):10491054.Google Scholar
Batchelor, GK. The stress system in a suspension of force-free particles. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1970;41(3):545570.Google Scholar
Batchelor, GK. The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1977;83(1):97117.Google Scholar
Batchelor, GK. Brownian diffusion of particles with hydrodynamic interaction. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1976;74(1):129.Google Scholar
Mazo, RM. On the theory of Brownian motion. III. Two-body distribution function. Journal of Statistical Physics. 1969;1:559562.Google Scholar
Deutch, JM, Oppenheim, IJ. Molecular theory of Brownian motion for several particles. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1971;54(8):35473555.Google Scholar
Murphy, TJ, Aguirre, JL. Brownian motion of interacting particles. I. Extension of the Einstein diffusion relation to the -particle case. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1972;57(5):20982104.Google Scholar
Dhont, JKG. On the distortion of the static structure factor of colloidal fluids in shear flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1989;204:421431.Google Scholar
Blawzdziewicz, J, Szamel, G. Structure and rheology of semidilute suspensions under shear. Physical Review E. 1993;48(6):46324636.Google Scholar
Wagner, NJ, Ackerson, BJ. Analysis of nonequilibrium structures of shearing colloidal suspensions. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1992;97(2):14731483.Google Scholar
Nägele, G. On the dynamics and structure of charge-stabilized suspensions. Physics Reports. 1996;272(5–6):215372.Google Scholar
Paul, GN, Pusey, PN. Observation of a long-time tail in brownian motion. Journal of Physics A. 1981;14(12):33013327.Google Scholar
Franosch, T, Grimm, M, Belushkin, M, Mor, F, Foffi, G, Forró, L, et al. Resonances arising from hydrodynamic memory in Brownian motion. Nature (London). 2011;478:8588.Google Scholar
Ermak, DL. A computer simulation of charged particles in solution. I. Technique and equilibrium properties. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1975;62(10):41894196.Google Scholar
Ermak, DL, McCammon, JA. Brownian Dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1978;69(4):13521360.Google Scholar
Allen, MP, Tildesley, DJ. Computer Simulation of Liquids, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tough, RJA, Pusey, PN, Lekkerkerker, HN, van den Broeck, C. Stochastic descriptions of the dynamics of interacting Bownian particles. Molecular Physics. 1986;59(3):595619.Google Scholar
Lhuillier, D, Nozières, P. Volume averaging of slightly non-homogeneous suspensions. Physica A Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications. 1992;181(3):427440.Google Scholar
Wang, W, Prosperetti, A. Flow of spatially non-uniform suspensions. part III: Closure relations for porous media and spinning particles. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 2001;27(9):16271653.Google Scholar
Dhont, JKG, Briels, WJ. Gradient and vorticity banding. Rheologica Acta. 2008;47(3):257.Google Scholar
Brady, JF. Brownian motion, hydrodynamics, and the osmotic pressure. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1993;98(4):33353341.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, DJ, Morris, JF, Brady, JF. The pressure moments for two rigid spheres in low Reynolds number flow. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics. 1993;5(10):23172325.Google Scholar
Marenne, S, Morris, JF. Nonlinear rheology of colloidal suspensions probed by oscillatory shear. Journal of Rheology. 2017;61(4):797815.Google Scholar
Bergenholtz, J, Brady, JF, Vicic, M. The non-Newtonian rheology of dilute colloidal suspensions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2002;456:239275.Google Scholar
Foss, DR, Brady, JF. Structure, diffusion and rheology of Brownian suspensions by Stokesian dynamics simulation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2000;407:167200.Google Scholar
Morris, JF, Katyal, B. Microstructure from simulated Brownian suspension flows at large shear rate. Physics of Fluids. 2002;14(6):19201937.Google Scholar
Morris, JF. A review of microstructure in concentrated suspensions and its implications for rheology and bulk flow. Rheologica Acta. 2009;48(8):909923.Google Scholar
Gurnon, A, Wagner, NJ. Microstructure and rheology relationships for shear thickening colloidal dispersions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2015;769(23):242276.Google Scholar
Maranzano, BJ, Wagner, NJ. The effects of particle size on reversible shear thickening of concentrated colloidal dispersions. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2001;114(23):1051410527.Google Scholar
Wagner, NJ, Brady, JF. Shear thickening in colloidal dispersions. Physics Today. 2009;62(October):2732.Google Scholar
Foss, DR, Brady, JF. Brownian dynamics simulation of hard-sphere colloidal dispersions. Journal of Rheology. 2000;44(3):629651.Google Scholar
Nazockdast, E, Morris, JF. Effect of repulsive interactions on structure and rheology of sheared colloidal dispersions. Soft Matter. 2012;8(8):42234234.Google Scholar
Banchio, AJ, Nägele, G, Bergenholtz, J. Viscoelasticity and generalized Stokes-Einstein relations of colloidal dispersions. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1999;111(18):87218740.Google Scholar
Batchelor, GK, Green, JT. The determination of the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles to order c2. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1972;56(3):401427.Google Scholar
Szymczak, P, Cichocki, B. A diagrammatic approach to response problems in composite systems. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment. 2008;2008(01):P01025.Google Scholar
Abade, GC, Cichocki, B, Ekiel-Jezewska, ML, Nägele, G, Wajnryb, E. High-frequency viscosity of concentrated porous particles suspensions. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2010;133(8):084906.Google Scholar
Abade, GC, Cichocki, B, Ekiel-Ježewska, ML, Nägele, G, Wajnryb, E. Diffusion, sedimentation, and rheology of concentrated suspensions of core-shell particles. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2012;136(10):104902.Google Scholar
Riest, J, Eckert, T, Richtering, W, Nägele, G. Dynamics of suspensions of hydrodynamically structured particles: Analytic theory and applications to experiments. Soft Matter. 2015;11(14):28212843.Google Scholar
Beenakker, C. The effective viscosity of a concentrated suspension of spheres (and its relation to diffusion). Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 1984;128(1):4881.Google Scholar
Banchio, AJ, Nägele, G. Short-time transport properties in dense suspensions: From neutral to charge-stabilized colloidal spheres. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2008;128(10):104903.Google Scholar
Heinen, M, Banchio, AJ, Nägele, G. Short-time rheology and diffusion in suspensions of Yukawa-type colloidal particles. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2011;135(15):154504.Google Scholar
Banchio, AJ, Heinen, M, Holmqvist, P, Nägele, G. Short- and long-time diffusion and dynamic scaling in suspensions of charged colloidal particles. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2018;148(13):134902.Google Scholar
Das, S, Riest, J, Winkler, RG, Gompper, G, Dhont, JKG, Nägele, G. Clustering and dynamics of particles in dispersions with competing interactions: Theory and simulation. Soft Matter. 2018;14(1):92103.Google Scholar
Riest, J, Nägele, G, Liu, Y, Wagner, NJ, Godfrin, PD. Short-time dynamics of lysozyme solutions with competing short-range attraction and long-range repulsion: Experiment and theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2018;148(6):065101.Google Scholar
Phung, T. Behaviour of Concentrated Colloidal Suspensions by Stokesian Dynamics Simulation [PhD thesis]. Pasadena: California Institute of Technology; 1995.Google Scholar
Lionberger, RA, Russel, WB. High frequency modulus of hard sphere colloids. Journal of Rheology. 1994;38(6):18851908.Google Scholar
Segrè, PN, Meeker, SP, Pusey, PN, Poon, WCK. Viscosity and structural relaxation in suspensions of hard-sphere colloids. Physical Review Letters. 1995;75(5):958961.Google Scholar
Weiss, A, Dingenouts, N, Ballauff, M, Senff, H, Richtering, W. Comparison of the effective radius of sterically stabilized latex particles determined by small-angle x-ray scattering and by zero shear viscosity. Langmuir. 1998;14(18):50835087.Google Scholar
Su, Y, Swan, JW, Zia, RN. Pair mobility functions for rigid spheres in concentrated colloidal dispersions: Stresslet and straining motion couplings. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2017;146(12):124903.Google Scholar
Nägele, G, Bergenholtz, J. Linear viscoelasticity of colloidal mixtures. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1998;108(23):98939904.Google Scholar
Widder, DV. The Laplace Transform, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1946.Google Scholar
Viehman, DC, Schweizer, KS. Theory of gelation, vitrification, and activated barrier hopping in mixtures of hard and sticky spheres. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2008;128(8):084509.Google Scholar
Contreras-Aburto, C, Nägele, G. Viscosity of electrolyte solutions: A mode-coupling theory. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2012;24(46):464108.Google Scholar
Aburto, CC, Nägele, G. A unifying mode-coupling theory for transport properties of electrolyte solutions. II. Results for equal-sized ions electrolytes. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2013;139(13):134110.Google Scholar
Wagner, NJ. The high-frequency shear modulus of colloidal suspensions and the effects of hydrodynamic interactions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1993;161(1):169181.Google Scholar
Cichocki, B, Felderhof, BU. Linear viscoelasticity of semidilute hard-sphere suspensions. Physical Review A. 1991;43(10):54055411.Google Scholar
Furst, EM, Squires, TM. Microrheology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.Google Scholar
Puertas, AM, Voigtmann, Th. Microrheology of colloidal systems. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2014;26(24):243101.Google Scholar
Mason, TG, Weitz, DA. Optical measurements of frequency-dependent linear viscoelastic moduli of complex fluids. Physical Review Letters. 1995;74(7):12501253.Google Scholar
Banchio, AJ, Bergenholtz, J, Nägele, G. Rheology and dynamics of colloidal suspensions. Physical Review Letters. 1999;82(8):17921795.Google Scholar
Abade, GC, Cichocki, B, Ekiel-Jezewska, ML, Nägele, G, Wajnryb, E. High-frequency viscosity and generalized Stokes–Einstein relations in dense suspensions of porous particles. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2010;22(32):322101.Google Scholar
Riest, J, Nägele, G. Short-time dynamics in dispersions with competing short-range attraction and long-range repulsion. Soft Matter. 2015;11(48):92739280.Google Scholar
Kholodenko, AL, Douglas, JF. Generalized Stokes-Einstein equation for spherical particle suspensions. Physical Review E. 1995;51(2):10811090.Google Scholar
Medina-Noyola, M. Long-time self-diffusion in concentrated colloidal dispersions. Physical Review Letters. 1988;60(26):27052708.Google Scholar
Brady, JF. The rheological behavior of concentrated colloidal dispersions. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1993;99(1):567581.Google Scholar
Brady, JF. The long-time self-diffusivity in concentrated colloidal dispersions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1994;272:109134.Google Scholar
Löwen, H, Palberg, T, Simon, R. Dynamical criterion for freezing of colloidal liquids. Physical Review Letters. 1993;70(10):15571560.Google Scholar
Nägele, G, Banchio, AJ, Kollmann, M, Pesche, R. Dynamic properties, scaling and related freezing criteria of two- and three-dimensional colloidal dispersions. Molecular Physics. 2002;100(18):29212933.Google Scholar
Maxwell, JC. On the dynamical theory of gases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 1867;157:4988.Google Scholar
Bengtzelius, U, Götze, W, Sjölander, A. Dynamics of supercooled liquids and the glass transition. Journal of Physics C. 1984;17(33):59155934.Google Scholar
Leutheusser, E. Dynamical model of the liquid-glass transition. Physical Review A. 1984;29(5):27652773.Google Scholar
Szamel, G, Löwen, H. Mode-coupling theory of the glass transition in colloidal systems. Physical Review A. 1991;44(12):82158219.Google Scholar
Berthier, L, Biroli, G. Theoretical perspective on the glass transition and amorphous materials. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2011;83(2):587645.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, K. Irreducible memory function for dissipative stochastic systems with detailed balance. Physica A. 1995;215(1–2):6174.Google Scholar
Szamel, G. Dynamics of interacting Brownian particles: A diagrammatic formulation. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2007;127(8):084515.Google Scholar
Götze, W, Sjögren, L. General properties of certain non-linear integro-differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 1995;195(1):230250.Google Scholar
Franosch, T, Voigtmann, Th. Completely monotone solutions of the mode-coupling theory for mixtures. Journal of Statistical Physics. 2002;109(1):237259.Google Scholar
Götze, W, Voigtmann, Th. Effect of composition changes on the structural relaxation of a binary mixture. Physical Review E. 2003;67(2):021502.Google Scholar
Nägele, G, Bergenholtz, J, Dhont, JKG. Cooperative diffusion in colloidal mixtures. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1999;110(14):70377052.Google Scholar
Bergenholtz, J, Horn, FM, Richtering, W, Willenbacher, N, Wagner, NJ. Relationship between short-time self-diffusion and high-frequency viscosity in charge-stabilized dispersions. Physical Review E. 1998;58(4):R4088R4091.Google Scholar
Pusey, PN, van Megen, W. Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres. Nature (London). 1986;320:340342.Google Scholar
Franosch, T, Fuchs, M, Götze, W, Mayr, MR, Singh, AP. Asymptotic laws and preasymptotic correction formulas for the relaxation near glass-transition singularities. Physical Review E. 1997;55(6):71537176.Google Scholar
van Megen, W, Underwood, SM. Glass transition in colloidal hard spheres: Mode-coupling theory analysis. Physical Review Letters. 1993;70(18):27662769.Google Scholar
Voigtmann, Th. Dynamics of colloidal glass-forming mixtures. Physical Review E. 2003;68(5):051401.Google Scholar
Sperl, M. Nearly logarithmic decay in the colloidal hard-sphere system. Physical Review E. 2005;71(6):060401(R).Google Scholar
Voigtmann, Th, Puertas, AM, Fuchs, M. Tagged-particle dynamics in a hard-sphere system: Mode-coupling theory analysis. Physical Review E. 2004;70(6):061506.Google Scholar
Weysser, F, Puertas, AM, Fuchs, M, Voigtmann, Th. Structural relaxation of polydisperse hard spheres: Comparison of the mode-coupling theory to a Langevin dynamics simulation. Physical Review E. 2010;82(1):011504.Google Scholar
Russel, WB, Wagner, NJ, Mewis, J. Divergence in the low shear viscosity for Brownian hard-sphere dispersions: At random close packing or the glass transition? Journal of Rheology. 2013;57(6):15551567.Google Scholar
Szamel, G, Flenner, E. Independence of the relaxation of a supercooled fluid from its micrsocopic dynamics: Need for yet another extension of the mode-coupling theory. Europhysics Letters. 2004;67(5):779785.Google Scholar
Brambilla, G, Masri, DE, Pierno, M, Berthier, L, Cipelletti, L, Petekidis, G, et al. Probing the equilibrium dynamics of colloidal hard spheres above the mode-coupling glass transition. Physical Review Letters. 2009;102(8):085703. Comments and replies in Physical Review Letters. 2010;104(16):169601; 2010;104(16):169602; 2010;105(19):199604; 2010;105(19):199605.Google Scholar
Siebenbürger, M, Fuchs, M, Winter, H, Ballauff, M. Viscoelasticity and shear flow of concentrated, noncrystallizing colloidal suspensions: Comparison with mode-coupling theory. Journal of Rheology. 2009;53(3):707726.Google Scholar
Dawson, K, Foffi, G, Fuchs, M, Götze, W, Sciortino, F, Sperl, M, et al. Higher order glass-transition singularities in colloidal systems with attractive interactions. Physical Review E. 2000;63(1):011401.Google Scholar
Pham, KN, Puertas, AM, Bergenholtz, J, Egelhaaf, SU, Moussaïd, A, Pusey, PN, et al. Multiple glassy states in a simple model system. Science. 2002;296(5565):104106.Google Scholar
Ramírez-González, P, Medina-Noyola, M. General nonequilibrium theory of colloid dynamics. Physical Review E. 2010;82(6):061503.Google Scholar
Ramírez-González, P, Medina-Noyola, M. Aging of a homogeneously quenched colloidal glass-forming liquid. Physical Review E. 2010;82(6):061504.Google Scholar
Pérez-Ángel, G, Sánchez-Díaz, LE, Ramírez-González, PE, Juárez-Maldonado, R, Vizcarra-Rendón, A, Medina-Noyola, M. Equilibration of concentrated hard-sphere fluids. Physical Review E. 2011;83(6):060501(R).Google Scholar
Chen, YL, Schweizer, KS. Microscopic theory of gelation and elasticity in polymer–particle suspensions. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2004;120(15):72127222.Google Scholar
Fuchs, M, Mayr, MR. Aspects of the dynamics of colloidal suspensions: Further results of the mode-coupling theory of structural relaxation. Physical Review E. 1999;60(5):57425752.Google Scholar
Puertas, AM, De Michele, C, Sciortino, F, Tartaglia, P, Zaccarelli, E. Viscoelasticity and Stokes-Einstein relations in repulsive and attractive colloidal glasses. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2007;127(14):144906.Google Scholar
Bonn, D, Kegel, WK. Stokes-Einstein relations and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem in a supercooled colloidal fluid. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2003;118(4):20052009.Google Scholar
Rizzo, T, Voigtmann, T. Qualitative features at the glass crossover. Europhysics Letters. 2015;111(5):56008.Google Scholar
Fuchs, M, Cates, ME. Theory of nonlinear rheology and yielding of dense colloidal suspensions. Physical Review Letters. 2002;89(24):248304.Google Scholar
Fuchs, M, Cates, ME. A mode coupling theory for Brownian particles in homogeneous steady shear flow. Journal of Rheology. 2009;53(4):9571000.Google Scholar
Brader, JM, Siebenbürger, M, Ballauff, M, Reinheimer, K, Wilhelm, M, Frey, SJ, et al. Nonlinear response of dense colloidal suspensions under oscillatory shear: Mode-coupling theory and fourier transform rheology experiments. Physical Review E. 2010;82(6):061401.Google Scholar
Brader, JM, Cates, ME, Fuchs, M. First-principles constitutive equation for suspension rheology. Physical Review Letters. 2008;101(13):138301.Google Scholar
Brader, JM, Cates, ME, Fuchs, M. First-principles constitutive equation for suspension rheology. Physical Review E. 2012;86(2):021403.Google Scholar
Brader, JM, Voigtmann, T, Fuchs, M, Larson, RG, Cates, ME. Glass rheology: From mode-coupling theory to a dynamical yield criterion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA. 2009;106(36):1518615191.Google Scholar
Besseling, R, Weeks, ER, Schofield, AB, Poon, WCK. Three-dimensional imaging of colloidal glasses under steady shear. Physical Review Letters. 2007;99(2):028301.Google Scholar
Ovarlez, G, Barral, Q, Coussot, P. Three-dimensional jamming and flows of soft glassy materials. Nature Materials. 2010;9(2):115119.Google Scholar
Voigtmann, Th, Brader, JM, Fuchs, M, Cates, ME. Schematic mode coupling theory of glass rheology: Single and double step strains. Soft Matter. 2012;8(15):42444253.Google Scholar
Farage, TFF, Brader, JM. Three-dimensional flow of colloidal glasses. Journal of Rheology. 2012;56(2):259278.Google Scholar
Lindemann, FA. Ueber die Berechnung molekularer Eigenfrequenzen. Physikalische Zeitschrift. 1910;11(14):609612.Google Scholar
Ballauff, M, Brader, JM, Egelhaaf, SU, Fuchs, M, Horbach, J, Koumakis, N, et al. Residual stresses in glasses. Physical Review Letters. 2013;110(21):215701.Google Scholar
Cates, ME, Sollich, P. Tensorial constitutive models for disordered foams, dense emulsions, and other soft nonergodic materials. Journal of Rheology. 2004;48(1):193207.Google Scholar
Zausch, J, Horbach, J, Laurati, M, Egelhaaf, SU, Brader, JM, Voigtmann, Th, et al. From equilibrium to steady state: The transient dynamics of colloidal liquids under shear. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2008;20(40):404210.Google Scholar
Henrich, O, Weysser, F, Cates, ME, Fuchs, M. Hard discs under steady shear: Comparison of Brownian dynamics simulations and mode coupling theory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A. 2009;367(1909):50335050.Google Scholar
Amann, CP, Denisov, D, Dang, MT, Struth, B, Schall, P, Fuchs, M. Shear-induced breaking of cages in colloidal glasses: Scattering experiments and mode coupling theory. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2015;143(3):034505.Google Scholar
Krüger, M, Weysser, F, Fuchs, M. Tagged-particle motion in glassy systems under shear: Comparison of mode coupling theory and Brownian dynamics simulations. European Physical Journal E. 2011;34(9):88.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, K, Reichman, DR. Molecular hydrodynamic theory of supercooled liquids and colloidal suspensions under shear. Physical Review E. 2002;66(6):050501(R).Google Scholar
Miyazaki, K, Wyss, HM, Weitz, DA, Reichman, DR. Nonlinear viscoelasticity of metastable complex fluids. Europhysics Letters. 2006;75(6):915921.Google Scholar
Krüger, M, Fuchs, M. Fluctuation dissipation relations in stationary states of interacting Brownian particles under shear. Physical Review Letters. 2009;102(13):135701.Google Scholar
Krüger, M, Fuchs, M. Nonequilibrium fluctuation-dissipation relations of interacting Brownian particles driven by shear. Physical Review E. 2010;81(1):011408.Google Scholar
Seyboldt, R, Merger, D, Coupette, F, Siebenbürger, M, Ballauff, M, Wilhelm, M, et al. Divergence of the third harmonic stress response to oscillatory strain approaching the glass transition. Soft Matter. 2016;12(43):88258832.Google Scholar
Farage, TFF, Reinhardt, J, Brader, JM. Normal-stress coefficients and rod climbing in colloidal dispersions. Physical Review E. 2013;88(4):042303.Google Scholar
Schilling, R, Scheidsteger, T. Mode coupling approach to the ideal glass transition of molecular liquids: Linear molecules. Physical Review E. 1997;56(3):29322949.Google Scholar
Letz, M, Schilling, R, Latz, A. Ideal glass transitions for hard ellipsoids. Physical Review E. 2000;62(4):51735178.Google Scholar
Schilling, R. Reference-point-independent dynamics of molecular liquids and glasses in the tensorial formalism. Physical Review E. 2002;65(5):051206.Google Scholar
Chong, SH, Götze, W, Singh, AP. Mode-coupling theory for the glassy dynamics of a diatomic probe molecule immersed in a simple liquid. Physical Review E. 2000;63(1):011206.Google Scholar
Chong, SH, Götze, W. Idealized glass transitions for a system of dumbbell molecules. Physical Review E. 2002;65(4):041503.Google Scholar
Szamel, G, Flenner, E, Berthier, L. Glassy dynamics of athermal self-propelled particles: Computer simulations and a nonequilibrium microscopic theory. Physical Review E. 2015;91(6):062304.Google Scholar
Szamel, G. Theory for the dynamics of dense systems of athermal self-propelled particles. Physical Review E. 2016;93(1):012603.Google Scholar
Flenner, E, Szamel, G, Berthier, L. The nonequilibrium glassy dynamics of self-propelled particles. Soft Matter. 2016;12(34):71367149.Google Scholar
Liluashvili, A, Ónody, J, Voigtmann, Th. Mode-coupling theory for active Brownian particles. Physical Review E. 2017;96(6):062608.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×