Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:25:36.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Ethical issues in research and treatment of patients with mood disorders

from Part V - Economic and ethical issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

Jay D. Amsterdam
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Mady Hornig
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Andrew A. Nierenberg
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Patients with mood disorders pose ethical challenges for both the clinicians who treat them and the researchers who study them. Although many of those challenges are similar to those posed by other patients with mental illnesses, there are characteristics of mood disorders that present unique problems for issues of informed consent, competence, treatment plan adherence, and so on. Mood disorders may weaken a patient's capacity to make autonomous, informed decisions, and so impose a special moral duty on those who care for them or who involve them in research.

The field of bioethics has achieved consensus about the centrality of a few basic ethical principles and values which have been articulated by physicians, professional organizations, legislatures, and the courts over the last 40 years. Respect for the self determination and dignity of all patients, the need for free, uncoerced informed consent, the importance of patient confidentiality, the right to treatment, truthfulness in all dealings with patients and their families, and equity in the selection of research subjects and the distribution of any risk associated with research form the modern foundations of clinical and research ethics. While these values and principles apply to all patient populations, they have special implications in psychiatric populations.

Clinical issues

Patients with mood disorders present special ethical problems for the clinician. Depressed patients are often indecisive or resistant to treatment, which raises the dilemma of when to consider such resistance a reasonable refusal of consent and when the resistance is a product of the illness itself.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×