Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:56:11.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

36 - Interpreting canopy water balance and fog screen observations: separating cloud water from wind-blown rainfall at two contrasting forest sites in Hawai'i

from Part III - Hydrometeorology of tropical montane cloud forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

T. W. Giambelluca
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i, USA
J. K. DeLay
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i, USA
M. A. Nullet
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i, USA
M. Scholl
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, USA
S. B. Gingerich
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, USA
L. A. Bruijnzeel
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
F. N. Scatena
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
L. S. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

Based on field measurements made at dry (Auwahi) and wet (Waikamoi) cloud forest sites on the island of Maui, a preliminary analysis of fog gage measurements and wet-canopy water balance estimates was made. Accounting for effects of wind-blown rainfall and varying wind direction, estimates of cloud water flux were derived based on fog gage observations. Throughfall (TF) measurements, incident rainfall estimates, and calculated amounts of wet-canopy evaporation were used to estimate event totals of cloud water interception (CWI) by the vegetation at each site. Measured TF was about 37% of incident rainfall at Auwahi, and 119% at Waikamoi. At both sites TF was dominated by rainfall, but was significantly influenced by fog at Waikamoi only. Fog contributed at an average frequency of once every two days at Auwahi and about twice in three days at Waikamoi. Derived CWI totals were equivalent to 151 mm year–1 at Auwahi and 1073 mm year–1 at Waikamoi. At Auwahi, however, the majority of intercepted water was re-evaporated from the wet vegetation, and never reached the ground. Total CWI was related to fog screen catch and cloud water flux at Waikamoi, but not at Auwahi.

Type
Chapter
Information
Tropical Montane Cloud Forests
Science for Conservation and Management
, pp. 342 - 351
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beiderwieden, E., Wolff, V., Hsia, Y. J., and Klemm, O. (2008). It goes both ways: measurements of simultaneous evapotranspiration and fog droplet deposition at a montane cloud forest. Hydrological Processes 22: 4181–4189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, D. C. (1953). Raindrop size-distribution in Hawaiian rains. Journal of Meteorology 10: 457–473.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blocken, B., Carmeliet, J., and Poesen, J. (2005). Numerical simulation of the wind-driven rainfall distribution over small-scale topography in space and time. Journal of Hydrology 315: 252–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blocken, B., Poesen, J., and Carmeliet, J. (2006). Impact of wind on the spatial distribution of rain over micro-scale topography: numerical modeling and experimental verification. Hydrological Processes 20: 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, S. G., Gray, W. R., Pigott, L. D., et al. (1997). Rainfall redistribution over low hills due to flow perturbation. Journal of Hydrology 202: 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruijnzeel, L. A., Eugster, W., and Burkard, R. (2005). Fog as an input to the hydrological cycle. In Encyclopaedia of Hydrological Sciences, eds. Anderson, M. G. and McDonnell, J. J., pp. 559–582. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
García-Santos, G. (2007). An ecohydrological and soils study in a montane cloud forest in the National Park of Garajonay, La Gomera (Canary Islands, Spain). PhD Thesis, VU University Ámsterdam, Ámsterdam, The Netherlands. [http://www.falw.vu.nl/nl/onderzoek/earth-sciences/geo-environmental-science-and-hydrology/hydrology-dissertations/index.asp].
Gunn, R., and Kinzer, G. D. (1948). The terminal velocity of fall for water droplets in stagnant air. Journal of Meteorology 6: 243–248.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herwitz, S. R., and Slye, R. E. (1992). Spatial variation in the interception of inclined rainfall by a tropical rainforest canopy. Selbyana 13: 62–71.Google Scholar
Holwerda, F., Burkard, R., Eugster, W. E., et al. (2006). Estimating fog deposition at a Puerto Rican elfin cloud forest site: comparison of the water budget and eddy covariance methods. Hydrological Processes 20: 2669–2692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juvik, J. O., and Nullet, D. (1995a). Comments on a proposed standard fog collector for use in high elevation regions. Journal of Applied Meteorology 34: 2108–2110.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juvik, J. O., and Nullet, D. (1995b). Relationships between rainfall, cloud-water interception, and canopy throughfall in a Hawaiian montane forest. In Tropical Montane Cloud Forests, eds. Hamilton, L. S., Juvik, J. O., and Scatena, F. N., pp. 165–182. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, L., Tobón, C., Frumau, K. F. A., and Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2007). Biomass and water storage dynamics of epiphytes in old-growth and secondary montane rain forest stands in Costa Rica. Plant Ecology 193: 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McJannet, D., Wallace, J. S., and Reddell, P. (2007a). Precipitation interception in Australian tropical rainforests. I. Measurement of stemflow, throughfall and cloud interception. Hydrological Processes 21: 1692–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McJannet, D., Wallace, J. S., and Reddell, P. (2007b). Precipitation interception in Australian tropical rainforests. II. Altitudinal gradients of cloud interception, stemflow, throughfall and interception. Hydrological Processes 21: 1703–1718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, A. C., Loope, L. L., and Hobdy, B. W. (1995). Conservation of Cloud Forests in Maui County (Maui, Molokai, and Lanai), Hawaiian Islands. In Tropical Montane Cloud Forests, eds. Hamilton, L. S., Juvik, J. O., and Scatena, F. N., pp. 223–233. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, A. C., Davenport, C. F., and Chimera, C. G. (1998). Auwahi: Ethnobotany of a Hawaiian Dryland Forest, Technical Report No. 114. Honolulu, HI: Cooperative National Park Resource Studies Unit.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1973). Principles of Environmental Physics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K., and Smith, W. K. (2008). Impacts of cloud immersion on microclimate, photosynthesis and water relations of Abies fraseri (Pursh.) Poiret in a temperate mountain cloud forest. Oecologia 158: 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellekens, J., Scatena, F. N., Bruijnzeel, L. A., and Wickel, A. J. (1999). Modelling rainfall interception by a lowland tropical rainforest in northeastern Puerto Rico. Journal of Hydrology 225: 168–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellekens, J., Bruijnzeel, L. A., Scatena, F. N., Bink, N. J., and Holwerda, F. (2000). Evaporation from a tropical rain forest, Luquillo Experimental Forest, eastern Puerto Rico. Water Resources Research 36: 2183–2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schemenauer, R. S., and Cereceda, P. (1994). A proposed standard fog collector for use in high elevation regions. Journal of Applied Meteorology 33: 1313–1322.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharon, D. (1980). The distribution of effective rainfall incident on sloping ground. Journal of Hydrology 46: 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, W. L., Herbst, D. R., and Sohmer, S. H. (1999). Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawai'i. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Waterloo, M. J., Bruijnzeel, L. A., Vugts, H. F., and Rawaqa, T. T. (1999). Evaporation from Pinus caribaea plantations on former grassland soil under maritime tropical conditions. Water Resources Research 35: 2133–2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weathers, K. C., Lovett, G. M., and Likens, G. E. (1995). Cloud deposition to a spruce forest edge. Atmospheric Environment 29: 665–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×