Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T20:15:28.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

33 - Measuring cloud water interception in the Tambito forests of southern Colombia

from Part III - Hydrometeorology of tropical montane cloud forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

J. González
Affiliation:
King's College London, UK
L. A. Bruijnzeel
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
F. N. Scatena
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
L. S. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

This chapter discusses the results obtained with passive cloud water collectors installed at five elevations between 1400 and 2400 m.a.s.l. in the Tambito area of southern Colombia. Harp-based cloud water interception (CWI) proved significantly higher in the upper montane cloud forest (UMCF) zone (>2200 m.a.s.l.) compared to the lower montane cloud forest (LMCF) zone. Average CWI values ranged from 0.1 to 1.3 mm day−1 but there was no significant correlation between altitude and average CWI below the main cloud belt, presumably due to differences in exposure between sites. Furthermore, CWI exhibited differences in seasonality with elevation, with maximum CWI/rainfall ratios in the UMCF zone during the dry season and earlier in the year at lower elevations. In addition, a comparison of the wire harp to the more widely use method of measuring the excess throughfall minus rainfall was explored in the LMCF.

INTRODUCTION

Despite the importance of cloud water interception (CWI) to the water budget of tropical montane cloud forest (TMCF), its quantification remains difficult. Various types of artificial cloud water collectors have been used to monitor fog incidence at many TMCF sites (Bruijnzeel and Proctor, 1995; Bruijnzeel 2001), but there is no standard device to monitor CWI. Interpreting the results obtained with fog collectors is confounded by the difficulty to distinguish rainfall from fog (cf. Frumau et al., this volume; Giambelluca et al., this volume; Tanaka et al., this volume), whereas the fog catch of some types of gages is also affected by wind direction (Juvik and Nullet, 1995a; García-Santos, 2007).

Type
Chapter
Information
Tropical Montane Cloud Forests
Science for Conservation and Management
, pp. 317 - 323
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2001). Hydrology of tropical montane cloud forest: a reassessment. Land Use and Water Resources Research: 1: 1–18.Google Scholar
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2005). Tropical montane cloud forests: a unique hydrological case. In Forests, Water and People in the Humid Tropics, eds. Bonell, M. and Bruijnzeel, L. A., pp. 462–483. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruijnzeel, L. A., and Proctor, J. (1995). Hydrology and biogeochemistry of tropical montane cloud forests: what do we really know? In Tropical Montane Cloud Forests, eds. Hamilton, L. S., Juvik, J. O., and Scatena, F. N., pp. 38–78. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavelier, J., Solis, D., and Jaramillo, M. A. (1996). Fog interception in montane forests across the Central Cordillera of Panama. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, T. E. (1998). Fog in the California redwood forest: ecosystem inputs and use by plants. Oecologia 117: 476–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Santos, G. (2007). An ecohydrological and soils study in a montane cloud forest in the National Park of Garajonay, La Gomera (Canary Islands, Spain). PhD Thesis, VU University Ámsterdam, Ámsterdam, The Netherlands. [http://www.falw.vu.nl/nl/onderzoek/earth-sciences/geo-environmental-science-and-hydrology/hydrology-dissertations/index.asp].
González, J. (2000). Monitoring cloud interception in a tropical montane cloud forest of the Southwestern Colombian Andes. Advances in Environmental Monitoring and Modelling 1: 97–117. Also available at www.kcl.ac.uk/advances.Google Scholar
González, J. (2005). Cloud interception by trees in a tropical montane cloud forest of southwestern Colombia. Ph.D. thesis, King's College London, University of London, UK.
Goodman, J. (1985). The collection of fog drip. Water Resources Research 21: 392–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunow, H. (1952). Fog precipitation. Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes in der U.S. Zone, Bad Kissingen 35(42): 30–34.Google Scholar
Holder, C. D. (2003). Fog precipitation in the Sierra de las Minas Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Hydrological Processes 17: 2001–2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holwerda, F., Scatena, F. N., and Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2006). Throughfall in a Puerto Rican lower montane rain forest: a comparison of sampling strategies. Journal of Hydrology 327: 592–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juvik, J. O., and Nullet, D. (1995a). Comments on “a proposed standard fog collector for use in high elevation regions.”Journal of Applied Meteorology 34: 2108–2110.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juvik, J. O., and Nullet, D. (1995b). Relationships between rainfall, cloud-water interception and canopy throughfall in a Hawaiian montane forest. In Tropical Montane Cloud Forests, eds. Hamilton, L. S., Juvik, J. O., and Scatena, F. N., pp. 165–182. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, C. R., and Marques, A. O. (1988). Spatial variability of throughfall and stemflow measurements in Amazonian rain forest. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 42: 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, A. (1956). Fog precipitation on Table mountain. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 82: 452–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schemenauer, R. S., and Cereceda, P. (1994). A proposed standard fog collector for use in high elevation regions. Journal of Applied Meteorology 33: 1313–1322.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×