Bibliography

Henning Lahmann

doi:10.1017/9781108807050.015

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2020

Henning Lahmann

Show author details

Henning Lahmann: Affiliation:
Digital Society Institute, ESMT Berlin

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Unilateral Remedies to Cyber Operations
Self-Defence, Countermeasures, Necessity, and the Question of Attribution
, pp. 285 - 318

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108807050.015 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Ackerman, S, ‘Snowden: NSA Accidentally Caused Syria’s Internet Blackout in 2012’ Guardian (London, 13 August 2014) <www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/13/snowden-nsa-syria-internet-outage-civil-war>>Google Scholar

Agamben, G, State of Exception (2005)Google Scholar

Agius, M, ‘The Invocation of Necessity in International Law’ (2009) 56 Netherlands International Law Review 95Google Scholar

Ago, R, ‘Seventh Report on State Responsibility’ (International Law Commission 1978) A/CN4/307Google Scholar

Ago, R, ‘Eighth Report on State Responsibility’ (1980)Google Scholar

Ago, R, ‘Eighth Report on State Responsibility. Addendum: The Internationally Wrongful Act of the State, Source of International Responsibility (part I) (concluded)’ (United Nations 1980) A/CN4/318/ADD5-7Google Scholar

Albright, MK, ‘Enforcing International Law’ (1995) 89 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 574CrossRef Google Scholar

Alexander, K, Responses to Advance Questions, Nomination of Lt Gen. Keith Alexander for Commander, US Cyber Command, US Senate Armed Service Committee 2010Google Scholar

Alexandrov, SA, Self-Defense against the Use of Force in International Law (1996)Google Scholar

Alland, D, ‘The Definition of Countermeasures’ in Crawford, James and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 1127Google Scholar

Allott, P, ‘State Responsibility and the Unmaking of International Law’ (1988) 29 Harvard International Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Amerasinghe, CE, Evidence in International Litigation (2005)Google Scholar

Appelbaum, J and others, ‘Kontrollierte Eskalation’ Der Spiegel (Hamburg, 17 January 2015) <www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-131355081.html>Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, G, ‘Second Report on State Responsibility’ (International Law Commission 1989) A/CN4/425Google Scholar

Arimatsu, L, ‘A Treaty for Governing Cyber-Weapons: Potential Benefits and Practical Limitations’ in Czosseck, C, Ottis, E, and Ziolkowski, K (eds), 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict – Proceedings (2012) 91Google Scholar

Arntz, J, Der Begriff der Friedensbedrohung in Satzung und Praxis der Vereinten Nationen (1975)Google Scholar

Arquilla, J, ‘The Great Cyberwar of 2002’ Wired (San Francisco, 10 July 2002) <www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.02/cyberwar_pr.html>Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J, ‘Cyber Operations and International Law: An Interventionist Legal Thought’ (2016) ACIL Research Paper 2016-11 <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2765408>CrossRef >Google Scholar

Asthana, A and Mason, R, ‘Barack Obama: Brexit Would Put UK “Back of the Queue” for Trade Talks’ Guardian (London, 22 April 2016) <www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/22/barack-obama-brexit-uk-back-of-queue-for-trade-talks>Google Scholar

Aston, JD, ‘Die Bekämpfung abstrakter Gefahren für den Weltfrieden durch legislative Maßnahmen des Sicherheitsrats – Resolution 1373 (2001) im Kontext’ (2002) 62 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 257Google Scholar

Aust, HP, ‘Through the Prism of Diversity: The Articles on State Responsibility in the Light of the ILC Fragmentation Report’ (2006) 49 German Yearbook of International Law 165Google Scholar

Baade, B, ‘Fake News and International Law’ (2019) 29 European Journal of International Law 1357Google Scholar

Bambauer, DE, ‘Conundrum’ (2011) 96 Minnesota Law Review 584Google Scholar

Bamford, J, ‘The Secret War’ Wired (San Francisco, 12 June 2013) <www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/06/general-keith-alexander-cyberwar>Google Scholar

Bamford, J, ‘The Most Wanted Man in the World’ Wired (San Francisco, 22 August 2014) <www.wired.com/2014/08/edward-snowden/#ch-1>Google Scholar

Banks, WC, ‘The Bumpy Road to a Meaningful International Law of Cyber Attribution’ (2019) 113 AJIL Unbound 191Google Scholar

Baram, G and Sommer, U, ‘Covert or not Covert: National Strategies during Cyber Conflict’ in Minárik, T and others (eds), 2019 11th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (2019)Google Scholar

Barboza, J, ‘Necessity (Revisited) in International Law’ in Makarczyk, J (ed), Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs (1984) 27Google Scholar

Barkham, J, ‘Information Warfare and International Law on the Use of Force’ (2001) 34 New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 57Google Scholar

Barnes, B and Cieply, M, ‘Sony Drops “The Interview” following Terrorist Threats’ New York Times (New York, 17 December 2014) <www.nytimes.com/2014/12/18/business/sony-the-interview-threats.html?_r=0&module=inline>Google Scholar

Barnes, J and Stoll, RJ, ‘Preemptive and Preventive War: A Preliminary Taxonomy’ (2007) The James A Baker III Institute for Public Policy <research.policyarchive.org/6810.pdf>>Google Scholar

Barnidge, RP Jr, ‘States’ Due Diligence Obligations with Regard to International Non-state Terrorist Organisations Post-11 September 2001: The Heavy Burden That States Must Bear’ (2005) 16 Irish Studies in International Affairs 103Google Scholar

Barnidge, RP, ‘The Due Diligence Principle under International Law’ (2006) 8 International Community Law Review 81CrossRef Google Scholar

Barsotti, R, ‘Armed Reprisals’ in Cassese, Antonio (ed), The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force (1986) 79Google Scholar

Baumgärtner, M and others, ‘Hacker mit Dienstausweis‘ Der Spiegel (Hamburg, 23 November 2017) 31Google Scholar

Baumgärtner, M and others, ‘Wer will die Verantwortung übernehmen, Unschuldige zu töten?‘ Der Spiegel (Hamburg, 25 August 2018)Google Scholar

BBC, ‘On This Day: 1967: Supertanker Torrey Canyon Hits Rocks’ BBC News (16 March 1967) <http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/18/newsid_4242000/4242709.stm>>Google Scholar

BBC, ‘On This Day: 1967: Bombs Rain down on Torrey Canyon’ BBC News (29 March 1967) <http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/29/newsid_2819000/2819369.stm>>Google Scholar

Bederman, DJ, ‘Counterintuiting Countermeasures’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 817CrossRef Google Scholar

Beitz, CR, ‘Justice and International Relations’ (1975) 4 Philosophy & Public Affairs 360, 387Google Scholar

Benatar, M, ‘The Use of Cyber Force: Need for Legal Justification?’ (2009) 1 Goettingen Journal of International Law 375Google Scholar

Ben-Naftali, O and others, ‘Illegal Occupation: Framing the Occupied Palestinian Territory’ (2005) 23 Berkeley Journal of International Law 551Google Scholar

Bennett, T, ‘Distributed Denial of Service Attacks’ (2000) <www.linuxsecurity.com/resource_files/intrusion_detection/ddos-whitepaper.html>>Google Scholar

Benzing, M, ‘Das Beweisrecht vor internationalen Gerichten und Schiedsgerichten in zwischenstaatlichen Streitigkeiten’ (2010)Google Scholar

Benzing, M, ‘Evidentiary Issues’ in Zimmermann, Andreas (ed), The Statute of the ICJ (2nd edn, 2012) 1234Google Scholar

Berman, I, ‘The Iranian Cyber Threat to the US Homeland. Statement before the US House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies and Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence’ (26 April 2012) <http://homeland.house.gov/sites/homeland.house.gov/files/Testimony%20-%20Berman.pdf>>Google Scholar

Beuth, P and others, ‘Merkel and the Fancy Bear’ Die Zeit (Hamburg, 12 May 2017) <www.zeit.de/digital/2017-05/cyberattack-bundestag-angela-merkel-fancy-bear-hacker-russia/komplettansicht>Google Scholar

Bianchi, A, ‘Enforcing International Law Norms against Terrorism: Achievements and Prospects’ in Andrea Bianchi (ed), Enforcing International Law Norms against Terrorism (2004) 491Google Scholar

Bijleveld, A, ‘We Have to Steer the Cyber Domain, before It Steers Us’ (2018) <https://puc.overheid.nl/mrt/doc/PUC_248137_11/1>>Google Scholar

Bill, BJ, ‘The Rendulic “Rule”: Military Necessity, Commander’s Knowledge, and Methods of Warfare’ (2009) 12 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 119Google Scholar

Biller, J and Schmitt, MN, ‘Un-caging the Bear? A Case Study in Cyber Opinio Juris and Unintended Consequences’ (2018) EJIL Talk <www.ejiltalk.org/un-caging-the-bear-a-case-study-in-cyber-opinio-juris-and-unintended-consequences>>Google Scholar

Binder, C, ‘Nichterfüllung Völkerrechtlicher Vertragspflichten wegen Notstands. Der Notstand im Völkergewohnheitsrecht und in besonderen Vertragsbestimmungen’ in Stephan Wittich, August Reinisch, and Andrea Gattini (eds), Kosovo – Staatsschulden – Notstand – EU-Reformvertrag – Humanitätsrecht. Beiträge zum 33. Österreichischen Völkerrechtstag 2008 in Conegliano (2008) 119Google Scholar

Binder, C, ‘Non Performance of Treaty Obligations in Cases of Necessity: From “Necessity Knows No Law” via the “Law(s) of Necessity” to Interfaces between Different “Laws of Necessity”’ (2008) 13 Austrian Review of International and European Law 3Google Scholar

Bing, C and Lynch, SN, ‘U.S. Charges North Korean Hacker in Sony, WannaCry Cyberattacks’ (Reuters, 6 September 2018) <www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-northkorea-sony/u-s-charges-north-korean-hacker-in-sony-wannacry-cyberattacks-idUSKCN1LM20W>>Google Scholar

Bjorklund, AK, ‘Emergency Exceptions: State of Necessity and Force Majeure’ in Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino, and Christoph Schreuer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (2008) 459Google Scholar

Boed, R, ‘State of Necessity as a Justification for Internationally Wrongful Conduct’ (2000) 1 Yale Human Rights & Development Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Bolton, J, ‘Overthrowing Saddam Hussein Was the Right Move for the US and Its Allies’ Guardian (London, 26 February 2013) <www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/26/iraq-war-was-justified?commentpage=1>Google Scholar

Boon, K, ‘The UN Security Council Takes up Ebola’ (2014) Opinio Juris <http://opiniojuris.org/2014/09/18/un-security-council-takes-ebola>>Google Scholar

Borelli, S and Olleson, S, ‘Obligations Relating to Human Rights and Humanitarian Law’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 1177Google Scholar

Borgen, CJ, ‘The Language of Law and the Practice of Politics: Great Powers and the Rhetoric of Self-Determination in the Cases of Kosovo and South Ossetia’ (2009) 10 Chicago Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Borgen, CJ, ‘The Crimea, Compliance, and the Constraint of International Law’ Opinio Juris (3 March 2014) <http://opiniojuris.org/2014/03/03/crimea-compliance-constraint-international-law>>Google Scholar

Borger, J, ‘As France Becomes Latest Target, Are Election Hacks the New Normal?’ Guardian (London, 6 May 2017) <www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/05/french-election-hack-emmanuel-macron>Google Scholar

Bork, R, Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuchs (3rd edn, 2011)Google Scholar

Bothe, M, ‘Terrorism and the Legality of Pre-emptive Force’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law 227Google Scholar

Bothe, M, ‘Oil Platforms Case’ in R Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Bradner, E, ‘Obama: North Korea’s Hack Not War, but “Cybervandalism”’ (CNN Online, 24 December 2014) <http://edition.cnn.com/2014/12/21/politics/obama-north-koreas-hack-not-war-but-cyber-vandalism>>Google Scholar

Brenner, SW, ‘“At Light Speed”: Attribution and Response to Cybercrime/Terrorism/Warfare’ (2007) 97 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 379Google Scholar

Brewster, T, ‘An NSA Cyber Weapon Might be behind a Massive Global Ransomware Outbreak’ Forbes (Jersey City, 12 May 2017) <www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2017/05/12/nsa-exploit-used-by-wannacry-ransomware-in-global-explosion/#18cc790ae599>Google Scholar

Brown, D, ‘A Proposal for an International Convention to Regulate the Use of Information Systems in Armed Conflict’ (2006) 47 Harvard International Law Journal 179Google Scholar

Brown, GD and Tullos, OW, ‘On the Spectrum of Cyberspace Operations’ Small Wars Journal (11 December 2012) <http://smallwarsjournal.com/print/13595>>Google Scholar

Brownlie, I, ‘International Law and the Activities of Armed Bands’ (1958) 7 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 712Google Scholar

Brownlie, I, International Law and the Use of Force by States (1963)Google Scholar

Brownlie, I, Principles of Public International Law (7th edn, 2008)Google Scholar

Brunée, J, ‘The Kyoto Protocol: Testing Ground for Compliance Theories?’ (2003) 63 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 255Google Scholar

Buffard, I and Wittich, S, ‘United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran Case (United States of America v Iran)’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Bumgarner, J and Borg, S, ‘Overview by the US-CCU of the Cyber Campaign against Georgia in August of 2008’ (2009) <www.registan.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/US-CCU-Georgia-Cyber-Campaign-Overview.pdf>>Google Scholar

Burke-White, WW and von Staden, A, ‘Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2008) 48 Virginia Journal of International Law 307Google Scholar

Calamita, NJ, ‘Sanctions, Countermeasures, and the Iranian Nuclear Issue’ (2009) 42 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1393Google Scholar

Calamita, NJ, ‘Countermeasures and Jurisdiction: Between Effectiveness and Fragmentation’ (2011) 42 Georgetown Journal of International Law 233Google Scholar

Caltagirone, SP, ‘Active Response’ (2005) <www.classstudio.com/scaltagi/papers/professional_papers/msthesis/sergioThesis.pdf>>Google Scholar

Caltagirone, SP and Frincke, D, ‘ADAM: Active Defense Algorithm and Model’ in Wyler, NR and Byrne, G (eds), Aggressive Network Self-Defense (2005) 287Google Scholar

Caltagirone, SP and Frincke, D, ‘ADAM: Active Defense Algorithm and Model’ in Wyler, NR and Byrne, G ‘The Response Continuum’, Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Information Assurance and Security, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY (2005)Google Scholar

Calvo, A, ‘Cyberwar Is War: A Critique of “Hacking Can Reduce Real-World Violence”’ (2014) Small Wars Journal <http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/cyberwar-is-war>>Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, E, ‘The Role of Proportionality in the Law of International Countermeasures’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 889Google Scholar

Caplan, LM, ‘State Immunity, Human Rights, and Jus Cogens: A Critique of the Normative Hierarchy Theory’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 741CrossRef Google Scholar

Carr, J, Inside Cyberwarfare (2nd edn, 2012)Google Scholar

Carr, J ‘Who’s Responsible for the Saudi Aramco Network Attack?’ (Infosec Island, 2012) <www.infosecisland.com/blogview/22290-Whos-Responsible-for-the-Saudi-Aramco-Network-Attack.html>>Google Scholar

Carr, J ‘Mandiant APT1 Report has Critical Analytic Flaws’ (Digital Dao, 2013) <http://jeffreycarr.blogspot.de/2013/02/mandiant-apt1-report-has-critical.html>>Google Scholar

Cassese, A, ‘A Judicial Massacre’ Guardian (London, 27 February 2007) <www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/feb/27/thejudicialmassacreofsrebr>Google Scholar

Cassese, A, ‘The Nicaragua and Tadić Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 649Google Scholar

Chaikin, D, ‘Network Investigation of Cyberattacks: The Limits of Digital Evidence’ (2006) 46 Crime, Law & Social Change 239Google Scholar

Chandler, JA, ‘Security in Cyberspace: Combatting Distributed Denial of Service Attacks’ (2004) 1 University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal 231Google Scholar

Charney, S, Rethinking the Cyber Threat: A Framework and Path Forward (2009) <www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=747>>Google Scholar

Chen, LC, An Introduction to Contemporary International Law: A Policy-Oriented Perspective (1989)Google Scholar

Chesney, R, ‘Hackback Is Back: Assessing the Active Cyber Defense Certainty Act’ (Lawfare, 2019) <www.lawfareblog.com/hackback-back-assessing-active-cyber-defense-certainty-act>>Google Scholar

Chesterman, S, ‘Secret Intelligence’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Chinkin, C, ‘Jus Cogens, Article 103 of the UN Charter and Other Hierarchical Techniques of Conflict Solution’ (2006) 17 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 63Google Scholar

Chong, J, ‘Bad Code: Should Software Makers Pay? Part 1’ (New Republic, 3 October 2013) <https://newrepublic.com/article/114973/bad-code-should-software-makers-pay-part-1>>Google Scholar

Christakis, T, ‘Intervention and Self-Help’ in Bannelier, K, Christakis, T, and Heathcote, S (eds), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (2012) 211Google Scholar

Christie, GC, ‘The Defense of Necessity Considered from the Legal and Moral Points of View’ (1999) 48 Duke Law Journal 975Google Scholar

Cirincione, J and others, ‘WMD in Iraq: Evidence and Implications’ (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 2004)Google Scholar

Clapper, JR, ‘Unclassified Statement for the Record on the Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’ (2012) <www.intelligence.senate.gov/120131/clapper.pdf>>Google Scholar

Clark, DD and Landau, S, ‘Untangling Attribution’ (2011) 2 Harvard National Security Journal 323Google Scholar

Clearwater, S, ‘Holding States Accountable for the Crime of Crimes: An Analysis of Direct State Responsibility for Genocide in Light of the ICJ’s 2007 Decision in Bosnia v Serbia’ (2009) 15 Auckland University Law Review 1Google Scholar

Condorello, L and Kreß, C, ‘The Rules of Attribution: General Considerations’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 221Google Scholar

Condron, SM, ‘Getting It Right: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure in Cyberspace’ (2007) 20 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology <http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/v20/20HarvJLTech403.pdf>Google Scholar

Corten, O, ‘L’état de Nécessité Peut-Il Justifier Un Recours À La Force Non Constitutif D’agression?’ (2004) 4 Global Community Yearbook of International Law & Jurisprudence 11Google Scholar

Corten, O, The Law against War (2010)Google Scholar

Corten, O, ‘Judge Simma’s Separate Opinion in the Oil Platforms Case: To What Extent Are Armed “Proportionate Defensive Measures” Admissible in Contemporary International Law?’ in Fastenrath, U and others (eds), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (2011) 843Google Scholar

Couzigou, I, ‘The Challenges Posed by Cyberattacks to the Law on Self-Defence’ (2014) European Society of International Law, 10th Anniversary ConferenceGoogle Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘Revising the Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 435Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘Second Report on State Responsibility’ (International Law Commission, 1999) A/CN4/498Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘Second Report on State Responsibility – Addendum 2’ (International Law Commission, 1999) A/CN4/498/Add2Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘Third Report on State Responsibility’ (International Law Commission, 2000) A/CN4/507Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘Third Report on State Responsibility – Addendum 3’ (International Law Commission, 2000) A/CN4/507/Add3Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘Fourth Report on State Responsibility’ (International Law Commission, 2001) A/CN4/517Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘Fourth Report on State Responsibility – Addendum’ (International Law Commission, 2001) A/CN4/517/Add1Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 874Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction’ in The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (2002) 1Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘State Responsibility’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Crawford, J and Olleson, S, ‘The Nature and Forms of International Responsibility’ in Evans, MD (ed), International Law (3rd edn, 2010) 441Google Scholar

Crayford, JV, ‘Forthcoming Changes to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL 73/78)’ in Nordquist, MH and Moore, JN (eds), Current Maritime Issues and the International Maritime Organization (1999) 133Google Scholar

Crimm, NJ, ‘Post-September 11 Fortified Anti-Terrorism Measures Compel Heightened Due Diligence’ (2005) 25 Pace Law Review 203Google Scholar

Czosseck, C, Klein, G, and Leder, F, ‘On the Arms Race around Botnets: Setting up and Taking down Botnets’ in Czosseck, C, Tyugu, E, and Wingfield, T (eds), 2011 3rd International Conference on Cyber Conflict – Proceedings (2011) 107 <www.ccdcoe.org/publications/2011proceedings/2011_Proceedings.pdf>>Google Scholar

Dainotti, A and others, ‘Analysis of Country-Wide Internet Outages Caused by Censorship’ (2011) <www.caida.org/publications/papers/2011/outages_censorship/outages_censorship.pdf>>Google Scholar

Damrosch, LF, ‘Retaliation or Arbitration – or Both? The 1978 United States–France Aviation Dispute’ (1980) 74 American Journal of International Law 785Google Scholar

Damrosch, LF, ‘Enforcing International Law through Non-forcible Measures’ (1997) 269 Recueil Des Cours 19Google Scholar

D’Argent, P, ‘Reparation and Compliance’ in Bannelier, K, Christakis, T, and Heathcote, S (eds), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (2012) 335Google Scholar

Davis, J, ‘Hackers Take down the Most Wired Country in Europe’ Wired (San Francisco, 21 August 2007) <www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/15-09/ff_estonia?currentPage=all>Google Scholar

Deeks, AS, ‘“Unwilling or Unable”: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense’ (2012) 52 Virginia Journal of International Law 483Google Scholar

De Hoogh, AJJ, ‘Article 4 and 8 of the 2001 ILC Articles on State Responsibility, the Tadić Case and Attribution of Acts of Bosnian Serb Authorities to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’ (2002) 72 British Yearbook of International Law 255CrossRef Google Scholar

de Jong-Chen, J and O’Brien, B, A Comparative Study: The Approach to Critical Infrastructure Protection in the US, E.U., and China (2017)Google Scholar

De La Fayette, L, ‘ITLOS and the Saga of the Saiga: Peaceful Settlement of a Law of the Sea Dispute’ (2000) 15 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 355Google Scholar

Del Mar, K, ‘The ICJ and Standards of Proof’ in Bannelier, K, Christakis, T, and Heathcote, S (eds), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (2012) 98Google Scholar

Demarest, GB, ‘Espionage in International Law’ (1996) 24 Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 321Google Scholar

Desierto, DA, Necessity and National Emergency Clauses: Sovereignty in Modern Treaty Interpretation (2012)CrossRef Google Scholar

de Wilde, M, ‘The State of Emergency in the Weimar Republic: Legal Disputes over Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution’ (2010) 78 Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 135Google Scholar

Diehl, J and Reinbold, F, ‘Wenn der Staat zum Hacker wird’ Spiegel Online (Hamburg, 10 December 2017) <www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/hackback-wenn-der-staat-zum-hacker-werden-will-a-1179423.html>Google Scholar

Diggelmann, O, ‘Fault in the Law of State Responsibility: Pragmatism Ad Infinitum?’ (2006) 49 German Yearbook of International Law 293Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y, ‘Computer Network Attacks and Self-Defense’ in Schmitt, MN and O’Donnell, BT (eds), Computer Network Attack and International Law (2002) 76–99Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y, War, Aggression and Self-Defence (5th edn, 2012)Google Scholar

Dittmar, F, Angriffe Auf Computernetzwerke: Ius Ad Bellum Und Ius in Bello (2005)Google Scholar

Dittrich, D and Himma, KE, ‘Active Response to Computer Intrusions’ in Bidgoli, H (ed), The Handbook of Information Security (2005) 664Google Scholar

Diurni, A, ‘Schädigende Nothilfe: Haftungszurechnung im Europäischen Privatrecht’ (2006) Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht 583Google Scholar

Donilon, T, ‘The United States and the Asia-Pacific in 2013’ (2013) <www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/03/11/remarks-tom-donilon-national-security-advisory-president-united-states-a>>Google Scholar

Dörr, O, ‘Use of Force, Prohibition of’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Drumbl, MA, ‘Trail Smelter and the International Law Commission’s Work on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts and State Liability’ in Bratspies, RM and Miller, RA (eds), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration (2006) 85Google Scholar

Dupont, PE, ‘Countermeasures and Collective Security: The Case of the EU Sanctions against Iran’ (2012) 17 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 301Google Scholar

Dupuy, PM and Hoss, C, ‘Trail Smelter and Terrorism: International Mechanisms to Combat Transboundary Harm’ in Bratspies, RM and Miller, RA (eds), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration (2006) 225Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D, ‘Schmitt v. Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order?’ (2006) 27 Cardozo Law Review 2005Google Scholar

Dzidzornu, DM and Tsamenyi, BM, ‘Enhancing International Control of Vessel-Source Oil Pollution under the Law of the Sea Convention, 1982: A Reassessment’ (1991) 10 University of Tasmania Law Review 269Google Scholar

Egloff, FJ and Wenger, A, ‘Public Attribution of Cyber Incidents’ CSS Analyses in Security Policy (Zurich, 2019)Google Scholar

Elagab, OY, The Legality of Non-forcible Counter-Measures in International Law (1988)Google Scholar

Emanuelli, CC, ‘The Right of Intervention of Coastal States on the High Seas in Cases of Pollution Casualties’ (1976) 25 UNB Law Journal 79Google Scholar

Ernst, N, ‘Digitale Selbstschussanlage der NSA Gegen DDoS-Attacken’ (Golem.de, 13 January 2015) <www.golem.de/news/snowden-unterlagen-digitale-selbstschussanlage-der-nsa-gegen-ddos-attacken-1501-111648.html>>Google Scholar

Evron, G, ‘Battling Botnets and Online Mobs: Estonia’s Defense Efforts during the Internet War’ (2008) 9 Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 121Google Scholar

Falk, RA, ‘The Beirut Raid and the International Law of Retaliation’ (1969) 63 American Journal of International Law 415Google Scholar

Falliere, N, O’Murchu, L, and Chien, E, ‘W32.Stuxnet Dossier’ (Symantec, 2011) <www.symantec.com/content/en/us/enterprise/media/security_response/whitepapers/w32_stuxnet_dossier.pdf>>Google Scholar

Feder, NM, ‘Reading the U.N. Charter Connotatively: Toward a New Definition of Armed Attack’ (1987) 19 New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 395Google Scholar

Finlay, L and Payne, C, ‘The Attribution Problem and Cyber Armed Attacks’ (2019) AJIL Unbound 202Google Scholar

Fischerkeller, MP and Harknett, RJ, ‘A Response on Persistent Engagement and Agreed Competition’ (Lawfare, 2019) <www.lawfareblog.com/response-persistent-engagement-and-agreed-competition>>Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, GG, ‘Arbitration between Portugal and Germany concerning War Damage Committed Prior to Portugal’s Entry into the War’ (1932) 13 British Yearbook of International Law 156Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Necessity in International Environmental Law’ (2010) 41 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 159Google Scholar

Fleck, D, ‘Individual and State Responsibility for Intelligence Gathering’ (2007) 28 Michigan Journal of International Law 687Google Scholar

Follath, E and Stark, H, ‘The Story of “Operation Orchard”: How Israel Destroyed Syria’s Al Kibar Nuclear Reactor’ Der Spiegel (Hamburg, 2 November 2009) <www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-story-of-operation-orchard-how-israel-destroyed-syria-s-al-kibar-nuclear-reactor-a-658663.html>Google Scholar

Forbrig, J, ‘Russian Hackers Can’t Beat German Democracy’ (Foreign Policy, 3 August 2017) <https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/03/russian-hackers-cant-beat-german-democracy-putin-merkel>>Google Scholar

Forteau, M, ‘Reparation in the Event of a Circumstance Precluding Wrongfulness’ in Crawford, James and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 887Google Scholar

Foster, C, ‘Necessity and Precaution in International Law: Responding to Oblique Forms of Urgency’ (2008) 23 New Zealand Universities Law Review 265Google Scholar

Foster, C, Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and Tribunals (2011)Google Scholar

Franck, TM, Recourse to Force: State Action against Threats and Armed Attacks (2002)Google Scholar

Franck, TM, ‘Reflections on Force and Evidence’ (2006) 100 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 51Google Scholar

Franck, TM, ‘On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 715Google Scholar

Freestone, D and Hey, E, The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation (1996)Google Scholar

Gallagher, S, ‘Eternally Blue: Baltimore City Leaders Blame NSA for Ransomware Attack’ (Ars Technica, 28 May 2019) <https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/05/eternally-blue-baltimore-city-leaders-blame-nsa-for-ransomware-attack>>Google Scholar

Gartzke, E, ‘The Myth of Cyberwar: Bringing War in Cyberspace Back down to Earth’ (2013) 38 International Security 41Google Scholar

Garwood-Gowers, A, ‘Israel’s Airstrike on Syria’s Al-Kibar Facility: A Test Case for the Doctrine of Pre-emptive Self-Defence?’ (2011) 16 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 263Google Scholar

Gattini, A, ‘La Notion de Faute a La Lumière Du Projet de Convention de La Commission Du Droit International Sur La Responsabilité Internationale’ (1992) 3 European Journal of International Law 253Google Scholar

Gattini, A, ‘Smoking/No Smoking: Some Remarks on the Current Place of Fault in the ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 397Google Scholar

Gattini, A, ‘Breach of the Obligation to Prevent and Reparation Thereof in the ICJ’s Genocide Judgment’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 695Google Scholar

Gattini, A, ‘Evidentiary Issues in the ICJ’s Genocide Judgment’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 889Google Scholar

Gaycken, S, ‘The Necessity of (Some) Certainty: A Critical Remark concerning Matthew Sklerov’s Concept of “Active Defense”’ (2010) 12 Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 1Google Scholar

Gaycken, S, ‘Krieg der Rechner’ (2011) Internationale Politik 88Google Scholar

Gaycken, S, Cyberwar: Das Wettrüsten hat längst begonnen. Vom digitalen Angriff zum realen Ausnahmezustand (2012)Google Scholar

Gazzini, T, The Changing Rules on the Use of Force in International Law (2005)Google Scholar

Gazzini, T and others, ‘Necessity across International Law: An Introduction’ (2010) 41 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 3Google Scholar

Geiß, R and Lahmann, H, ‘Freedom and Security in Cyberspace: Shifting the Focus Away from Military Responses towards Non-forcible Countermeasures and Collective Threat-Prevention’ in Ziolkowski, K (ed), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy (2013) 621Google Scholar

Giles, K, ‘Russia’s Public Stance on Cyberspace Issues’ in Czosseck, C, Ottis, R, and Zielkowski, K (eds), 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict – Proceedings (2012) 63Google Scholar

Giorgio, EJ, ‘Planning for the Future of Cyberattack Attribution’ (US House of Representatives Committee on Science and Technology, 2010)Google Scholar

Glennon, MJ, ‘The Road Ahead: Gaps, Leaks and Drips’ (2013) 89 International Law Studies 362Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J, Cybersecurity Treaties: A Skeptical View (2011) <http://media.hoover.org/sites/default/files/documents/FutureChallenges_Goldsmith.pdf>>Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J, ‘A Modest Defense of the Government’s Legal and Policy Confusion Re Sony’ (Lawfare, 23 December 2014) <www.lawfareblog.com/2014/12/a-modest-defense-of-the-governments-legal-and-policy-confusion-re-sony>>Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J and Levinson, D, ‘Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law’ (2009) 122 Harvard Law Review 1791Google Scholar

Gorman, S and Barnes, JE, ‘Iran Blamed for Cyberattacks’ Wall Street Journal (New York, 12 October 2012) <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444657804578052931555576700.html>Google Scholar

Gorman, S and Yadron, D, ‘Iran Hacks Energy Firms, US Says’ Wall Street Journal (New York, 24 May 2013) A4Google Scholar

Graham, DE, ‘Cyber Threats and the Law of War’ (2010) 4 Journal of National Security Law & Policy 87Google Scholar

Gray, CD, Judicial Remedies in International Law (1987)Google Scholar

Gray, CD, International Law and the Use of Force (3rd edn, 2008)Google Scholar

Gray, CD, ‘The Different Forms of Reparation: Restitution’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 589Google Scholar

Green, JA, ‘Docking the Caroline: Understanding the Relevance of the Formula in Contemporary Customary International Law concerning Self-Defence’ (2006) 14 Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law 429Google Scholar

Green, JA, The ICJ and Self-Defence in International Law (2009)Google Scholar

Green, JA, ‘Fluctuating Evidentary Standards for Self-Defence in the ICJ’ (2009) 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 163Google Scholar

Green, JA, ‘Questioning the Peremptory Status of the Prohibition of the Use of Force’ (2011) 32 Michigan Journal of International Law 215Google Scholar

Greenawalt, K, ‘The Perplexing Borders of Justification and Excuse’ (1984) 84 Columbia Law Review 1897Google Scholar

Greenberg, A, ‘“Crash Override”: The Malware That Took down a Power Grid’ Wired (San Francisco, 12 June 2017) <www.wired.com/story/crash-override-malware>Google Scholar

Greenberg, A, ‘The Untold Story of NotPetya, the Most Devastating Cyberattack in History’ Wired (San Francisco, 22 August 2018) <www.wired.com/story/notpetya-cyberattack-ukraine-russia-code-crashed-the-world>Google Scholar

Greenwald, G, ‘Obama Orders US to Draw up Overseas Target List for Cyber-Attacks’ Guardian (London, 7 June 2013) <www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/07/obama-china-targets-cyber-overseas>Google Scholar

Greenwood, C, ‘Self-Defence’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Griebel, J and Plücken, M, ‘Hague International Tribunals: ICJ – New Developments Regarding the Rules of Attribution? The ICJ’s Decision in Bosnia v. Serbia’ (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law 601Google Scholar

Grindal, K and others., ‘Is It Time to Institutionalize Cyber-Attribution?’ (2018) Internet Governance Project White Paper <www.internetgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/WhitePaper-Attribution-Final-PDF.pdf>>Google Scholar

Groll, E, ‘Cyberattack Targets Safety System at Saudi Aramco’ (Foreign Policy, 21 December 2017) <https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/12/21/cyber-attack-targets-safety-system-at-saudi-aramco>>Google Scholar

Gross, E, ‘Use of Civilians as Human Shields: What Legal and Moral Restrictions Pertain to a War Waged by a Democratic State against Terrorism?’ (2002) 16 Emory International Law Review 445Google Scholar

Grosswald, L, ‘Cyberattack Attribution Matters under Article 51 of the U.N. Charter’ (2011) 36 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 1151Google Scholar

Hack, G, ‘Das Internet Als Militärisches System’ (2015) 69 Merkur 81Google Scholar

Haddick, R, ‘This Week at War: Lessons from Cyberwar I’ (Foreign Policy, 28 January 2011) <http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/01/28/this-week-at-war-lessons-from-cyberwar-i>>Google Scholar

Haferkamp, H-P, ‘Ausübung der Rechte, Selbstverteidigung, Selbsthilfe’ in Schmoeckel, M, Rückert, J, and Zimmermann, R (eds), Historisch-kritischer Kommentar zum BGB, Band I: Allgemeiner Teil (2003) §§ 226–231Google Scholar

Hahn, MJ, ‘Vital Interests and the Law of GATT: An Analysis of GATT’s Security Exception’ (1991) 12 Michigan Journal of International Law 558Google Scholar

Hailbronner, K and Heilmann, D, ‘Aerial Incident Cases before International Courts and Tribuals’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Halloran, R, ‘The Downing of Flight 655: US Downs Iran Airliner Mistaken for F-14; 290 Reported Dead; A Tragedy, Reagan Says; Action Is Defended’ New York Times (New York, 4 July 1988) <www.nytimes.com/1988/07/04/world/downing-flight-655-us-downs-iran-airliner-mistaken-for-f-14-290-reported-dead.html>Google Scholar

Hathaway, OA and others, ‘The Law of Cyber-Attack’ (2012) 100 California Law Review 817Google Scholar

Newman, L Hay, ‘The Iran Hacks Cybersecurity Experts Feared May be Here’ Wired (San Francisco, 18 December 2018) <www.wired.com/story/iran-hacks-nuclear-deal-shamoon-charming-kitten>Google Scholar

Heathcote, S, ‘Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in the ILC Articles on State Responsibility: Necessity’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 491Google Scholar

Heathcote, S, ‘Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in the ILC Articles on State Responsibility: Necessity’ in Crawford, J ‘State Omissions and Due Diligence: Aspects of Fault, Damage and Contribution to Injury in the Law of State Responsibility’ in Bannelier, K, Christakis, T, and Heathcote, S (eds), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (2012) 295Google Scholar

Heintschel von Heinegg, W, ‘Blockade’ in R Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Heintschel von Heinegg, W, ‘Die völkerrechtlichen Verträge als Hauptrechtsquelle des Völkerrechts’ in Ipsen, K (ed), Völkerrecht (6th edn, 2014) 390Google Scholar

Heintschel von Heinegg, W and Epping, V, ‘Friedenssicherung und friedliche Streitbeilegung’ in Ipsen, K (ed), Völkerrecht (6th edn, 2014) 1055Google Scholar

Henckaerts, J-M and Doswald-Beck, L, Customary International Humanitarian Law, vol I: Rules (2005)Google Scholar

Henkin, L, How Nations Behave (2nd edn, 1979)Google Scholar

Henriksen, A, ‘Jus Ad Bellum and American Targeted Use of Force to Fight Terrorism around the World’ (2014) 19 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 211Google Scholar

Henriksen, A, ‘The End of the Road for the UN GGE Process: The Future of Regulation of Cyberspace’ (2019) 5 Journal of Cybersecurity 1Google Scholar

Herpig, S, ‘Governmental Vulnerability Assessment and Management’ (SNV, 2018) <www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/files/vulnerability_management.pdf> 18+18>Google Scholar

Hessbruegge, JA, ‘The Historical Development of the Doctrines of Attribution and Due Diligence in International Law’ (2004) 36 New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 265Google Scholar

Hinck, G and Maurer, T, ‘What’s the Point of Charging Foreign State-Linked Hackers?’ (Lawfare, 2019) <www.lawfareblog.com/whats-point-charging-foreign-state-linked-hackers>>Google Scholar

Hinkle, KC, ‘Countermeasures in the Cyber Context: One More Thing to Worry About’ (2011) 37 Yale Journal of International Law Online 11Google Scholar

Hitchens, T, Lewis, JA, and Neuneck, G, ‘Foreword & Introduction’ in United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (ed), The Cyber Index: International Security Trends and Reality (2013)Google Scholar

Hobbes, T, Leviathan (1935)Google Scholar

Hoisington, M, ‘Cyberwarfare and the Use of Force Giving Rise to the Right of Self-Defense’ (2009) 32 Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 439Google Scholar

Hollis, DB, ‘Why States Need an International Law for Information Operations’ (2007) 11 Lewis & Clark Law Review 1023Google Scholar

Hollis, DB, ‘An E-SOS for Cyberspace’ (2011) 52 Harvard International Law Journal 373Google Scholar

Hollis, DB, ‘Re-thinking the Boundaries of Law in Cyberspace: A Duty to Hack?’ in Ohlin, JD, Govern, K, and Finkelstein, C (eds), Cyberwar: Law & Ethics for Virtual Conflicts (2015) 129Google Scholar

Hopkins, N, ‘Computer Worm that Hit Iran Oil Terminals “Is Most Complex Yet”’ Guardian (London, 28 May 2012) <www.theguardian.com/world/2012/may/28/computer-worm-iran-oil-w32flamer>Google Scholar

Hoss, C, ‘Satisfaction’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Hoyer, W, ‘Opening Speech of the Conference: Challenges in Cybersecurity – Risks, Strategies, and Confidence-Building’ (2011) <www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Infoservice/Presse/Reden/2011/111213-StM_H_Cybersecurity.html>>Google Scholar

Hunker, J, ‘US International Policy for Cybersecurity: Five Issues That Won’t Go Away’ (2010) 4 Journal of National Security Law & Policy 197Google Scholar

Hunker, J, Hutchinson, R, and Margulies, J, ‘Attribution of Cyberattacks on Process Control Systems’ (2008) Critical Infrastructure Protection II 87Google Scholar

Ignatius, D, ‘Putin Steals the CIA’s Playbook on Anti-Soviet Covert Operations’ Washington Post (Washington, DC, 9 April 2014) <www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/david-ignatius-putin-steals-from-the-cias-playbook-with-anti-soviet-covert-operations/2014/04/08/2fd4f73a-bf57-11e3-b195-dd0c1174052c_story.html>Google Scholar

Information Warfare Monitor, ‘Tracking GhostNet: Investigating a Cyberespionage Network’ (2009) <www.infowar-monitor.net/2009/09/tracking-ghostnet-investigating-a-cyber-espionage-network>>Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘State Responsibility: Comments and Observations Received from Governments’ (1998) A/CN4/488Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Fiftieth Session (1998). Topical Summary of the Discussion Held in the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly during Its Fifty-Third Session Prepared by the Secretariat’ (1999) A/CN4/496Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Fifty-First Session, 3 May–23 July 1999, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty Fourth Session, Supplement No 10’ (1999) A/54/10 <http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/reports/english/A_54_10.pdf>>Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Fifty-First Session. Topical Summary of the Discussion Held in the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly during Its Fifty-Fourth Session Prepared by the Secretariat’ (2000) A/CN4/504Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities, with Commentaries’ (2001) <http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_7_2001.pdf>>Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with Commentaries’ (2001) <https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf>>Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ‘State Responsibility: Comments and Observations Received from Governments’ (2001) A/CN4/515Google Scholar

Iwasawa, Y and Iwatsuki, N, ‘Procedural Conditions’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 1149Google Scholar

Jachec-Neale, A, ‘Fact-Finding’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Jacobsson, M, ‘Evidence as an Issue in International Legal Practice’ (2006) 100 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 40Google Scholar

Jarrett, HM and others, Prosecuting Computer Crimes (2015) <www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/docs/ccmanual.pdf>>Google Scholar

Jennings, RY, ‘The Caroline and McLeod Cases’ (1938) 32 American Journal of International Law 82Google Scholar

Jensen, ET, ‘Computer Attacks on Critical National Infrastructure: A Use of Force Invoking the Right of Self-Defense’ (2002) 38 Stanford Journal of International Law 207Google Scholar

Jensen, ET, ‘Unexpected Consequences from Knock-On Effects: A Different Standard for Computer Network Operations?’ (2003) 18 American University International Law Review 1145Google Scholar

Johnson, WJ and Gillman, AD (eds), Law of Armed Conflict Deskbook (2012) <www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/LOAC-Deskbook-2012.pdf>>Google Scholar

Johnson, B and others, ‘Attackers Deploy New ICS Attack Framework “TRITON” and Cause Operational Disruption to Critical Infrastructure’ (Fire Eye, 14 December 2017) <www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2017/12/attackers-deploy-new-ics-attack-framework-triton.html>>Google Scholar

Johnstone, I, ‘The Plea of “Necessity” in International Legal Discourse: Humanitarian Intervention and Counter-Terrorism’ (2005) 43 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 337Google Scholar

Joseph, S and Castan, M, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (3rd edn, 2013)Google Scholar

Jötten, S, Enforced Disappearances und EMRK (2012)Google Scholar

Joyner, CC and Lotrionte, C, ‘Information Warfare as International Coercion: Elements of a Legal Framework’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 825Google Scholar

Jurich, JP, ‘Cyberwar and Customary International Law: The Potential of a “Bottom-up” Approach to an International Law of Information Operations’ (2008) 9 Chicago Journal of International Law 275Google Scholar

Kaljulaid, K, ‘President of the Republic at the Opening of CyCon 2019’ (2019) <www.president.ee/en/official-duties/speeches/15241-president-of-the-republic-at-the-opening-of-cycon-2019/index.html>>Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J, ‘Oil’s Well That Ends Well? Critical Comments on the Merits Judgement in the Oil Platforms Case’ (2004) 17 Leiden Journal of International Law 695Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J, Uncertainty in International Law (2011)Google Scholar

Kamto, M, ‘The Time Factor in the Application of Countermeasures’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 1169Google Scholar

Katz-Bassett, E and others, ‘Reverse Traceroute’ (2010) USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation (NSDI) <www.cs.washington.edu/research/networking/astronomy/reverse-traceroute.html>>Google Scholar

Kazazi, M, Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study on Evidence before International Tribunals (1996)Google Scholar

Keber, TO and Roguski, PN, ‘Ius Ad Bellum Electronicum? Cyberangriffe im Lichte der UN-Charta und aktueller Staatenpraxis’ (2011) 49 Archiv des Völkerrechts 399Google Scholar

Keitner, C, ‘Attribution by Indictment’ (2019) 113 AJIL Unbound 207Google Scholar

Kendall, J, Barron, PO, and Allenbaugh, MH, ‘The Diligence Due in the Era of Globalized Terrorism’ (2002) 36 The International Lawyer 49Google Scholar

Kerry, J, ‘Condemning Cyber-Attack by North Korea’, US Department of State (2014) <https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2014/12/235444.htm>>Google Scholar

Kesan, JP and Hayes, CM, ‘Mitigative Counterstriking: Self-Defense and Deterrence in Cyberspace’ (2012) 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 429Google Scholar

Kilovaty, I, ‘Doxfare: Politically Motivated Leaks and the Future of the Norm on Non-intervention in the Era of Weaponized Information’ (2018) 9 Harvard National Security Journal 146.Google Scholar

Kinsch, P, ‘On the Uncertainties Surrounding the Standard of Proof in Proceedings before International Courts and Tribunals’ in Venturini, G and Bariatti, S (eds), Liber Fausto Pocar: Individual Rights and International Justice (2009) 427Google Scholar

Kirchner, S, ‘Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS)-Attacks under Public International Law: State-Responsibility in Cyberwar’ (2009) 8 ICFAI University Journal of Cyber Law 10Google Scholar

Kiss, J, ‘Sony Hack: Sacked Employees Could be to Blame, Researchers Claim’ Guardian (London, 30 December 2014) <www.theguardian.com/film/2014/dec/30/sony-hack-researchers-claim-sacked-employees-could-be-to-blame?CMP=fb_gu>Google Scholar

Klein, E, ‘Gegenmaßnahmen’ (1998) 37 Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht 39Google Scholar

Kleinhans, JP, ‘Internet of Insecure Things: Can Security Assessment Cure Market Failures?’ (SNV, 2017) <www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/files/internet_of_insecure_things.pdf>>Google Scholar

Knake, RK, Untangling Attribution: Moving to Accountability in Cyberspace. Hearing on Planning for the Future of Cyberattack (2010) Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation, Committee on Science and Technology, United States House of Representatives, 111th CongressGoogle Scholar

Koh, HH, ‘The Obama Administration and International Law’ (2010) <www.state.gov/s/l/releases/remarks/139119.htm>>Google Scholar

Koh, HH, ‘Remarks at the USCYBERCOM Inter-Agency Legal Conference: International Law in Cyberspace’ (2012) <www.state.gov/s/l/releases/remarks/197924.htm>>Google Scholar

Kohen, MG, ‘The Notion of “State Survival” in International Law’ in Boisson De Chazournes, L and Sands, P (eds), International Law, the ICJ and Nuclear Weapons (1999) 293Google Scholar

Koivurora, T, ‘What Is the Principle of Due Diligence?’ in Petman, J and Klabbers, J (eds), Nordic Cosmopolitanism: Essays in International Law for Martti Koskenniemi (2003) 341Google Scholar

Kolb, R, ‘General Principles of Procedural Law’ in Zimmermann, A (ed), The Statute of the ICJ (2nd edn 2012) 871Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission’ (2006) A/CN4/L682Google Scholar

Krajewski, M, ‘Selbstverteidigung gegen bewaffnete Angriffe nicht-staatlicher Organisationen’ (2002) 40 Archiv des Völkerrechts 183Google Scholar

Kramer, AE and Perlroth, N, ‘Cyberweapon Warning from Kaspersky, a Computer Security Expert’ New York Times (New York, 3 June 2012) <www.nytimes.com/2012/06/04/technology/cyberweapon-warning-from-kaspersky-a-computer-security-expert.html>Google Scholar

Kravetz, D, ‘Internet “Kill Switch” Legislation Back in Play’ Wired (San Francisco, 28 January 2011) <www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/01/kill-switch-legislation>Google Scholar

Kreß, C, Gewaltverbot Und Selbstverteidigungsrecht Nach Der Satzung Der Vereinten Nationen Bei Staatlicher Verwicklung in Gewaltakte Privater (1995)Google Scholar

Kreß, C, ‘Some Reflections on the International Legal Framework Governing Transnational Armed Conflicts’ (2010) 15 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 245Google Scholar

Kretzmer, D, ‘The Inherent Right to Self-Defence and Proportionality in Jus Ad Bellum’ (2013) 24 European Journal of International Law 235Google Scholar

Krieger, H, ‘Krieg gegen Anonymous: Völkerrechtliche Regelungsmöglichkeiten bei unsicherer Zurechnung im Cyberwar’ (2012) 50 Archiv des Völkerrechts 1Google Scholar

Kritsiotis, D, ‘Questions of Fact and Evidence and the Laws of Force’ (2006) 100 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 39Google Scholar

Kritsiotis, D, ‘International Law and the Relativities of Enforcement’ in Crawford, J and Koskenniemi, M (eds), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (2012) 245Google Scholar

Ku, J, ‘Russia Reminds the World (and International Lawyers) of the Limits of International Law’ (2014) <http://opiniojuris.org/2014/03/02/ukraine-russia-international-law-governing-use-force>>Google Scholar

Kühnbach, L, Solidaritätspflichten Unbeteiligter: Dargelegt am Beispiel von Aggressivnotstand, Defensivnotstand, unterlassener Hilfeleistung und polizeilichem Notstand (2007)Google Scholar

Kulesza, J, ‘State Responsibility for Cyber-Attacks on International Peace and Security’ (2009) 29 Polish Yearbook of International Law 139Google Scholar

Kunig, P, ‘Intervention, Prohibition of’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Küper, W, ‘Von Kant zu Hegel: Das Legitimationsproblem des rechtfertigenden Notstandes und die freiheitsphilosophischen Notrechtslehren‘ (2005) 60 JuristenZeitung 105Google Scholar

Kurtz, J, ‘Adjudging the Exceptional at International Investment Law: Security, Public Order and Financial Crisis’ (2010) 59 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 325CrossRef Google Scholar

Kurtz, PB and others, ‘Virtual Criminology Report 2009: Virtually Here – The Age of Cyberwarfare’ (2009) <www.mcafee.com/us/resources/reports/rp-virtual-criminology-report-2009.pdf>>Google Scholar

Langner, R, ‘To Kill a Centrifuge: A Technical Analysis of What Stuxnet’s Creators Tried to Achieve’ (November 2013) <www.langner.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/To-kill-a-centrifuge.pdf>>Google Scholar

Langner, R, ‘Stuxnet’s Secret Twin’ (Foreign Policy, 19 November 2013) <http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/11/19/stuxnets-secret-twin>>Google Scholar

La Rue, F, ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression’ (2013) A/HRC/23/40Google Scholar

Laughland, O, ‘Christmas Release of The Interview Cancelled by Sony’ Guardian (London, 18 December 2014) <www.theguardian.com/film/2014/dec/17/sony-pictures-cancels-christmas-release-the-interview>Google Scholar

Laursen, A, ‘The Judgment by the ICJ in the Oil Platforms Case’ (2004) 73 Nordic Journal of International Law 135Google Scholar

Laursen, A, ‘The Use of Force and (the State of) Necessity’ (2004) 37 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 485Google Scholar

Lawson, S, ‘Anonymous Sources Provide No Evidence of Iran Cyberattacks’ Forbes (Jersey City, NJ, 31 October 2012) <www.forbes.com/sites/seanlawson/2012/10/31/anonymous-sources-provide-no-evidence-of-iran-cyber-attacks/#4b4729793a00>Google Scholar

Leben, C, ‘Obligations Relating to the Use of Force and Arising from Peremptory Norms of International Law’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 1197Google Scholar

Lederman, M, ‘Question on 2007 Strike against Syria and Anticipatory Self-Defense’ (Opinio Juris, 2012) <http://opiniojuris.org/2012/04/06/question-on-2007-strike-against-syria-and-anticipatory-self-defense>>Google Scholar

Lee, RM and others, ‘Analysis of the Cyber Attack on the Ukrainian Power Grid’ (18 March 2016) <https://ics.sans.org/media/E-ISAC_SANS_Ukraine_DUC_5.pdf>>Google Scholar

Leich, MN, ‘Denial of Liability: Ex Gratia Compensation on a Humanitarian Basis’ (1989) 83 American Journal of International Law 319Google Scholar

Lerche, C, Militärische Abwehrbefugnisse bei Angriffen auf Handelsschiffe (1993)Google Scholar

Lesaffre, H, ‘Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in the ILC Articles on State Responsibility: Countermeasures’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 469Google Scholar

Lewis, JA, The ‘Korean’ Cyberattacks and Their Implications for Cyber Conflict (2009) <http://csis.org/files/publication/091023_Korean_Cyber_Attacks_and_Their_Implications_for_Cyber_Conflict.pdf>>Google Scholar

Li, S, ‘When does Internet Denial Trigger the Right of Armed Self-Defense?’ (2013) 38 Yale Journal of International Law 179Google Scholar

Lillich, RB and Paxman, JM, ‘State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens Occasioned in Terrorist Activities’ (1977) 26 American University Law Journal 217Google Scholar

Limnéll, J and Rid, T, ‘Is Cyberwar Real? Gauging the Threats’ (Foreign Affairs, 2014) <www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/140762/jarno-limnell-thomas-rid/is-cyberwar-real>>Google Scholar

Lin, HS, ‘Offensive Cyber Operations and the Use of Force’ (2010) 4 Journal of National Security Law & Policy 63Google Scholar

Lin, HS, ‘Arms Control in Cyberspace: Challenges and Opportunities’ (2012) World Politics Review <www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/print/11683>>Google Scholar

Linderfalk, U, ‘The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Ever Think about the Consequences?’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 853Google Scholar

Linderfalk, U, ‘What Is so Special about Jus Cogens? On the Difference between the Ordinary and the Peremptory International Law’ (2012) 14 International Community Law Review 3Google Scholar

Linnan, DK, ‘Iran Air Flight 655 and beyond: Free Passage, Mistaken Self-Defense, and State Responsibility’ (1991) 16 Yale Journal of International Law 245Google Scholar

Linnan, DK, ‘Self-Defense, Necessity and U.N. Collective Security: United States and Other Views’ (1991) 1 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 57Google Scholar

Lipson, HF, ‘Tracking and Tracing Cyber-Attacks: Technical Challenges and Global Policy Issues’ (2002) CMU/SEI-2002-SR-009 <www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/reports/02sr009.cfm>>Google Scholar

Lobel, J, ‘The Use of Force to Respond to Terrorist Attacks: The Bombing of Sudan and Afghanistan’ (1999) 24 Yale Journal of International Law 537Google Scholar

Lowe, V, ‘Precluding Wrongfulness or Responsibility: A Plea for Excuses’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 405Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, AF, ‘Agora: The Downing of Iran Air Flight 655’ (1989) 83 American Journal of International Law 318Google Scholar

Lubell, N, Extraterritorial Use of Force against Non-state Actors (2010)Google Scholar

Luhmann, N, Law as a Social System (2004)Google Scholar

Mandiant, ‘APT1: Exposing One of China’s Cyberespionage Units’ (2013) <http://intelreport.mandiant.com/Mandiant_APT1_Report.pdf>>Google Scholar

Margulies, P, ‘Sovereignty and Cyberattacks: Technology’s Challenge to the Law of State Responsibility’ (2014) 14 Melbourne Journal of International Law 496Google Scholar

Markoff, J, Sanger, DE, and Shanker, T, ‘In Digital Combat, US Finds No Easy Deterrent’ New York Times (New York, 25 January 2010) <www.nytimes.com/2010/01/26/world/26cyber.html>Google Scholar

Marsh, S, ‘US Joins UK in Blaming Russia for NotPetya Cyber-Attack’ Guardian (London, 15 February 2018) <www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/15/uk-blames-russia-notpetya-cyber-attack-ukraine>Google Scholar

Marxsen, C, ‘Violation and Confirmation of the Law: The Intricate Effects of the Invocation of the Law in Armed Conflict’ (2018) 5 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 8Google Scholar

Mascolo, G and Steinke, R, ‘BND könnte Lizenz zum “Hack Back” bekommen’ Süddeutsche Zeitung (Munich, 5 September 2018) <www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/cybersicherheit-bnd-koennte-lizenz-zum-hack-back-bekommen-1.4115365>Google Scholar

Maslaton, M, Notstandsklauseln Im Regionalen Menschenrechtsschutz (2002)Google Scholar

Mattessich, W, ‘Digital Destruction: Applying the Principle of Non-intervention to Distributed Denial of Service Attacks Manifesting No Physical Damage’ (2016) 54 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 873Google Scholar

Mattheis, C, ‘The System Theory of Niklas Luhmann and the Constitutionalization of the World Society’ (2012) 4 Goettingen Journal of International Law 625Google Scholar

Maurer, T, Cyber Norm Emergence at the United Nations: An Analysis of the UN’s Activities Regarding Cyber-Security (2011) Discussion Paper 2011-11 <http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/21445/cyber_norm_emergence_at_the_united_nationsan_analysis_of_the_uns_activities_regarding_cybersecurity.html>>Google Scholar

McLaughlin, R and Schmitt, MN, ‘The Need for Clarity in International Cyber Law’ (Policy Forum, 2017) <www.policyforum.net/the-need-for-clarity-in-international-cyber-law>..>Google Scholar

Melnitzky, A, ‘Defending America against Chinese Cyberespionage through the Use of Active Defenses’ (2012) 20 Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law 537Google Scholar

M’Gonigle, RM and Zacher, MW, Pollution, Politics and International Law (1979)Google Scholar

Michaels, J, ‘Pentagon Seeking “Rules of Engagement” for Cyber-War’ USA Today (Tysons Corner, VA, 4 April 2013) <www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/04/pentagon-wants-cyber-war-rules-of-engagement/2054055>Google Scholar

Milanovic, M, ‘State Responsibility for Genocide’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 553Google Scholar

Milanovic, M, ‘State Responsibility for Genocide: A Follow-Up’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 669Google Scholar

Milanovic, M, ‘State Responsibility for Acts of Non-state Actors: A Comment on Griebel and Plucken’ (2009) 22 Leiden Journal of International Law 307Google Scholar

Milanovic, M, ‘Palmer Committee Report on the Mavi Marmara Incident’ (2011) EJIL Talk <www.ejiltalk.org/palmer-committee-report-on-the-mavi-marmara-incident>>Google Scholar

Milanovic, M, ‘Human Rights Treaties and Foreign Surveillance: Privacy in the Digital Age’ (2014) 56 Harvard International Law Journal 81Google Scholar

Milevski, L, ‘Stuxnet and Strategy: A Special Operation in Cyberspace?’ (2011) 63 Joint Force Quarterly 64Google Scholar

Miller, E, ‘Self-Defense, International Law and the Six-Day War’ (1985) 20 Israel Law Review 68Google Scholar

Miller, RB, ‘Justifications of the Iraq War Examined’ (2008) 22 Ethics & International Affairs 43Google Scholar

Miller, JN and Pollard, NA, ‘Persistent Engagement, Agreed Competition and Deterrence in Cyberspace’ (Lawfare, 2019) <www.lawfareblog.com/persistent-engagement-agreed-competition-and-deterrence-cyberspace>>Google Scholar

Mills, E, ‘Stuxnet: Fact vs. Theory’ (CNET, 5 October 2010) <http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20018530-245.html?tag=topStories1>>Google Scholar

Mills, E, ‘Was US Water Utility Hacked Last Week?’ (CNET, 17 November 2011) <http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-57327030-245/was-u.s-water-utility-hacked-last-week>>Google Scholar

Mills, E, ‘Hacker Says He Broke into Texas Water Plant, Others’ (CNET, 18 November 2011) <http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-57327968-245/hacker-says-he-broke-into-texas-water-plant-others/?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20>>Google Scholar

Mitchell, RB, ‘Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance’ (1994) 48 International Organization 425Google Scholar

Moraes, C, ‘Report on the US NSA Surveillance Programme, Surveillance Bodies in Various Member States and Their Impact on EU Citizens’ Fundamental Rights and on Transatlantic Cooperation in Justice and Home Affairs’ (2014) A7-0139/2014 <www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A7-2014-0139+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN>>Google Scholar

Morgenthau, H, Politics among Nations (2nd edn, 1954)Google Scholar

Mosk, RM, ‘The Role of Facts in International Dispute Resolution’ (2003) 304 Recueil Des Cours 9Google Scholar

Moussa, J, ‘Can Jus Ad Bellum Override Jus in Bello? Reaffirming the Separation of the Two Bodies of Law’ (2008) 90 International Review of the Red Cross 963Google Scholar

Mrazek, J, ‘Prohibition of the Use and Threat of Force: Self-Defense and Self-Help in International Law’ (1989) 27 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 81Google Scholar

Mueller, RS III, Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election (2019) vol I of IIGoogle Scholar

Müller, GV, ‘Bis ein Unternehmen einen Cyberangriff bemerkt, dauert es im Durchschnitt 200 Tage’ Neue Zürcher Zeitung (Zürich, 30 May 2017) <www.nzz.ch/wirtschaft/mehr-firmen-von-cyberattacken-betroffen-cyber-security-ist-kein-it-problem-ld.1298355>Google Scholar

Murase, S, ‘Unilateral Responses to International Terrorism: Self-Defense or Law Enforcement?’ in Multiculturalism and International Law: Essays in Honour of Edward McWhinney (2009) 429Google Scholar

Nakashima, E, ‘Pentagon Proposes More Robust Role for Its Cyber-Specialists’ Washington Post (Washington, DC, 10 August 2012) <www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/pentagon-proposes-more-robust-role-for-its-cyber-specialists/2012/08/09/1e3478ca-db15-11e1-9745-d9ae6098d493_story.html>Google Scholar

Nakashima, E, ‘U.S. Cyber Command Operation Disrupted Internet Access of Russian Troll Factory on Day of 2018 midterms’ Washington Post (27 February 2019) <www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-cyber-command-operation-disrupted-internet-access-of-russian-troll-factory-on-day-of-2018-midterms/2019/02/26/1827fc9e-36d6-11e9-af5b-b51b7ff322e9_story.html?utm_term=.54e14bcc7d72>>Google Scholar

Nakashima, E and Warrick, J, ‘Stuxnet Was Work of US and Israeli Experts, Officials Say’ Washington Post (Washington, DC, 2 June 2012) <www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/stuxnet-was-work-of-us-and-israeli-experts-officials-say/2012/06/01/gJQAlnEy6U_story.html>Google Scholar

Nakashima, E and Rucker, P, ‘U.S. Declares North Korea Carried out Massive WannaCry Cyberattack’ Washington Post (Washington, DC, 19 December 2017) <www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-set-to-declare-north-korea-carried-out-massive-wannacry-cyber-attack/2017/12/18/509deb1c-e446-11e7-a65d-1ac0fd7f097e_story.html?utm_term=.4943a2c04565>Google Scholar

Nanda, VP, ‘The “Torrey Canyon” Disaster: Some Legal Aspects’ (1967) 44 Denver Law Journal 400Google Scholar

Neuneck, G, ‘Civilian and Military Cyberthreats: Shifting Identities and Attribution’ in United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (ed), The Cyber Index: International Security Trends and Reality (2013) 115Google Scholar

Nichols, S, ‘Lazarus Group Rises Again from the Digital Grave with Hoplight Malware for All’ (The Register, 10 April 2019) <www.theregister.co.uk/2019/04/10/lazarus_group_malware>>Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A, ‘Concurrence between Individual Responsibility and State Responsibility in International Law’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 615Google Scholar

Noortmann, N, Enforcing International Law: From Self-Help to Self-Contained Regimes (2005)Google Scholar

Nye, JS, Cyber Power (2010)Google Scholar

O’Connell, ME, ‘Evidence of Terror’ (2002) 7 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 19Google Scholar

O’Connell, ME, ‘Rules of Evidence for the Use of Force in International Law’s New Era’ (2006) 100 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 44Google Scholar

O’Connell, ME, The Power and Purpose of International Law: Insights from the Theory and Practice of Enforcement (2008)Google Scholar

O’Connell, ME, ‘Cybersecurity without Cyberwar’ (2012) 17 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 187Google Scholar

O’Donnell, T, ‘Security Council Resolution 1530, Evidence and the United Nations Security Council’ (2006) 100 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 47Google Scholar

Office of the Secretary of Defense, ‘Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2013’ (2013) <www.defense.gov/pubs/2013_china_report_final.pdf>>Google Scholar

Ogus, AI, The Law of Damages (1973)Google Scholar

Ohlin, JD, ‘Did Russian Cyber-Interference in the 2016 Election Violate International Law?’ (2017) 95 Texas Law Review 1579Google Scholar

Ohlin, JD and May, L, Necessity in International Law (2016)Google Scholar

O’Keefe, R, ‘Proportionality’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 1157Google Scholar

Olson, KK, ‘Cyberspace as Place and the Limits of Metaphor’ (2005) 11 Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 10Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A, ‘Current Developments: Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America), Merits, Judgment of 6 November 2003’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 753Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A, Peremptory Norms in International Law (2006)Google Scholar

Owens, WA, Dam, KW, and Lin, H, Technology, Policy, Law, and Ethics Regarding US Acquisition and Use of Cyberattack Capabilities (2009)Google Scholar

Pagliery, J, ‘The Inside Story of the Biggest Hack in History’ (CNN, 5 August 2015) <https://money.cnn.com/2015/08/05/technology/aramco-hack/index.html>>Google Scholar

Peevers, C, The Politics of Justifying Force: The Suez Crisis, the Iraq War, and International Law (2013)Google Scholar

Pellet, A, ‘Can a State Commit a Crime? Definitely, Yes!’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 425Google Scholar

Pellet, A, ‘Comments in Response to Christine Chinkin and in Defense of Jus Cogens as the Best Bastion against the Excesses of Fragmentation’ (2006) 17 Finnish Yearbook of International Law 83Google Scholar

Pellet, A, ‘The Definition of Responsibility in International Law’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 3Google Scholar

Pellet, A and Miron, A ‘Sanctions’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Perina, AH, ‘Black Holes and Open Secrets: The Impact of Covert Action on International Law’ (2015) 53 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 507Google Scholar

Perlroth, N, ‘In Cyberattack on Saudi Firm, US Sees Iran Firing Back’ New York Times (New York, 23 October 2012) <www.nytimes.com/2012/10/24/business/global/cyberattack-on-saudi-oil-firm-disquiets-us.html>Google Scholar

Perlroth, N and Sanger, DE, ‘New Computer Attacks Traced to Iran, Officials Say’ New York Times (New York, 25 May 2013) A10Google Scholar

Peters, A, ‘Surveillance without Borders? The Unlawfulness of the NSA-Panopticon, Part I’ (EJIL Talk, 2013) <www.ejiltalk.org/surveillance-without-borders-the-unlawfulness-of-the-nsa-panopticon-part-i>>Google Scholar

Pfeil, J, ‘Naulilaa Arbitration (Portugal v Germany)’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Pictet, J, Commentary on the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, vol I (1952)Google Scholar

Pihelgas, M, ‘Back-Tracing and Anonymity in Cyberspace’ in Zielkowski, K (ed), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy (2013) 31Google Scholar

Portmess, L, ‘Compensation Ex Gratia and the Vincennes Incident’ (1992) 6 Public Affairs Quarterly 401Google Scholar

Proulx, V-J, ‘Babysitting Terrorists: Should States be Strictly Liable for Failing to Prevent Transborder Attacks?’ (2005) 23 Berkeley Journal of International Law 615Google Scholar

Quigley, J, The Six-Day War and Israeli Self-Defense (2013)Google Scholar

Raab, D, ‘“Armed Attack” after the Oil Platforms Case’ (2004) 17 Leiden Journal of International Law 719Google Scholar

Radsan, AJ, ‘The Unresolved Equation of Espionage and International Law’ (2007) 28 Michigan Journal of International Law 595Google Scholar

Randelzhofer, A and Nolte, G, ‘Article 51’ in Simma, B and others (eds), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (3rd edn, 2012)Google Scholar

Ranger, S, ‘What Is Cyberwar? Everything You Need to Know about the Frightening Future of Digital Conflict’ (ZDNet, 4 December 2018) <www.zdnet.com/article/cyberwar-a-guide-to-the-frightening-future-of-online-conflict>>Google Scholar

Ratner, SR, ‘Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello after September 11’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 908Google Scholar

Ratner, SR, ‘Persuading to Comply: On the Deployment and Avoidance of Legal Argumentation’ in Dunoff, JL and Pollack, MA (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations (2013) 568Google Scholar

Reinhold, T and Schulze, M, ’Digitale Gegenangriffe’ (SWP, 2017) <www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/arbeitspapiere/AP_Schulze_Hackback_08_2017.pdf>>Google Scholar

Reinisch, A, ‘Sachverständigengutachten zur Frage des Bestehens und der Wirkung des völkerrechtlichen Rechtfertigungsgrundes “Staatsnotstand”’ (2008) 68 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 3Google Scholar

Reisman, WM, ‘Assessing Claims to Revise the Laws of War’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 82Google Scholar

Reisman, WM and Parajon Skinner, C, Fraudulent Evidence before Public International Tribunals: The Dirty Stories of International Law (2014)Google Scholar

Reißmann, O, ‘Ferngesteuertes Wasserwerk: Hacker führen US-Behörden vor’ Der Spiegel (Hamburg, 20 November 2011) <www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,798866,00.html>Google Scholar

Ricks, TE, ‘The Future of War: Cyber Is Expanding the Clausewitzian Spectrum of Conflict’ (Foreign Policy, 13 November 2014) <http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/11/13/the-future-of-war-cyber-is-expanding-the-clausewitzian-spectrum-of-conflict>>Google Scholar

Rid, T, ‘Cyberwar Will Not Take Place’ (2012) 35 Journal of Strategic Studies 5Google Scholar

Rid, T, ‘Cyberwar and Peace: Hacking Can Reduce Real-World Violence’ (2013) 92 Foreign Affairs 77Google Scholar

Rid, T and Buchanan, B, ‘Attributing Cyberattacks’ (2015) 38 Journal of Strategic Studies 4Google Scholar

Riddell, A and Plant, B, Evidence before the ICJ (2009)Google Scholar

Riley, M and Engleman, E, ‘Code in Aramco Cyberattack Indicates Lone Perpetrator’ (Bloomberg News, 25 October 2012) <www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-25/code-in-aramco-cyber-attack-indicates-lone-perpetrator.html>>Google Scholar

Rivkin, DB Jr and Casey, LA, ‘Saddam, Nikita and Virtual Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Question of Threat Perception and Intelligence Assessment’ (The National Interest, 2003) <http://nationalinterest.org/article/saddam-nikita-and-virtual-weapons-of-mass-destructiona-question-of-threat-percep-2362>>Google Scholar

Rivkin, DB Jr, Casey, LA, and DeLaquil, MW, ‘Preemption and Law in the Twenty-First Century’ (2005) 5 Chicago Journal of International Law 467Google Scholar

Rizmal, I, ‘Cyberterrorism: What Are We (Not) Talking About?’ (Diplo, 3 August 2017) <www.diplomacy.edu/blog/cyberterrorism-what-are-we-not-talking-about>>Google Scholar

Roberts, A, ‘Legality vs Legitimacy: Can Uses of Force Be Illegal but Justified?’ in Alston, P and Macdonald, E (eds), Human Rights, Intervention, and the Use of Force (2008) 179Google Scholar

Roberts, PF, ‘If This Is Cyberwar, Where Are All the Cyberweapons?’ (MIT Technology Review, 27 January 2014) <www.technologyreview.com/news/523931/if-this-is-cyberwar-where-are-all-the-cyberweapons>>Google Scholar

Robertson, J and Riley, M, ‘Mysterious ’08 Turkey Pipeline Blast Opened New Cyberwar Era’ (Bloomberg News, 10 December 2014) <www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-10/mysterious-08-turkey-pipeline-blast-opened-new-cyberwar.html>>Google Scholar

Rõigas, H, ‘An Updated Draft of the Code of Conduct Distributed in the United Nations: What’s New?’ (2015) <https://ccdcoe.org/updated-draft-code-conduct-distributed-united-nations-whats-new.html>>Google Scholar

Romano, J-A, ‘Combating Terrorism and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Reviving the Doctrine of a State of Necessity’ (1999) 87 Georgetown Law Journal 1023Google Scholar

Roscini, M, ‘World Wide Warfare: Jus Ad Bellum and the Use of Cyber Force’ (2010) 14 Max Planck United Nations Yearbook 85Google Scholar

Roscini, M, Cyber Operations and the Use of Force in International Law (2014)Google Scholar

Roscini, M, ‘Evidentiary Issues in International Disputes Related to State Responsibility for Cyber Operations’ in Ohlin, JD and others (eds), Cyberwar: Law and Ethics for Virtual Conflicts (2015) 215Google Scholar

Rosenne, S and Yankov, A, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary, vol IV (1991)Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, P, ‘National Security Threats in Cyberspace: A Workshop’ (2009) <www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/natsecurity/threats_in_cyberspace.authcheckdam.pdf>>Google Scholar

Rotenberg, M, Attribution: Hearing on Planning for the Future of Cyberattack (2010) <http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1106&context=cong>>Google Scholar

Ruys, T, ‘Quo Vadit Jus Ad Bellum? A Legal Analysis of Turkey’s Military Operations against the PKK in Northern Iraq’ (2008) 9 Melbourne Journal of International Law 334Google Scholar

Ruys, T, ‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice (2010)Google Scholar

Ryngaert, C, ‘State Responsibility, Necessity and Human Rights’ (2010) 41 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 79Google Scholar

Rytter, JE, ‘Humanitarian Intervention without the Security Council: From San Francisco to Kosovo – and Beyond’ (2001) 70 Nordic Journal of International Law 121Google Scholar

Saalbach, K-P, Cyberwar: Methods and Practice (2013) <www.dirk-koentopp.com/downloads/saalbach-cyberwar-methods-and-practice.pdf>>Google Scholar

Salmon, JJA, ‘Faut-Il Codifier L’État de Nécessité En Droit International?’ in Makarczyk, J (ed), Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs (1984) 235Google Scholar

Sanger, DE, ‘US Blames China’s Military Directly for Cyberattacks’ New York Times (New York, 6 May 2013) A1Google Scholar

Sanger, DE, ‘US and China Seek Arms Deal for Cyberspace’ New York Times (New York, 19 September 2015) A1Google Scholar

Sanger, DE, The Perfect Weapon (2018)Google Scholar

Sanger, DE, Barboza, D, and Perlroth, N, ‘Chinese Army Unit Is Seen as Tied to Hacking against US’ The New York Times (New York, 19 February 2013) A1Google Scholar

Sanger, DE and Fackler, M, ‘N.S.A. Breached North Korean Networks before Sony Attack, Officials Say’ New York Times (New York, 18 January 2015)<www.nytimes.com/2015/01/19/world/asia/nsa-tapped-into-north-korean-networks-before-sony-attack-officials-say.html?_r=0>Google Scholar

Sanger, DE and Mazzetti, M, ‘U.S. had Cyberattack Plan if Iran Nuclear Dispute Led to Conflict’ New York Times (New York, 16 February 2016) <www.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/world/middleeast/us-had-cyberattack-planned-if-iran-nuclear-negotiations-failed.html>Google Scholar

Sanger, DE and Perlroth, N, ‘U.S. Escalates Online Attacks on Russia’s Power Grid’ New York Times (New York, 15 June 2019) <www.nytimes.com/2019/06/15/us/politics/trump-cyber-russia-grid.html>Google Scholar

Sari, A, ‘Hybrid Warfare, Law and the Fulda Gap’ in Williams, WS and Ford, CM (eds), Complex Battlespaces: The Law of Armed Conflict and the Dynamics of Modern Warfare (2019), 161.Google Scholar

Schaap, AJ, ‘Cyberwarfare Operations: Development and Use under International Law’ (2009) 64 Air Force Law Review 121Google Scholar

Schachter, O, ‘The Lawful Use of Force by a State against Terrorists in Another Country’ (1989) 19 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 209Google Scholar

Schmahl, S, ‘Zwischenstaatliche Kompetenzabgrenzung Im Cyberspace’ (2009) 47 Archiv des Völkerrechts 284Google Scholar

Schmitt, C, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (2005)Google Scholar

Schmitt, MN, ‘Computer Network Attack and the Use of Force in International Law: Thoughts on a Normative Framework’ (1999) 37 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 885Google Scholar

Schmitt, MN, ‘Preemptive Strategies in International Law’ (2003) 24 Michigan Journal of International Law 513Google Scholar

Schmitt, MN, ‘US Security Strategies: A Legal Assessment’ (2004) 27 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 737Google Scholar

Schmitt, MN, ‘Cyber Operations and the Jus Ad Bellum Revisited’ (2011) 56 Villanova Law Review 569Google Scholar

Schmitt, MN, ‘Cyber Activities and the Law of Countermeasures’ in Ziolkowski, K (ed), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy (2013) 659Google Scholar

Schmitt, MN, ‘Grey Zones in the International Law of Cyberspace’ (2017) 42 Yale Journal of International Law 2Google Scholar

Schmitt, MN, (ed), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (2017)Google Scholar

Schmitt, MN, ‘Cyber Activities and the Law of Countermeasures’ in Ziolkowski, K ‘“Virtual” Disenfranchisement: Cyber Election Meddling in the Grey Zones of International Law’ (2018) 19 Chicago Journal of International Law 30Google Scholar

Schmitt, MN, ‘Cyber Activities and the Law of Countermeasures’ in Ziolkowski, K ‘Estonia Speaks out on Key Rules for Cyberspace’ (Just Security, 2019) <www.justsecurity.org/64490/estonia-speaks-out-on-key-rules-for-cyberspace>>Google Scholar

Schmitt, MN and Vihul, L, ‘Respect for Sovereignty in Cyberspace’ (2017) 95 Texas Law Review 1639Google Scholar

Schneider, JG, ‘Persistent Engagement: Foundation, Evolution and Evaluation of a Strategy‘ (Lawfare, 10 May 2019) <www.lawfareblog.com/persistent-engagement-foundation-evolution-and-evaluation-strategy>>Google Scholar

Schneier, B, ‘Anonymity and the Internet’ (Schneier on Security, 3 February 2010) <www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/02/anonymity_and_t_3.html>>Google Scholar

Schneier, B, ‘Choosing Secure Passwords’ (Schneier on Security, 3 March 2014) <www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/03/choosing_secure_1.html>>Google Scholar

Schneier, B, ‘Did North Korea Really Attack Sony?’ (The Atlantic, 22 December 2014) <www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/12/did-north-korea-really-attack-sony/383973/?single_page=true>>Google Scholar

Schneier, B, ‘We Still Don’t Know Who Hacked Sony’ The Atlantic (Washington, DC, 5 January 2015) <www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/01/we-still-dont-know-who-hacked-sony-north-korea/384198>Google Scholar

Schneier, B, ‘What’s Next in Government Surveillance’ The Atlantic (Washington, DC, 2 March 2015) <www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/03/whats-next-in-government-surveillance/385667>Google Scholar

Schneier, B, Click Here to Kill Everybody (2018)Google Scholar

Schröder, M, ‘Precautionary Approach/Principle’, in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012) 400Google Scholar

Schultz, GP, ‘Low Intensity Warfare, the Challenge of Ambiguity’ (1986) 25 ILM 204Google Scholar

Schulze, M, ‘Governance von 0-Day-Schwachstellen in der deutschen Cyber-Sicherheitspolitik’ (SWP, 2019) <www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/governance-von-0-day-schwachstellen>>Google Scholar

Segal, A and Waxman, MC, ‘Why a Cybersecurity Treaty Is a Pipe Dream’ (2011) Council on Foreign Relations <www.cfr.org/cybersecurity/why-cybersecurity-treaty-pipe-dream/p26325>>Google Scholar

Shackelford, SJ, ‘From Nuclear War to Net War: Analogizing Cyberattacks in International Law’ (2009) 27 Berkeley Journal of International Law 191Google Scholar

Shackelford, SJ and Andres, RB, ‘State Responsibility for Cyberattacks: Competing Standards for a Growing Problem’ (2011) 42 Georgetown Journal of International Law 971Google Scholar

Shany, Y, ‘Know Your Rights! The Flotilla Report and International Law Governing Naval Blockades’ (EJIL Talk, 2010) <www.ejiltalk.org/know-your-rights-the-flotilla-report-and-international-law-governing-naval-blockades>>Google Scholar

Sharp, WG, Cyberspace and the Use of Force (1999)Google Scholar

Shaw, MN, International Law (6th edn, 2008)Google Scholar

Shelton, D, ‘Reparations’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Silver, DB, ‘Computer Network Attack as a Use of Force under Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter’ in Schmitt, MN and O’Donnell, BT (eds), Computer Network Attack and International Law (2002) 73Google Scholar

Simma, B, ‘Grundfragen der Staatenverantwortlichkeit in der Arbeit der International Law Commission’ (1986) 24 Archiv des Völkerrechts 357Google Scholar

Simma, B and Pulkowski, D, ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 483Google Scholar

Singer, PW and Friedman, A, Cybersecurity and Cyberwar: What Everyone Needs to Know (2014)Google Scholar

Sklerov, MJ, ‘Solving the Dilemma of State Responses to Cyberattacks: A Justification for the Use of Active Defenses against States Who Neglect Their Duty to Prevent’ (2009) 201 Military Law Review 1Google Scholar

Sloane, RD, ‘On the Use and Abuse of Necessity in the Law of State Responsibility’ (2012) 106 American Journal of International Law 447Google Scholar

Smith, JE (ed), ‘Torrey Canyon’ Pollution and Marine Life (1968)Google Scholar

Sofaer, AD, ‘Terrorism and the Law’ (1986) 64 Foreign Affairs 901Google Scholar

Sofaer, AD, ‘Compensation for Iranian Airbus Tragedy’ Statement before the Defense Policy Panel of the House Committee of Armed Services (4 August 1988) <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1079/is_n2139_v88/ai_6876360/?tag=content;col1>>Google Scholar

Spencer, R, ‘Stuxnet Virus Attack on Iranian Nuclear Programme: The First Strike by Computer?’ Telegraph (London, 4 October 2010) <www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/8040656/Stuxnet-virus-attack-on-Iranian-nuclear-programme-the-first-strike-by-computer.html>Google Scholar

Spiermann, O, ‘Humanitarian Intervention as a Necessity and the Threat or Use of Jus Cogens’ (2002) 71 Nordic Journal of International Law 523Google Scholar

Sreenivasa Rao, P, ‘Countermeasures in International Law: The Contribution of the International Law Commission’, in Studi di diritto internazionale in onore di Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz, vol. 2 (2004)Google Scholar

Stahlberg, T and Lahmann, H, ‘A Paradigm of Prevention: Humpty Dumpty, the War on Terror, and the Power of Preventive Detention in the United States, Israel, and Europe’ (2011) 59 American Journal of Comparative Law 1051Google Scholar

Stein, T and Marauhn, T, ‘Völkerrechtliche Aspekte von Informationsoperationen’ (2000) 60 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 1Google Scholar

Stein, T and von Buttlar, C, Völkerrecht (13th edn, 2012)Google Scholar

Stevenson, J, ‘A Different Kind of Emergency’ New York Review of Books (New York, 23 May 2019) <www.nybooks.com/articles/2019/05/23/trump-different-emergency>Google Scholar

Stilgherrian, ‘Blaming Russia for NotPetya Was Coordinated Diplomatic Action’ (ZDNet, 12 April 2018) <www.zdnet.com/article/blaming-russia-for-notpetya-was-coordinated-diplomatic-action>>Google Scholar

Stohl, M, ‘Cyber Terrorism: A Clear and Present Danger, the Sum of All Fears, Breaking Point or Patriot Games?’ (2006) 46 Journal of Crime, Law & Social Change 223Google Scholar

Suarez, SV, ‘Korean Air Lines Incident (1983)’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Swaine, J, ‘Georgia: Russia “Conducting Cyberwar”’ Telegraph (London, 11 August 2008) <www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/georgia/2539157/Georgia-Russia-conducting-cyber-war.html>Google Scholar

Swartz, J, ‘“Kill Switch” Internet Bill Alarms Privacy Experts’ USA Today (Tysons Corner, VA, 15 February 2011) <http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/news/internetprivacy/2011-02-15-kill-switch_N.htm>Google Scholar

Szurek, S, ‘The Notion of Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 427Google Scholar

Taft, WH IV, ‘Self-Defense and the Oil Platforms Decision’ (2004) 29 Yale Journal of International Law 295Google Scholar

Tams, CJ, ‘Recognizing Guarantees and Assurances of Non-repetition: LaGrand and the Law of State Responsibility’ (2002) 27 Yale Journal of International Law 441Google Scholar

Tams, CJ, ‘Light Treatment of a Complex Problem: The Law of Self-Defence in the Wall Case’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 963Google Scholar

Tams, CJ, ‘The Use of Force against Terrorists’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 359Google Scholar

Tanriverdi, H, ‘Die Hackback-Pläne der Bundesregierung‘ (Tagesschau, 29 May 2019) <www.tagesschau.de/investigativ/seehofer-cyberabwehr-103.html>>Google Scholar

Tanzi, A, ‘Necessity, State of’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Taylor, A, ‘Sorry, but That “Chinese” Hacking Report Proves Nothing’ (Business Insider, 19 February 2013) <www.businessinsider.com/mandiant-china-report-questioned-2013-2>>Google Scholar

The Economist, ‘Internet Blackouts: Reaching for the Kill Switch’ (10 February 2011) <www.economist.com/node/18112043>>Google Scholar

The White House, ‘International Strategy for Cyberspace: Prosperity, Security, and Openness in a Networked World’ (2011) <www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/international_strategy_for_cyberspace.pdf>>Google Scholar

The White House, ‘Presidential Policy Directive/PPD-20’ (2012) <www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2013/jun/07/obama-cyber-directive-full-text>>Google Scholar

Thompson, A, ‘Coercive Enforcement of International Law’ in Dunoff, JL and Pollack, MA (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations (2013) 502Google Scholar

Thürer, D and Burri, T, ‘Self-Determination’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Tikk, E and others, International Cyber Incidents: Legal Considerations (2010) <https://ccdcoe.org/publications/books/legalconsiderations.pdf>>Google Scholar

Tomaševski, K, Responding to Human Rights Violations: 1946–1999 (2000)Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C, ‘Are Counter-Measures Subject to Prior Recourse to Dispute Settlement Procedures?’ (1994) 5 European Journal of International Law 77Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C, ‘Reparation in Cases of Genocide’ (2007) 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice 905Google Scholar

Trapp, KN, State Responsibility for International Terrorism: Problems and Prospects (2011)Google Scholar

Troianovski, A, ‘Investigators in Downing of Jet over Ukraine Charge 4 Suspects with Ties to Russian Intelligence, Pro-Moscow Militia’ Washington Post (Washington, DC, 19 June 2019) <www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/investigation-into-downing-of-flight-mh-17-over-ukraine-names-four-russian-ukrainian-suspects/2019/06/19/02d52e42-9280-11e9-aadb-74e6b2b46f6a_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c2c1dc3eddaf>Google Scholar

Tromparent, P, ‘French Cyberdefence Policy’ in Czosseck, C, Ottis, R, and Ziolkowski, K (eds), 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict – Proceedings (2012) 77Google Scholar

Trouwborst, A, Precautionary Rights and Duties of States (2006)Google Scholar

Tsagourias, N, ‘Necessity and the Use of Force: A Special Regime’ (2010) 41 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 11Google Scholar

UN General Secretary, ‘Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security’ (2011) A/66/152Google Scholar

US Department of Defense, Office of General Counsel, ‘An Assessment of International Legal Issues in Information Operations’ (1999) <www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/dod-io-legal/dod-io-legal.pdf>>Google Scholar

US Department of State, International Security Advisory Board, ‘A Framework for International Cyber Stability’ (2014) <www.state.gov/documents/organization/229235.pdf>>Google Scholar

Utton, AE, ‘Protective Measures and the “Torrey Canyon”’ (1968) 9 Boston College Industrial and Commercial Law Review 613Google Scholar

Valeriano, B, ‘Cyberwar and Rivalry: The Dynamics of Cyber Conflict between Antagonists, 2001–2011’ (2012) <http://wpsa.research.pdx.edu/meet/2012/manessvaleriano.pdf>>Google Scholar

de Vattel, E, The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (4th edn, 1811)Google Scholar

Vázquez-Irizarry, W, ‘Excepción y necesidad: la posibilidad de una teoría general de emergencia’ (2010) Sela 2010: Inseguridad, democracia y derecho, 274Google Scholar

Vecchione, E, ‘Is It Possible to Provide Evidence of Insufficient Evidence? The Precautionary Principle at the WTO’ (2013) 13 Chicago Journal of International Law 153Google Scholar

Verdross, A and Simma, B, Universelles Völkerrecht (3rd edn, 1984)Google Scholar

Victor, DG, ‘Enforcing International Law: Implications for an Effective Global Warming Regime’ (1999) 10 Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 147Google Scholar

von Bar, C, Gemeineuropäisches Deliktsrecht, Band II (1999)Google Scholar

von Carlowitz, L, ‘Interpreting Self-Defense Restrictively: The World Court in the Oil Platforms Case’ (2005) 23 Sicherheit und Frieden 79Google Scholar

von Stein, J, ‘The Engines of Compliance’ in Dunoff, JL and Pollack, MA (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations (2013) 477Google Scholar

Waibel, M, ‘Two Worlds of Necessity in ICSID Arbitration: CMS and LG&E’ (2007) 20 Leiden Journal of International Law 637Google Scholar

Wakefield, J, ‘Tax Software Blamed for Cyber-Attack Spread’ BBC (28 June 2017) <www.bbc.com/news/technology-40428967>>Google Scholar

Ward, A, ‘ISIS’s Use of Social Media Still Poses a Threat to Stability in the Middle East and Africa’ (The Rand Blog, 11 December 2018) <www.rand.org/blog/2018/12/isiss-use-of-social-media-still-poses-a-threat-to-stability.html>>Google Scholar

Waterman, S, ‘Microsoft Calls for UN-type Body to Attribute Big Cyberattacks’ (fedscoop, 23 June 2016) <www.fedscoop.com/microsoft-wants-iaea-type-body-to-attribute-big-cyberattacks>>Google Scholar

Watts, S, ‘Low-Intensity Cyber Operations and the Principle of Non-intervention’ in Ohlin, JD and others (eds), Cyber War (2015), 249Google Scholar

Waxman, MC, ‘Cyber-Attacks and the Use of Force: Back to the Future of Article 2(4)’ (2011) 36 Yale Journal of International Law 421Google Scholar

Weaver, N, ‘The GCHQ’s Vulnerabilities Equities Process’ (Lawfare, 2019) <www.lawfareblog.com/gchqs-vulnerabilities-equities-process>>Google Scholar

Webb, P, ‘Deadlock or Restraint? The Security Council Veto and the Use of Force in Syria’ (2014) 19 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 471Google Scholar

Wedgwood, R, ‘Responding to Terrorism: The Strikes against Bin Laden’ (1999) 24 Yale Journal of International Law 559Google Scholar

Wedgwood, R, ‘The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Israeli Security Fence and the Limits of Self-Defense’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law 52Google Scholar

Weir, T, ‘Complex Liabilities’ in Tunc, André (ed), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Volume XI: Torts (1976)Google Scholar

Wendel, P, State Responsibility for Interferences with the Freedom of Navigation in Public International Law (2007)Google Scholar

Wengler, W, ‘Public International Law: Paradoxes of a Legal Order’ (1977) 158 Recueil Des Cours 16Google Scholar

Wilmshurst, E, ‘Principles of International Law on the Use of Force by States in Self-Defence’ (2005) <www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/108106>>Google Scholar

Wintour, P, ‘Russian Bid to Influence Brexit Vote Detailed in New US Senate Report’ Guardian (London, 10 January 2018) <www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/10/russian-influence-brexit-vote-detailed-us-senate-report>Google Scholar

Wheeler, DA and Larsen, GN, Techniques for Cyberattack Attribution (October 2003) <http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA468859>>Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R, ‘International Courts and Tribunals, Evidence’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Woltag, JC, ‘Computer Network Operations below the Level of Armed Force’, European Society of International Law – Conference Paper Series (2011)Google Scholar

Woltag, JC, ‘Cyberwarfare’ in Wolfrum, R (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Woltag, JC, Cyberwarfare: Military Cross-Border Computer Network Operations under International Law (2014)Google Scholar

Wright, J, Cyber and International Law in the 21st Century (2018) <www.gov.uk/government/speeches/cyber-and-international-law-in-the-21st-century>>Google Scholar

Wyler, E and Papaux, A, ‘The Different Forms of Reparation: Satisfaction’ in Crawford, J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (2010) 623Google Scholar

Yoo, CS, ‘Cyberespionage or Cyberwar? International Law, Domestic Law, and Self-Protective Measures’ in Ohlin, JD, Govern, K, and Finkelstein, C (eds), Cyberwar: Law and Ethics for Virtual Conflicts (2015) 175Google Scholar

Zemanek, K, Haftungsformen Im Völkerrecht (1980)Google Scholar

Zemanek, K, ‘Schuld- und Erfolgshaftung im Entwurf der Völkerrechtskommission über Staatenverantwortlichkeit. Zugleich Bemerkungen zum Prozess der Kodifikation im Rahmen der Vereinten Nationen’ in Dietz, E (ed), Festschrift für Rudolf Bindschedler (1980) 315Google Scholar

Zemanek, K, ‘Armed Attack’, in R Wolfrum (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2012)Google Scholar

Zetter, K, ‘Lawmaker Wants “Show of Force” against North Korea for Website Attacks’ Wired (San Francisco, 10 July 2009) <www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/07/show-of-force>Google Scholar

Zetter, K, ‘Cyberattacks Traced to the US, Britain’ Wired (San Francisco, 14 July 2009) <www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/07/brits-attack-us>Google Scholar

Zetter, K, ‘New Clues Point to Israel as Author of Blockbuster Worm, or Not’ Wired (San Francisco, 1 October 2010) <www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/10/stuxnet-deconstructed>Google Scholar

Zetter, K, ‘H(ackers)2O: Attack on City Water Station Destroys Pump’ Wired (San Francisco, 18 November 2011) <www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/11/hackers-destroy-water-pump>Google Scholar

Zetter, K, ‘Logic Bomb Set off South Korea Cyberattack’ Wired (San Francisco, 21 March 2013) <www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/logic-bomb-south-korea-attack>Google Scholar

Zetter, K, Countdown to Zero Day (2014)Google Scholar

Zetter, K, ‘The Evidence That North Korea Hacked Sony Is Flimsy’ Wired (San Francisco, 17 December 2014) <www.wired.com/2014/12/evidence-of-north-korea-hack-is-thin>Google Scholar

Zetter, K, ‘The Biggest Security Threats We’ll Face in 2015’ Wired (San Francisco, 4 January 2015) <www.wired.com/2015/01/security-predictions-2015>Google Scholar

Zetter, K, ‘Critics Say New Evidence Linking North Korea to the Sony Hack Is Still Flimsy’ Wired (San Francisco, 8 January 2015) <www.wired.com/2015/01/critics-say-new-north-korea-evidence-sony-still-flimsy>Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A, ‘The Second Lebanon War: Jus Ad Bellum, Jus in Bello and the Issue of Proportionality’ (2007) 11 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 99Google Scholar

Zimmermann, A, ‘International Law and “Cyber Space”’ (2014) 3 ESIL Reflections 1Google Scholar

Ziolkowski, K, ‘Ius Ad Bellum in Cyberspace: Some Thoughts on the “Schmitt-Criteria” for Use of Force’ in Czosseck, C and others (eds), 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict – Proceedings (2012) 295Google Scholar

Zoller, E, Peacetime Unilateral Remedies: An Analysis of Countermeasures (1984)Google Scholar

Zuckerman, E and others, ‘2010 Report on Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks’ (2010) Research Publication No. 2010-16Google Scholar

Zwitter, A, ‘The Rule of Law in Times of Crisis: A Legal Theory on the State of Emergency in Liberal Democracy’ (2013) University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 10/2013Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive