Book contents
- Who Owns Outer Space?
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 176
- Who Owns Outer Space?
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Note
- Introduction
- 1 Space Tourism
- 2 Mega-constellations
- 3 Mega-constellations and International Law
- 4 Abandoned Rocket Bodies
- 5 Space Mining
- 6 Planetary Defence
- 7 Space Security
- 8 Anti-satellite Weapons and International Law
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2023
Book contents
- Who Owns Outer Space?
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 176
- Who Owns Outer Space?
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Note
- Introduction
- 1 Space Tourism
- 2 Mega-constellations
- 3 Mega-constellations and International Law
- 4 Abandoned Rocket Bodies
- 5 Space Mining
- 6 Planetary Defence
- 7 Space Security
- 8 Anti-satellite Weapons and International Law
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Who Owns Outer Space?International Law, Astrophysics, and the Sustainable Development of Space, pp. 372 - 389Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Abraham, Kenneth S, ‘Environmental liability and the limits of insurance’ (1988) 88:5 Columbia Law Review 942.Google Scholar
Adams, Andrew A & McCrindle, Rachel J, Pandora’s Box: Social and Professional Issues of the Information Age (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2008).Google Scholar
A’Hearn, Michael F, ‘Comets as building blocks’ (2011) 49 Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 281.Google Scholar
Ailor, William H, ‘Large constellation disposal hazards’ (20 January 2020), Center for Space Policy and Strategy, The Aerospace Corporation, online: aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2020-01/Ailor_LgConstDisposal_20200113.pdf.Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo & Liefländer, Thomas, ‘Clarifying necessity, imminence, and proportionality in the law of self-defense’ (2013) 107:3 American Journal of International Law 563.Google Scholar
Akehurst, Michael, ‘Custom as a source of international law’ (1975) 47:1 British Yearbook of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Albrecht, R & Dore, MHJ, ‘Toward plans for mitigating possible socio-economic effects due to a physical impact of an asteroid on Earth’ (paper delivered at the 7th IAA Planetary Defense Conference, virtual, 26–30 April 2021), online: ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021plde.confE..74A/abstract.Google Scholar
Alexander, Emma, ‘A 4G network on the Moon is bad news for radio astronomy’, The Conversation (23 October 2020), online: theconversation.com/a-4g-network-on-the-moon-is-bad-news-for-radio-astronomy-148652.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Jose E, ‘Torturing the law’, (2006) 37:2 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 175.Google Scholar
American Astronomical Society, ‘Impact of satellite constellations on optical astronomy and recommendations towards mitigations’ (2020), ed. Constance Walker & Jeffrey Hall [‘SATCON1 Report’], online: aas.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/SATCON1-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
American Astronomical Society, ‘Report of the SATCON2 Workshop’ (2021), ed. Constance Walker & Jeffrey Hall [‘SATCON2 Report’], online: baas.aas.org/pub/2021i0205/release/1.Google Scholar
Anz-Meador, Phillip D, Opiela, John N, Shoots, Debra & Liou, J-C, History of On-Orbit Satellite Fragmentations, 15th ed. (Houston: NASA, 2018).Google Scholar
Aoki, Setsuko, ‘Satellite ownership transfers and the liability of the launching states’ (presentation delivered at the IISL/ECSL Symposium at the 51st Session of the Legal Subcommittee of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, Vienna, 19 March 2012), online: www.unoosa.org/pdf/pres/lsc2012/symp-03E.pdf.Google Scholar
Arakawa, M, Saiki, T, Wada, K, Ogawa, K, Kadono, T, Shirai, K et al., ‘An artificial impact on the asteroid (162173) Ryugu formed a crater in the gravity-dominated regime’ (2020) 368:6486 Science 67.Google Scholar
Arbatov, Alexey, ‘Arms control in outer space: The Russian angle, and a possible way forward’ (2019) 75:4 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 151.Google Scholar
Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzarelli, Tony, ‘Obtaining landing licenses and permission to operate LEO constellations on a global basis’, in Pelton, Joseph N & Madry, Scott, eds., Handbook of Small Satellites (Cham: Springer, 2020) 1287.Google Scholar
Banner, Stuart, Who Owns the Sky? The Struggle to Control Airspace from the Wright Brothers On (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Barbee, Brent W, Megan Bruck Syal, David Dearborn, Galen Gisler, Kevin Greenaugh, Kirsten M Howley, et al., ‘Options and uncertainties in planetary defense: Mission planning and vehicle design for flexible response’ (2008) 143 Acta Astronautica 37.Google Scholar
Barbee, Brent, Chodas, Paul, Lyzhoft, Joshua, Petropoulos, Anastassios E, Roa, Javier & Sarli, Bruno, ‘2019 PDC mitigation mission options’ (paper delivered at the 6th IAA Planetary Defense Conference, College Park, Maryland, 29 April–3 May 2019), NASA, online: cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/pd/cs/pdc19/pdc19_briefing4c.pdf.Google Scholar
Barnes, Richard JH & Clapp, Jennifer, ‘Cospas-Sarsat: A quiet success story’ (1995) 11:4 Space Policy 261.Google Scholar
Beyerlin, Ulrich & Marauhn, Thilo, International Environmental Law (Oxford: Hart, 2011).Google Scholar
Billingham, John, Gilbreath, William & O’Leary, Brian, eds., Space Resources and Space Settlements (Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center, 1979).Google Scholar
Birnie, Patricia & Boyle, Alan, International Law and the Environment, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Boley, Aaron & Byers, Michael, ‘Satellite mega-constellations create risks in low Earth orbit, the atmosphere and on Earth’ (2021) 11 Scientific Reports 10642.Google Scholar
Boley, Aaron C, Wright, Ewan, Lawler, Samantha, Hickson, Paul & Balam, Dave, ‘Plaskett 1.8 metre observations of Starlink satellites’ (2022) 163:5 Astronomical Journal 199.Google Scholar
Booth, Ken & Wheeler, Nicholas J, The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation, and Trust in World Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottke, William F & Norman, Marc D, ‘The late heavy bombardment’ (2017) 45 Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 619.Google Scholar
Bottke, William F, Jr, David Vokrouhlický, David P Rubincam, & Nesvorný, David, ‘The Yarkovsky and YORP effects: Implications for asteroid dynamics’ (2006) 34 Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 157.Google Scholar
Bower, Adam, Norms without the Great Powers: International Law and Changing Social Standards in World Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Brown, PG, Assink, JD, Astiz, L, Blaauw, R, Boslough, MB, Borovička, J et al., ‘A 500-kiloton airburst over Chelyabinsk and an enhanced hazard from small impactors’ (2013) 503:7475 Nature 238.Google Scholar
Brundtland, Gro H, ‘Report of the World Commission on Environmental Development: Our Common Future’ (1987), United Nations, online: sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Steven M, Cabell, Jayson W & McCrary, Daniel C, Acquiring Combat Capability through Innovative Uses of Public Private Partnerships (MBA professional report, Naval Postgraduate School, 2006), online: calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/384.Google Scholar
Bullard, John W, History of the Redstone Missile System (Huntsville: Army Missile Command, 1965).Google Scholar
Burkadze, Khatuna, ‘A shift in the historical understanding of armed attack and its applicability to cyberspace’ (2020) 44:1 Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 33.Google Scholar
Burton, Michael G, ‘Astronomy in Antarctica’ (2010) 18:4 Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 417.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Conceptualising the relationship between jus cogens and erga omnes rules’ (1997) 66:2–3 Nordic Journal of International Law 211.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Still agreeing to disagree: International security and constructive ambiguity’ (2020) 8:1 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 91.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael & Boley, Aaron, ‘Cis-lunar space and the security dilemma’ (2022) 78:1 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 17.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael & Byers, Cameron, ‘Toxic splash: Russian rocket stages dropped in Arctic waters raise health, environmental and legal concerns’ (2017) 53:6 Polar Record 580.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, Franks, Kelsey & Gage, Andrew, ‘The internationalization of climate damages litigation’ (2017) 7:2 Washington Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 264.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael & Nolte, Georg, eds., United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Byers, Michael & Simon-Butler, Andrew, ‘Outer space’, in Peters, Anne, ed., Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, article last modified October 2020), online: opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1202.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, Wright, Ewan, Boley, Aaron & Byers, Cameron, ‘Unnecessary risks created by uncontrolled rocket reentries’ (2022) 6 Nature Astronomy 1–5, online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-022-01718-8.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A, Lawson, Robert J & Tomlin, Brian W, eds., To Walk without Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Capone, Francesca, ‘Remedies’, in Peters, Anne, ed., Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, article last modified October 2020), online: opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1089.Google Scholar
Cheng, Andrew F, Michel, P, Jutzi, M, Rivkin, AS, Stickle, A, Barnouin, O et al., ‘Asteroid impact & deflection assessment mission: Kinetic impactor’ (2016) 121 Planetary and Space Science 27.Google Scholar
Cheng, Andrew F, Michel, P, Reed, C, Galvez, A & Carnelli, I, ‘DART: Double Asteroid Redirection Test’ (paper delivered at the European Planetary Science Congress, Madrid, September 2012), online: meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EPSC2012/EPSC2012–935-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Cheng, Andrew F, Rivkin, Andrew S, Michel, Patrick, Atchison, Justin, Barnouin, Olivier, Benner, Lance et al., ‘AIDA DART asteroid deflection test: Planetary defense and science objectives’ (2018) 157 Planetary and Space Science 104.Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin, ‘The legal regime of airspace and outer space: The boundary problem. Functionalism versus spatialism: The major premises’ (1980) 5 Annals of Air & Space Law 323.Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin, ‘The 1968 astronauts agreement or how not to make a treaty’ (1969) 23 Year Book of World Affairs 185.Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin, Studies in International Space Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Cheng, Bin, ‘United Nations resolutions on outer space: “Instant” international customary law?’ (1965) 5 Indian Journal of International Law 23.Google Scholar
Chesley, SR & Farnocchia, D, ‘Apophis impact hazard assessment and sensitivity to spacecraft contact’ (paper delivered at the Apophis T-9 Years workshop, virtual, November 2020), Lunar and Planetary Institute Contrib No 2242, Universities Space Research Association, online: www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/apophis2020/pdf/2049.pdf.Google Scholar
Chesley, Steven R, Farnocchia, Davide, Nolan, Michael C, Vokrouhlický, David, Chodas, Paul W, Milani, Andrea et al., ‘Orbit and bulk density of the OSIRIS-REx target asteroid (101955) Bennu’ (2014) 235 Icarus 5.Google Scholar
Chesley, Steven R & Spahr, Timothy B, ‘Earth impactors: orbital characteristics and warning time’, in Belton, Michael JS, Morgan, Thomas H, Samarasinha, Nalin H & Yeomans, Donald K, eds., Mitigation of Hazardous Comets and Asteroids (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) 22.Google Scholar
Christol, CQ, The Modern International Law of Outer Space (New York: Pergamon Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Committee on the Review of Planetary Protection Policy Development Processes, Review and Assessment of Planetary Protection Policy Development Process (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Cordesman, Anthony H & Kendall, Joseph, ‘Chinese space strategy and developments’ (18 August 2016) CSIS report, Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), online: www.csis.org/analysis/china-space-strategy-and-developments.Google Scholar
Craven, Matthew, The Decolonization of International Law: State Succession and the Law of Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Crawford, James & Viles, Thomas (1994) ‘International law on a given day’, in Ginther, Konrad, Hafner, Gerhard, Lang, Winfried, Neuhold, Hanspeter & Sucharipa, Lilly-Behrmann, , eds., Völkerrecht zwischen normativem Anspruch und politischer Realität: Festschrift für Karl Zemanek (Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1994) 45.Google Scholar
Cronin, John R & Pizzarello, Sandra, ‘Amino acids in meteorites’ (1983) 3:9 Advances in Space Research 5.Google Scholar
Dallas, JA, Raval, S, Alvarez Gaitan, JP, Saydam, S & Dempster, AG, ‘The environmental impact of emissions from space launches: A comprehensive review’ (2020) 255 Journal of Cleaner Production 120209.Google Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony, ‘Custom and treaty: A response to Professor Weisburd’ (1988) 21:3 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 459.Google Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony, ‘International law, intertemporal problems’, in Bernhardt, R, ed., Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992) 1234.Google Scholar
Dean, Arthur H, Test Ban and Disarmament: The Path of Negotiation, 1st ed. (New York: Published for the Council on Foreign Relations by Harper & Row, 1966).Google Scholar
De la Fuente Marcos, C, & de la Fuenta Marcos, R, ‘Asteroid (469219) 2016 HO3, the smallest and closest Earth quasi-satellite’ (2016) 462 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 3341.Google Scholar
De Lucia, Vito & Iavicoli, Viviana, ‘From outer space to ocean depths: The “spacecraft cemetery” and the protection of the marine environment in areas beyond national jurisdiction’ (2019) 49:2 California Western International Law Journal 345.Google Scholar
De Man, Philip, ‘State practice, domestic legislation and the interpretation of fundamental principles of international space law’ (2017) 42 Space Policy 92.Google Scholar
Dembling, Paul G & Arons, Daniel M, ‘The Treaty on Rescue and Return of Astronauts and Space Objects’ (1968) 9:3 William and Mary Law Review 649.Google Scholar
Doboš, Bohumil, Pražák, Jakub & Němečková, Marie, ‘Atomic salvation: A case for nuclear planetary defense’ (2020) 18:1 Astropolitics 73.Google Scholar
Dones, L, Weissman, PR, Levison, HF & Duncan, MJ, ‘Oort Cloud formation and dynamics’, in Johnstone, D, Adams, Fred C, Lin, Doug NC, Neufeld, David A & Ostriker, Eve C, eds., Star Formation in the Interstellar Medium: In Honor of David Hollenbach, Chris McKee and Frank Shu (San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2004) 371.Google Scholar
Draguljić, Gorana, ‘Power in numbers: The developing world and the construction of global commons institutions’ (2020) 41:12 Third World Quarterly 1973.Google Scholar
Drolshagen, Gerhard, Koschny, Detlef, Drolshagen, Sandra, Kretschmer, Jana & Poppe, Björn, ‘Mass accumulation of Earth from interplanetary dust, meteoroids, asteroids, and comets’ (2017) 143 Planetary and Space Science 21.Google Scholar
Duke, Michael B, Gaddis, Lisa R, Taylor, Jeffrey & Schmitt, Harrison H, ‘Development of the Moon’ (2006) 60:1 Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry 597.Google Scholar
Durkee, Melissa J, ‘Interstitial space law’ (2019) 97:2 Washington University Law Review 423.Google Scholar
Egan, Brian J, ‘The next fifty years of the Outer Space Treaty’ (address delivered at the Galloway Symposium on Critical Issues in Space Law, Washington, DC, 7 December 2016), US State Department, online: 2009-2017.state.gov/s/l/releases/remarks/264963.htm.Google Scholar
ESA Space Debris Office, ‘ESA’s Annual Space Environment Report’ (2022) European Space Agency (ESA) Ref No GEN-DB-LOG-00288-OPS-SD, online: www.sdo.esoc.esa.int/environment_report/Space_Environment_Report_latest.pdf.Google Scholar
European Space Policy Institute (ESPI), EPSI Yearbook 2020: Space Policies, Issues and Trends (Vienna: ESPI, 2020), online: espi.or.at/publications/espi-yearbook.Google Scholar
Evans, David, ‘“Star Wars” Will It Work?’ Chicago Tribune (23 May 1987) online: https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1987-05-24-8702080800-story.html.Google Scholar
Faber, Daniel, Capitalizing on Environmental Injustice: The Polluter–Industrial Complex in the Age of Globalization (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008).Google Scholar
Farnocchia, D, Chesley, SR, Chodas, PW, Micheli, M, Tholen, DJ, Milani, A et al., ‘Yarkovsky-driven impact risk analysis for asteroid (99942) Apophis’ (2013) 224:1 Icarus 192.Google Scholar
Farwell, James P & Rohozinski, Rafal, ‘Stuxnet and the future of cyber war’ (2011) 30:1 Survival 23.Google Scholar
Feder, Toni, ‘Iridium satellite system poses threat to radio astronomy’ (1996) 49:11 Physics Today 71.Google Scholar
Feynman, RP, ‘Volume 2: Appendix F – Personal observations on reliability of shuttle’, Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident (1986), online: history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v2appf.htm.Google Scholar
Fladeland, Logan, Boley, Aaron C & Byers, Michael, ‘Meteoroid stream formation due to the extraction of space resources from asteroids’ (paper delivered at the First International Orbital Debris Conference, Sugar Land, TX, 9–12 December 2019), online: arxiv.org/pdf/1911.12840.pdf.Google Scholar
Forden, Geoffrey, ‘After China’s test: Time for a limited ban on anti-satellite weapons’ (2007) 37:April Arms Control Today, online: www.armscontrol.org/act/2007-04/features/after-chinas-test-time-limited-ban-anti-satellite-weapons.Google Scholar
Freeland, Steven, ‘Up, up and … back: The emergence of space tourism and its impact on the international law of outer space’ (2005) 6:1 Chicago Journal of International Law 10.Google Scholar
Freeland, Steven & Jakhu, Ram, ‘Article II’, in Hobe, Stephan, Schmidt-Tedd, Bernhard, Schrogl, Kai-Uwe & Meishan Goh, Gérardine, eds., Cologne Commentary on Space Law: Volume 1, Outer Space Treaty (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2009) 44.Google Scholar
Friedman, George, Lewis, John, Snively, Leslie, Valentine, Lee, Gertsch, Richard & Wingo, Dennis, ‘Mass drivers for planetary defense’ (paper delivered at the Planetary Defense Conference: Protecting Earth from Asteroids, Orange County, California, 23–26 February 2004).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Richard, ‘The Vienna Convention rules on treaty interpretation’, in Hollis, Duncan B, ed., The Oxford Guide to Treaties, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020) 459.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Richard K, Treaty Interpretation, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Gill, Bates & Kleiber, Martin, ‘China’s space odyssey: What the antisatellite test reveals about decision-making in Beijing’ (2007) 86:3 Foreign Affairs 2, online: www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2007-05-01/chinas-space-odyssey-what-antisatellite-test-reveals-about-decision.Google Scholar
Givel, Michael & Glantz, Stanton A, ‘The “global settlement” with the tobacco industry: Six years later’ (2004) 94:2 American Journal of Public Health 218.Google Scholar
Gladman, Brett & Volk, Kathryn, ‘Transneptunian space’ (2021) 59 Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 203.Google Scholar
Gleason, Michael P, ‘A short guide for understanding and assessing US space sustainability initiatives’ (April 2021), Center for Space Policy and Strategy, online: aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/Gleason_SpaceSustainability_20210407.pdf.Google Scholar
Gordon, Todd & Webber, Jeffery R, ‘Imperialism and resistance: Canadian mining companies in Latin America’ (2008) 29:1 Third World Quarterly 63.Google Scholar
Gottfried, Kurt & Lebow, Richard N, ‘Anti-satellite weapons: Weighing the risks’, in Long, Franklin A, Hafner, Donald & Boutwell, Jeffrey, eds., Weapons in Space, 1st ed. (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1986) 147.Google Scholar
Gray, Christine, International Law and the Use of Force, 4th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Green, James A, ‘India and a customary comprehensive nuclear test-ban: Persistent objection, peremptory norms and the 123 Agreement’ (2011) 51:3 Indian Journal of International Law 3.Google Scholar
Green, James A, The Persistent Objector Rule in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Green, James A, ‘Planetary defense: Near-Earth objects, nuclear weapons, and international law’ (2019) 42 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Grego, Laura & Wright, David, ‘Incremental progress but no realistic capability: Analysis of the ground-based midcourse missile defense test FTG-15’ (2018) Union of Concerned Scientists report, online: www.ucsusa.org/resources/analysis-gmd-missile-defense-test-ftg-15.Google Scholar
Greig, DW, ‘Reflections on the role of consent’ (1989) 12 Australian Yearbook of International Law 125.Google Scholar
Grün, E, Zook, HA, Fechtig, H & Giese, RH, ‘Collisional balance of the meteoritic complex’ (1985) 62:2 Icarus 244Google Scholar
Hall, R Cargill ‘Rescue and return of astronauts on Earth and in outer space’ (1962) 63:2 American Journal of International Law 197.Google Scholar
The Hague International Space Resources Governance Working Group, ‘Building blocks for the development of an international framework on space resource activities’ (12 November 2019), Leiden University, online: www.universiteitleiden.nl/binaries/content/assets/rechtsgeleerdheid/instituut-voor-publiekrecht/lucht--en-ruimterecht/space-resources/bb-thissrwg--cover.pdf.Google Scholar
Harrison, Todd, Cooper, Zack, Johnson, Kaitlyn & Robert, Thomas G, ‘Escalation and deterrence in the second space age’ (October 2017) CSIS Project report, Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), online: www.csis.org/analysis/escalation-and-deterrence-second-space-age.Google Scholar
Herz, John H, ‘Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma’ (1950) 2:2 World Politics 157.Google Scholar
Housen-Couriel, Deborah, ‘Disruption of satellite transmissions ad bellum and in bello: Launching a new paradigm of convergence’ (2012) 45:3 Israel Law Review 431.Google Scholar
Humphrey, John, Human Rights and the United Nations: A Great Adventure (Epping: Bowker, 1984).Google Scholar
Huzel, Dieter K & Von Braun, Wernher, Peenemünde to Canaveral (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962).Google Scholar
International Astronomical Union & United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, ‘Dark and quiet skies for science and society – Report and recommendations’ (2021), ed. Constance Walker & Simonetta Di Pippo [‘Dark and Quiet Skies I Report’], online: www.iau.org/static/publications/dqskies-book-29-12-20.pdf.Google Scholar
International Astronomical Union & United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, ‘Dark and quiet skies II for science and society – Working group reports’ (2022), ed. Constance Walker & Piero Benvenuti [‘Dark and Quiet Skies II Report’], online: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5874725.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), ‘The potential human cost of the use of weapons in outer space and the protection afforded by international humanitarian law’ (2021), position paper submitted by the ICRC to the secretary general of the United Nations on the issues outlined in General Assembly Resolution 75/36, ICRC, online: www.icrc.org/en/document/potential-human-cost-outer-space-weaponization-ihl-protection.Google Scholar
International Law Commission, ‘Ways and means for making the evidence of customary international law more readily available’, in Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1950, Volume 2 (New York: UN, 1957).Google Scholar
Israel, Brian R, ‘Space Resources in the Evolutionary Course of Space Lawmaking’ (2019) 113 AJIL Unbound 114.Google Scholar
Jarosewich, Eugene, ‘Chemical analyses of meteorites: A compilation of stony and iron meteorite analyses’ (1990) 25:4 Meteoritics 323.Google Scholar
Jennings, Barbara, ‘Day 5 at risk critical infrastructure effects’ (paper delivered at the 6th Planetary Defense Conference, College Park, Maryland, 29 April–3 May 2019), NASA, online: cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/pd/cs/pdc19/pdc19_briefing5c.pdf.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, ‘Cooperation under the security dilemma’ (1978) 30:2 World Politics 167.Google Scholar
Jia, Bing Bing ‘The relations between treaties and custom’ (2010) 9:1 Chinese Journal of International Law 81.Google Scholar
Johnson, Christopher D, ‘The legal status of megaLEO constellations and concerns about appropriation of large swaths of earth orbit’, in Pelton, Joseph N & Madry, Scott, eds., Handbook of Small Satellites (Cham: Springer, 2020) 1337.Google Scholar
Johnson, Lindley N, ‘Preparing for planetary defense: Detection and interception of asteroids on collision course with Earth’ (paper delivered at the 32nd Space Congress, Cocoa Beach, Florida, 25 April 1995), online: commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1995-32nd/april-25-1995/18/.Google Scholar
Johnson, Nicholas L, ‘Operation Burnt Frost: A view from inside’ (2021) 56 Space Policy 101411.Google Scholar
Johnson, Nicholas L & Rodvold, David M, Europe and Asia in Space 1993–1994, 2nd ed. (Colorado Springs: Kaman Sciences Corp, 1993).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred, ‘The Pentagon’s innovation experiment’ MIT Technology Review (19 December 2016), online: www.technologyreview.com/2016/12/19/155246/the-pentagons-innovation-experiment.Google Scholar
Kaur, Karanpreet, ‘China’s anti-satellite warfare programme: Implications and lessons’ (Spring 2014) Scholar Warrior 112.Google Scholar
Keith, David W, ‘Geoengineering the climate: History and prospect’ (2000) 25 Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 245.Google Scholar
Kessler, Donald J & Cour-Palais, Burton G, ‘Collision frequency of artificial satellites: The creation of a debris belt’ (1978) 83:A6 Journal of Geophysical Research 2637.Google Scholar
Kocifaj, Miroslav, Kundracik, Frantisek, Barentine, John C & Bará, Salvador, ‘The proliferation of space objects is a rapidly increasing source of artificial night sky brightness’ (2021) 504:1 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters L40.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, ‘Selected problems in the theory of customary international law’ (2003) 50:2 Netherlands International Law Review 119.Google Scholar
Koplow, David A, ‘ASAT-isfaction: Customary international law and the regulation of anti-satellite weapons’ (2009) 30 Michigan Journal of International Law 1187.Google Scholar
Koplow, David A, Death by Moderation: The U.S. Military’s Quest for Useable Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Koplow, David A, ‘An inference about interference: A surprising application of existing international law to inhibit anti-satellite weapons’ (2014) 35:3 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 737.Google Scholar
Kováčová, M, Nagy, R, Kornoš, L & Tóth, J, ‘101955 Bennu and 162173 Ryugu: Dynamical modelling of ejected particles to the Earth’ (2020) 185 Planetary and Space Science 104897.Google Scholar
Kretzmer, David, ‘The inherent right to self-defence and proportionality in jus ad bellum’ (2013) 24:1 European Journal of International Law 235.Google Scholar
Larson, Erik JL, Portmann, Robert W, Rosenlof, Karen H, Fahey, David W, Daniel, John S & Ross, Martin N, ‘Global atmospheric response to emissions from a proposed reusable space launch system’ (2017) 5:1 Earth’s Future 37.Google Scholar
Lawler, Samantha M, Boley, Aaron C & Rein, Hanno, ‘Visibility predictions for near-future satellite megaconstellations: Latitudes near 50° will experience the worst light pollution’ (2022) 163:1 Astronomical Journal 21.Google Scholar
Le May, S, Gehly, S, Carter, BA & Flegel, S, ‘Space debris collision probability analysis for proposed global broadband constellations’ (2018) 151 Acta Astronautica 445.Google Scholar
Levesque, Daniel, ed., The History and Experience of the International Cospas-Sarsat Programme for Search and Rescue (Paris: International Astronautical Federation, 2016), online: https://cospas-sarsat.int/images/content/articles/Cospas-Sarsat-Report_ReducedSize_Jan-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Lewis, Hugh G, ‘Understanding long-term orbital debris population dynamics’ (2020) 7:3 Journal of Space Safety Engineering 164.Google Scholar
Li, Shuai, Lucey, Paul G, Milliken, Ralph E, Hayne, Paul O, Fisher, Elizabeth, Williams, Jean-Pierre et al., ‘Direct evidence of surface exposed water ice in the lunar polar regions’ (2018) 115:36 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 8907.Google Scholar
Liemer, Ross & Chyba, Christopher F, ‘A verifiable limited test ban for anti-satellite weapons’ (2010) 33:3 Washington Quarterly 149.Google Scholar
Liou, J-C & Johnson, NL, ‘Risks in space from orbiting debris’ (2006) 311 Science 340.Google Scholar
Liou, J-C, Matney, M, Vavrin, A, Manis, A & Gates, D, ‘NASA ODPO’s large constellation study’ (2018) 22:3 Orbital Debris Quarterly News 4.Google Scholar
Livingstone, David & Lewis, Patricia, ‘Space, the final frontier for cybersecurity?’ (22 September 2016) Chatham House research paper, online: www.chathamhouse.org/2016/09/space-final-frontier-cybersecurity.Google Scholar
Lodders, K, Palme, H & Gail, HP, ‘Abundances of the elements in the solar system’, in Trümper, JE, ed., Landolt-Börnstein: Group VI Astronomy and Astrophysics (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009), Volume 4B, ch. 4.4, 560.Google Scholar
Lodders, Katharina, ‘Solar system abundances of the elements’, in Goswami, Aruna & Reddy, B Eswar, eds., Principles and Perspectives in Cosmochemistry (Berlin: Springer, 2010) 379.Google Scholar
Lowe, Vaughan, ‘Do general rules of international law exist?’ (1983) 9:3 Review of International Studies 207.Google Scholar
Lu, Edward T & Love, Stanley G, ‘Gravitational tractor for towing asteroids’ (2005) 438:7065 Nature 177.Google Scholar
Lyall, Francis & Larsen, Paul B, Space Law: A Treatise (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
McDowell, Jonathan C, ‘The edge of space: Revisiting the Karman Line’ (2018) 151 Acta Astronautica 668.Google Scholar
MacGibbon, Iain C, ‘Customary international law and acquiescence’ (1957) 33 British Yearbook of International Law 115.Google Scholar
MacGibbon, Iain C, ‘The scope of acquiescence in international law’ (1954) 31 British Yearbook of International Law 143.Google Scholar
McNair, Lord, The Law of Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961) (republished 1986).Google Scholar
Mallowan, Lucas, Rapp, Lucien & Topka, Maria, ‘Reinventing treaty compliant “safety zones” in the context of space sustainability’ (2021) 8:2 Journal of Space Safety Engineering 155.Google Scholar
Mandaraka-Sheppard, Alexandra, Modern Maritime Law: Volume 2, Managing Risks and Liabilities, 3rd ed. (Abingdon: Informa Law from Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Marboe, Irmgard, ed., Soft Law in Outer Space: The Function of Non-binding Norms in International Space Law (Vienna: Böhlau Verlag, 2012).Google Scholar
Marchisio, Sergio, ‘Article IX’, in Stephan Hobe et al., eds., Cologne Commentary on Space Law: Volume 1 (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2009) 169.Google Scholar
Massey, Robert, Sara Lucatello & Piero Benvenuti, ‘The challenge of satellite megaconstellations’ (2020) 4 Nature Astronomy 1022.Google Scholar
Masson-Zwaan, Tanja & Sundahl, Mark J, ‘The lunar legal landscape: Challenges and opportunities’ (2021) 46 Air and Space Law 29.Google Scholar
Metzger, Philip T, ‘Dust transport and its effects due to landing spacecraft’ (paper delivered at the Impact of Lunar Dust on Human Exploration conference, Houston, 11–13 February 2020, LPI Contrib No. 2141), online: www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lunardust2020/pdf/5040.pdf.Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul, ‘Arms control in outer space: Mission impossible or unrealized potential?’ (20 October 2020), Canadian Global Affairs Institute Policy Perspective, online: www.cgai.ca/arms_control_in_outer_space_mission_impossible_or_unrealized_potential.Google Scholar
Millard, William H, ‘The legal environment of the British oil industry’ (1982) 18:3 Tulsa Law Review 394.Google Scholar
Mineiro, Michael C, ‘FY-1C and USA-193 ASAT intercepts: An assessment of legal obligations under Article IX of the Outer Space Treaty’ (2008) 34:2 Journal of Space Law 321.Google Scholar
Moltz, James Clay, ‘The changing dynamics of twenty-first-century space power’ (2019) 12:1 Journal of Strategic Security 15.Google Scholar
Moltz, James Clay, The Politics of Space Security, 3rd ed. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Montana, Patricia Grande, ‘Watch or report? Livestream or help? Good Samaritan laws revisited: The need to create a duty to report’ (2017) 66:3 Cleveland State Law Review 533.Google Scholar
Moorhead, Althea V, Kingery, Aaron & Ehlert, Steven, ‘NASA’s meteoroid engineering Model 3 and its ability to replicate spacecraft impact rates’ (2020) 57:1 Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 160.Google Scholar
Morrison, David, ‘Tunguska Workshop: Applying modern tools to understand the 1908 Tunguska impact’ (December 2018), NASA Ames Research Center, NASA Technical Memorandum 220174, NASA, online: ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190002302.Google Scholar
Mossop, Joanna, ‘Protests against oil exploration at sea: Lessons from the Arctic Sunrise arbitration’ (2016) 31:1 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 60.Google Scholar
Mowthorpe, Matthew, The Militarization and Weaponization of Space (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2004).Google Scholar
Nadarajah, Hema, ‘Soft law and international relations: The Arctic, outer space, and climate change’ (PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, 2020), online: dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0394919.Google Scholar
NASA Orbital Debris Program Office, ‘West Ford needles: Where are they now?’ (2013) 17:4 Orbital Debris Quarterly 3, online: orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/quarterly-news/pdfs/odqnv17i4.pdf.Google Scholar
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), ‘Near-Earth object survey and deflection analysis of alternatives – Report to Congress’ (Washington, DC, NASA, March 2007), online: cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/neo_report2007.html.Google Scholar
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), ‘NASA Confirms DART Mission Impact Changed Asteroid?s Motion in Space’, NASA (11 Oct 2022), online: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-confirms-dart-mission-impact-changed-asteroid-s-motion-in-space.Google Scholar
Neufeld, Michael J, The Rocket and the Reich: Peenemünde and the Coming of the Ballistic Missile Era (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995).Google Scholar
Newman, Christopher, Dinsley, Ralph & Ralston, William, ‘Introducing the law games: Predicting legal liability and fault in satellite operations’ (2021) 67:11 Advances in Space Research 3785Google Scholar
Nicolls, Michael J & McKnight, Darren, ‘Collision risk assessment for derelict objects in low-Earth orbit’ (paper delivered at the First International Orbital Debris Conference, Sugar Land, TX, 9–12 December 2019), online: www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/orbitaldebris2019/orbital2019paper/pdf/6096.pdf.Google Scholar
O’Neill, GK & Kolm, HH, ‘High-acceleration mass drivers’ (1980) 7 Acta Astronautica 1229.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Jesse, ‘Danger at 700,000 feet: Why the United States needs to develop a kinetic anti-satellite missile technology test-ban treaty’ (2013) 38:2 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 761.Google Scholar
Pardini, Carmen & Anselmo, Luciano, ‘Uncontrolled re-entries of spacecraft and rocket bodies: A statistical overview over the last decade’ (2019) 6 Journal of Space Engineering Safety 30.Google Scholar
Park, Seong-Hyeon, Navarro Laboulais, Javier, Leyland, Pénélope, Mischler, Stefano, ‘Re-entry survival analysis and ground risk assessment of space debris considering by-products generation’ (2021) 179 Acta Astronautica 604.Google Scholar
Parson, Edward A & Keith, David W, ‘End the deadlock on governance of geoengineering research’ (2013) 339 Science 1278.Google Scholar
Patera, Russell P, ‘Hazard analysis for uncontrolled space vehicle reentry’ (2008) 45:5 Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 1031.Google Scholar
Pelton, Joseph N, ‘Global space governance and planetary defense mechanisms’, in Schmidt, Nikola, ed., Planetary Defense: Global Space Collaboration for Saving Earth from Asteroids and Comets (Cham: Springer, 2019) 339.Google Scholar
Pépin, Eugène, ‘Legal problems created by the Sputnik’ (1957) 4 McGill Law Journal 66.Google Scholar
Petras, Christopher M, ‘The use of force in response to cyber-attack on commercial space systems: Reexamining “self-defense” in outer space in light of the convergence of U.S. military and commercial space activities’ (2002) 67:4 Journal of Air Law and Commerce 1213.Google Scholar
Phillips, Catherine & Sirkar, Jaideep, ‘The International Conference on Safety of Life at Sea, 1914’ (Summer 2012) 69:2 Coast Guard Proceedings: Journal of Safety & Security at Sea 27, online: www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/DCO%20Documents/Proceedings%20Magazine/Archive/2012/Vol69_No2_Sum2012.pdf.Google Scholar
Pillsbury, Michael P, ‘An assessment of China’s anti-satellite and space warfare programs, policies and doctrines’ (19 January 2007), US–China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) Report, USCC, online: www.uscc.gov/research/assessment-chinas-anti-satellite-and-space-warfare-programs-policies-and-doctrines.Google Scholar
Pisani, Donald J, ‘“I am resolved not to interfere, but permit all to work freely”: The Gold Rush and American resource law’ (Winter 1998–1999) 77:4 California History 123.Google Scholar
Poole, Bryce G, ‘Against the nuclear option: Planetary defence under international space law’ (2020) 45:1 Air and Space Law 55.Google Scholar
Price, Richard M, The Chemical Weapons Taboo (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, Rajeswari Pillai, ‘Changing space security dynamics and governance debates’, in De Zwart, Melissa & Henderson, Stacey, eds., Commercial and Military Uses of Outer Space (Singapore: Springer, 2021) 153.Google Scholar
Raju, Nivedita, ‘Russia’s anti-satellite test should lead to a multilateral ban’ (7 December 2021), Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, online: www.sipri.org/commentary/essay/2021/russias-anti-satellite-test-should-lead-multilateral-ban.Google Scholar
Ranganathan, Surabhi, ‘The common heritage of mankind: Annotations on a battle’, in von Bernstorff, Jochen & Dann, Philipp, eds., The Battle for International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019) 35.Google Scholar
Rapp, Lucien & Topka, Maria, ‘Small satellite constellations, infrastructure shift and space market regulation’, in Froehlich, Annette, ed., Legal Aspects around Satellite Constellations, Volume 2 (Cham: Springer, 2021) 1.Google Scholar
Rawls, Meredith L, Thiemann, Heidi B, Chemin, Victor, Walkowicz, Lucianne, Peel, Mike W & Grange, Yan G, ‘Satellite constellation internet affordability and need’ (2020) 4:10 Research Notes of the AAS 189.Google Scholar
Reiland, Nathan, Rosengren, Aaron J, Malhotra, Renu & Bombardelli, Claudio, ‘Assessing and minimizing collisions in satellite mega-constellations’ (2021) 67:11 Advances in Space Research 3755.Google Scholar
Rein, Hanno & Spiegel, David S, ‘IAS15: A fast, adaptive, high-order integrator for gravitational dynamics, accurate to machine precision over a billion orbits’ (2015) 446:2 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 1424.Google Scholar
Rein, Hanno, Tamayo, Daniel & Vokrouhlický, David, ‘The random walk of cars and their collision probabilities with Planets’ (2018) 5:2 Aerospace 57.Google Scholar
Rogers, APV, Law on the Battlefield, 3rd ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Ross, Martin, Mills, Michael & Toohey, Darin, ‘Potential climate impact of black carbon emitted by rockets’ (2010) 37:24 Geophysical Research Letters L24810.Google Scholar
Ross, Martin & Sheaffer, Patti, ‘Radiative forcing caused by rocket engine emissions’ (2014) 2:4 Earth’s Future 117.Google Scholar
Ross, Martin & Vedda, James, ‘The policy and science of rocket emissions’, Center for Space Policy and Strategy, the Aerospace Corporation (2018), online: aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2018-05/RocketEmissions_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Rossi, A, Petit, A & McKnight, D, ‘Short-term space safety analysis of LEO constellations and clusters’ (2020) 175 Acta Astronautica 476.Google Scholar
Rotola, Giuliana & Williams, Andrew, ‘Regulatory Context of Conflicting Uses of Outer Space: Astronomy and Satellite Constellations’ (2021) 46:4/5 Air and Space Law 545.Google Scholar
Ruys, Tom, Armed Attack and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Saunders, Philippe C & Lutes, Charles D, ‘China’s ASAT test: Motivations and implications’ (2007) 46:3 Joint Force Quarterly 39, online: apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA517485.pdf.Google Scholar
Schlüter, Lukas & Cowley, Aidan, ‘Review of techniques for in-situ oxygen extraction on the Moon’ (2020) 181 Planetary and Space Science 104753.Google Scholar
Schmidle, Nicholas, Virgin Galactic and the Making of a Modern Astronaut (New York: Henry Holt & Co, 2021).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N, ‘International law and military operations in space’ (2006) 10 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 89.Google Scholar
Schulz, Leonard & Glassmeier, Karl-Heinz, ‘On the anthropogenic and natural injection of matter into Earth’s atmosphere’ (2021) 67:3 Advances in Space Research 1002.Google Scholar
Scott, Edward RD, ‘Chondrites and the Protoplanetary Disk’ (2007) 35:1 Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 577.Google Scholar
Seamone, Evan R, ‘When wishing on a star just won’t do: The legal basis for international cooperation in the mitigation of asteroid impacts and similar transboundary disasters’ (2002) 87 Iowa Law Review 1091.Google Scholar
Shahar, Keren & Greenbaum, Dov, ‘Lessons in space regulations from the lunar tardigrades of the Beresheet hard landing’ (2020) 4 Nature Astronomy 208.Google Scholar
Singh, Pradeep A, ‘The two-year deadline to complete the International Seabed Authority’s Mining Code: Key outstanding matters that still need to be resolved’ (2021) 134 Marine Policy 104804.Google Scholar
Slouka, Zdenek, International Custom and the Continental Shelf (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1968).Google Scholar
Sokol, Joshua, ‘The fault in our stars: Satellite swarms are threatening the night sky. Is low-Earth orbit the next great crucible of environmental conflict?’, Science (7 October 2021), online: www.science.org/content/article/satellite-swarms-are-threatening-night-sky-creating-new-zone-environmental-conflict.Google Scholar
Space Mission Planning Advisory Group (SMPAG), ‘Planetary defence legal overview and assessment: Report by the Ad-Hoc Working Group on Legal Issues to the Space Mission Planning Advisory Group’ (8 April 2020), ESA, online: www.cosmos.esa.int/documents/336356/336472/SMPAG-RP-004_1_0_SMPAG_legal_report_2020-04-08.pdf.Google Scholar
Stares, Paul, The Militarization of Space: U.S. Policy 1945–1984 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Stickle, AM, Rainey, ESG, Bruck Syal, M, Owen, JM, Miller, P, Barnouin, OS et al., ‘Modeling impact outcomes for the Double Asteroids Redirection Test (DART) mission’ (2017) 204 Procedia Engineering 116.Google Scholar
Stucke, Maurice & Grunes, Allen, Big Data and Competition Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Sturdevant, Rick W, ‘NAVSTAR, the global positioning system: A sampling of its military, civil, and commercial impact’, in Dick, Steven J & Launius, Roger D, eds., Societal Impact of Spaceflight (NASA: Washington DC, 2007) 331, online: history.nasa.gov/sp4801-part2.pdf.Google Scholar
Su, Jinyuan, ‘The legal challenge of arms control in space’, in Steer, Cassandra & Hersch, Matthew, eds., War and Peace in Outer Space: Law, Policy, and Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020) 181.Google Scholar
Sundahl, Mark J, ‘The duty to rescue space tourists and return private spacecraft’ (2009) 35:1 Journal of Space Law 169.Google Scholar
Sur, Serge, La coutume internationale, 2e cahier (Paris: Librairies techniques, 1990).Google Scholar
Tellis, Ashley J, ‘India’s ASAT test: An incomplete success’ (15 April 2019), Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, online: carnegieendowment.org/2019/04/15/india-s-asat-test-incomplete-success-pub-78884.Google Scholar
Thirlway, Hugh, Sources of International Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Turnbull, Timothea, ‘Prestige, power, principles and pay-off: Middle powers negotiating international conventional weapons treaties’ (2022) 76:1 Australian Journal of International Affairs 98.Google Scholar
United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), ‘Compendium – Space debris mitigation standards adopted by states and international organizations’ (17 June 2021), UNOOSA, online: www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/spacelaw/sd/Space_Debris_Compendium_COPUOS_17_june_2021.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), ‘Working paper on the establishment of a working group on space resources submitted by Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Greece, Slovakia and Spain’ (27 May 2021), UNOOSA, online: www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/copuos/lsc/space-resources/Non-paper-on-the-Establishment-of-a-Working-Group-on-Space_Resources-at-COPUOS_LSC-27-05-2021.pdf.Google Scholar
Van Ness, Peter, ‘The time has come for a treaty to ban weapons in space’ (2010) 34:3 Asian Perspective 215.Google Scholar
Vasani, Harsh, ‘How China is weaponizing outer space’, The Diplomat (1 January 2017), online: thediplomat.com/2017/01/how-china-is-weaponizing-outer-space.Google Scholar
Vavrin, D & Manis, A, ‘CubeSat study project review’ (2018) 22: 1 Orbital Debris Quarterly News 6.Google Scholar
Velikhov, Yevgeni, Sagdeev, Roald & Kokoshin, Andrei, eds., Weaponry in Space: The Dilemma of Security, translated by Alexander Repyev (Moscow: Mir Publishers, 1986).Google Scholar
Velkovsky, Pavel, Mohan, Janani & Simon, Maxwell, ‘Satellite jamming: A technology primer’ (3 April 2019), Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), online: res.cloudinary.com/csisideaslab/image/upload/v1565982911/on-the-radar/Satellite_Jamming_Primer_FINAL_pdf_bdzxwn.pdf.Google Scholar
Venkatesan, Aparna, Lowenthal, James, Prem, Parvathy & Vidaurri, Monica, ‘The impact of satellite constellations on space as an ancestral global commons’ (2020) 4 Nature Astronomy 1043.Google Scholar
Vereschetin, Vladlen S, ‘Astronauts’, in Peters, Anne, ed., Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, article last modified January 2006), online: opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1141.Google Scholar
Verspieren, Quentin, ‘The US Air Force compliance with the Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices’ (paper delivered at the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, virtual, 16–18 September 2020), online: amostech.com/TechnicalPapers/2020/Orbital-Debris/Verspieren.pdf.Google Scholar
Volynskaya, Olga A, ‘Landmark space-related accidents and the progress of space law’ (2013) 62 Zeitschrift für Luft- und Weltraumrecht (German Journal of Air and Space Law) 220.Google Scholar
Vraken, Martin, ‘Duty to rescue in civil law and common law: Les extrêmes se touchent’ (1998) 47:4 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 934.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Lorien, Dotson, Jessie, Aftosmis, Michael, Stern, Eric, Mathias, Donovan & Chodas, Paul, ‘2021 PDC hypothetical impact exercise: Probabilistic asteroid impact risk, scenario day 3’ (paper delivered at the 7th IAA Planetary Defense Conference, virtual, 26–30 April 2021), NASA, online: cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/pd/cs/pdc21/pdc21_day3_briefing2.pdf.Google Scholar
Wiegert, Paul, ‘On the delivery of DART-ejected material from asteroid (65803) Didymos to Earth’ (2019) 1:3 Planetary Science Journal 1.Google Scholar
Wiegert, Paul A, ‘Meteoroid impacts onto asteroids: A competitor for Yarkovsky and YORP’ (2015) 252 Icarus 22.Google Scholar
Wilson, James R, ‘Regulation of the outer space environment through international accord: The 1979 Moon Treaty’ (1990) 2:2 Fordham Environmental Law Review 173.Google Scholar
Wilson, Tom, ‘Threats to United States space capabilities’ (2001), Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization, online: spp.fas.org/eprint/article05.html.Google Scholar
Wood, Steven, ‘The scope of international obligations to extend rescue assistance to “astronauts” and “personnel” under the Outer Space Treaty and the Return and Rescue Agreement’, in Wouters, Jan, De Man, Philip & Hansen, Rik, eds., Commercial Uses of Space and Space Tourism: Legal and Policy Aspects (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017) 44.Google Scholar
Yeomans, DK, Bhaskaran, S, Broschart, SB, Chesley, SR, Chodas, PW, Sweetser, TH et al., ‘Deflecting a hazardous near-Earth object’ (paper delivered at the 1st IAA Planetary Defense Conference, Granada, Spain, 27–30 April 2009), NASA, online: cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/PDC_proceedings_062009.pdf.Google Scholar
Zedalis, Rex J & Wade, Catherine L, ‘Anti-satellite weapons and the Outer Space Treaty of 1967’ (1978) 8:3 California Western International Law Journal 454.Google Scholar
Zissis, Carin, ‘China’s anti-satellite test’ (22 February 2007), Council on Foreign Relations, online: www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-anti-satellite-test.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access