Book contents
- Why Democracy Failed
- Cambridge Studies in Economic History
- Why Democracy Failed
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on the Regional Division of Spain
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The European Experience: Economic and Political Development, 1870–1939
- Part II Spanish Agriculture, Economic Development, and Democracy
- Part III Explaining the Weakness of the Family Farm
- Part IV Rural Elites, Poverty, and the Attempts at Land Reform
- 7 Landownership, Economic Development, and Poverty in Andalusia and Southern Spain
- 8 The Limits to Land Reform
- Part V Rural Conflicts and the Polarization of Village Society
- Book part
- Glossary
- Bibliography
- Index
7 - Landownership, Economic Development, and Poverty in Andalusia and Southern Spain
from Part IV - Rural Elites, Poverty, and the Attempts at Land Reform
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2020
- Why Democracy Failed
- Cambridge Studies in Economic History
- Why Democracy Failed
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on the Regional Division of Spain
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The European Experience: Economic and Political Development, 1870–1939
- Part II Spanish Agriculture, Economic Development, and Democracy
- Part III Explaining the Weakness of the Family Farm
- Part IV Rural Elites, Poverty, and the Attempts at Land Reform
- 7 Landownership, Economic Development, and Poverty in Andalusia and Southern Spain
- 8 The Limits to Land Reform
- Part V Rural Conflicts and the Polarization of Village Society
- Book part
- Glossary
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This chapter challenges contemporary beliefs that latifundios were inefficient by showing that farmers were quick to respond to changes in factor and commodity prices. Land ownership in southern Spain was heavily concentrated, both on the rich cereal lands of the Guadalquivir valley, as well as the huge dehesas found in the less populated upland regions. Contemporaries believed that large numbers of landless workers lived in extreme poverty at the same time as absentee landowners left significant areas of fertile land abandoned, or under-cultivated. In fact, large farms by the late 1920s were especially suitable for extensive cereals and livestock given the growing possibilities for reducing labour costs through mechanization, and there were difficulties to extend labour-intensive olive and vine cultivation. The chapter also shows that the living standards of rural workers improved over time, although they were vulnerable to economic downturns because of the erosion of traditional safety nets, and the failure of the state to create new ones. Finally, it examines why large landowners were often uninterested in extending state capacity.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Why Democracy FailedThe Agrarian Origins of the Spanish Civil War, pp. 157 - 178Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020