Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- Editors' note
- PART I WTO accessions, the trading system and the global economy
- PART II Overview: systemic outcomes from accessions
- PART III Members’ perspectives on accession negotiations
- PART IV Working party chairpersons’ perspectives on accession negotiations
- PART V Salient features inWTOAccession Protocols
- 29 Market access goods negotiations: salience, results and meaning
- 30 Services market opening: salience, results and meaning
- 31 WTO accession and the private sector: the nexus of rules and market opportunities
- 32 WTO accession and accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement: what is the relationship? Why should WTO acceding governments also consider GPA accession?
- 33 Energy-related rules in Accession Protocols: where are they?
- 34 Domestic framework for making and enforcing policies
- 35 Export duty commitments: the treaty dialogue and the pattern of commitments
- 36 Disciplining state trading practices: lessons from WTO accession negotiations
- 37 Intellectual property rights protection: the plus/minus debate from a least-developed country perspective – sense and nonsense
- 38 The future of multilateral investment rules in the WTO: contributions from WTO accession outcomes
- 39 Sanitary and phytosanitary measures: trends in accession plurilateral negotiations
- 40 Strengthening transparency in the multilateral trading system: the contribution of the WTO accession process
- PART VI Conclusion
- Annex: Contributor biographies
- Index
- Plate section
- References
34 - Domestic framework for making and enforcing policies
from PART V - Salient features inWTOAccession Protocols
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2015
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- Editors' note
- PART I WTO accessions, the trading system and the global economy
- PART II Overview: systemic outcomes from accessions
- PART III Members’ perspectives on accession negotiations
- PART IV Working party chairpersons’ perspectives on accession negotiations
- PART V Salient features inWTOAccession Protocols
- 29 Market access goods negotiations: salience, results and meaning
- 30 Services market opening: salience, results and meaning
- 31 WTO accession and the private sector: the nexus of rules and market opportunities
- 32 WTO accession and accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement: what is the relationship? Why should WTO acceding governments also consider GPA accession?
- 33 Energy-related rules in Accession Protocols: where are they?
- 34 Domestic framework for making and enforcing policies
- 35 Export duty commitments: the treaty dialogue and the pattern of commitments
- 36 Disciplining state trading practices: lessons from WTO accession negotiations
- 37 Intellectual property rights protection: the plus/minus debate from a least-developed country perspective – sense and nonsense
- 38 The future of multilateral investment rules in the WTO: contributions from WTO accession outcomes
- 39 Sanitary and phytosanitary measures: trends in accession plurilateral negotiations
- 40 Strengthening transparency in the multilateral trading system: the contribution of the WTO accession process
- PART VI Conclusion
- Annex: Contributor biographies
- Index
- Plate section
- References
Summary
ABSTRACT
A core objective of accession results is to establish a legal foundation for the conduct and management of trade policy based on the rule of law. Implementation of accession commitments hinges on the existence of an effective domestic framework for making and enforcing policies. Customarily, this is described in the third chapter of working party reports. Twenty-eight of the members that acceded pursuant to procedures in Article XII of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO Agreement), have undertaken a total of fifty-five accession-specific commitments in this regard. The uniquely definable pattern that has emerged from WTO Accession Protocols confirms the uniform applicability of the WTO Agreement throughout and across the entirety of the customs territory of the new member, the exclusive authority of central governments to implement and enforce WTO rules, the strengthening of due process and the rule of law, and the precedence of ratified international treaties over domestic legislation, in many instances. These commitments are integral to the WTO Agreement and are enforceable under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding. Although normative and standard, they confirm the long-standing accession practice that a range of original members have not confirmed and from which several deviate. This chapter studies the specific accession-specific commitments in the domestic framework for making and enforcing policies. It also investigates the relationship between Accession Protocols and domestic legal systems and asks whether original members undertook similar obligations.
The WTO Agreement and the Domestic Framework for Making and Enforcing Policies
Accession commitments are to be implemented, in most cases, upon accession. In practice, implementation takes place through the amendment and/or enactment of legal instruments, which are, in turn, applied and enforced by designated authorities. Article XVI:4 of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization WTO Agreement provides that ‘Each Member shall ensure the conformity of its laws, regulations and administrative procedures with its obligations as provided in the annexed Agreements’.
Nevertheless, the WTO Agreement does not provide instruction as to the architecture necessary to comply with Article XVI:4. Hence, each member enjoys the sovereign right to design its domestic institutions and processes. Different agreements establish the standard on how this should be effected.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- WTO Accessions and Trade MultilateralismCase Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty, pp. 729 - 740Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015