Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:41:51.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

34 - Domestic framework for making and enforcing policies

from PART V - Salient features inWTOAccession Protocols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Josefita Pardo De León
Affiliation:
Accessions Division of the WTO
Rafat Al-Akhali
Affiliation:
Accessions Division of the WTO
Uri Dadush
Affiliation:
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC
Chiedu Osakwe
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

A core objective of accession results is to establish a legal foundation for the conduct and management of trade policy based on the rule of law. Implementation of accession commitments hinges on the existence of an effective domestic framework for making and enforcing policies. Customarily, this is described in the third chapter of working party reports. Twenty-eight of the members that acceded pursuant to procedures in Article XII of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO Agreement), have undertaken a total of fifty-five accession-specific commitments in this regard. The uniquely definable pattern that has emerged from WTO Accession Protocols confirms the uniform applicability of the WTO Agreement throughout and across the entirety of the customs territory of the new member, the exclusive authority of central governments to implement and enforce WTO rules, the strengthening of due process and the rule of law, and the precedence of ratified international treaties over domestic legislation, in many instances. These commitments are integral to the WTO Agreement and are enforceable under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding. Although normative and standard, they confirm the long-standing accession practice that a range of original members have not confirmed and from which several deviate. This chapter studies the specific accession-specific commitments in the domestic framework for making and enforcing policies. It also investigates the relationship between Accession Protocols and domestic legal systems and asks whether original members undertook similar obligations.

The WTO Agreement and the Domestic Framework for Making and Enforcing Policies

Accession commitments are to be implemented, in most cases, upon accession. In practice, implementation takes place through the amendment and/or enactment of legal instruments, which are, in turn, applied and enforced by designated authorities. Article XVI:4 of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization WTO Agreement provides that ‘Each Member shall ensure the conformity of its laws, regulations and administrative procedures with its obligations as provided in the annexed Agreements’.

Nevertheless, the WTO Agreement does not provide instruction as to the architecture necessary to comply with Article XVI:4. Hence, each member enjoys the sovereign right to design its domestic institutions and processes. Different agreements establish the standard on how this should be effected.

Type
Chapter
Information
WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism
Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty
, pp. 729 - 740
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaronson, S. and Rodwan, A. M. (2011). ‘Does the WTO help member states clean up?’ Washington DC, Institute for International Economic Policy, George Washington University, Working Paper 2011–13.
Ala'i, P. (2011). ‘Transparency and the expansion of the WTO mandate’, American University International Law Review, 26(4): 1009–1029.Google Scholar
Leebron, D. W. (1997). ‘Implementation of the Uruguay Round results in the United States’, in Jackson, J. H. and Sykes, A. O. (eds.), Implementing the Uruguay Round. Oxford University Press, Chapter 6.Google Scholar
ReamsJr, B. D. Jr, and Schultz, J. S. (eds.) (1995). Uruguay Round Agreements Act: A Legislative History of Public Law No. 103–465. Buffalo, NY, Institute for International Legal Information, W.S. Hein & Co.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×