Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:00:27.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - WTO accessions: what does the academic literature say?

from PART I - WTO accessions, the trading system and the global economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Alexei Kireyev
Affiliation:
International Monetary Fund
Mustapha Sekkate
Affiliation:
Accessions Division of the WTO
Uri Dadush
Affiliation:
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC
Chiedu Osakwe
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

This chapter takes stock of the recent academic literature on accessions. It focuses only on the analytical work published since 2000 in books, academic journals and working papers by key WTO scholars across the world. These contributions are related to the procedural, legal, economic and institutional aspects of WTO accessions, and to the proposals for their reform. Country-specific studies, research on the impact of accessions on individual industries and reports on accessions by national and international institutions are not included.

Revisiting the literature on WTO accessions accumulated since the start of the twenty-first century is a daunting exercise. The literature is vast and includes both in-depth theoretical analyses and empirical studies. It covers the legal, economic and institutional aspects of accessions, and includes numerous country- and sector-specific cases. A simple search for ‘WTO accessions 2000–2014’ in Google Scholar, which indexes scholarly literature, returns about 33,000 academic contributions across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

Two relatively recent publications on accessions stand out clearly from this extensive list. First, A Handbook on Accession to the WTO (Williams, 2008), prepared by the WTO Secretariat, presents a broad overview of key aspects of accessions and provides the general reader with a basis for informed discussion and analysis of the WTO's membership process. It places accession in the context of the WTO, sets out the basic provisions governing accession and the standard procedures and terms of accession and brings together key documents used in the accession process. Second, the two-volume The WTO and Accession Countries (Primo Braga and Cattaneo, 2009), with contributions by some of the authors included in this review, explores the intertwined economic, legal and political dimensions of accessions. It also includes country cases and sector-specific issues in agriculture, services and intellectual property. Both publications remain valuable reference sources for scholars and practitioners grappling with the increasing complexity of WTO accession.

The academic literature broadly converges on the overall assessment of the accession process. The rationale of WTO accession includes better integration into the world economy by securing permanent and unconditional most-favoured-nation (MFN) status and protection against arbitrary protectionist measures by major trading partners. Negotiating costs are reduced by negotiating multilaterally rather than bilaterally or regionally, participating in international trade rule-making and accessing an impartial and binding dispute settlement mechanism.

Type
Chapter
Information
WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism
Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty
, pp. 198 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allee, T. L. and Scalera, J. E. (2012). ‘The divergent effects of joining international organizations: trade gains and the rigors of WTO accession’, International Organization, 66(2): 243–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, S. R. (2008). ‘Does WTO accession affect domestic economic policies and institutions?’, Geneva, Graduate Institute for International Studies, HEI Working Paper 03/2008.
Basu, S. R., Ognivtsev, V. and Shirotori, M. (2009). ‘Building trade-relating institutions and WTO accession’, Geneva, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series 41.
Bienen, D. and Mihretu, M. (2010). ‘The principle of fairness and WTO accession: an appraisal and assessment of consequences’, London, London School of Economics and Political Science, Society of International Economic Law Working Paper 2010/29.
Cattaneo, O. and Primo Braga, C. A. (2009). ‘Everything you always wanted to know about WTO accession (but were afraid to ask)’, Washington DC, World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 5116.
Charnovitz, S. (2007). ‘Mapping the law of WTO accession’, Washington DC, George Washington University, GWU Legal Studies Research Paper 237.
Davis, C. and Wilf, M. (2011). ‘Joining the Club: Accession to the GATT/WTO’, paper presented at the American Political Science Association (APSA) Annual Meeting, Seattle, 24 August.
Drabek, Z. and Bacchetta, M. (2004). ‘Tracing the effects of WTO accession on policy-making in sovereign states: preliminary lessons from the recent experience of transition countries’, World Economy, 27(7): 1083–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drabek, Z. and Woo, W. (2010). ‘Who should join the WTO and why? A cost–benefit analysis of WTO membership’, in Drabek, Z. (ed.), Is the World Trade Organization Attractive Enough for Emerging Economies?New York, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrill, L., Stotsky, J. and Gropp, R. (1999). ‘Revenue implications of trade liberalization’, Washington DC, International Monetary Fund, IMF Occasional Paper 180.
Evenett, S. and Gage, J. (2005). Evaluating WTO Accessions: The Effect of WTO Accession on National Trade Flows. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evenett, S. J. and Primo Braga, C. A. (2006). ‘WTO accession: moving the goalposts?’, in Newfarmer, R. (ed.), Trade, Doha, and Development: A Window into the Issues. Washington DC, World Bank.Google Scholar
Ferrantino, M. (2009). ‘Policy anchors: do free trade agreements and WTO accessions serve as vehicles for developing-country policy reform?’, in Drabek, Z. (ed.), Is the World Trade Organization Attractive Enough for Emerging Economies?New York, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., Tomz, M. and Rivers, M. (2007). ‘Do we really know that the WTO increases trade?American Economic Review, 97(5): 2005–2018.Google Scholar
Javorcik, B. S. and Narciso, G. (2013). ‘Accession to the World Trade Organization and tariff evasion’, London, Centre for Economic Policy Research, CEPR Discussion Paper 9592.
Jones, K. (2009). ‘The political economy of WTO accession: the unfinished business of universal membership’, World Trade Review, 18: 279–314.Google Scholar
Jones, K. and Gai, Y. (2013). ‘Joining the WTO: Why does it take so long?’, Open Economies Review, 24(4): 695–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavass, I. (2007). ‘WTO accession: procedure, requirements and costs’, Journal of World Trade, 41: 453–474.Google Scholar
Lacey, S. (2007). ‘WTO accession from the perspective of WTO members: the view from the other side of the table’, in Streatfield, J. and Lacey, S. (eds.), New Reflections on International Trade: Essays on Agriculture, WTO Accession and Systemic Issues. London, Cameron May.Google Scholar
Laird, S. (2009). ‘Cost of implementation of WTO agreements’, in Drabek, Z. (ed.), Is the World Trade Organization Attractive Enough for Emerging Economies?New York, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Li, D. D. and Wu, C. C. (2004). ‘GATT/WTO accession and productivity’, in Itō, T. and Rose, A. K. (eds.), Growth and Productivity in East Asia, vol. 13. NBER–East Asia Seminar on Economics, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maggi, G. and Rodriguez-Clare, A. (1998). ‘The value of trade agreements in the presence of political pressures’, Journal of Political Economy, 106(3): 574–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milthorp, P. (2009). ‘WTO accessions: the story so far’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 4: 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, E. (2013). ‘Strategic delaying and concessions extraction in accession negotiations to the World Trade Organization: an analysis of working party membership’, World Trade Review, 12(4): 669–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osakwe, C. (2011). ‘Developing countries and GATT/WTO rules: dynamic transformations in trade policy behavior and performance’, Minnesota Journal of International Law, 20(2): 365–436.Google Scholar
Parenti, A. (2000). ‘Accession to the World Trade Organization: a legal analysis’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 27(2): 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelc, K. J. (2011). ‘Why do some countries get better WTO accession terms than others?’, International Organization, 65(4): 639–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primo Braga, C. A. and Cattaneo, O. (eds.) (2009). The WTO and Accession Countries. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, J. (2015). ‘The conundrum of WTO Accession Protocols: in search of legality and legitimacy’, Virginia Journal of International Law. In press.
Rose, A. (2005). ‘Which international institutions promote international trade?Review of International Economics, 13(4): 682–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, C. and Urpelainen, J. (2012). ‘Accession rules for international institutions: a legitimacy-efficacy trade-off?’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(2): 290–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramanian, A. and Wei, S.-J. (2007). ‘The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly’, Journal of International Economics, 72(1): 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, M.-K. and Wei, S.-J. (2009). ‘The value of making commitments externally: evidence from WTO accessions’, Journal of International Economics, 78(2): 216–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. J. (2008). A Handbook on Accession to the WTO. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, K.-F. and Yu, M. (2008). ‘Democracy and the GATT/WTO accession duration’, retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=982032.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×