Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:04:13.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The WTO and the global economy: contemporary challenges and possible responses

from PART I - WTO accessions, the trading system and the global economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Bernard M. Hoekman
Affiliation:
European University Institute
Uri Dadush
Affiliation:
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC
Chiedu Osakwe
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

The high economic growth rates that have been achieved by many countries in Asia have led to a contemporary world economy that is multipolar. This has had repercussions for the WTO, as well as for other multilateral organisations. The deadlock in the WTO's Doha Round has led the United States and the European Union increasingly to turn their attention towards the negotiation of preferential trade agreements, including so-called ‘mega-regional’ partnerships. This chapter discusses some of the implications for – and possible responses by – the economies that have the greatest stake in a well-functioning multilateral trading system. These economies may find themselves caught in the midst of disagreements between the major trading nations, with few prospects of participating in the mega-regionals. The chapter argues that these economies – including those that have acceded to the WTO since its creation – need to take a more proactive leadership role in the WTO to enhance the transparency of what is done in the ‘megaregionals’ and to facilitate the pursuit of rule-making initiatives in the WTO on a plurilateral basis.

The global trade regime embodied in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)/WTO has provided an important framework for countries to agree to trade policy disciplines and commitments, as well as a mechanism through which these can be enforced. After the limited membership of low-income countries in the GATT in 1948 – twelve of the original twenty-three signatories were developing economies – in the 1960s there was a substantial expansion of developing country membership. With the creation of the WTO, membership continued to expand steadily, standing at 161 currently, up from 128 in 1995. Twenty-three countries are in the process of negotiating accession.

Developing country engagement in the WTO has been based on the premise of ‘more favourable’ or ‘special and differential treatment’ (S&D). This takes several forms. One is acceptance by the WTO membership of higher trade barriers in developing nations and ‘less than full reciprocity’ in multilateral trade negotiations. Another is a promise by high-income countries to provide preferential access to their markets for exports from developing countries – through the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) or through better than GSP treatment – duty-free, quota-free (DFQF) access for the least-developed countries (LDCs). A third dimension involves exceptions and exemptions from specific disciplines.

Type
Chapter
Information
WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism
Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty
, pp. 52 - 80
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, K. (ed.) (2009). Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: A Global Perspective, 1955–2007. Washington DC, Palgrave-Macmillan and World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antras, P. and Staiger, R. (2012). ‘Offshoring and the role of trade agreements’, American Economic Review, 102(7): 3140–3183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvis, J. F., Duval, Y., Shepherd, B. and Utoktham, C. (2013). ‘Trade costs in the developing world: 1995–2010’, Washington DC, World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 6309.
Baldwin, R. and Low, P. (eds.) (2009). Multilateralizing Regionalism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, C. (ed.) (2011). The Great Recession and Import Protection: The Role of Temporary Trade Barriers. Washington DC, CEPR and World Bank.Google Scholar
Chen, M. and Mattoo, A. (2008). ‘Regionalism in standards: good or bad for trade?’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 41(3): 838–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, S. (2010). ‘Regional trade policy cooperation and architecture in East Asia’, Tokyo, Asian Development Bank Institute, ADBI Working Paper 191.
Fink, C. and Jansen, M. (2009). ‘Services provisions in regional trade agreements: stumbling or building blocks for multilateral liberalization?’, in Baldwin, R. and Low, P. (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gao, H. (2009). ‘China's strategy for free trade agreements: political battle in the name of trade’. Retrieved from http://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/971.
Gawande, K., Hoekman, B. and Cui, Y. (2014). ‘Determinants of trade policy responses to the 2008 financial crisis’, World Bank Economic Review, 28(3).Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. (2011). ‘North–South preferential trade agreements’, in Chauffour, J. and Maur, J. (eds.), Preferential Trade Agreements and Development: A Handbook. Washington DC, World Bank.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. (2012). ‘WTO reform: a synthesis and assessment of recent proposals’, in Narlikar, A., Daunton, M. and Stern, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. (2014). Supply Chains, Mega-Regionals and Multilateralism: A Road Map for the WTO. London, CEPR Press.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. and Mattoo, A. (2013). ‘Liberalizing trade in services: lessons from regional and WTO negotiations’, International Negotiation, 18(1): 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, B. and Mavroidis, P.C. (2013). ‘WTO à la carte or WTO menu du jour: assessing the case for plurilateral agreements’, Fiesole, Italy, European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Working Paper 2013/58.
Hoekman, B., Martin, W. and Mattoo, A. (2010). ‘Conclude Doha: it matters!’, World Trade Review, 9(3): 505–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, H., Mavroidis, P. and Sapir, A. (2010). ‘Beyond the WTO? An anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements’, World Economy, 33(11): 1565–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kee, H., Nicita, A. and Olarreaga, M. (2009). ‘Estimating trade restrictiveness indices’, Economic Journal 119(534): 172–199.Google Scholar
Laborde, D., Martin, W. and Mensbrugghe, D. van der (2011). ‘Implications of the Doha market access proposals for developing countries’, Washington DC, World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 5679.
Lawrence, R. (2006). ‘Rulemaking amidst growing diversity: a “club of clubs” approach to WTO reform and new issue selection’, Journal of International Economic Law, 9(4): 823–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, P. C. (2012). Trade in Goods. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sally, R. and Sen, R. (2011). ‘Trade policies in South-East Asia in the wider Asian perspective’, World Economy, 34(4): 568–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, B. (2007). ‘Product standards, harmonization, and trade: evidence from the extensive margin’, Washington DC, World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 4390.
Timmer, M., Erumban, A., Los, B., Stehrer, R. and Vries, G. de (2013). ‘Slicing up global value chains’, GGDC Research Memorandum 135. Retrieved from www.ggdc.net/publications/memorandum/gd135.pdf.
Van der Marel, E. and Miroudot, S. (2014). ‘The economics and political economy of going beyond the GATS’, Review of International Organizations, 9(2): 205–239.Google Scholar
Wolfe, R. (2013). ‘First diagnose, then treat: what ails the Doha Round?’, Fiesole, Italy, European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Working Paper 2013/85.
World Economic Forum (2010). ‘A Plurilateral “Club-of-Clubs” Approach to World Trade Organization Reform and New Issues’. Geneva, Global Agenda Council on the Global Trade System and FDI.
World Economic Forum (with Bain & Co. and World Bank) (2013). Enabling Trade: Valuing Growth Opportunities. Geneva, WEF.
WTO (2007). Six Decades of Multilateral Trade Cooperation: World Trade Report 2007. Geneva, WTO.
WTO (2011) International Trade Statistics. Geneva, WTO.
WTO (2012). International Trade Statistics. Geneva, WTO.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×