Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introducing the issues
- 2 Dealing with risk
- 3 Regulating experimental procedures and medical research
- 4 Regulatory responses to developing biotechnologies
- 5 Challenges to legal and ethical norms: first-party consent and third parties at risk
- 6 Surveillance and monitoring: balancing public health and individual freedom
- 7 Summary and concluding thoughts: looking to the future
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introducing the issues
- 2 Dealing with risk
- 3 Regulating experimental procedures and medical research
- 4 Regulatory responses to developing biotechnologies
- 5 Challenges to legal and ethical norms: first-party consent and third parties at risk
- 6 Surveillance and monitoring: balancing public health and individual freedom
- 7 Summary and concluding thoughts: looking to the future
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Xenotransplantation and RiskRegulating a Developing Biotechnology, pp. 247 - 280Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
A New Pathway for the Regulation and Governance of Health ResearchLondonAcademy of Sciences 2011Google Scholar
‘Regulating Research on the Terminally Ill: A Proposal for Heightened Safeguards’ 1999 15 Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy479Google Scholar
‘The Last Twist of the Knife: Encouraging the Regulation of Innovative Surgical Procedures’ 2005 105 Columbia Law Review1529Google Scholar
‘Engaging the Public in the Regulation of Xenotransplantation: Would the Canadian Model of Public Consultation Be Effective in the US?’ 2004 13 Public Understanding of Science417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies’ 1986 46 Fertility and Sterility1SGoogle Scholar
Opinions of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: Gene Therapy and Surrogate MothersChicago, ILAMA 1988Google Scholar
1998 www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion207.shtml
2000 www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/code-medical-ethics/2169a.pdf
2001 www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion80315.shtml
2001 www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion2169.shtml
‘Gene Therapy in Humans: When Is It Ethical to Begin?’ 1980 303 New England Journal of Medicine1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Precautionary Principle: A New Legal Standard for a Technological Age’ 2004 1 Journal of International Biotechnology Law11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Consistency in Decision Making by Research Ethics Committees: A Controlled Comparison’ 2006 32 Journal of Medical Ethics662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985 15
‘The Changing Landscape of Human Experimentation: Nuremberg, Helsinki and Beyond’ 1992 2 Health Matrix119Google Scholar
2009
1998
‘The Therapeutic Misconception: Informed Consent in Psychiatric Research’ 1982 5 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995
‘Uncertainty in Xenotransplantation: Individual Benefit versus Collective Risk’ 1998 4 Nature Medicine141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Ethical and Legal Issues in Technology: Xenotransplantation’ 2001 27 American Journal of Law and Medicine283Google Scholar
‘Baboon-to-Human Cardiac Xenotransplantation in a Neonate’ 1985 254 Journal of the American Medical Association3321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Ureteral Stenosis in HDAF Pig-to-Primate Renal Xenotransplantation: A Phenomenon Related to Immunological Events?’ 2004 4 American Journal of Transplantation475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘A Human Cardiac Transplant: An Interim Report of a Successful Operation Performed at the Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town’ 1967 41 South African Medical Journal1271Google Scholar
‘Sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease in a 18-year-old in the UK’ 1995 346 The Lancet1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Understanding Responses to Risk: Some Basic Findings’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 3Google Scholar
‘Risk Communication as a Decision ProcessRisk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 207Google Scholar
‘Summary Statement of the Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA Molecules’ 1975 72 Proceedings of the National Academy of Science1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Regulation of Hybrids and Chimeras in the UK’Chimbrids: Chimeras and Hybrids in Comparative European and International Research: Scientific, Ethical, Philosophical and Legal AspectsBerlinSpringer 2009 645Google Scholar
Healthcare Research Ethics and Law: Regulation, Review and ResponsibilityLondonRoutledge-Cavendish 2010Google Scholar
‘On the State of the Art: Risk Communication to the Public’ 2001 71 Reliability Engineering and System Safety139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘WHO Hosts Web Discussion on Xenotransplantation Policy’ 1999 5 Nature Medicine595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Skepticism Surrounds Diabetes Xenograft Experiment’ 2002 8 Nature Medicine1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘T Lymphocyte-Directed Gene Therapy for ADA Deficiency SCID: Initial Trial Results after 4 Years’ 1995 270 Science475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Xenotransplantation: Regulatory Challenges’ 2001 12 Current Opinion in Biotechnology312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Medical Framework for Viewing the Problem of Human Experimentation’ 1969 98 Daedalus248Google Scholar
‘New Technologies, the Precautionary Principle, and Public Participation’New Technology and Human RightsOxford University Press 2009 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008
‘Obtaining Voluntary Consent for Research in Desperately Ill Patients’ 2002 40 Medical CareVCrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Arguments for the Ethical Permissibility of Transgenic Xenografting’ 2000 7 Gene Therapy633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Patient Autonomy and Consent to Treatment: The Role of the Law?’ 1987 7 Legal Studies169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Do No Harm – Do Patients Have Responsibilities Too?’ 2006 65 Cambridge Law Journal397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Medical Decision-Making and Communication of Risks: an Ethical Perspective’ 2010 36 Journal of Medical Ethics349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Interim Report on Human In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Replacement and Transfer’ 1983 286 British Medical Journal1594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Medical Profession and Human Rights: Handbook for a Changing AgendaLondonZed Books 2001Google Scholar
‘Sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease in a 16-year-old in the UK’ 1995 346 The Lancet1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994
‘What the World Needs Now: Techno-Regulation, Human Rights and Human Dignity’Global Governance and the Quest for JusticeOxfordHart 2004 203Google Scholar
‘Biotechnology and Rights: Where Are We Coming from and Where Are We Going?’Human Rights in the Digital AgeLondonGlass House Press 2005 219Google Scholar
‘Last Chance to Stop and Think on Risks of Xenotransplants’ 1998 391 Nature320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Assessment of Renal Function During the Postoperative Period Following Liver Xenotransplantation From Transgenic Pig to Baboon’ 2002 34 Transplantation Proceedings321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of Science and TechnologyThe Advisory and Regulatory Framework for Biotechnology: Report from the Government's ReviewLondonCabinet Office 1999Google Scholar
‘Cancer: Science and Society and the Communication of Risk’ 1996 313 British Medical Journal799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Dependency: The Foundational Value in Medical Ethics’Medicine and Moral ReasoningNew York, NYCambridge University Press 1994 184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010
2010 www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf
Animal-to-Human Transplantation: Should Canada Proceed? A Public Consultation on XenotransplantationOntarioCPHA 2001Google Scholar
‘Is It Sound Public Policy to Let the Terminally Ill Access Experimental Medical Innovations?’ 2007 7 American Journal of Bioethics1Google Scholar
‘Ethical Issues Raised by Research Involving Xenografts’ 1985 254 Journal of the American Medical Association3339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genetic Intervention on Human Subjects: The Report of a Working Party of the Catholic Bishops’ Joint Committee on Bioethical IssuesLondonCatholic Bishops’ Joint Committee 1996Google Scholar
Research Group on Ethical Issues in Early Human Development and GeneticsHuman Genetics: Ethical Issues in Genetic Testing, Counseling, and TherapySt Louis, MOCatholic Health Association of the United States 1990Google Scholar
‘Xenotransplantation: Consent, Public Health and Charter Issues’ 2001 5 Medical Law International81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001 www2a.cdc.gov/phlp/docs/msehpa2.pdf
2001
‘Off-Trial Access to Experimental Cancer Agents for the Terminally Ill: Balancing the Needs of Individuals and Society’ 2010 36 Journal of Medical Ethics367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Speculation, Stringent Reasoning, and Science’ 1999 77 Bulletin of the World Health Organization68Google Scholar
‘Clinical Xenotransplantation’ 2001 285 Journal of the American Medical Association2304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Brief Report: Treatment of Hepatic Failure with Ex Vivo Pig-Liver Perfusion Followed by Liver Transplantation’ 1994 331 New England Journal of Medicine234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Beyond the Liberal and Communitarian Impasse: A Framework and Vision for Public Health’ 2003 55 Florida Law Review1191Google Scholar
‘Public Health Ethics: Mapping the Terrain’ 2002 30 Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘A Puzzle about Consent in Research and in Practice’ 2010 27 Journal of Applied Philosophy258Google Scholar
‘Gene Therapy in Germany and in Europe: Regulatory Issues’ 1997 2 Quality Assurance Journal1413.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘This Little Piggy Went to Market: The Xenotransplantation and Xenozoonose Debate’ 1999 27 Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.hdc.org.nz/media/24833/brochure-code-white.pdf
‘Public Health, Responsibility and English Law: Are There Such Things as No Smoke Without Ire or Needless Clean Needles?’ 2009 17 Medical Law Review127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
‘Harmful Rights-Doing? The Perceived Problem of Liberal Paradigms and Public Health’ 2008 34 Journal of Medical Ethics798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Overview of Regulation of Gene Therapy in Europe: A Current Statement Including Reference to US Regulation’ 1995 6 Human Gene Therapy773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Opinion Paper on the Current Status of the Regulation of Gene Therapy in Europe’ 2002 13 Human Gene Therapy2085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Introduction: The Importance of Law for Public Health Policy and Practice’ 2006 120 Public Health2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Public Health Law and Tuberculosis Control in Europe’ 2007 121 Public Health266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Identification and Management of Risk: Opening Up the Process’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 195Google Scholar
‘Molecular Analysis of Prion Strain Variation and the Aetiology of “New Variant” CJD’ 1996 383 Nature685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984 www.ccne-ethique.fr/docs/en/avis003.pdf
1986 www.ccne-ethique.fr/docs/en/avis008.pdf
1990 www.ccne-ethique.fr/docs/en/avis022.pdf
1993 www.ccne-ethique.fr/docs/en/avis036.pdf
1999 www.ccne-ethique.fr/docs/en/avis061.pdf
2000
Report on the Disposition of Embryos Produced by In Vitro FertilizationMelbourneParliament of the State of Victoria 1984Google Scholar
2007
1985
2001
2003
Xenotransplantation – Science, Ethics and Public PolicyWashington, DCNational Academy Press 1996Google Scholar
2010
2010
‘What Constitutes Adequate Public Consultation? Xenotransplantation Proceeds in Australia’ 2011 8 Bioethical Inquiry67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Global Consultation on Regulatory Requirements for Xenotransplantation in Clinical Trials, Conference held in Changsha, China, 19–21 November 2008’ 2009 16 Xenotransplantation58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Recent Advances in Pig-to-Human Organ and Cell Transplantation’ 2008 8 Expert Opinion in Biological Therapeutics1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Will the Pig Solve the Transplantation Backlog?’ 2002 53 Annual Review of Medicine133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Report of the Xenotransplantation Advisory Committee of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: The Present Status of Xenotransplantation and Its Potential Role in the Treatment of End-Stage Cardiac and Pulmonary Diseases’ 2000 19 Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xeno – The Promise of Transplanting Animal Organs into HumansOxford University Press 2000Google Scholar
‘Negotiating Risks to Public Health – Models for Participation’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 183Google Scholar
‘Empty Ethics: The Problem with Informed Consent’ 2003 25 Sociology of Health and Illness768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000
2003
2003 www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/activities/06_xenotransplantation_en/XENO(2003)1_SAR.pdf
The Declaration of Inuyama, adopted by the XXIVth Round Table Conference of CIOMS on Genetics, Ethics and Human Values: Human Genome Mapping, Genetic Screening and Gene TherapyTokyo 1990Google Scholar
International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human SubjectsGenevaCIOMS 2002Google Scholar
‘Position Paper on Human Germ Line Manipulation Presented by Council for Responsible Genetics, Human Genetics Committee Fall, 1992’ 1993 4 Human Gene Therapy35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The International Xenotransplantation Association Consensus Statement on Conditions for Undertaking Clinical Trials of Porcine Islet Products in Type 1 Diabetes – Chapter 1: Key Ethical Requirements and Progress Toward the Definition of an International Regulatory Framework’ 2009 16 Xenotransplantation203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Learning from the Law to Address Uncertainty in the Precautionary Principle’ 2001 7 Science and Engineering Ethics313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007
‘Ethics of Xenotransplantation: Animal Issues, Consent, and Likely Transformation of Transplant Ethics’ 1997 21 World Journal of Surgery975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Xenotransplantation – Science, Risk and International Regulatory Efforts’The Commercialization of Genetic Research – Ethical, Legal and Policy IssuesNew York, NYKluwer Academic 1999 129Google Scholar
2000 www.bmj.com/content/320/7238/868/reply#bmj_el_7566
‘In Defence of Moral Imperialism: Four Equal and Universal Prima Facie Principles’ 2006 32 Journal of Medical Ethics200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethics, Prevention and Public HealthOxford University Press 2007
Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department, Welsh Assembly Government, Department of the Environment in Northern IrelandThe GM Dialogue: Government ResponseLondonDEFRA 2004Google Scholar
1998
Learning from Bristol: The Report of the Public Inquiry into Children's Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995LondonStationery Office 2001Google Scholar
Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Operation of NHS Research Ethics CommitteesLondonDH 2005Google Scholar
2006 www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_063074.pdf
Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and EmbryologyLondonHMSO 1984Google Scholar
‘Long-Term Absence of Porcine Endogenous Infection in Chronically Immunosuppressed Patients after Treatment with the Porcine Cell-Based Academic Medical Center Bioartificial Liver’ 2010 17 Xenotransplantation431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Pig Heart Transplant “Breakthrough” Stirs Debate over Timing of Trials’ 1995 377 Nature185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Knockdown of Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses (PERV) Expression by PERV-Specific shRNA in Transgenic Pigs’ 2008 15 Xenotransplantation36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidance for Quality and Safety Assurance in Drugs for Gene TherapyTokyoMinistry for Health and Welfare 1995Google Scholar
2003
‘Innovative Treatment Versus Clinical Research: An Ethics Issue in Transplantation’ 1990 22 Transplantation Proceedings966Google Scholar
‘Informed Consent: Moral Necessity or Illusion?’ 2001 10 Quality in Health Carei29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
‘Taking Risks with the Precautionary Principle: Food (and the Environment) for Thought at the European Commission’ 2002 4 Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Treatment Adherence in Chronic Disease’ 2001 54 Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyS57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xenotransplantation: Is and Should It Be Possible? Final Report in Respect of the Public Debate on XenotransplantationThe HagueDutch Consumer and Biotechnology Foundation 2001Google Scholar
Worse than the Disease: Pitfalls of Medical ProgressNew York, NYCambridge University Press 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Understanding Risk and Lessons for Clinical Risk Communication about Treatment Preferences’ 2001 10 Quality in Health Carei9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Assessing a Controversial Medical Technology: Canadian Public Consultations on Xenotransplantation’ 2002 11 Public Understanding of Science315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Animal Spare Parts? A Canadian Public Consultation on Xenotransplantation’ 2002 8 Science and Engineering Ethics579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘No Evidence of Infection with Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus in Recipients of Encapsulated Porcine Islet Xenografts’ 2000 9 Cell Transplantation895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Live Encapsulated Porcine Islets from A Type 1 Diabetic Patient 9.5 Years after Xenotransplantation’ 2007 14 Xenotransplantation157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘An Extract from Prospects and Risks of Gene Technology: The Report of the Enquête Commission to the Bundestag of the Federal Republic of Germany’ 1988 2 Bioethics254Google Scholar
1979 http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/past_commissions/HEW_IVF_report.pdf
‘The Transplantation Society and Xenotransplantation (Draft Guidelines)’ 1997 6 Transplantation Society Bulletin11Google Scholar
1994 www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC195763449.pdf
Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products Safety Working Party and Biotechnology Working PartySafety Studies for Gene Therapy Products – Annex to Note for Guidance on Gene Therapy Quality Aspects in the Production of Vectors and Genetically Modified Somatic CellsLondonEMEA 1998Google Scholar
2000
2001
‘Recommendations on Human In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer’ 1983 322 The Lancet1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Gene Therapy in Man: Recommendations of European Medical Research Councils’ 1988 2 The Lancet1271Google Scholar
Creating Children: A Uniform Approach to the Law and Practice of Reproductive Technology in AustraliaCanberraAustralian Government Publishing Service 1985Google Scholar
‘If Pigs Could Fly, They Would: The Problems with Xenotransplantation’Redesigning Life? The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic EngineeringLondonZed Books 2001 182Google Scholar
The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Harm to Others Volume OneNew York, NYOxford University Press 1984Google Scholar
‘Precautionary Maybe, But What's the Principle? The Precautionary Principle, the Regulation of Risk, and the Public Domain’ 2005 32 Journal of Law and Society371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Patients’ Perceptions of Information Provided in Clinical Trials’ 2002 28 Journal of Medical Ethics45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Human “Guinea Pigs”: Why Patients Participate in Clinical Trials’First Do No Harm – Law, Ethics and HealthcareAldershotAshgate 2006 165Google Scholar
‘Constitutional Outlines of Public Health's “New World Order”’ 2004 77 Temple Law Review247Google Scholar
‘Neutralizing Antibodies against Conserved Domains of p15E of Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses: Basis for a Vaccine for Xenotransplantation?’ 2003 307 Virology406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘A Precautionary Tale: The Role of the Precautionary Principle in Policy-Making for Public Health’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2010 202Google Scholar
‘The Precautionary Principle: Towards a Deliberative, Transdisciplinary Problem-Solving Process’Perspectives on the Precautionary PrincipleNew South WalesFederation Press 1999 292Google Scholar
‘Infection and Xenotransplantation: Developing Strategies to Minimize Risk’Xenotransplantation: Scientific Frontiers and Public PolicyNew York, NYNew York Academy of Sciences 1998 52Google Scholar
‘SARS, Xenotransplantation and Bioterrorism: Preventing the Next Epidemic’ 2003 3 American Journal of Transplantation909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xenotransplantation: Scientific Frontiers and Public PolicyNew York, NYNew York Academy of Sciences 1998Google Scholar
‘Perception of Risk – Is the Public Probably Right?’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 133Google Scholar
‘Moral Problems and Ethical Issues in Prospective Human Gene Therapy’ 1983 69 Virginia Law Review515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Are Xenotransplantation Safeguards Legally Viable?’ 2001 16 Berkeley Technology Law Journal937Google Scholar
‘Legal Enforcement of Xenotransplantation Public Health Safeguards’ 2004 32 Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Consenting to Bio-Risk: Xenotransplantation and the Law’ 2005 25 Legal Studies404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘“Oh Pick Me, Pick Me”: Selecting Participants for Xenotransplant Clinical Trials’ 2007 15 Medical Law Review176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?: The GMC, the Common Law and “Informed” Consent’ 2010 36 Journal of Medical Ethics494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘When Should Precaution Prevail? Interests in (Public) Health and the Risk of Harm: The Xenotransplantation Example’ 2010 18 Medical Law Review302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Germ-Line Gene Therapy and the Clinical Ethics of Medical Genetics’ 1989 10 Theoretical Medicine151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Research Bodies: Feminist Perspectives on Clinical Research’Feminist Perspectives on Health Care LawLondonCavendish 1998 115Google Scholar
‘Clinical Research and Patients: The Legal Perspective’Nursing Law and EthicsOxfordBlackwell 2002 252Google Scholar
The Courage to Fail – A Social View of Organ Transplants and DialysisNew Brunswick, NJTransaction 2002Google Scholar
‘Public Risk Perceptions and Risk Communication’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 20Google Scholar
‘Public Attitudes, Scientific Advice and the Politics of Regulatory Policy: The Case of BSE’ 2002 29 Science and Public Policy137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘A Proposal for Modernizing the Regulation of Human Biotechnologies’ 2007 37 Hastings Center Report16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Between the Needy and the Greedy: The Quest for A Just and Fair Ethics of Clinical Research’ 2010 36 Journal of Medical Ethics500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defending the Genetic Supermarket: The Law and Ethics of Selecting the Next GenerationOxfordRoutledge-Cavendish 2007Google Scholar
Guidance on Making Proposals to Conduct Gene Therapy Research on Human SubjectsLondonDH 1994Google Scholar
‘Political Considerations of Controversial Medical Issues: Xenotransplantation and Society. A Presentation of the Work of the Norwegian National Working Group on Xenotransplantation’ 2004 45 Acta Veterinaria ScandinavicaS53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Communicating About Risk of Infectious Diseases’ 1996 275 Journal of the American Medical Association253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Conflict of Interest and Commercialization of Biomedical Research: What Is the Role of Research Ethics Review’The Commercialization of Genetic Research: Ethical, Legal and Policy IssuesNew York, NYKluwer Academic Press 1999 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethics of New Reproductive Technologies: The Glover Report to the European Commission – Studies in Biomedical PolicyDeKalb, ILNorthern Illinois Press 1989Google Scholar
Reconciling Private Benefit and Public Risk in Biotechnology: Xenotransplantation as a Case Study in Consent’ 2002 10 Health Law Journal31Google Scholar
Public Health Law: Power, Duty, RestraintBerkeley, CAUniversity of California Press 2008Google Scholar
‘Ethical and Legal Challenges Posed by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Implications for the Control of Severe Infectious Disease Threats’ 2003 290 Journal of the American Medical Association3229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Public and Professional Perceptions of Environmental and Health Risks’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 51Google Scholar
Final Report – Increasing Public Involvement in Debates on Ethical Questions of XenotransplantationViennaInstitute for Advanced Studies 2004Google Scholar
‘The Influence of SARS on Perceptions of Risk and Reality’ 2009 31 Journal of Public Health466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Transplantation of Porcine Fetal Pancreas to Diabetic Patients’ 1994 344 The Lancet1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Is There a Government in the Cockpit: A Passenger's Perspective or Global Public Health: The Role of Human Rights’ 2004 22 Temple Law Review313Google Scholar
‘Compensation for Subjects of Medical Research: The Moral Rights of Patients and the Power of Research Ethics Committees’ 1997 23 Journal of Medical Ethics181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human In Vitro Fertilisation – A Case Study in the Regulation of Medical InnovationAldershotDartmouth 1993Google Scholar
‘HIV Infection: Individual Rights v. Disease Control’ 1990 17 Journal of Law and Society66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Heart Transplantation in Man: Compilation of Cases – January 1 1964 to October 23 1968 1968 22 American Journal of Cardiology840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘A Comparative Approach to the Regulation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Europe’ 2004 12 Medical Law Review40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesser Harms: The Morality of Risk in Medical ResearchChicago, ILUniversity of Chicago Press 2006Google Scholar
1995
‘The Collapse of the Harm Principle’ 1999 90 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The First Heart Transplant in Man – Developmental Animal Investigations with Analysis of the 1964 Case in the Light of Current Clinical Experience’ 1968 22 American Journal of Cardiology772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Heart Transplantation in Man’ 1964 188 Journal of the American Medical Association1132Google Scholar
‘Deciding Best Interests: Medical Progress, Clinical Judgment and the “Good Family”’ 2003 3 Web Journal of Current Legal IssuesGoogle Scholar
‘The Exercise of Public Health Powers In An Era Of Human Rights: The Particular Problems of Tuberculosis’ 2004 118 Public Health313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Research on Human Subjects, Exploitation, and Global Principles of Ethics’Law and Medicine: Current Legal IssuesOxford University Press 2000 379Google Scholar
‘Heart Xenografting: A Route Not Yet to Trod’ 1993 12 Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation3Google ScholarPubMed
2001
Report of the National Forum on Xenotransplantation: Clinical, Ethical, and Regulatory Issues November 6–8, 1997OttawaHealth Canada 1998Google Scholar
1999 www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/brgtherap/xeno_survey-enquete-eng.pdf
2000 www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/brgtherap/awsreport-rapportvif-eng.pdf
2001
2004 www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/md-im/applic-demande/guide-ld/anim_tiss-eng.php
2009 www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/brgtherap/activit/com/eacx-ccerx/index-eng.php
2006 www.hc-sc.gc.ca/sr-sr/biotech/about-apropos/xeno-eng.php
Heredity: Science and Society – On the Possibilities and Limits of Genetic Testing and Gene TherapyThe HagueHealth Council of the Netherlands 1989Google Scholar
Committee on XenotransplantationXenotransplantationRijswijkHealth Council of the Netherlands 1998Google Scholar
The Human Animal Infections and Risk Surveillance (HAIRS) Group, First Report 2004–2007LondonHPA 2008Google Scholar
2002 www.hrc.govt.nz/assets/pdfs/publications/Ethics%20Guidelines%20July%202006.pdf
2007 www.hrc.govt.nz/assets/pdfs/publications/Guidelines%20for%20Preparation%20of%20Applications%20Involving%20Clinical%20Trials%20of%20Xenotransplantation%20in%;20NZ.pdf
2008 www.hrc.govt.nz/assets/pdfs/publications/GTACProcess%20and%20Guidelines%202008%20_2_.pdf
‘Consent to Clinical Research – Adequately Voluntary or Substantially Influenced?’ 1996 22 Journal of Medical Ethics232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
‘Globalizing Regulation: Reaching Beyond the Borders of Chemical Safety’ 2009 36 Journal of Law and Society110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Medication Compliance After Renal Transplantation’ 1995 60 Transplantation914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007
‘The BSE Crisis: A Study of the Precautionary Principle and the Politics of Science in Law’Law and Science: Current Legal IssuesOxford University Press 1998 129Google Scholar
‘The “Catch-22” of Xenotransplantation: Compelling Compliance with Long-Term Surveillance’ 2007 7 Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy151Google Scholar
2004
2008
2003
NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, ‘Points to Consider in the Design and Submission of Protocols for the Transfer of Recombinant DNA into the Genome of Human Subjects’ 1986 11 Recombinant DNA Research119Google Scholar
2011 www.bionews.org.uk
‘Which Patients First? Planning the First Clinical Trial of Xenotransplantation: A Case for Cardiac Bridging’ 2005 12 Xenotransplantation168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Xenotransplantation and Public Responsibility’ 2003 10 European Journal of Health Law295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xenotransplantation: Science, Ethics and Public PolicyWashington, DCNational Academy Press 1996Google Scholar
‘Helsinki Statement on Human In Vitro Fertilization’ 1985 442 Annals of New York Academy of Sciences571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996 www.ich.org/LOB/media/MEDIA482.pdf
‘Mind the Gap: Policy Approaches to Embryonic Stem Cell and Cloning Research in 50 Countries’ 2006 13 European Journal of Health Law9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Donation of Eggs for Research and the Rise of Neopaternalism’Law and Bioethics: Current Legal Issues 2008Oxford University Press 2008 286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Strengths of Public Dialogue on Science-Related Issues’ 2005 8 Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Rights and Quarantine During the SARS Global Health Crisis: Differentiated Legal Consciousness in Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Toronto’ 2007 41 Law and Society Review511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Precautionary Principle and Electric and Magnetic Fields’ 2001 91 American Journal of Public Health1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Civilization and Madness: The Great BSE Scare of 1996’ 1997 6 Public Understanding of Science221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Particular Issues of Public Health: Infectious Disease’Law and the Public Dimension of HealthLondonCavendish 2001 243Google Scholar
‘The Art of Regulation and the Regulation of ART: The Impact of Regulation on Research and Clinical Practice’ 2002 9 Journal of Law and Medicine399Google Scholar
‘Regulating the Science and Therapeutic Application of Human Embryo Research: Managing the Tension Between Biomedical Creativity and Public Concern’Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive ChoiceOxfordHart 2006 91Google Scholar
‘Trust – The Fragile Foundation of Contemporary Biomedical Research’ 1996 26 Hastings Center Report25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Appraising the Precautionary Principle – A Decision Analysis Perspective’ 2001 4 Journal of Risk Research191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Shared Understandings for Informed Consent: The Relevance of Psychological Research on the Provision of Information’ 1996 43 Social Science and Medicine1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Experimental Treatment: Oxymoron or Aspiration?’ 1995 25 Hastings Center Report6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
‘Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials’ 2000 28 Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Reflections: The Challenge of Biotechnology and Public Policy’ 2000 45 McGill Law Journal559Google Scholar
‘The Regulation of Gene Therapy Research in Competent Adult Patients, Today and Tomorrow: Implications of EU Directive 2001/20/EC’ 2004 12 Medical Law Review164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Legitimate Requests and Indecent Proposals: Matters of Justice in the Ethical Assessment of Phase I Trials Involving Competent Patients’ 2005 31 Journal of Medical Ethics205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Reenergizing Public Health Through Precaution’ 2001 91 American Journal of Public Health1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Xenotransplantation in the New Millennium: Moratorium or Cautious Experimentation?’ 2000 4 Perspectives in Biology and Medicine562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Incompetent Patients, Experimental Treatment and the “ Test” – v. ; v. ’ 2003 11 Medical Law Review237Google Scholar
‘Public Reactions to Risk: Social Structures, Images of Science, and The Role of Trust’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 33Google Scholar
1998 www.ciwf.org.uk/includes/documents/cm_docs/2008/a/animal_organs_in_humans_1998.pdf
Biomedical Experimentation Involving Human Subjects, Working PaperOttawaLaw Reform Commission of Canada 1989Google Scholar
‘Current Cellular Immunological Hurdles in Pig-to Primate Xenotransplantation’ 2009 21 Transplant Immunology60Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology – Regulating the Reproductive RevolutionOxfordBlackstone 2001Google Scholar
‘Biotechnology, Bioethics and Law: Europe's 21st Century Challenge’ 2006 69 Modern Law Review1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Impact of HIV Infection on Society's Perception of Clinical Trials’ 1994 4 Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Present Status of Xenotransplantation’ 2001 33 Transplantation Proceedings3050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Extent of Patients’ Understanding of the Risk of Treatments’ 2001 10 Quality in Health Carei14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Reappraisal of Biosafety Risks Posed by PERVs in Xenotransplantation’ 2008 18 Reviews in Medical Virology53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Risk as Moral Danger: The Social and Political Functions of Risk Discourse in Public Health’ 1993 23 International Journal of Health Services425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illegal Beings: Human Clones and the LawNew York, NYCambridge University Press 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency and the Social SelfNew York, NYOxford University Press 2000Google Scholar
‘Giving the Reasonable Patient a Voice: Information Disclosure and the Relevance of Empirical Evidence’ 2005 7 Medical Law International1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009 http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/432209-overview
‘What Does the History of Technology Teach Us About Nano Oversight?’ 2009 37 Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Counselling Following Diagnosis of a Fetal Abnormality: The Differing Approaches of Obstetricians, Clinical Geneticists, and Genetic Nurses’ 1994 31 Journal of Medical Genetics864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Exercise of Public Health Powers in Cases of Infectious Disease: Human Rights Implications: v. European Court of Human Rights: [2005] ECHR 56529/00’ 2006 14 Medical Law Review132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Role of Law in Public Health’The Philosophy of Public HealthSurreyAshgate 2009 11Google Scholar
‘Organ Donation and Transplantation’Doctors, Patients and the LawOxfordBlackwell 1992 120Google Scholar
‘Strategies to Enhance the Safety Profile of Xenotransplantation: Minimizing the Risk of Viral Zoonoses’ 2008 13 Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The British Government's Handling of Risk: Some Reflections on the BSE/CJD Crisis’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 95Google Scholar
‘Gene Therapy – Cure or Challenge?’Law and Medicine: Current Legal IssuesOxford University Press 2000 205Google Scholar
‘The Demise of UKXIRA and the Regulation of Solid-Organ Xenotransplantation in the UK’ 2007 33 Journal of Medical Ethics373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Statement on Research Related to Human Fertilization and Embryology’ 1982 285 British Medical Journal1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidelines for Research on Somatic Cell Gene Therapy in HumansOttawaMinister of Supply and Services 1990Google Scholar
1997 www.crt-online.org/mrmc.html
‘The Meat of the Matter: Grasping and Judging Xenotransplantation’ 2004 13 Public Understanding of Science379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Scientific Citizenships: Self-Representations of Xenotransplantation's Public’ 2005 14 Science as Culture39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Individual Freedom or Collective Welfare? An Analysis of Quarantine as a Response To Global Infectious Disease’Ethics and Infectious DiseasesOxfordWiley-Blackwell 2006 53Google Scholar
‘Xenotransplantation: Endogenous Pig Retroviruses and the Precautionary Principle’ 2001 7 Trends in Molecular Medicine62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Critical Issues Related to Porcine Xenograft Exposure to Human Viruses: Lessons from Allotransplantation’ 2010 15 Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Risk Communication: The Relationships between the Media, Public Beliefs, and Policy-Making’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 229Google Scholar
‘On the Materiality of Risk – Paper Tigers and Panaceas’ 2009 17 Medical Law Review76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consultative Committee on Research into Spongiform Encephalopathies, Interim ReportLondonMAFF 1990Google Scholar
Guidelines on Issues of Infectious Diseases in Public Health Associated with Clinical Trials of XenotransplantationTokyoMHLW 2001Google Scholar
Swedish Act Concerning the Use of Gene Technology on Human Beings and Experiments with Fertilised OvaStockholmThe Ministry 1991Google Scholar
‘Clinical Transplantation of Organs: Why Aren't We There Yet?’ 2007 75 PLoS Medicine0429Google Scholar
‘Medicalising Crime? Criminalising Health?’The Criminal Justice System and Health CareOxford University Press 2007 257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008
‘Recurring Dilemmas: The Law's Race to Keep up with Technological Change’ 2007 2 Journal of Law, Technology and Policy239Google Scholar
‘The Democratic Potential of Public Participation: Healthcare Governance in England’ 2011 20 Social and Legal Studies21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Impact of BSE and FMD on Ethics and Democratic Process’ 2004 17 Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991 www.palazzochigi.it/bioetica/eng/opinions.html
1975 http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/past_commissions/research_fetus.pdf
1979 http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html
Panel on Bioethical ConcernsGenetic Engineering: Social and Ethical ConsequencesNew York, NYPilgrim Press 1984Google Scholar
2008 www.nhc.health.govt.nz/moh.nsf/pagescm/7547/$File/nhc-living-cell-technologies-report-oct082.pdf
‘Ethics in Medical Research’Report of the NHMRC Working Party on Ethics in Medical ResearchCanberraAustralian Government Publishing Service 1982Google Scholar
Ethics in Medical Research Involving the Human Fetus and Human Fetal TissueCanberraAustralian Government Publishing Service 1983Google Scholar
Ethical Aspects of Research on Human Gene Therapy: Report to the NHMRC by the Medical Ethics Committee of NHMRCCanberraAustralian Government Publishing Service 1987Google Scholar
Human Gene Therapy and Related Procedures: An Information Paper to Assist in the Consideration of Ethical Aspects of Human Gene TherapyCanberraAustralian Government Publishing Service 1995Google Scholar
Guidelines for Ethical Review of Research Proposals for Human Somatic Cell Gene Therapy and Related TherapiesCanberraNHMRC 1999Google Scholar
2009 www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/about/committeess/expert/gtrap/nhmrc_xeno_discussion_paper_website.pdf
2002 www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/about/committeess/expert/gtrap/xeno.pdf
2009 www.nhmrc.gov.au/media/noticeboard/notice09/091210-xenotransplantation.htm
2010 www.nhmrc.gov.au/health_ethics/health/xeno.htm
2010 www.nhmrc.gov.au/health_ethics/health/xeno.htm
Australian Research Council, Australian Vice-Chancellor's CommitteeNational Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human ResearchCanberraAustralian Government 2007Google Scholar
www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/publications/synopses/e55.pdf
2003 www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/publications/synopses/e54.pdf
Animal-to-Human Transplantation (Xenotransplantation): Final Report and Advice to the National Health and Medical Research CouncilCanberraNHMRC 2004Google Scholar
Guidelines for Clinical Animal-to-Human Transplantation (Xenotransplantation) Research DRAFT for NHMRC ConsiderationCanberraNHMRC 2004Google Scholar
2010 www.uktransplant.org.uk/ukt/statistics/transplant_activity_report/transplant_activity_report.jsp
www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/whatwedo/about_interventional_procedures/about_interventional_procedures.jsp
2004 www.nice.org.uk/media/8BD/2B/Legal_context_nice_guidance.pdf
Information Sheets & Consent Forms: Guidance for Researchers and ReviewersLondonNRES 2009Google Scholar
‘Voluntariness of Consent for Research: An Empirical and Conceptual Review’ 2002 40 Medical CareVCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Animal-to-Human Transplants – The Ethics of XenotransplantationLondonNuffield Council on Bioethics 1996Google Scholar
Genetically Modified Crops: The Ethical and Social IssuesLondonNuffield Council on Bioethics 1999Google Scholar
‘Have Lessons Been Learned from the UK Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Epidemic?’ 2000 29 International Journal of Epidemiology730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Precautionary Principle in Contemporary Environmental Politics’ 1995 4 Environmental Values191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010 www.thehastingscenter.org/Bioethicsforum/Post.aspx?id=4034&blogid=140
‘Proposal for a Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology’ 1984 49 Federal Register50856Google Scholar
‘Public Trust is Necessary to Protect the Population from Threats to Public Health’ 2009 31 Journal of Public Health468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report on Human Artificial Reproduction and Related MattersOntarioMinistry of the Attorney-General 1985Google Scholar
1994 http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/docs/opinion4_en.pdf
www.oecd.org/document/29/0,3343,en_2649_34537_1887773_1_1_1_1,00.html
www.oecd.org/document/62/0,3343,en_2649_34537_1887806_1_1_1_1,00.html
www.oecd.org/document/36/0,3343,en_2649_34537_2352420_1_1_1_1,00.html
Advances in Transplantation Biotechnology and Animal to Human Organ Transplants (Xenotransplantation) Safety, Economic and Ethical AspectsParisOECD 1996Google Scholar
2001
‘Incidental Findings in Imaging Research: Evaluating Incidence, Benefit, and Burden’ 2010 170 Archives of Internal Medicine1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Criminal Liability for the Transmission of HIV’ 1996 1 Web Journal of Current Legal IssuesGoogle Scholar
‘Search for Cross Species Transmission of Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus in Patients Treated with Living Pig Tissue’ 1999 285 Science1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010
‘Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus – Advances, Issues and Solutions’ 2002 9 Xenotransplantation373Google Scholar
‘Infection of Human Cells by Endogenous Retrovirus of Pigs’ 1997 3 Nature Medicine282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criminalising Harmful Conduct: The Harm Principle, Its Limits and Continental CounterpartsNew York, NYSpringer-Verlag 2007Google Scholar
‘Research Ethics and the Development of Medical Biotechnology’ 2006 13 Xenotransplantation511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
How Safe is Safe Enough? Obligations to the Children of Reproductive TechnologyNew York, NYOxford University Press 2004Google Scholar
The BSE Inquiry: Report: Evidence and Supporting Papers of the Inquiry into the Emergence and Identification of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) and variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease (CJD) and the Action Taken in Response to it up to 20 March 1996LondonStationery Office 2000Google Scholar
‘Introduction: Reconceptualizing Regulation in the Era of Globalization’ 2002 29 Journal of Law and Society1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Public Health Communication and The Social Amplification of Risks: Present Knowledge and Future Prospects’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 65Google Scholar
‘Current Status of Xenotransplantation and Prospects for Clinical Application’ 2009 16 Xenotransplantation263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Ethical Considerations in Clinical Cardiac Xenografting – Letter’ 1993 12 Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation876Google Scholar
‘Beyond the HFE Act? The Regulation of Stem Cell Research in the UK’ 2002 10 Medical Law Review132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001 www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdlife/documents/rc_pa_acdlife_doc_20010926_xenotrapianti_en.html
Mad Cows and Mother's Milk: The Perils of Poor Risk CommunicationQuebecMcGill-Queen's University Press 1997Google Scholar
Making Health Care Decisions: The Ethical and Legal Implications of Informed Consent in the Patient–Practitioner Relationship, Volume One: ReportWashington, DCPresident's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research 1982Google Scholar
Splicing Life: The Social and Ethical Issues of Genetic Engineering with Human BeingsWashington, DCPresident's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research 1982Google Scholar
‘Remodelling the Regulation of Postmodern Innovation in Medicine’ 2005 1 International Journal of Law in Context121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Biotechnology on the RAC – FDA/NIH Regulation of Human Gene Therapy’ 2000 55 Food and Drug Law Journal575Google Scholar
‘Production of Transgenic Pigs that Express Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus Small Interfering RNAs’ 2009 16 Xenotransplantation164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Xenotransplantation and the Harm Principle: Factoring Out Foreseen Risk’ 2007 16 Journal of Evolution and Technology127Google Scholar
‘Proceeding with Clinical Trials of Animal to Human Organ Transplantation: A Way out of the Dilemma’ 2004 30 Journal of Medical Ethics92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984
‘Is the Precautionary Principle Unscientific?’ 2003 34 Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Role of the Police Power in 21st Century Public Health’ 1999 26 Sexually Transmitted Disease350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996
‘Are Traditional Public Health Strategies Consistent With Contemporary American Values?’ 2004 77 Temple Law Review175Google Scholar
Report of the RCOG Ethics Committee On In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Replacement or TransferLondonRCOG 1983Google Scholar
Guidelines on the Practice of Ethics Committees in Medical Research with Human ParticipantsLondonRCP 2007Google Scholar
2002 www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/organisms/royal-commission-gm/
Proceed with Care: Final Report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive TechnologiesOttawaMinistry of Supply and Services 1993Google Scholar
2001
1990
‘Five Charges Against the Precautionary Principle’ 2002 5 Journal of Risk Research287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004 www.deliberative-mapping.org/papers/f-briefing-5.pdf
‘Porcine Endogenous Retrovirus and Other Viruses in Xenotransplantation’ 2009 14 Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Prevention as a Problem of Modernity: The Example of HIV and AIDS’Medicine, Health and Risk: Sociological ApproachesOxfordBlackwell 1995 151Google Scholar
‘International Human Xenotransplantation Inventory’ 2010 90 Transplantation597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Clinician Gate-Keeping in Clinical Research Is Not Ethically Defensible: An Analysis’ 2010 36 Journal of Medical Ethics363CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
‘Counselling and HIV Testing: Ethical Dilemmas’HIV and AIDS; Testing, Screening and ConfidentialityOxford University Press 1999 39Google Scholar
‘Thrombotic Microangiopathy Associated with Humoral Rejection of Cardiac Xenografts from Alpha 1,3-Galactosyltransferase Gene-Knockout Pigs in Baboons’ 2008 172 American Journal of Pathology1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘An Introduction to Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research’Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Practice and ResearchOxford University Press 1996 361Google Scholar
‘The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology’ 2000 20 Risk Analysis195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Are There Characteristics of Infectious Diseases that Raise Special Ethical Issues?’ 2004 4 Developing World Bioethics1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Certainty and Uncertainty in Genetic Counselling: A Qualitative Case Study’ 2000 15 Psychology and Health1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Sexual Etiquette, Public Interest and the Criminal Law’ 1991 42 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly309Google Scholar
‘Xenotransplantation Action Plan: US Food and Drug Administration Approach to the Regulation of Xenotransplantation’ 2000 1 Medscape TransplantationGoogle Scholar
‘Declining Enrolment in a Clinical Trial and Injurious Misconceptions: Is there a Flipside to the Therapeutic Misconception?’ 2007 2 Clinical Ethics193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Position Paper – Ethics Manual Fifth Edition’ 2005 142 Annals of Internal Medicine560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Current Developments on Xenotransplantation in the Council of Europe’Xenotransplantation: Scientific Frontiers and Public PolicyNew York, NYNew York Academy of Sciences 1998 211Google Scholar
‘Searching for Ethics in a Secular Society’Ethics of Science and Technology, Explorations of the Frontiers of Science and EthicsParisUNESCO 2006Google Scholar
‘Cloning Trojan Horses: Precautionary Regulation of Reproductive Technologies’Regulating Technologies: Legal Futures, Regulatory Frames and Technological FixesOxfordHart 2008 221Google Scholar
‘Productive Infection of Human Primary Cells and Cell Lines with Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses’ 2001 285 Virology177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Clinical Trials of Xenotransplantation: Waiver of the Right to Withdraw from a Clinical Trial Should Be Required’ 2007 35 Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985 http://cpme.dyndns.org:591/adopted/cp%201985_93.pdf
‘The Precautionary Principle: A New Approach to Public Decision-Making’ 2006 5 Law, Probability and Risk19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Explanatory Report to Recommendation Rec(2003)10 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on xenotransplantationCDBI/INF 2003Google Scholar
On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risk, Volume I A Synthesis of Case StudiesSevilleEuropean Commission Institute for Prospective Technological Studies 1999Google Scholar
Risk: Improving Government's Capability to Handle Risk and Uncertainty: Full Report – A Source DocumentLondonCabinet Office 2002Google Scholar
Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary PrincipleCambridge University Press 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
From One Species to Another – Transplantation from Animals to Humans: Summary and Statutory ProposalsStockholmSwedish Committee on Xenotransplantation 1999Google Scholar
1998 www.ta-swiss.ch/incms_files/filebrowser/1998_TA30A_KF_xenotransplantation_e.pdf
‘2007 IXA Presidential Address: Progress Toward an Ideal Source Animal: Opportunities and Challenges in a Changing World’ 2008 15 Xenotransplantation7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Position Paper of the Ethics Committee of the International Xenotransplantation Association’ 2003 10 Xenotransplantation194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Community and Public Participation in the Risk Assessment of Experimental Clinical Trials’ 2007 14 Xenotransplantation356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Political Risk Culture: Not Just A Communication Failure’Risk Communication and Public HealthOxford University Press 2001 152Google Scholar
‘UNESCO and Ethics of Science and Technology’ in Ethics of Science and Technology, Explorations of the Frontiers of Science and EthicsParisUNESCO 2006Google Scholar
2008
‘Clinical Trials – A Brave New Partnership?’ 1994 20 Journal of Medical Ethics19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Cultural, Spiritual and Ethical Aspects of Xenotransplantation: Animal-to-Human Transplantation – Final ReportWellingtonNew Zealand 2005Google Scholar
The Cultural, Spiritual and Ethical Aspects of Xenotransplantation: Animal-to-Human Transplantation – A Discussion DocumentWellingtonNew Zealand 2005Google Scholar
‘The Physician's Influence on Patients’ Choices’ 1986 7 Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003
1998
‘Oversight and Monitoring of Clinical Research with Gene Therapy in Australia’ 2005 182 Medical Journal of Australia441Google Scholar
Guidance on Making Proposals to Conduct Xenotransplantation on Human SubjectsLondonDH 1998Google Scholar
Draft Guidance Notes on Biosecurity Considerations in Relation to XenotransplantationLondonDH 1999Google Scholar
Criminal Law, Public Health and HIV Transmission: A Policy Options PaperGenevaUNAIDS 2002Google Scholar
1998 www.eubios.info/UNESCO/ibc1994.pdf
2005 http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001395/139578e.pdf
New Developments in Biotechnology, Volume 2: Background Paper: Public Perceptions of BiotechnologyWashington, DCOTA 1987Google Scholar
‘Protection of Human Subjects: Fetuses, Pregnant Women and In Vitro Fertilization’ 1975 40 Federal Register33526Google Scholar
‘Draft Public Health Service (PHS) Guideline on Infectious Disease Issues in Xenotransplantation’ 1996 61 Federal Register49920Google Scholar
1999 www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Xenotransplantation/ucm092866.pdf
2000 http://archive.hhs.gov/news/press/2000pres/20000307A.html
‘Application of Current Statutory Authorities to Human Somatic Cell Therapy Products and Gene Therapy Products’ 1993 58 Federal Register53248Google Scholar
2001 www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Xenotransplantation/UCM092858.pdf
1998 www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/CellularandGeneTherapy/ucm081670.pdf
2002 www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Blood/ucm080375.pdf
2003 www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Xenotransplantation/ucm092707.pdf
‘Recombinant DNA Research: Actions Under the NIH Guidelines’ 2001 66 Federal Register57970Google Scholar
2004 www.scribd.com/doc/1111353/National-Institutes-of-Health-IC-draft-030905
2004 www.nelsonerlick.com/PDF/NIH%20Report%20on%20State%20of%20Xenotransplantation%202005.pdf
Hearings on Human Genetic Engineering Before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Science and TechnologyWashington, DCGovernment Printing Office 1982Google Scholar
‘Extending the Harm Principle: “Remote” Harms and Fair Imputation’Harm and CulpabilityOxfordClarendon Press 1996 259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Xenotransplantation of Porcine Neonatal Islets of Langerhans and Sertoli Cells: A 4-Year Study’ 2005 153 European Journal of Endocrinology419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Critical Ethical Issues in Clinical Trials with Xenotransplants’ 1998 351 The Lancet1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The International Xenotransplantation Association Consensus Statement on Conditions for Undertaking Clinical Trials of Porcine Islet products in Type 1 Diabetes – Chapter 7: Informed Consent and Xenotransplantation Clinical Trials’ 2009 16 Xenotransplantation255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Integrating Values in Risk Analysis of Biomedical Research: The Case for Regulatory and Law Reform’Law and RiskVancouverUBC Press 2005Google Scholar
2006 www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldhansrd/text/61212-wms0001.htm
Xenotransplantation: The Ethical and Legal ConcernsSri LankaWeeramantry International Centre for Peace Education and Research 2007Google Scholar
‘Starting Clinical Trials of Xenotransplantation – Reflections on the Ethics of the Early Phase’ 2006 26 Journal of Medical Ethics231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Some Ethical Problems in Xenotransplantation: Introductory Remarks at Ethics Workshop’ 2006 13 Xenotransplantation500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Information and Attitudes: Consulting the Public About Biomedical ScienceLondonWellcome Trust 2005Google Scholar
‘Xenotransplantation, Risk, Regulation and Surveillance: Social and Technological Dimensions of Change’ 1999 18 New Genetics and Society197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘What Should Research Participants Understand to Understand that They Are Participants in Research?’ 2008 22 Bioethics203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Embryo and Stem Cell Research in the United States: History and Politics’ 2002 9 Gene Therapy674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001
‘The Regulation of Xenotransplantation in the United Kingdom After UKXIRA: Legal and Ethical Issues’ 2007 34 Journal of Law and Society441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Public Value of Science: Or How to Ensure that Science Really MattersLondonDemos 2005Google Scholar
‘Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses and Xenotransplantation’ 2008 65 Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences3399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008
Xenotransplantation: Medical Use of Live Cells, Tissues and Organs from AnimalsOsloMinistry of Health 2001 18Google Scholar
2004
1998 http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1998/WHO_EMC_ZOO_98.1.pdf
1998 www.who.int/emc-documents/zoonoses/whoemczoo982c.html
2000 www.who.int/docstore/peh-emf/publications/facts_press/EMF-Precaution.htm
Operational Guidelines for Ethics Committees that Review Biomedical ResearchGenevaWHO 2000Google Scholar
Ethics, Access and Safety in Tissue and Organ Transplantation: Issues of Global Concern – Madrid, Spain, 6–9 October 2003 – ReportMadridWHO 2003Google Scholar
Statement from the Xenotransplantation Advisory Consultation, Xenotransplantation: Hopes and ConcernsGeneva 2005Google Scholar
Declaration of Helsinki, Recommendations Guiding Physicians in Biomedical Research in Biomedical Research Involving Human SubjectsHelsinki, Finland 1964Google Scholar
WMA Statement on Genetic Counseling and Genetic EngineeringWorld Medical Assembly MadridSpain 1987Google Scholar
World Medical Association Statement on Human Organ Donation and Transplantation 2000 WMA General Assembly, PilanesbergSouth AfricaGoogle Scholar
Declaration of Helsinki, Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human SubjectsWMAHelsinki, Finland 2008Google Scholar