The recovery approach is much in vogue, initiated by the user movement and embraced by politicians. Users and politicians have a variety of opinions about how it fits with professional psychiatric practice – some view recovery and professional practice as compatible, others view them as mutually exclusive, naming professional practice the ‘medical model’. This editorial explores the relationship between the medical model and the recovery approach. We argue that both have multiple points of similarity, and that applying the medical model to the recovery approach has the potential to significantly influence psychiatric practice.

In this issue of APT Mountain & Shah seek to reconcile the currently fashionable ‘recovery’ paradigm of mental healthcare with the distinctly unfashionable ‘medical model’ of psychiatric practice. I argue that their article raises more questions than it answers – not least whether the recovery concept is amenable to empirical analysis.

Depression is increasingly recognised as a major public health problem worldwide. The heterogeneity of this condition implies that there may be several neurobiological pathways to depression. This article attempts to explore a pathway that links depression with the inflammatory response. Associations linking inflammation and chronic immune activation with depression have been noted, particularly in the context of (a) medical disorders with inflammatory pathophysiology and (b) immunotherapy for cancer and hepatitis C. Acute coronary syndrome is given as an example of how the inflammatory process might result in depression, and potential mechanisms are discussed. These include: direct action of pro-inflammatory cytokines on the serotonin system, with specific reference to the serotonin transporter; action of cytokines on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis; and effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines on neurogenesis in the hippocampus. Reference is made to the potential anti-inflammatory effects of antidepressant drugs and antidepressant effects of anti-inflammatory treatments.

Men are a numerical minority group receiving a diagnosis of, and treatment for, depression. However, community surveys of men and of their mental health issues (e.g. suicide and alcoholism) have led some to suggest that many more men have depression than are currently seen in healthcare services. This article explores current approaches to men and depression, which draw on theories of sex differences, gender roles and hegemonic masculinity. The sex differences approach has the potential to provide diagnostic tools for (male) depression; gender role theory could be used to redesign health services so that they target individuals who have a masculine, problem-focused coping style; and hegemonic masculinity highlights how gender is enacted through depression and that men's depression may be visible in abusive, aggressive and violent practices. Depression in men is receiving growing recognition, and recent policy changes in the UK may mean that health services are obliged to incorporate services that meet the needs of men with depression.

Do men comprise a minority group whose distress would be better understood by positing a new ‘male depressive syndrome’? Or have gender differences been overemphasised for political reasons that are clinically unhelpful? An unedifying list of mistaken categories of depression advocates caution.

He could not die when trees were green,
For he loved the time too well.
His little hands, when flowers were seen,
Were held for the bluebell,
As he was carried o'er the green.

The Disability Discrimination Act, passed by Parliament in 1995 and amended in 2001 and 2005, covers people in Britain with physical or mental impairments that have a substantial and long-term adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The Act has been important in setting a framework for good practice and it can stimulate more systemic change through formal investigations of organisations or whole sectors, and through the Disability Equality Duty, in force since December 2006. The Disability Discrimination Act has implications for people working in mental health services when they are considering employment and educational opportunities for service users, and when they are considering how to redress systemic disadvantage, including inequalities in physical health.

In 1951 Asher described chronic factitious disorder characterised by dramatic presentations, histories and recurrent admissions. Asher initially described three types of presentation – acute abdominal (laparotamophilia migrans), haemorrhagic (haemorrhagia histrionica) and neurological (neuropathica diabolica). Factitious disorder is now included in both DSM–IV and ICD–10. Numerous case reports exist but the evidence base for effective management strategies remains relatively sparse. It is an uncommon disorder most often encountered in liaison psychiatry that remains difficult to manage and characteristically stimulates strong countertransference reactions in the teams involved. Psychiatric involvement remains vital in such cases although poor engagement is often a significant obstruction. As an illustration, we present a vignette based on case of a previously unreported variant of the neurological category involving Guillain-Barré syndrome.

This commentary questions whether the usual ethical and legal requirements for maintaining confidentiality of individuals who fabricate illness should be breached in order to prevent further harm to themselves as well as cost to society. A case report of an individual with Munchausen's syndrome submitted for publication in Advances in Psychiatric Treatment provoked considerable Editorial discussion regarding the absence of written informed consent from the individual described. It is hoped that this commentary will widen the debate regarding the requirement for confidentiality in the exceptional circumstances of patients with Munchausen's syndrome.

Multicultural societies offer a significant challenge to mental health services. Different groups have different rates of illness, illness models, ideas of what a suitable pathway of care is and what suitable care looks like. Trying to set up services to meet all these needs can be difficult. There may need to be modifications in clinical practice, service configuration and the way services are commissioned. Ethnic minority communities face complex problems and, consequently, strategies to deal with them can be complex, requiring support from the non-statutory sector, social services and other branches of medicine. Service development often needs research, staff training, race-equality schemes and sufficient funding to make change possible. I offer here a scheme for considering how to think through service development in this area as well as introducing the government strategy, Delivering Race Equality.

The management of delirium requires careful consideration of the potential value both of pharmacological interventions and of a range of non-drug strategies. Although placebo-controlled studies of delirium treatment are lacking, less robust evidence can still inform practice. This review makes the case for more active management of delirium on the basis of recent studies of prevention, early identification and treatment both during an episode and managing the aftermath in survivors. A drug-treatment algorithm for delirium advising how drug treatments can be tailored to the specific needs of individual patients is described.

A significant proportion of people live and work in rural areas, and rural mental health is important wherever psychiatry is practised. There are inherent difficulties in conducting rural research, due in part to the lack of an agreed definition of rurality. Mental health is probably better in rural areas, with the exception of suicide, which remains highest in male rural residents. A number of aspects of rural life (such as the rural community, social networks, problems with access, and social exclusion) may all have particular implications for people with mental health problems. Further issues such as the effect of rural culture on help-seeking for mental illness, anonymity in small rural communities and stigma may further affect the recognition, treatment and maintenance of mental health problems for people in rural areas. Providing mental health services to remote and rural locations may be challenging.

There is a field of knowledge that speaks of the promotion of positive mental health, well-being and happiness yet it may not be well-known to all psychiatric practitioners. Economists, geneticists, positive psychologists, evolutionary psychologists, neuroscientists and sociocultural researchers have all contributed to what might be termed the emerging science of well-being. This article provides a brief introduction to this complex topic. We outline some of the findings, theories and arguments from this comparatively new but burgeoning research area. We also rehearse some critical responses to this field which indicate that both the evidence on well-being and the implications for practice and policy might be less straightforward than researchers sometimes imply. We conclude by suggesting that psychiatrists, as leaders in the field of mental health, might want to consider the implications (positive and negative) of well-being research for the development of their own discipline and professional practice.