Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:08:41.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responsible whale watching and whale welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

MA Iñíguez*
Affiliation:
Fundación Cethus, Monteverde 3695, Olivos, (B1636AEM), Prov Buenos Aires, Argentina Whale and Dolphin Conservation, Capitán Bermúdez 1598, (B1636EMB), Olivos, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Whale watching is defined as tours by air, sea or land to view any of the 86 reported species of whales, dolphins and porpoises in their natural habitat where a commercial aspect exists (IFAW 1999). Whale-watching platforms include small boats, sailboats, cruise ships, inflatables, kayaks, helicopters and airplanes, and the activity can also include observation from land-based sites and approaches made by swimmers. In addition to being non-disruptive to the cetacean population, ‘responsible whale watching’ has many potential educational, environmental, scientific and socioeconomic benefits for human communities (Hoyt & Iñíguez 2008). As a result, tourism of this kind can have a positive effect on nature through the promotion of a general interest and awareness in cetaceans, sustainable economic growth for local economies (which are often otherwise struggling), therefore providing multiple benefits, including improved motivation to preserve marine wildlife.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2013 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Arcangeli, A and Crosti, R 2009 The short-term impact of dolphin-watching on the behavior of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in western Australia. Journal of Marine Mammals and their Ecology 2(1): 39Google Scholar
Connecticut Cetacean Society and Animal Welfare Institute 1983 WhalesAlive. Report of Global Conference on the Non-Consumptive Utilisation of Cetacean Resources pp 49. Robbins Barstow: Wethersfield, CT, USAGoogle Scholar
Foote, AD, Osborne, RW and Hoelzel, AR 2004 Whale-call response to masking boat noise. Nature 428: 910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/428910aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoyt, E 2002 Whale watching. In: Perrin, WF, Würsig, B and Thewissen, JGM (eds) Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals pp 13051310. Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, E and Iñíguez, M 2008 El Estado del Avistamiento de Cetáceos en América Latina pp 60. WDCS: Chippenham, UK, IF AW: Yarmouth Port, USA and Global Ocean: London, UK. [Title translation: The state of whale watching in Latin America]Google Scholar
IFAW 1999 Report of the Workshop on the Socioeconomic Aspects of Whale Watching, Kaikoura, New Zealand pp 88. IFAW: Yarmouth Port, USAGoogle Scholar
International Whaling Commission 1997 Report of the Scientific Committee, Annex Q. Report of the whalewatching working group. Reports of the International Whaling Commission 47: 250256Google Scholar
International Whaling Commission 2003 Report of the Scientific Committee. Annex L. Report of the Sub-Committee on Whalewatching: Appendix 3. Examples of scientific studies showing changes in cetacean behaviour and habitat use as a result of the presence of whalewatching vessels. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 5(S): 391Google Scholar
International Whaling Commission 2005 Report of the Scientific Committee. Annex M. Report of the Sub-Committee on Whalewatching. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 7(S): 328329Google Scholar
International Whaling Commission 2007 Report of the Scientific Committee. Annex M. Report of the Sub-Committee on Whalewatching. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 9(S): 326340Google Scholar
International Whaling Commission 2008 Chair's Report of the Sixtieth Annual Meeting. Whalewatching. Annual Report of the International Whaling Commission pp 3031. 2-13 June 2008, Santiago, ChileGoogle Scholar
International Whaling Commission 2009 Report of the Intersessional Workshop to Plan a Large-Scale Whalewatching Experiment; LaWE, 30 March-4 April 2008, Murdoch University, Bunbury, Australia. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 11(S): 483500Google Scholar
International Whaling Commission 2010 Report of the Scientific Committee. Annex M. Report of the Sub-Committee on Whalewatching. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 11(S2): 332345Google Scholar
International Whaling Commission 2011 Report of the IWC Workshop on Whalewatching pp 26. 3-5 November 2010, Ecocentro Mar Patagonia, Puerto Madryn, Chubut, ArgentinaGoogle Scholar
Jensen, FH, Bejder, L, Wahlberg, M, Aguilar Soto, N, Johnson, M and Madsen, PT 2009 Vessel noise effects on delphinid communication. Marine Ecology Progress Series 395: 161175. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps08204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D 2005 The residency pattern of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops spp) in Milford Sound, New Zealand, is related to boat traffic. Marine Ecology Progress Series 295: 265272. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps295265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusseau, D, Slooten, E and Currey, R 2006 Unsustainable dolphin-watching activities in Fiordland, New Zealand. Tourism in Marine environments 3(2): 173178Google Scholar
O’Connor, S, Campbell, R, Cortez, H and Knowles, T 2009 Whale watching worldwide: tourism numbers, expenditures and expanding economic benefits. A special report from the International Fund for Animal Welfare pp 295. IFAW: Yarmouth MA, USAGoogle Scholar
Sousa-Lima, RS and Clark, CW 2009 Whale sound recording technology as a tool for assessing the effects of boat noise in a Brazilian marine park. Park Science 26(1): 5963Google Scholar
Stockin, K, Lusseau, D, Binedell, V, Wiseman, N and Orams, M 2008 Tourism affects the behavioural budget of the common dolphin Delphinus spp in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. Marine Ecology Progress Series 355: 287295. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps07386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Waerebeek, K, Baker, AN, Félix, F, Gedamke, J, Iñíguez, M, Sanino, GP, Secchi, E, Sutaria, D, van Helden, A and Wang, Y 2007 Vessel collisions with small cetaceans worldwide and with large whales in the Southern Hemisphere, an initial assessment. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 6(1): 4369. http://dx.doi.org/10.5597/lajam00109CrossRefGoogle Scholar