Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:14:33.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Don't shoot the giant whose shoulders we are standing on

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

Jan P. de Ruiter
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155. jp.deruiter@tufts.eduhttps://ase.tufts.edu/psychology/people/de_ruiter/
Laura E. de Ruiter
Affiliation:
LuCiD, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL Manchester, United Kingdom. laura.deruiter@manchester.ac.ukhttp://www.lucid.ac.uk/who-we-are/our-people/researchers/laura-de-ruiter/

Abstract

Structural priming is a sufficient but not a necessary condition for proving the existence of representations. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Cognitive science relies on the legitimacy of positing representations and processes without “proving” every component. Also, psycholinguistics relies on other methods, including acceptability judgments, to find the materials for priming experiments in the first place.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Healey, P. G. T, Purver, M. & Howes, C. (2014) Divergence in dialogue. PLoS ONE 9(2):e98598. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098598.Google Scholar
Mahowald, K., James, A., Futrell, R. & Gibson, E. (2016b) A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 91:527. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55(4):189208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tooley, K. M., Konopka, A. E. & Watson, D. G. (2014a) Can intonational phrase structure be primed (like syntactic structure)? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40(2):348–63. doi:10.1037/a0034900.Google ScholarPubMed