Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:17:15.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Encodingism is not just a bad metaphor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2019

Robert Mirski
Affiliation:
The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950Lublin, Polandrobertmirski@kul.lublin.plhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert_Mirski Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA18015. mhb0@lehigh.eduhttps://www.lehigh.edu/~mhb0/mhb0.html
Mark H. Bickhard
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA18015. mhb0@lehigh.eduhttps://www.lehigh.edu/~mhb0/mhb0.html

Abstract

Brette's criticism of the coding metaphor focuses on its presence in neurosciences. We argue that this problematic view, which we call “encodingism,” is pernicious in any model of cognition that adopts it. We discuss some of the more specific problems it begets and then elaborate on Brette's action-based alternative to the coding framework.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. W. P. & Bickhard, M. H. (2013) Stepping off the pendulum: Why only an action-based approach can transcend the nativist–empiricist debate. Cognitive Development 28(2):96133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2001) Error dynamics: The dynamic emergence of error avoidance and error vicariants. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 13:199209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2003) Process and emergence: Normative function and representation. In: Process theories, ed. Seibt, J., pp. 121–55. Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2009) The interactivist model. Synthese 166(3):547–91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9375-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2015a) Toward a model of functional brain processes: I. Central nervous system functional micro-architecture. Axiomathes 25(3):217–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-015-9275-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2015b) Toward a model of functional brain processes: II. Central nervous system functional macro-architecture. Axiomathes 25(4):377407. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-015-9276-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2015c) What could cognition be if not computation … or connectionism, or dynamic systems? Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 35(1):5366. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2016a) Inter- and en- activism: Some thoughts and comparisons. New Ideas in Psychology 41:2332. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2016b) The anticipatory brain: Two approaches. In: Müller, V. C. (Ed.), Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence, ed. Müller, V. C., pp. 259–81. Springer International.Google Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. & Campbell, R. L. (1996) Topologies of learning and development. New Ideas in Psychology 14(2):111–56. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(96)00015-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. & Terveen, L. (1996) Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution (Advances in psychology, Vol. 109). Elsevier/North-Holland.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2016) Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind/Andy Clark. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Paolo, E. & De Jaegher, H. (2012) The interactive brain hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6:163. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirski, R. & Gut, A. (2018) Action-based versus cognitivist perspectives on socio-cognitive development: Culture, language and social experience within the two paradigms. Synthese 28(2):96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01976-y.Google Scholar