Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
宋, 慧玲
2017.
The Preference for People with Facial Attractiveness—Explanations from Different Perspectives.
Advances in Psychology,
Vol. 07,
Issue. 10,
p.
1233.
Chen, Bin-Bin
and
Qu, Wenxiang
2017.
Life history strategies and procrastination: The role of environmental unpredictability.
Personality and Individual Differences,
Vol. 117,
Issue. ,
p.
23.
Zhang, Ling
Chen, Wenfeng
Liu, Menghan
Ou, Yuxiao
Xu, Erjia
and
Hu, Ping
2021.
Light makeup decreases receivers’ negative emotional experience.
Scientific Reports,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
Shang, Junchen
Zhang, Yizhuo
Chen, Wenfeng
and
Fu, Xiaolan
2024.
The impact of facial attractiveness on economic decision-making.
Chinese Science Bulletin,
Target article
Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology
Related commentaries (25)
An assessment of the mating motive explanation of the beauty premium in market-based settings
Attention and memory benefits for physical attractiveness may mediate prosocial biases
Attentional and affective biases for attractive females emerge early in development
Attractiveness bias: A cognitive explanation
Attractiveness biases are the tip of the iceberg in biological markets
Context matters for attractiveness bias
Evolutionary explanations for financial and prosocial biases: Beyond mating motivation
Explanations for attractiveness-related positive biases in an evolutionary perspective of life history theory
How should we tackle financial and prosocial biases against unattractive people?
Is there an alternative explanation to the evolutionary account for financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive individuals?
It is not all about mating: Attractiveness predicts partner value across multiple relationship domains
Just My Imagination: Beauty premium and the evolved mental model
Mating motives are neither necessary nor sufficient to create the beauty premium
Omitted evidence undermines sexual motives explanation for attractiveness bias
Oxytocin drives prosocial biases in favor of attractive people
Prosocial behavior as sexual signaling
Strong but flexible: How fundamental social motives support but sometimes also thwart favorable attractiveness biases
The biasing effects of appearances go beyond physical attractiveness and mating motives
The out-of-my-league effect
The type of behavior and the role of relationship length in mate choice for prosociality among physically attractive individuals
The wolf will live with the lamb
There is more: Intrasexual competitiveness, physical dominance, and intrasexual collaboration
Tinbergen's “four questions” provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people
Understanding the physical attractiveness literature: Qualitative reviews versus meta-analysis
What does evolutionary theory add to stereotype theory in the explanation of attractiveness bias?
Author response
Moving forward with interdisciplinary research on attractiveness-related biases