Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:38:23.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Omitted evidence undermines sexual motives explanation for attractiveness bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2017

Marianne LaFrance  and
Alice H. Eagly
Marianne LaFrance
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520marianne.lafrance@yale.eduhttp://genderlab.yale.edu
Alice H. Eagly
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60108. eagly@northwestern.eduhttp://www.psychology.northwestern.edu/people/faculty/core/profiles/alice-eagly.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This commentary makes three points: (1) the existing evidence does not consistently favor the proposed sex difference in attractiveness preferences, nor the fitness-related outcomes of attractiveness; (2) the neglected association of perceived attractiveness and trustworthiness allowed the authors to incorrectly attribute many findings solely to attractiveness, and (3) the importance accorded attractiveness in mate preferences is culturally shaped and likely evolutionarily novel.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e31
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bzdok, D., Langner, R., Caspers, S., Kurth, F., Habel, V., Zilles, K., Laird, A. & Eickhoff, S. B. (2011) ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness. Brain Structure and Function 215:209–23.Google Scholar
Chithambo, T. P. & Huey, S. J. (2013) Black/white differences in perceived weight and attractiveness among overweight women. Journal of Obesity 2013:320326.Google Scholar
Duarte, J., Siegel, S. & Young, L. (2012) Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Review of Financial Studies 25(8):2455–84.Google Scholar
Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J. & Hunt, L. L. (2014a) The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 140:623–65.Google Scholar
Eastwick, P. W., Neff, L. A., Finkel, E. J., Luchies, L. B. & Hunt, L. L. (2014b) Is meta-analysis a foundation, or just a brick? Comment on Meltzer, McNulty, Jackson, and Karney (2014) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106:429–34.Google Scholar
Feingold, A. (1992b) Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin 112:125–39.Google Scholar
Gintis, H., van Schaik, C. & Boehm, C. (2015) Zoon politikon: The evolutionary origins of human political systems. Current Anthropology 56:327–53.Google Scholar
Hart, W., Albarracin, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J. & Merrill, L. (2009) Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin 135:555–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Henderson, A. J., Holzleitner, I. J., Talamas, S. N. & Perrett, D. I. (2016) Perceptions of health from facial cues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 13:371.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:61–83.Google Scholar
Jokela, M. (2009) Physical attractiveness and reproductive success in humans: Evidence from the late 20th century United States. Evolution and Human Behavior 30:342–50.Google Scholar
Kaisler, R. E. & Leder, H. (2016) Trusting the looks of others: Gaze effects of faces in social settings. Perception 45(8):875–892.Google Scholar
Ma, F., Xu, F. & Luo, X. (2015) Children's and adults' judgments of facial trustworthiness: The relationship to facial attractiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills 211:179–98.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L., McNulty, J. K., Jackson, G. & Karney, B. R. (2014) Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106:418–28.Google Scholar
Ohanian, R. (1991) The impact of celebrity spokespersons' perceived image on consumers' intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research 31:46–54.Google Scholar
Oosterhof, N. N. & Todorov, A. (2008) The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:11087–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Palmer, C. L. & Peterson, R. D. (2016) Halo effects and the attractiveness premium in perceptions of political expertise. American Politics Research 44:353–82.Google Scholar
Scott, I. M., Clark, A. P., Josephson, S. C., Boyette, A. H., Cuthill, I. C., Fried, R. L., Gibson, M. A., Hewlett, B. S., Jamieson, M., Jankowiak, W., Honey, P. L., Huang, Z., Liebert, M. A., Purzcyki, B. G., Shaver, J. H., Snodgrass, J., Sosis, R., Sugiyama, L. S., Swami, V., Yu, D. W., Zhaoi, Y. & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2014) Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionary novel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111:14388–93.Google ScholarPubMed
Selterman, D. F., Chagnon, E. & Mackinnon, S. P. (2015) Do women and men exhibit different preferences for mates? A replication of Eastwick and Finkel (2008). SAGE Open 2015:1–14.Google Scholar
Silva, A. S., Lummaa, V., Muller, U., Raymond, M. & Alvergne, A. (2012) Facial attractiveness and fertility in populations with low levels of modern birth control. Evolution and Human Behavior 33:491–98.Google Scholar
Sofer, C., Dotsch, R., Wigboldus, D. H. J. & Todorov, A. (2015) What is typical is good. The influence of face typicality on perceived trustworthiness. Psychological Science 26:39–47.Google Scholar
Sorokowski, P., Kościński, K., Sorokowska, A. & Huanca, T. (2014) Preference for women's body mass and waist-to-hip ratio in Tsimane' men of the Bolivian Amazon: Biological and cultural determinants. PLoS ONE 9:e105468.Google ScholarPubMed
Sutherland, C. A., Oldmeadow, J. A., Santos, I. M., Towler, J., Michael, B. D. & Young, A. W. (2013) Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model. Cognition 127:105–18.Google Scholar
van't Wout, M. & Sanfey, A. G. (2008) Friend or foe: The effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition 108(3):796–803.Google ScholarPubMed
Weeden, J. & Sabini, J. (2005) Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin 131:635–53.Google Scholar
Zebrowitz, L. A. & Rhodes, G. (2004) Sensitivity to “bad genes” and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: Cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 28(3):167–85.Google Scholar