No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 March 2016
Richerson et al. propose cultural group selection (CGS) as the basis for understanding the evolution of cultural systems. Their proposal does not take into account the nature of cultural idea systems as being constituted at an organizational, rather than an individual level. The sealing partners of the Netsilik Inuit exemplify the problem with their account.
Target article
Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence
Related commentaries (27)
A framework for modeling human evolution
Clarifying the time frame and units of selection in the cultural group selection hypothesis
Cultural differentiation does not entail group-level structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
Cultural evolution need not imply group selection
Cultural group selection in the light of the selection of extended behavioral patterns
Cultural group selection is plausible, but the predictions of its hypotheses should be tested with real-world data
Does cultural group selection explain the evolution of pet-keeping?
Frozen cultural plasticity
How evolved psychological mechanisms empower cultural group selection
Human cooperation shows the distinctive signatures of adaptations to small-scale social life
Human evolutionary history and contemporary evolutionary theory provide insight when assessing cultural group selection
Intergroup competition may not be needed for shaping group cooperation and cultural group selection
Is cultural group selection enough?
Mother–infant cultural group selection
Multi-level selection, social signaling, and the evolution of human suffering gestures: The example of pain behaviors
Self-interested agents create, maintain, and modify group-functional culture
Social selection is a powerful explanation for prosociality
Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
Testing the cultural group selection hypothesis in Northern Ghana and Oaxaca
The burden of proof for a cultural group selection account
The cooperative breeding perspective helps in pinning down when uniquely human evolutionary processes are necessary
The disunity of cultural group selection
The empirical evidence that does not support cultural group selection models for the evolution of human cooperation
The role of cultural group selection in explaining human cooperation is a hard case to prove
The selective social learner as an agent of cultural group selection
The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
When is the spread of a cultural trait due to cultural group selection? The case of religious syncretism
Author response
Cultural group selection follows Darwin's classic syllogism for the operation of selection