No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Human evolutionary history and contemporary evolutionary theory provide insight when assessing cultural group selection
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 March 2016
Abstract
Richerson et al. provide a much needed roadmap for assessing cultural group selection (CGS) theory and for applying it to understanding variation between contemporary human groups. However, the current proposal lacks connection to relevant evidence from the human evolutionary record and requires a better integration with contemporary evolutionary theory. The article also misapplies the Fst statistic.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
References
Andersson, C., Törnberg, A. & Törnberg, P. (2014) An evolutionary developmental approach to cultural evolution. Current Anthropology
55(2):154–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, J. D. & Brown, K. S. (2001) The Twin Rivers Kopje, Zambia: Stratigraphy, fauna, and artefact assemblages from the 1954 and 1956 excavations. Journal of Archaeological Science
28(3):305–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, A. (2015) Integrative anthropology and the human niche: Towards a contemporary approach to human evolution. American Anthropologist
117(2):302–15. doi: 10.1111/aman.12248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, M. & Coward, F. (2008) From individual neurons to social brains. Cambridge Archaeological Journal
18:387–400. doi: 10.1017/S0959774308000437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernandez-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. (2007) Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science
317:1360–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Laland, K. N., Tobias, U., Feldman, M., Sterelny, K., Muller, G., Moczek, A., Jabonka, E. & Odling-Smee, J. (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Yes, urgently. Nature
514:161–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E. & Odling-Smee, J. (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B
282(1813):20151019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019.Google ScholarPubMed
MacKinnon, K. C. & Fuentes, A. (2011) Primates, niche construction, and social complexity: The roles of social cooperation and altruism. In: Origins of altruism and cooperation. Developments in primatology: Progress and prospects, vol. 36, Part 2, ed. Sussman, R. W. & Cloninger, R. C., pp. 121–43. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, N. M., Fuentes, A. & White, F. J. (2012) Variation in the social systems of extant hominoids: Comparative insight into the social behaviour of early hominins. International Journal of Primatology
33(6):1251–77. doi: 10.10007/s10764-012-9617-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mania, D. & Mania, U. (1988) Deliberate engravings on bone artefacts of Homo erectus
. Rock Art Research
5:91–107.Google Scholar
Peer, P. Van, Rots, V. & Vroomans, J. (2004) A story of colourful diggers and grinders: The Sangoan and Lupemban at site 8-B-11, Sai Island, Northern Sudan. Before Farming
3:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roebroeks, W., Sier, M. J., Nielsen, T. K., De Loecker, D., Parés, J. M., Arps, C. E. S. & Mücher, H. J. (2012) Use of red ochre by early Neandertals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA
109(6):1889–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterelny, K. & Hiscock, P. (2014) Symbols, signals, and the archaeological record. Biological Theory
9:1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, D. (2012) Stone toolmaking and the evolution of human culture and cognition. In: Culture evolves, ed. Whitten, A., Hinde, R. A., Stringer, C. B. & Laland, K. N., pp. 197–14. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. & Erdal, D. (2012) The human socio-cognitive niche and its evolutionary origins. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B
367:2119–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence
Related commentaries (27)
A framework for modeling human evolution
Clarifying the time frame and units of selection in the cultural group selection hypothesis
Cultural differentiation does not entail group-level structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
Cultural evolution need not imply group selection
Cultural group selection in the light of the selection of extended behavioral patterns
Cultural group selection is plausible, but the predictions of its hypotheses should be tested with real-world data
Does cultural group selection explain the evolution of pet-keeping?
Frozen cultural plasticity
How evolved psychological mechanisms empower cultural group selection
Human cooperation shows the distinctive signatures of adaptations to small-scale social life
Human evolutionary history and contemporary evolutionary theory provide insight when assessing cultural group selection
Intergroup competition may not be needed for shaping group cooperation and cultural group selection
Is cultural group selection enough?
Mother–infant cultural group selection
Multi-level selection, social signaling, and the evolution of human suffering gestures: The example of pain behaviors
Self-interested agents create, maintain, and modify group-functional culture
Social selection is a powerful explanation for prosociality
Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
Testing the cultural group selection hypothesis in Northern Ghana and Oaxaca
The burden of proof for a cultural group selection account
The cooperative breeding perspective helps in pinning down when uniquely human evolutionary processes are necessary
The disunity of cultural group selection
The empirical evidence that does not support cultural group selection models for the evolution of human cooperation
The role of cultural group selection in explaining human cooperation is a hard case to prove
The selective social learner as an agent of cultural group selection
The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
When is the spread of a cultural trait due to cultural group selection? The case of religious syncretism
Author response
Cultural group selection follows Darwin's classic syllogism for the operation of selection