No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Not just a bad metaphor, but a little piece of a big bad metaphor
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2019
Abstract
Besides failing for the reasons Brette gives, codes fail to help us understand brain function because codes imply algorithms that compute outputs without reference to the signals' meanings. Algorithms cannot be found in the brain, only manipulations that operate on meaningful signals and that cannot be described as computations, that is, sequences of predefined operations.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
Bickhard, M. H. & Terveen, L. (1996) Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution (Advances in psychology, Vol. 109). Elsevier/North-Holland.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. In: Connections and symbols, ed. Pinker, S. & Mehler, J.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, C. D. (1996) Plasticity in visual perception and physiology. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 6(2):269–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harnad, S. (1990a) The symbol grounding problem. In: Emergent computation, ed. Forrest, S., pp. 335–46. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Izhikevich, E. M. (2006) Polychronization: Computation with spikes. Neural Computation 18(2):245–82. doi: 10.1162/089976606775093882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeke, G. N. Jr. & Edelman, G. M. (1988) Real brains and artificial intelligence. Daedalus 117:143–73.Google Scholar
Reeke, G. N. Jr., Finkel, L. H., Sporns, O. & Edelman, G. M. (1990) Synthetic neural modeling: A multilevel approach to the analysis of brain complexity. In: Signal and sense: Local and global order in perceptual maps, ed. Edelman, G. M., Gall, W. E. & Cowan, W. M., pp. 607–706. Wiley.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. & The PDP Research Group. (1986) Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tsotsos, J. K. (2011) A computational perspective on visual attention. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Is coding a relevant metaphor for the brain?
Related commentaries (27)
A clash of Umwelts: Anthropomorphism in behavioral neuroscience
A sensorimotor alternative to coding is possible
Abandoning the code metaphor is compatible with semiotic process
Beyond metaphors and semantics: A framework for causal inference in neuroscience
Beyond Neural Coding? Lessons from Perceptual Control Theory
Codes are for messages, not for neurons
Codes, communication and cognition
Codes, functions, and causes: A critique of Brette's conceptual analysis of coding
Encodingism is not just a bad metaphor
Extrinsic and intrinsic representations
From mental representations to neural codes: A multilevel approach
From the “coding metaphor” to a theory of representation
Generative models as parsimonious descriptions of sensorimotor loops
How can we play together? Temporal inconsistencies in neural coding of music
Is coding a relevant metaphor for building AI?
Is information theory, or the assumptions that surround it, holding back neuroscience?
Is “the brain” a helpful metaphor for neuroscience?
Modest and immodest neural codes: Can there be modest codes?
Neural code: Another breach in the wall?
Neural codes – Necessary but not sufficient for understanding brain function
Not just a bad metaphor, but a little piece of a big bad metaphor
Our understanding of neural codes rests on Shannon's foundations
Plasticity of the neural coding metaphor: An unnoticed rhetoric in scientific discourse
Prediction, embodiment, and representation
Quantifying the role of neurons for behavior is a mediation question
The Bayesian brain: What is it and do humans have it?
The origin of the coding metaphor in neuroscience
Author response
Neural coding: The bureaucratic model of the brain