Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T21:14:55.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Associations Between Adiposity Measures and Depression and Well-Being Scores: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Middle- to Older-Aged Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Caoimhe Lonergan*
Affiliation:
Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Seán Millar
Affiliation:
University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Zubair Kabir
Affiliation:
University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Obesity and mental health are significant global health concerns. Evidence has linked increased adiposity with depression and well-being; however, there is limited documented evidence in Ireland. Research also suggests that lifestyle factors and disease conditions are related to mental health. These may modulate relationships between adiposity and depression and well-being. The aim of this study was to examine associations between mental health scores and adiposity defined using body mass index (BMI) and waist-height ratio, and subsequently determine whether significant relationships persist following adjustment for lifestyle factors and common disease conditions.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of 1,821 men and women aged 46–73 years, randomly selected from a large primary care centre. Depression and well-being were assessed using the 20-item Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the World Health Organization-Five (WHO-5) Well-Being Index. Linear regression analyses were performed to examine relationships between mental health scores (dependent variable) and adiposity defined using BMI and waist-height ratio (independent variable), while adjusting for demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors and disease conditions. These demographic, lifestyle and disease factors included gender, age, education, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity levels, dietary quality, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer.

Results

BMI and waist-height ratio had a significant positive association with depression scores and a significant inverse association with well-being scores in males and females. These associations were maintained following adjustment for demographic variables and lifestyle factors. In final models where disease conditions were adjusted for, BMI (β = 0.743, p <0.001) and waist-height ratio (β = 0.719, p <0.001) associations with the CES-D score remained significant. In stratified analyses, relationships between measures of adiposity and depression were found to be stronger in females (BMI: β = 0.806, p = 0.007; waist-height ratio: β = 0.768, p = 0.01) than males (BMI: β = 0.573, p = 0.049; waist-height ratio: β = 0.593, p = 0.044) but no effect modification was identified.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a significant association between increased adiposity and poorer mental health in a middle- to older-aged population, which is in agreement with previous evidence. In addition, these findings suggest that the positive relationship between adiposity and depression is independent of lifestyle factors and disease conditions and is stronger in females. Targeted interventions for reducing depression should include better weight management population-level measures, particularly in the female population.

Type
1 Research
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.