Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:06:27.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maternal stress in pregnancy and child autism spectrum disorder: evaluating putative causal associations using a genetically informed design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Mohamed Essam Gamil Abdelrazek*
Affiliation:
Cardiff Univeristy
Frances Rice
Affiliation:
Wolfson Centre for Young People's Mental Health, Section of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Prenatal adversity is hypothesized to increase risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) via epigenetic changes. Maternal stress in late pregnancy may alter offspring neurodevelopmental outcomes by disrupting a unique period of rapid neurogenesis. Observational studies reporting an environmentally mediated programming pathway face challenges in drawing causal inferences including passive gene-environment correlation. This project aims to use a quasi-experimental genetically informed design to assess if reported correlations between maternal prenatal stress and offspring ASD traits were due to maternally inherited factors or consistent with a potentially causal prenatal exposure effect. No previous cross-fostering studies have assessed the effects of prenatal stress on childhood ASD.

Method

This study used an in-vitro fertilization cross-fostering sample with pregnant mothers related (n = 365) or unrelated (n = 111) to their offspring (mean age = 9.84 years). Prenatal stress was assessed using a subjective Likert scale during pregnancy. Questionnaires examined maternally rated offspring ASD traits using the Social and Communication Disorders Checklist. Birth weight and gestational age from medical records were used as comparison outcomes to validate the measure of stress as evidence suggests they are influenced by environmental factors. Correlations from multiple regression models were examined in relation to magnitude of effect size as well as significance. This is partly due to small sample size and that cross-fostering designs rely on comparing magnitudes of associations between related and unrelated groups. An interaction term was used to test the difference in the strength of association between related and unrelated mother-child groups.

Result

Subjective assessment of prenatal maternal stress showed construct validity as it was associated with low birth weight (β = –0.297, p = 0.005) and reduced gestational age (β= –0.320, p = 0.001). Subjective late pregnancy stress was associated with increased offspring ASD traits in the whole sample (β = 0.089, p = 0.073) and in the related (β=0.045, p = 0.424) and unrelated mother-child (β=0.233, p = 0.029) subgroups. Non-significant interaction terms demonstrated that the mechanisms underlying the association between maternal stress and ASD and birth outcomes are likely to be similar and environmentally driven in the different conception groups.

Conclusion

Findings demonstrate the utility of genetically informed designs in disentangling inherited factors from environmental influences in the study of prenatal risk factors. Correlations between maternal prenatal stress and offspring ASD being present in both related and unrelated mother-child groups indicate an environmental link that is consistent with a potential causal effect. Associations detected are of imperative use for clinicians and policymakers, as they can guide the implementation of early psychosocial care for families at high liability.

Type
Rapid-Fire Poster Presentations
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.