Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:37:33.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring Physical Health in Patients on Antipsychotic Medications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Elizabeth Beavis*
Affiliation:
Hitchin, United Kingdom
Jessica Morris
Affiliation:
Northumbria Healthcare, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Katherine McMenzie
Affiliation:
Northumbria Healthcare, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Mental illness is associated with poorer physical health and reduced life expectancy in comparison to the general population. This is influenced by many factors, one of which is medication related. Antipsychotics can have multi system effects on the body such as increasing the risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Our objective was to understand current challenges when monitoring patients' physical health and thereby improve overall health outcomes.

Methods

Utilising a clinical audit template, the study group was 9 inpatients during cycle 1 and 10 inpatients during cycle 2, who were prescribed antipsychotics on an Old Age Psychiatry ward. Northumberland, Tyne and Wear (NTW) antipsychotic monitoring guidelines were used as criteria which stipulate that blood tests, ECGs, BMI, waist circumference, side effects and lifestyle effects should be recorded at defined intervals. A proforma highlighting these guidelines was created following audit cycle 1 and utilised by the MDT on the ward, the purpose of cycle 2 was to compare findings following the implementation of the proforma. The standard to meet was that 100% of patients should fulfil the guidelines. Data was collected by retrospectively reviewing paper and electronic notes.

Results

Audit cycle 1 revealed 0 of the patients met the physical health criteria. 0 had the full set of required bloods in the correct timeframe, 0 had waist circumference checked and 2 and 1 patients had side effect and lifestyle effects documented respectively. By comparison, ECGs and BMIs were recorded well. Audit cycle 2 demonstrated significant improvement in all areas. 9 patients had bloods accurately measured. 3 and 6 had side effect and lifestyle reviews respectively. ECGs and BMIs continued to be monitored well. However, waist circumference remained poor with 1 patient recorded. Qualitative feedback when presenting these findings to the MDT highlighted an interest debate into the cost/benefit of measuring waist circumference with the main point being not wishing to cause undue anxiety to the patient.

Conclusion

The use of an accessible proforma clearly outlining the criteria to meet for each patient proved valuable in improving the monitoring of physical health parameters. This study highlighted a need for increased awareness of metabolic syndrome and the importance of empowering patients with knowledge regarding their healthcare to help tailor a patient-centred approach to physical health monitoring. Our presentation aims to encourage discussion among attendees around measuring waist circumference and raise awareness of metabolic syndrome.

Type
3 Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.