Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:14:03.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A pilot to assess the feasibility and potential clinical utility of enhanced sleep management on inpatient wards in a mental health trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Ambrina Roshi*
Affiliation:
St Nicholas Hospital, Cumbria Northumberland Tyne Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Rose McGowan
Affiliation:
Newcastle University
Lauren Roberts
Affiliation:
Newcastle University
Stuart Watson
Affiliation:
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne And Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Kirstie Anderson
Affiliation:
Newcastle University
Patrick Keown
Affiliation:
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne And Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Rod Bowles
Affiliation:
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne And Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Ron Weddle
Affiliation:
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne And Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Sophie Connolly
Affiliation:
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne And Wear NHS Foundation Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To assess the feasibility and utility of introducing the following changes on to in-patient units:

Structural and cultural adaptation to create a sleep friendly ward environment

A “Protected Sleep Time” between midnight and 6am

Routine screening for sleep disorders, including obstructive sleep apnoea and restless leg syndrome

Background

Insomnia and other sleep disturbances are cause, correlate and consequence of psychiatric disorders. Routine hourly night time observations, ward noise, bright lights at night time, sleep disorders, insufficient exercise, insufficient day light exposure, too much caffeine and inappropriate psychotropic use are all causes of disturbed sleep (Horne 2018).

Method

Seven wards participated in a pilot (SleepWell). These consisted of one male and two female Acute Wards (General Adult), a High Dependency Unit, a Neurorehabilitation ward, an in-patient dementia service and one rehabilitation ward. These wards were supported via an existing trust management structure and the pilot was specifically supported by two trust managers (RW and RB) and by a clinical director (PK). The expectation was that each ward would identify a sleep champion from existing staff to facilitate the changes. A “product” was developed which identified core sleep management features but, in addition, wards were not confined to these. The existing policy that all inpatients should be checked each hour over night was suspended for the pilot wards and the patients had protected sleep time (PST) if the MDT agreed that it was clinically appropriate.

Quantitative and qualitative techniques were used to identify facilitators of change, impact on sleep and, outcome.

Result

Protected sleep was viewed positively by all staff and approximately 50% of patients on the pilot wards were able to have PST at some point in their admission. Routine sleep disorder assessments were harder to implement and 33% of patients were screened. There were no deaths or significant events on patients due to PST. Hypnotic use on the pilot wards reduced. It is anticipated that PST where it is safe will be rolled out across all adult and old age wards in the trust.

Conclusion

With support, it has been feasible to change many aspects of sleep management across a breadth of inpatient units in a large NHS trust.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.