Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:19:27.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PLAN standards and writing to patients: quality improvement by audit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Edie Shaw*
Affiliation:
Foundation Doctor, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Catherine Adams
Affiliation:
Consultant Psychiatrist, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
Thomas Maclaren
Affiliation:
Consultant Psychiatrist, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
Fergus Brown
Affiliation:
Foundation Doctor, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

This quality improvement project aimed to assess the adherence of a hospital psychiatric liaison team's documentation of assessments to the Psychiatric Liaison Accreditation Network (PLAN) standards framework; to identify areas of improvement; to identify barriers to and improve adherence.

Method

Data were extracted from 27 randomly selected patient assessments from 01/07/2020 to 31/08/2020 and then 27 assessments from 01/10/2020 to 30/11/2020 for re-audit.

Quantitative data was collected by calculating the percentage of assessments which documented each specific aspect of PLAN standards.

Qualitative data including attitudes specifically towards writing to patients was gathered from 1:1 discussions with members of staff.

Interventions between rounds of audit:

Presentation of results of 1st data collection to team in November 2020 followed by discussion

Emailed instructions to create a template based on PLAN standards for assessments to staff

Lobbied for Cerner access at liaison team office to facilitate use of above

Result

Quantitative – overall improvements were seen in adherence to all aspects of documentation of assessments including collateral history (from 23% to 67%) past medical history (30% to 70%) and acknowledging the patient/carer perspective (46% to 74%). Some improvement was seen in offering written correspondence to patients (0% to 20%).

Qualitative – the majority of comments regarding writing to patients were positive, with no staff members opposing the standard (“it is best practice”, “should become a habit”). However, some barriers were identified including increased workload (“requires more editing”, “could take a lot more time”).

Conclusion

Team adherence to PLAN standards for documentation of assessments was improved through low intensity interventions. Overall adherence was high, however certain areas leave space for improvement. The audit facilitated conversations around writing to patients on discharge, both in the form of formal gathering of qualitative data and informal discussions between staff. Attitudes towards writing these letters were positive and some improvement was seen between audits. Ongoing audit activity aims to further improve adherence and monitor improvements.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.