Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:01:21.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Rare Case of rTMS Induced Schizophrenia Symptom Switch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2024

Aayushi Sobhani*
Affiliation:
All india Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Sachin Pursnani
Affiliation:
All india Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Anureet kaur Chandi
Affiliation:
All india Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Akansha Bhardwaj
Affiliation:
All india Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Nand Kumar
Affiliation:
All india Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
*
*Presenting author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

  • This case study investigates a rare occurrence of symptom transition in a chronic schizophrenia patient following high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), aiming to understand the unexpected shift from predominantly negative to positive symptoms.

  • rTMS, known for inducing changes in neuronal activity based on Faraday's law, is believed to enhance cortical excitability through high-frequency stimulation.

  • Schizophrenia, a severe and chronic mental disorder, presents with both positive (e.g., delusions, hallucinations) and negative symptoms (e.g., apathy). Current treatments, predominantly antipsychotic drugs, often show limited efficacy, especially for negative symptoms. Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques like rTMS are emerging as potential interventions.

Methods

This case involves a 27-year-old banking executive with a 30 months illness duration primarily marked by negative symptoms over the past 3 months. Despite various antipsychotics, there was no improvement, leading to the initiation of high-frequency rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) as an adjunct strategy for persistent negative symptoms. Surprisingly, after the 5th rTMS session, positive symptoms like delusions and hallucinations emerged. Serial assessments demonstrated a decrease in negative symptom domain scores on PANSS but an increase in positive symptom domain scores on PANSS.

Results

  • Results suggest that 5 Hz rTMS over the left DLPFC may have contributed to the transition to positive symptoms. The discussion explores limited literature on rTMS-induced positive symptoms, with case reports dating back to 2004 indicating the possibility of such induction. Studies propose a link between higher pulse frequency, motor threshold intensity, left prefrontal cortex stimulation, and longer trial durations with the exacerbation of positive symptoms, possibly linked to dopamine changes in specific brain tracts.

  • Recent trials indicate potential improvement in positive symptoms, such as excitement, with low frequency rTMS of the temporo parietal area. However, the efficacy of rTMS varies with the stimulation site, with left prefrontal rTMS showing promise for negative symptoms and left temporo-parietal junction stimulation possibly reducing auditory hallucinations.

Conclusion

This case report suggests that a subset of schizophrenia patients may experience a transient exacerbation of positive symptoms following rTMS. This underscores the need for increased awareness of potential side effects, serving as an exploratory study that calls for future research to refine these findings for a clearer understanding of rTMS-induced symptom switches in schizophrenia.

Type
6 Case Study
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.