Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:53:41.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of rapidly available glucose (RAG) in plant foods: a potential in vitro predictor of the glycaemic response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Hans N Englyst ,
Jan Veenstra  and
Geoffrey J Hudson
Hans N Englyst
Affiliation:
1MRC Dunn Clinical Nutrition Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2DH
Jan Veenstra
Affiliation:
2Hercules European Research Centre, 3770 AK Barneveld, The Netherland
Geoffrey J Hudson
Affiliation:
1MRC Dunn Clinical Nutrition Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2DH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The glycaemic index (GI) is an in vivo measurement based on the glycaemicresponse to carbohydrate-containing foods, and allows foods to be ranked on the basis of the rate of digestion and absorption of the carbohydrates that they contain. GI values are normalizedto a reference amount of available carbohydrate and do not reflect the amounts of carbohydrate normally present in foods; for example, a food with a low content of carbohydrates will have a high GI value if that carbohydrate is digested and absorbed rapidly in the human small intestine. This is potentially confusing for a person wishing to control his or her blood glucoselevels by the choice of foods. The rate and extent of starch digestion in vitro has been measured using a technique that classifies starch into three major fractions: rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS) and resistant starch (RS). In addition, thistechnique gives a value for rapidly available glucose (RAG), which includes RDS, free glucose and the glucose moiety of sucrose. When the values for thirty-nine foods were expressed on the basis ofthe available carbohydrate content of these foods, highly significant (P<0·001) positive correlations were observed between GI and both RDS and RAG. The measurement of RAGin vitro provides values for direct calculation of the amount of glucose likely to be rapidly absorbed in the human small intestine and,thus, to influence blood glucose and insulin levels. These values can be used to compare foods, as eaten,on an equal-weight basis. Food-table RAG values would allow simple calculation of the total amount of RAG provided by single foods, by whole meals and by whole diets. Studies are planned in which RAG and the glycaemic response in man will be measured for identical food products.

Keywords

Rapidly available glucosePlant foodsStarchGlycaemic response
Type
rapidly available glucose and the glycaemic response
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , March 1996 , pp. 327 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1996

References

Bornet, F. R. J., Cloaree, D., Barry, J. L., Colonna, P., Gouilloud, S., Laval, J. D. & Galmiche, J. P. (1990). Pasta cooking time: influence on starch digestion and plasma glucose and insulin responses in healthy subjects. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 51, 421–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, R. W., Sillery, J. K., Graham, M. M. & Saunders, D. R. (1985). Absorption of starch by healthy ileostomates: effects of transit time and of carbohydrate load. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 41, 1244–1248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawley, H. (1988). Food Portion Sizes. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Englyst, H. N. & Cummings, J. H. (1986). Digestion of the carbohydrates of banana (Musaparadisiaca sapienturn)in the human small intestine. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 44, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Englyst, H. N.Kingman, S. M. & Cummings, J. H. (1992 a). Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions.European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 46, S33–S50.Google ScholarPubMed
Englyst, H. N., Kingman, S. M., Hudson, G. J. & Cummings, J. H. (1996). Measurement of resistant starch in vitro and in vivo. BritishJournal of Nutrition (In the Press).Google ScholarPubMed
Englyst, H. N., Quigley, M. E. & Hudson, G. J. (1994).rDetermination of dietary fibre as non-starch polysaccharides with gas-liquid chromatographic, high-performance liquid chromatographic or spectro-photometric measurement of constituent sugars.Analyst 119, 1497–1509.Google Scholar
Englyst, H. N., Quigley, M. E., Hudson, G. J. & Cummings, J.H. (1992 b). Determination of dietary fibre as nonstarch polysaccharides by gas-liquid chromatography. Analystx 117, 1707–1714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, G., Wolever, T. M. S. & Leeds, A. R. (1993). Review: the glycaemic index. Is it time to take a new look? Dietary Fiber Bibliography and Reviews 1, 66–71.Google Scholar
Haber, G. B., Heaton, K. W.,Murphy, D. & Burroughs, L. F. (1977). Depletion and disruption of dietary fibre. Effects on satiety, plasma-glucose, and serum-insulin. Lancet ii, 679–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, K. W., Marcus, S. N., Emmett, P. M. & Bilton, C. H. (1988). Particle size of wheat, maize and oat test meals: effects on plasma glucose and insulin responses and on the rate of starch digestion in vitro. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47, 675–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, D. J. A., Thorne, M. J., Cameleon, K., Jenkins, A., Rao, A. V., Taylor,, R. H., Thompson,, L. U., Kalmusky, J., Reichert, R. & Francis, T. (1982). Effect of processing on digestibility and the blood glucose response: a study in lentils. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 36, 1093–1101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, D. J. A., Wolever, T. M. S., Jenkins, A. L., Josse, R. G. & Wong, G. S. (1984). The glycaemic response to carbohydrate foods. Lancet ii, 388–391.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D. J. A., Wolever, T. M. S., Jenkins, A. L., Thompson, L. U., Rao, A. V. & Francis, T. (1986). The glycaemic index: blood glucose response to foods. In Dietary Fibrey. Basic and Clinical Aspects, pp. 167–179 [Vahouny, G. V. and Kritchevsky, D., editors[. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, D. J. A., Wolever, T. M. S., Taylor, R. H., Barker, H., Fielden, H., Baldwin, J. M., Bowling, A. C., Newman, H. C., Jenkins, A. L. & Goff, D. V. (1981). Glycaemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34, 362–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. R. (1934). X-ray investigation of gelatinization and retrogradation of starch in its importance for bread research. Bakers Weekly 81, 34–37.Google Scholar
Katz, J. R. (1937). The amorphous part of starch in fresh bread, and in fresh pastes and solutions of starch. Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays Bas et de la Belgique 18, 55–59.Google Scholar
Katz, J. R. & Van Itallie, T. B. (1930). Abhandlungen zur physikalischen Chemie der Brotbereitung. V. Alle Starkearten haben das gleiche Retrogradationsspektrum (Study of the physical chemistry of breadmaking. V. All types of starch have the same retrogradation spectrum). Zeitschrqt f¨ur Physikalische Chernie A150.Google Scholar
Read, N. W., Welch, I. M., Austen, C. J., Barnish, C., Bartlett, C. E., Baxter, A. J., Brown, G., Compton, M. E.Hume, K. E. Hume, K. E., Storie, I. & Worldling, J. (1986). Swallowing food without chewing: a simple way to reduce postprandial glycemia. British Journal of Nutrition, 43–47.Google Scholar
Silvester, K. R., Englyst, H. N. & Cummings, J. H. (1995). Ileal recovery of starch from whole diets containing resistant starch measured in vitro and fermentation of ileal effluent. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 62, 403–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterling, C. (1978). Textural qualities and molecular structure of starch products. Journal of Texture Studies 9, 225–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. R. P. & Walker, B. F. (1984). Glycaemic index ofSouth African foods determined in rural blacks - a population of low risk of diabetes. Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition 38 C, 215–222.Google Scholar
Wolever, T. M. S. (1990). Relationship between dietary fiber content and composition in foods and the glycaemic index. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 51, 72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolever, T. M. S. & Jenkins, D. J. A. (1992). Effect of fiber and foods on carbohydrate metabolism. In Handbook of Dietary Fiber in Human Nutrition, 2nd ed., pp. 111–152 [Spiller, , editor[. Boca Raton: CRC Press Inc.Google Scholar
Wolever, T. M. S., Jenkins, D. J. A., Kalmusky, J., Giordano, C., Giudici, S., Jenkins, A. L., Thompson, L. U., Wong, G. S. & Josse, R. G. (1986). Glycaemic response to pasta: effect of surface area, degree of cooking and protein enrichment. Diabetes Care 9, 401–404.Google Scholar
Würsch, P., Del Vedovo, S. & Koellreutter, B. (1986). Cell structure and starch nature as key determinants of the digestion rate of starch in legume. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 43, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed