Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:30:22.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dharma and Abhidharma1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Johannes Bronkhorst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most commonly it is presented as a list of beneficial psychic characteristics (kuśala dharma) or simply psychic characteristics (dharma). Sometimes practising the items of this list is stated to be a precondition for liberation from the intoxicants (āśrava). Or else the list is said to constitute the ‘cultivation of the road’ (mārgabhāvanā). In a few instances the items of the list are characterized as ‘jewels’ (ratna). This characterization occurs where doctrine and discipline (dharmavinaya) are compared with the ocean, and finds its justification in this comparison.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 305 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anesaki, M. 1908a. ‘Some problems of the textual history of the Buddist scriptures’, Transcations of the Asiatic Society of Japan, xxxv, 81–96.Google Scholar
Anesaki, M. 1908b. ‘The four Buddhist āgamas in chinese: a concordance of their parts and of the corresponding counterparts in the Pāli Nikāyas’, Transactions of the asiatic Society of Japan, xxxv, 1–149.Google Scholar
Bareau, André. 1955a. Les sects bouddhiques du Pelit Véhicule. (Publications de I'École francaise d'Extrême-Orient, Vol.XXXVIII.) Paris: École Française d'Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
Bareau, André. 1955b. Les premiers conciles bouddhiques. (Annales du Musée Guimet. Bibliothéque d'Études, Tome LX.) Paris: Pressess Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bareau, André. 1957. ‘Les controverses relatives à la nature de l'arhant dans le Bouddhisme ancien’, IIJ, I, 241–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bareau, André. 1963. Recherches sur la Biographie du Buddha dans les Sūtrapitaka et les Vinayapilaka anciens: De la quête de I'éveil a la conversion de Śāriputra et de Maudgalyāyana. (Publications de l'EcoleFrançaise d'Extrême-Orient, Vol. LIII.) Paris: Ecole Française: d'Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
Bareau, André. 1970. Recherches sur la Biographie du Buddha dans les Sūtrapitaka et les Vinayapiṯaka anciens: II. Les derniers mois, le Parinirvāṇa et les funérailles. Tome I. (Publications de l'École Francaise d'Extrême-Orient, Vol. LXXVII.) Paris: École Francaise d'Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
Bechert, Heinz. 1982. ‘The date of the Buddha reconsidered’, Indologica Taurinensia, x, 29–36.Google Scholar
Bronkhorst, Johannes. Forthcoming. The two traditions of meditation in ancient India. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Conze, Edward. 1962. Buddhist thought in India. London:George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Edgerton, Franklin. 1953. Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit grammar and dictionary, Vol. II: Dictionary. Delhi-Varanasi-Patna: Motilal Banarsidass, 1977.Google Scholar
Frauwallner, Erich. 1952. ‘Die buddhistischen Konzile’. ZDMG, CII (N.F.27), 240–61.Google Scholar
Frauwallner, Erich. 1953. Geschichte der indischen Philosophie. i. Band. Salzburg: Otto Mūller.Google Scholar
Frauwallner, Erich. 1956. The earliest Vinaya and the beginnings of Buddhist literature. (Serie Orientate Roma, VIII.) Roma: IsMEO.Google Scholar
Frauwallner, Erich. 1964. ‘Abhidharma-Studien. III. Dir abhisamayavādaḣ (pp.69–102). IV. Der Abhidharma der anderen Schulen (pp. 103–21)’, WZKS, XV, 69–121.Google Scholar
Geiger, Magdalene und Wilhelm. 1921. Pāli Dhamma, vornehmlich in derkanonischen Literatur. (Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-philologische und historische Klasse, xxxi. Band, 1. Abteilung.) Miinchen: Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Glasenapp, Helmuth von. 1938. ‘Zur Geschichte der buddhistischen Dharma-Theorie’, ZDMG, XCII (N.F. 17), 383–420. Repr. in Von Buddha zu Gandhi. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. 1962. Pp.47–80.Google Scholar
Hirakawa, Akira. 1980. ‘The meaning of “dharma” and “abhidharma”’, Indianisme et Bouddhisme. (Publications de l'lnstitut Orientaliste de Louvain, 23.) Melanges offerts à Mgr. Étienne Lamotte. Louvain-la-Neuve: Institut Orientaliste, University Catholique de Louvain. 159–75.Google Scholar
Kalupahana, David J. 1975. Causality: the central philosophy of Buddhism. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamotte, Étienne. 1958. Histoire du Bouddhisme indien: des origines à Ére Šaka. (Bibliotheque du Muséon, Vol. 43.) Louvain: Université de Louvain, Institut Orientaliste.Google Scholar
Lamotte, Étienne. 1967. ‘Un Sūtra composite de l'Ekottarāgama’, BSOAS, xxx, 1, 105–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Sylvain and Chavannes, Édouard. 1916. ‘Les seize arhat protecteurs de la loi’, JA, II Sér., Tome VIII, 5–50, 189–304.Google Scholar
Migot, Andre. 1952. ‘Un grand disciple du Buddha, Šāriputra: son role dans l'histoire du bouddhisme et dans le développement de 1'Abhidharma’, BEFEO, XLVI, 405–554.Google Scholar
Muck, Terry C. 1980. ‘The meaning of “abhidhamma” in the Pali canon’, Pali Bvddhist Review, v, 12–22.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Hajime. 1976. ‘A critical survey of early Buddhism (II)’, Bukkyō kenkyū (Hamamatsu), 5: 167–141.Google Scholar
Nattier, Janice J., and Prebish, Charles S. 1977. ‘Mahāsāmghika origins: the beginnings of Buddhist sectarianism’, HistR, xvi, 237–72.Google Scholar
Norman, K. R. 1983. Pāli literature. (A history of Indian literature. Vol. vn, Fasc. 2.) Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Ono, Gemyo. 1968–1975. Bussho kaisetsu daijiten. 12 vols. 2nd ed. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Paṅcavimśatisāhasrikā Prajṅāpāramitā, (ed.)Nalinaksha, Dutt. (Calcutta Oriental Series, No. 28.) London: Luzac, 1934.Google Scholar
Prebish, Charles S. 1975. Buddhist monastic discipline: the Sanskrit Prātimoksa Sūtras of the Mahāsāmghikas and Mūlasarvastivādins. University Park and London: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Przyluski, Jean. 1926. Le Concile de Rājagrha. Paris: Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
Rhys Davids, C. A. F. 1908. Review of Patisambhidāmagga, Vol. II, JRAS, 1908, 589–92.Google Scholar
Rockhill, W. Woodville. 1907. The life of the Buddha and the early history of his order. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.Google Scholar
Schmithausen, Lambert. 1976. ‘Die vier Konzentration der Aufmerksamkeit’, Zeitschrift für Missionswissenschaft und Religionswissenschaft, LX, 241–6.Google Scholar
Stache-Rosen, Valentina. 1968. Dogmatische Begriffsreihen im älteren Buddhismus. II. Das Sa1E45;gītisūtra und sein Kommentar Saṅgitiparyūya. Teil l. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Stcherbatsky, Th. 1923. the central conception of Buddhism and the meaning of the word ‘dharma’. (Prize Publication Fund, Vol. VII.) London: Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Warder, A.K. 1961. ‘The Mātikā’, in Mohavicchedani, PTS ed., 19–27.Google Scholar
Warder, A.K. 1980. Indian Buddhism. Second revised edition. Delhi-Varanasi-Patna: Motilal Babarsidass.Google Scholar
Winternitz, Moriz. 1920. Geschichte der indischen Litenatur. Bd. 2.Stuttgart: K. F. Kochler. (Repr. 1968.)Google Scholar