Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:28:28.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Where's the spleen? Looking for the spleen and assessing its function in the syndromes of isomerism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Colin Kit Lun Phoon*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology and Department of Pediatrics, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
*
Colin K.L. Phoon, MPhil, MD Pediacric Echocardiography Laboratory, New York University Medical Center, 530 First Avenue, Suite 9U, New York, NY 10016. Tel: 212-263-5940; Fax: 212-263-5808

Abstract

Despite the close association of certain constellations of cardiac malformations with splenic status (right isomerism / asplenia, left isomerism / polysplenia), the association is not perfect. Given the risk of infection in the patient lacking splenic tissue, it seems prudent to assess the state of the spleen separately from the cardiovascular system, in order to decide on antimicrobial prophylaxis. A wide variety of tests is available to assess splenic function and/or anatomy. Counting pitted erythrocytes or Howell-Jolly bodies in the peripheral blood smear can be a good indicator of the lack of splenic function, although the former appears more sensitive and quantitative than the latter. Radionuclide spleen scans can provide both anatomic and functional information about the spleen, and may be a useful adjunctive test. Relatively poor spatial resolution, and interfering hepatic activity (even with spleen-specific scans), mitigate its usefulness in the young infant. The reliability of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting splenic tissue in the heterotaxy syndromes is unproven and perhaps only fair at best. They are probably most helpful as adjunctive tests. Ultrasonography offers excellent spatial resolution, portability, and lack of ionizing radiation, but is operator- and patient-dependent. Nonetheless, ultrasonography, coupled with an examination of the peripheral blood for Howell-Jolly bodies or pitted erythrocytes, is probably the set of tests with highest sensitivity and greatest convenience. Management strategies for the asplenic patient are also discussed.

Type
Continuing Medical Education
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Martin, G. Observation d'une déviation organique del'estomac, d'une anomalie dans la situation, dans la configuration du coeur et des vaisseaux qui partent ou qui s'y rendent. Bull Soc Anat de Paris 1826; 1:4051.Google Scholar
2.Ivemark, BI. Implications of agenesis of the spleen on the pathogenesis of cono-truncus anomalies in childhood. Acta Paediatr (Suppl 104) 1955; 44:1110.Google Scholar
3.Moller, JH, Nakib, A, Anderson, RC, Edwards, JE. Congenital cardiac disease associated with polysplenia. Circulation 1967; 36:789799.Google Scholar
4.Van Mierop, LHS, Gessner, IH, Schiebler, GL. Asplenia and polysplenia syndromes. Birth Defects Orig Article Series 1972; 8:7482.Google Scholar
5.Rose, V, Izukawa, T, Möes, CAF. Syndromes of asplenia and polysplenia: a review of cardiac and non-cardiac malformations in 60 cases with special reference to diagnosis and prognosis. Br Heart J 1975; 37:840852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Peoples, WM, Moller, JH, Edwards, JE. Polysplenia: a review of 146 cases. Pediatr Cardiol 1983; 4:129137.Google Scholar
7.Phoon, CK, Neill, CA. Asplenia syndrome: insight into embryology through an analysis of cardiac and extracardiac anomalies. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73:581587.Google Scholar
8.Putschar, WGJ, Manion, WC. Congenital absence of the spleen and associated anomalies. Am J Clin Pathol 1956; 26:429470.Google Scholar
9.MacArtney, FJ, Zuberbuhler, JR, Anderson, RH. Morphologic considerations pertaining to recognition of atrial isomerism. Consequences for chamber localisation. Br Heart J 1980; 44:657667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Sharma, S, Devine, W, Anderson, RH, Zuberbuhler, JR. The determination of atrial arrangement by examination of appendage morphology in 1842 autopsied specimens. Br Heart J 1988; 60:227231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Becker, AE, Anderson, RH. Isomerism of the atrial appendages – goodbye to asplenia and all that. In: Clark, EB, Takao, A (eds). Developmental Cardiology. Morphogenesis and function. Futura, Mt. Kisco, NY, 1990, pp 659670.Google Scholar
12.Anderson, C, Devine, WA, Anderson, RH, Debich, DE, Zuberbuhler, JR. Abnormalities of the spleen in relation to congenital malformations of the heart: a survey of necropsy findings in children. Br Heart J 1990; 63:122128.Google Scholar
13.Devine, WA. What if Ivemark had suggested the term “Syndrome of Visceral Symmetry with Asplenia” instead of “Asplenia, a Teratologic Syndrome of Visceral Heterotaxy”? Cardiol Young 1992; 2:108113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Uemura, H, Ho, SY, Devine, WA, Anderson, RH. Analysis of visceral heterotaxy according to splenic status, appendage morphology, or both. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:846849.Google Scholar
15.Pearson, HA, Schiebler, GL, Spencer, RP. Functional hyposplenism in cyanotic heart disease. Pediatrics 1971; 48:277280.Google Scholar
16.Freedom, RM. Functional hyposplenism in congenital heart disease: comments. Pediatrics 1972; 49:475476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Rodin, AE, Sloane, JA, Nghiem, QX. Polysplenia with severe congenital heart disease and Howell-Jolly bodies. Am J Clin Pathol 1972; 58:127134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Dyke, MP, Martin, RP, Berry, PJ. Septicaemia and adrenal haemorrhage in congenital asplenia. Arch Dis Child 1991; 66:636637.Google Scholar
19.American Academy of Pediatrics. Immunization in special clinical circumstances. In: Peter, G (ed). 1994 Red Book: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 23rd edition. American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove, IL, 1994, pp 5171.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Lane, PA. The spleen in children. Curr Opin Pediatr 1995; 7:3641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Working Party of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology Clinical Haematology Task Force. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infection in patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen. Br Med J 1996; 312:430434.Google Scholar
22.Waldman, JD, Rosenthal, A, Smith, AL, Shurin, S, Nadas, AS. Sepsis and congenital asplenia. J Pediatr 1977; 90 555559.Google Scholar
23.Biggar, WD, Ramirez, RA, Rose, V. Congenital asplenia: immunologic assessment and a clinical review of eight surviving patients. Pediatrics 1981; 67:548551.Google Scholar
24.Wang, J-K, Hsieh, K-H. Immunologic study of the asplenia syndrome. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1991; 10:819822.Google Scholar
25.Phoon, CK, Neill, CA. Asplenia syndrome – risk factors for early unfavorable outcome. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73:12351237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Buchanan, GR. Chemoprophylaxis in asplenic adolescents and young adults. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1993; 12:892893.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Lortan, JE. Management of asplenic patients. Br J Haematol 1993; 84:566569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Murdoch, IA, Dos Anjos, R, Mitchell, A. Fatal pneumococcal septicaemia associated with asplenia and isomerism of the right atrial appendages. Br Heart J 1991; 65:102103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Ruttenberg, HD. Corrected transposition (L-transposition) of the great arteries and splenic syndromes. In: Adams, FH, Emmanouilides, GC (eds). Moss' Heart Disease in Infants, Children, and Adolescents, 3rd edition. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1983, pp 333350.Google Scholar
30.Anderson, RH, MacArtney, FJ, Shinebourne, EA, Tynan, M, in collaboration with Sapire DW. Atrial isomerism. In: Anderson, RH, MacArtney, FJ, Shinebourne, EA, Tynan, M (eds). Paediatric Cardiology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1987, pp 473495.Google Scholar
31.Gutgesell, HP. Cardiac malposition and heterotaxy. In: Garson, A, Bricker, JT, McNamara, DG (eds). The Science and Practice of Pediatric Cardiology. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, 1990, pp 12801303.Google Scholar
32.Van Praagh, S, Santini, F, Sanders, SP. Cardiac malpositions with special emphasis on visceral heterotaxy (asplenia and polysplenia syndromes). In: Fyler, DC (ed). Nadas' Pediatric Cardiology. Hanley and Belfus, Philadelphia, PA, 1992, pp 589608.Google Scholar
33.Dallman, PR. Spleen. In: Rudolph, AM (ed). Rudolph's Pediatrics, 19th edition. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk, CT, 1991, pp 11511153.Google Scholar
34.Pearson, HA. The spleen and disturbances of splenic function. In: Nathan, DG, Oski, FA (eds). Hematology of Infancy and Childhood, 4th edition. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 1993, pp 10581077.Google Scholar
35.Hagler, DJ, O'Leary, PW. Cardiac malpositions and abnormalities of atrial and visceral situs. In: Emmanouilides, GC, Riemenschneider, TA, Allen, HD, Gutgesell, HP (eds). Moss and Adams' Heatt Disease in Infants, Children, and Adolescents: Including the Fetus and Young Adult, 5th edition. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1995, pp 13071336.Google Scholar
36.Crosby, WH. Hyposplenism: an inquiry into normal functions of the spleen. Ann Rev Med 1963; 14:349370.Google Scholar
37.Zago, MA. The evaluation of spleen function in man. Brazilian J Med Biol Res 1989; 22;159169.Google Scholar
38.Acevedo, G, Mauer, AM. The capacity for removal of erythro cytes containing Heinz bodies in premature infants and patients following splenectomy. J Pediatr 1963; 63:6164.Google Scholar
39.Holroyde, CP, Oski, FA, Gardner, FH. The “pocked” erythrocyte: red cell surface alterations in reticuloendothelial immaturity of the neonate. N Engl J Med 1969; 281:516520.Google Scholar
40.Padmanabhan, J, Risenberg, HM, Rowe, RD. Howell-Jolly bodies in the peripheral blood of full-term and premature infants. Johns Hopkins Med J 1973; 132:146150.Google Scholar
41.Nathan, DG. Rubbish in the red cell. N Engl J Med 1969; 281:558559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Bush, JA, Ainger, LE. Congenital absence of the spleen with congenital heart disease: report of a case with ante mortem diagnosis on the basis of hematologic morphology. Pediatrics 1955; 15:9399.Google Scholar
43.Lipson, RL, Bayrd, ED, Watkins, CH. The postsplenectomy blood picture. Am J Clin Pathol 1959; 32:526532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Lyons, WS, Hanlon, DG, Helmholz, HE Jr, DuShane, JW, Edwards, JE. Congenital cardiac disease and asplenia: report of seven cases. Proc Staff Meetings Mayo Clin 1957; 32:277286.Google Scholar
45.Casper, JT, Koethe, S, Rodey, GE, Thatcher, LG. A new method for studying reticuloendothelial dysfunction in sickle cell disease patients and its clinical applications: a brief report. Blood 1976; 47:183188.Google Scholar
46.Pearson, HA, Johnston, D, Smith, KA, Touloukian, RJ. The born-again spleen: return of splenic function after splenectomy for trauma. N Engl J Med 1978; 298:13891392.Google Scholar
47.Robertson, DAF, Bullen, AW, Hall, R, Losowsky, MS. Blood film appearances in the hyposplenism of coeliac disease. Br J Clin Pract 1983; 37:1922.Google Scholar
48.Corazza, GR, Ginaldi, L, Zoli, G, Frisoni, M, Lalli, G, Gasbarrini, G, Quaglino, D. Howell-Jolly body counting as a measure of splenic function. A reassessment. Clin Lab Haematol 1990; 12:269275.Google Scholar
49.Sills, RH, Oski, FA. RBC surface pits in the sickle hemoglobinopathies. Am J Dis Child 1979; 133:526527.Google Scholar
50.Holroyde, CP, Gardner, FH. Acquisition of autophagic vacuoles by human erythrocytes: physiological role of the spleen. Blood 1970; 36:566575.Google Scholar
51.Pearson, HA, McLntosh, S, Ritchey, AK, Lobel, JS, Rooks, Y, Johnston, D. Developmental aspects of splenic function in sickle cell diseases. Blood 1979; 53:358365.Google Scholar
52.Freedman, RM, Johnston, D, Mahoney, MJ, Pearson, HA. Development of splenic reticuloendothelial function in neonates. J Pediatr 1980; 96:466468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53.Corazza, GR, Tarozzi, C, Vaira, D, Frisoni, M, Gasbarrini, G. Return of splenic function after splenectom: how much tissue is needed? Br Med J 1984; 289:861864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54.Pearson, HA, Gallagher, D, Chilcote, R, Sullivan, E, Wilmas, J, Espeland, M, Ritchey, AK, and the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease. Developmental pattern of splenic dysfunction in sickle cell disorders. Pediatrics 1985; 76:392397.Google Scholar
55.Armas, RR. Clinical studies with spleen-specific radiolabeled agents. Sem Nucl Med 1985; 15:260275.Google Scholar
56.Spencer, RP, Gupta, SM. The spleen: diagnosis of splenic diseases using radiolabeled tracers. Crit Rev Lab Sci 1989; 27:299318.Google Scholar
57.Spencer, RP. Spleen imaging. In: Sandier, MP, Coleman, RE, Wackers, FJT, Patron, JA, Gottschalk, A, Hoffer, PB (eds). Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine, 3rd edition. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1996, pp 865874.Google Scholar
58.Myers, MJ. Spleen imaging. Clin Haematol 1983; 12:395420.Google Scholar
59.Farber, EN, Dachman, AH. Anomalies and congenital disorders. In: Dachman, AH, Friedman, AC (eds). Radiology of the Spleen. Mosby Year - Book, St. Louis, MO, 1993, pp 4268.Google Scholar
60.Sty, JR, Conway, JJ. The spleen: development and functional evaluation. Sem Nucl Med 1985; 15:276298.Google Scholar
61.Freedom, RM, Treves, S. Splenic scintigraphy and radionuclide venography in the heterotaxy syndrome. Radiology 1973; 107:381386.Google Scholar
62.Bakir, M, Bilgic, A, Özmen, M, Çaglar, M. The value of radionuclide splenic scanning in the evaluation of asplenia in patients with heterotaxy. Pediatr Radiol 1994; 24:2528.Google Scholar
63.Owunwanne, A, Halkar, R, Al-Rasheed, A, Abubacker, KC, Abdel-Dayem, H. Radionuclide imaging of the spleen with heat-denatured technetium-99m RBC when the splenic reticuloendothelial system seems impaired. J Nucl Med 1988; 29:320323.Google Scholar
64.Wagman, PG, Dworkin, HJ. Splenic imaging in a patient with functional asplenia. Clin Nucl Med 1989; 14:264267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65.Ehrlich, CP, Papanicoloau, N, Treves, S, Hurwitz, RA, Richards, P. Splenic scintigraphy using Tc-99m-labeled heat denatured red blood cells in pediatric patients: concise communications. J Nucl Med 1982; 23:209213.Google Scholar
66.Hernanz-Schulman, M, Ambrosino, MM, Genieser, NB, Friedman, D, Banner, H, Rumancik, W, Teele, RL. Current evaluation of the patient with abnormal visceroatrial situs. AJR 1990; 154:797802.Google Scholar
67.Winer-Muram, HT, Tonkin, ILD. The spectrum of heterotaxic syndromes. Radiol Clin N A 1989; 27:11471170.Google Scholar
68.Freeman, JL, Jafri, SZHRoberts, JL, Mezwa, DG, Shirkhoda, A. CT of congenital and acquired abnormalities of the spleen. Radiographics 1993; 13:597610.Google Scholar
69.Torres, GM, Terry, NL, Mergo, PJ, Ros, PR. MR imaging of the spleen. MRI Clin N A 1995; 3:3950.Google Scholar
70.Thomsen, C. Quantitative magnetic resonance methods for in vivo investigation of the human liver and spleen. Acta Radiol 1996; 37 (Suppl 401):l34.Google Scholar
71.Newman, B, Bowen, A, Eggli, KD. Recognition of malposition of the liver and spleen: CT, MRI, nuclear scan and fluoroscopic imaging. Pediatr Radiol 1994; 24:274279.Google Scholar
72.Brown, ED, Semelka, RC. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spleen and pancreas. Topics Magnet Reson Imag 1995; 7:8289.Google ScholarPubMed
73.Wang, J-K, Li, Y-W, Chiu, I-S, Wu, M-H, Chang, Y-C, Hung, C-R, Lue, H-C. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of venoatrial connections, atrial morphology, bronchial situs, and other anomalies in right atrial isomerism. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74:701704.Google Scholar
74.Niwa, K, Uchishiba, M, Aotsuka, H, Tateno, S, Tashima, K, Fujiwara, T, Matsuo, K. Magnetic resonance imaging of heterotaxia in infants. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23:177183.Google Scholar
75.O'Leary, PW, Seward, JB, Hagler, DJ, Tajik, AJ. Echocardiographic documentation of splenic anatomy in complex congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68:15361538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76.Freedom, RM. The asplenia syndrome: a review of significant extracardiac structural anomalies in 29 necropsied patients. J Pediatr 1972; 81: 11301133.Google Scholar