Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:52:19.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning and evolving*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2015

Peter C. Laussen
Peter C. Laussen*
Affiliation:
Department Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Department of Anaesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Correspondence to: Professor P. C. Laussen, MBBS, FCICM. E-mail: peter.laussen@sickkids.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is an honour to present the Anthony Chang lecture at this 10th International Conference of the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society. I have had the privilege of knowing Dr Chang for over 20 years, and although we only worked for a short period of time together at the Children’s Hospital, Boston, in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, we have remained close colleagues and friends since that time. The contributions of Dr Chang to the development of paediatric cardiac intensive care are very clear, based on his clinical expertise, research and scholarship, and the development of the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society in its early days. More than this, Dr Chang is an individual with vision; in many respects, he has been ahead of the curve, anticipating and leading the direction of paediatric cardiac intensive care.

Keywords

Pediatric cardiac critical carecongenital heart diseasedata analysisimprovement science
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , June 2015 , pp. 984 - 990
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

2nd Anthony Chang Lecture presented at the 10th International Meeting of the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society, Miami, Florida, 12 December, 2014.

References

1. Wernovsky, G, Wypij, D, Jonas, RA, et al. Postoperative course and hemodynamic profile after the arterial switch operation in neonates and infants. A comparison of low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. Circulation 1995; 92: 2226–2235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Newburger, JW, Wypij, D, Bellinger, DC, et al. Length of stay after infant heart surgery is related to cognitive outcome at age 8 years. J Pediatr 2003; 143: 67–73.Google Scholar
3. Goldberg, CS, Lu, M, Sleeper, LA, et al. Factors associated with neurodevelopment for children with single ventricle lesions. J Pediatr 2014; 165: 490.e8–496.e8.Google Scholar
4. Ohye, RG, Sleeper, LA, Mahony, L, et al. Comparison of shunt types in the Norwood procedure for single-ventricle lesions. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1980–1992.Google Scholar
5. Tabbutt, S, Ghanayem, N, Ravishankar, C, et al. Risk factors for hospital morbidity and mortality after the Norwood procedure: a report from the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 882–895.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Pasquali, SK, Ohye, RG, Lu, M, et al. Variation in perioperative care across centers for infants undergoing the Norwood procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 915–921.Google Scholar
7. Catchpole, K, Sellers, R, Goldman, A, et al. Patient handovers within the hospital: translating knowledge from motor racing to healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19: 318–322.Google Scholar
8. Warnes, CA, Williams, RG, Bashore, TM, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines on the management of adults with congenital heart disease). Circulation 2008; 118: e714–e833.Google Scholar
9. Silversides, CK, Marelli, A, Beauchesne, L, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2009 Consensus Conference on the management of adults with congenital heart disease: executive summary. Can J Cardiol 2010; 26: 143–150.Google Scholar
10. d’Udekem, Y, Iyengar, AJ, Galati, JC, et al. Redefining expectations of long-term survival after the Fontan procedure: twenty-five years of follow-up from the entire population of Australia and New Zealand. Circulation 2014; 130 (Suppl 1): S32–S38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Celi, LA, Mark, RG, Stone, DJ, et al. “Big data” in the intensive care unit. Closing the data loop. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 1157–1160.Google Scholar
12. Celi, LA, Ippolito, A, Montgomery, RA, et al. Crowdsourcing knowledge discovery and innovations in medicine. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e216.Google Scholar
13. Mcmanus, M, Baronov, D, Almodovar, M, et al. Novel risk-based monitoring solution to the data overload in intensive care medicine. In 52nd Conference on Decision and Control 2013, pp. 1009–1016.Google Scholar