No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Transposition with atypical coronary pattern: the Aubert technique
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2017
Abstract
The arterial switch operation is currently the gold standard technique for repair of transposition of the great arteries. Some atypical coronary patterns such as intramural, interarterial, and a unique posterior button are associated with more complexity and surgical risk. We report a successful Aubert operation for transposition of the great arteries associated with a single and interarterial coronary artery arising from a posterior sinus.
Keywords
- Type
- Brief Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
1.
Jonas, RA. Comprehensive Surgical Management of Congenital Heart Disease, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Ratón, Florida, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.
Pasquali, SK, Hasselblad, V, Li, JS, et al. Coronary artery pattern and outcome of arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries: a meta-analysis. Circulation
2002; 106: 2575–2580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.
Aubert, J, Pannetier, A, Couvelly, JP, et al. Transposition of the great arteries. New technique for the anatomical correction. Br Heart J
1978; 40: 204–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.
Takeuchi, S, Katogi, T. New technique for the arterial switch operation in difficult situations. Ann Thorac Surg
1990; 50: 1000–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.
Yacoub, MH, Radley-Smith, R. Anatomy of the coronary arteries in transposition of the great arteries and methods for their transfer in anatomical correction. Thorax
1978; 33: 418–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.
Koshiyama, H, Nagashima, M, Matsumura, G, et al. Arterial switch operation with and without coronary relocation for intramural coronary arteries. Ann Thorac Surg
2016; 102: 1353–1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.
Adluri, K, Barron, DJ, Brawn, WJ. D-transposition of the great arteries with an aortopulmonary window: a new corrective technique. Ann Thorac Surg
2005; 79: 1066–1067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed