Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:42:49.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chronostratigraphy and Biostratigraphy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Hollis D. Hedberg
Hollis D. Hedberg
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J., U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comments are given on a number of papers dealing with principles and procedure in stratigraphic classification which have appeared in British journals during 1963–65. It is emphasized that a clear distinction should be made between biostratigraphic units—bodies of rock strata characterized by certain palaeontological features and bounded by the limits of known occurrence of such features—and chronostratigraphic units—bodies of rock strata characterized by representing the rocks formed during certain time-spans of earth history and bounded above and below by isochronous surfaces. Biostratigraphic zones and the chronostratigraphic terms chronozone and stage are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 102 , Issue 5 , October 1965 , pp. 451 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ager, D. V., 1963. Jurassic stages. Nature, 198 (no. 4885), 1045–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ager, D. V. 1964 a. The British Mesozoic Committee.Nature(no. 4949), 1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ager, D. V. 1964 b, The Luxembourg Colloquium. Geol. Mag., 101, 471–2.Google Scholar
American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1961, Code of Stratigraphic Nomenclature. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 45, 645–665.Google Scholar
Hedberg, H. D., 1937. Stratigraphy of the Rio Querecual section of northeastern Venezuela. Geol. Soc. America Bull., 48, 1971–2024 (see pp. 1975–7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedberg, H. D. 1941. Discussion of technique of Stratigraphic nomenclature by C. W. Tomlinson. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 25, 2202–6.Google Scholar
Hedberg, H. D., 1965. Earth history and the record in the rocks. Am. Philosophical Society, Proc., 109, 99–104.Google Scholar
Holland, C. H., 1964. Stratigraphical classification. Science Progress, 52, 439–451.Google Scholar
International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Terminology, 1961, Statement of principles of Stratigraphic classification and terminology (with accompanying glossary of terms). Rept. 21st Int. Geol. Cong., Part 25, 38 pp., Copenhagen.Google Scholar
International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Terminology, 1964, Definition of geologic systems Rept. 22nd Int. Geol. Cong., Part 18, 26 pp., New Delhi.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. J., 1964. The Luxembourg Colloquium and the revision of the stages of the Jurassic System. Geol. Mag., 101, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, A. J. 1965. The Luxembourg Colloquium—a reply. Geol Mag., 102, 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T. G., 1964. The Luxembourg Colloquium. Geol. Mag., 101, 469–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T. G. 1965. Time in stratigraphy: Paleontology, 8, 113–131.Google Scholar
Pia, Julius V., 1937. Das Wesen der Geologischen Chronologie. Deuxieme Congrès pour l'avancement des Études de Stratigraphie Carbonifère, Heerlen, 1935, C.R., 2, 857–902.Google Scholar
Schenck, H. G., Hedberg, H. D., and Kleinpell, R. M., 1935. Stage as a Stratigraphic unit (abstract). Pan-Am. Geol., 64, 70–1. 1936, Geol. Soc. America Proc., for 1935, 347–8.Google Scholar
Schenck, H. G., and Muller, S. W., 1941. Stratigraphic terminology. Geol. Soc. America Bull., 52, 1419–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, C. W., 1940. Technique of Stratigraphic nomenclature. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 24, 2038–2048.Google Scholar