Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:46:02.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ovarian activity in Fleckvieh, Brown Swiss and two strains of Holstein-Friesian cows in pasture-based, seasonal calving dairy systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2011

Valérie Piccand ,
Susanne Meier ,
Erwan Cutullic ,
Sara Weilenmann ,
Peter Thomet ,
Fredy Schori ,
Chris R Burke ,
Daniel Weiss ,
John R Roche  and
Peter L Kunz
Valérie Piccand*
Affiliation:
Swiss College of Agriculture, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland
Susanne Meier
Affiliation:
DairyNZ Limited, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
Erwan Cutullic
Affiliation:
Swiss College of Agriculture, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland
Sara Weilenmann
Affiliation:
Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, 8052 Zürich, Switzerland
Peter Thomet
Affiliation:
Swiss College of Agriculture, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland
Fredy Schori
Affiliation:
Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
Chris R Burke
Affiliation:
DairyNZ Limited, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
Daniel Weiss
Affiliation:
TU ARGE Landnutzung, Mühlenweg 12a, 85354 Freising, Germany
John R Roche
Affiliation:
DairyNZ Limited, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
Peter L Kunz
Affiliation:
Swiss College of Agriculture, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: valerie.piccand@bfh.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to compare the ovarian activity of Holstein-Friesian (CH HF), Fleckvieh (CH FV) and Brown Swiss (CH BS) dairy cows of Swiss origin with that of Holstein-Friesian (NZ HF) dairy cows of New Zealand origin, the latter being used as a reference for reproductive performance in pasture-based seasonal calving systems. Fifty, second-lactation NZ HF cows were each paired with a second-lactation Swiss cow (17, 15 and 18 CH HF, CH FV and CH BS respectively) in 13 pasture-based, seasonal-calving commercial dairy farms in Switzerland. Ovarian activity was monitored by progesterone profiling from calving to first breeding service. CH BS cows produced less energy-corrected milk (mean 22·8 kg/d) than the other breeds (26·0–26·5 kg/d) during the first 100 d of lactation. CH HF cows had the lowest body condition score (BCS) at calving and the greatest BCS loss from calving to 30 d post partum. Commencement of luteal activity (CLA) was later for NZ HF than for CH FV (51·5 v. 29·2 d; P <0·01), with CH HF and CH BS intermediate (43 d). On average, NZ HF and CH HF cows had one oestrous cycle before the onset of the seasonal breeding period; this was less (P<0·01) than either CH FV (1·7) or CH BS (1·6). There was a low prevalence of luteal persistency (3%) among the studied cows. First and second oestrous cycle inter-ovulatory intervals did not differ between breeds (20·5–22·6 d). The luteal phase length of CH BS during the second cycle was shorter (10·6 d) than that of the other breeds (13·8–16·0 d), but the inter-luteal interval was longer (9·8 d v. 7·0–8·0 d). The results suggest that the Swiss breeds investigated have a shorter interval from calving to CLA than NZ HF cows.

Keywords

Genetic strainfertilityprogesterone
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 78 , Issue 4 , November 2011 , pp. 464 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, D & Maechler, M 2010 lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 R package version 0.999375–35Google Scholar
Blättler, T, Durgai, B, Kohler, S, Kunz, P, Leuenberger, S, Müller, R, Schäublin, H, Spring, P, Stähli, R, Thomet, P, Wanner, K, Weber, A & Menzi, A 2004 [Opti-Milk Project: Objectives and Basic Information.] Agrarforschung 11 80–85Google Scholar
Bleach, ECL, Glencross, RG & Knight, PG 2004 Association between ovarian follicle development and pregnancy rates in dairy cows undergoing spontaneous oestrous cycles. Reproduction 127 621–629CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Böbner, C 1994 [Estimation of economic weighting for secondary production trait by Swiss dual purpose cows with the use of dynamic optimisation.] PhD Thesis, ETHZ, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Butler, WR, Everett, R & Coppock, CE 1981 The relationships between energy balance, milk production and ovulation in post-partum Holstein cows. Journal of Animal Science 53 742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, CR, Kay, JK, Phyn, CVC, Meier, S, Lee, JM & Roche, JR 2010 Short communication: Effects of dietary nonstructural carbohydrates pre- and postpartum on reproduction of grazing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93 4292–4296CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, CR & Roche, JR 2007 Effects of pasture feeding during the periparturient period on postpartum anovulation in grazed dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90 4304–4312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chagas, LM, Gore, P, Sheahan, JA, Lee, JM, Watkins, PW, Aspin, PW & Roche, JR 2006 Diet or strain: effects on postpartum anovulatory interval in dairy cows. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 66 339–343Google Scholar
Cutullic, E 2010 Competition between lactation and reproduction in the dairy cow PhD Thesis, University Caen Basse-Normandie, FranceGoogle Scholar
Cutullic, E, Delaby, L, Gallard, Y & Disenhaus, C 2011 Dairy cows reproductive response to feeding level differs according to the reproductive stage and the breed. Animal 5 731–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonson, AJ, Lean, IJ, Weaver, LD, Farver, T & Webster, G 1989 A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72 68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flückiger, N 1990 100 [100 years of the Swiss Red and White dairy cow Breeding Federation.] In: Fédération suisse d'élevage de la race tachetée rouge, ZollikofenGoogle Scholar
Friggens, NC, Disenhaus, C & Petit, HV 2010 Nutritional sub-fertility in the dairy cow: towards improved reproductive management through a better biological understanding. Animal 4 1197–1213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulkerson, WJ, Davison, TM, Garcia, SC, Hough, G, Goddard, ME, Dobos, R & Blockey, M 2008 Holstein-Friesian dairy cows under a predominantly grazing system: Interaction between genotype and environment. Journal of Dairy Science 91 826–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, JG, Lee, WJ, Garnsworthy, PC & Webb, R 2002 Effect of dietary-induced increases in circulating insulin concentrations during the early postpartum period on reproductive function in dairy cows. Reproduction 123 419–427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagger, C 2005 Estimates of genetic diversity in the brown cattle population of Switzerland obtained from pedigree information. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 122 405–413CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, CW, Brookes, IM, Garrick, DJ, Mackenzie, DDS, Parkinson, TJ & Wilson, GF 2007 Milk Production from Pasture. Principles and Practices. Massey University, Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Horan, B, Mee, JF, O'Connor, P, Rath, M & Dillon, P 2005 The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian cow and feeding system on postpartum ovarian function, animal production and conception rate to first service. Theriogenology 63 950–971CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeanneret, F & Vautier, P 1977 [Mapping of the climatic suitability for agriculture in Switzerland.] Geographisches Institut der Universität Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Kolver, ES, Roche, JR, Veth, MJ de, Thorne, PL & Napper, AR 2002 Total mixed rations versus pasture diets: Evidence for a genotype×diet interaction in dairy cow performance. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 62 246–251Google Scholar
Macdonald, KA, Verkerk, GA, Thorrold, BS, Pryce, JE, Penno, JW, McNaughton, LR, Burton, LJ, Lancaster, JAS, Williamson, JH & Holmes, CW 2008 A comparison of three strains of Holstein-Friesian grazed on pasture and managed under different feed allowances. Journal of Dairy Science 91 1693–1707CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macmillan, KL 2002 Advances in bovine theriogenology in New Zealand. 1. Pregnancy, parturition and the postpartum period. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 50 67–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNaughton, LR, Sanders, KM, Pryce, JE, Bracefield, GE, Harcourt, SJ & Spelman, RJ 2007 Phenotypic relationships between the interval from calving to first luteal activity and fertility in a seasonal dairy production system. Animal Reproduction Science 102 98–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, LR, Verkerk, GA, Parkinson, TJ, Macdonald, KA & Holmes, CW 2003 Postpartum anoestrous intervals and reproductive performance of three genotypes of Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle managed in a seasonal pasture-based dairy system. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 63 77–81Google Scholar
Meier, S, Roche, JR, Kolver, ES, Verkerk, GA & Boston, RC 2009 Comparing subpopulations of plasma progesterone using cluster analyses. Journal of Dairy Science 92 1460–1468CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, HHD, Gueven, B & Karg, H 1986 [Enzyme-immuno assay (EIA) on microtitration plate for progesterone determination in skim milk.] Wiener Tierärztliche Monatsschrift 73 86–92Google Scholar
Petersson, K, Gustafsson, H, Strandberg, E & Berglund, B 2006 Atypical progesterone profiles and fertility in Swedish dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89 2529–2538CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piccand, V, Cutullic, E, Schori, F, Weilenmann, S & Thomet, P 2011 [Which cow for pasture-based production systems? Production, reproduction and health.] Recherche Agronomique Suisse 2 252–257Google Scholar
Pollott, GE & Coffey, MP 2008 The effect of genetic merit and production system on dairy cow fertility, measured using progesterone profiles and on-farm recording. Journal of Dairy Science 91 3649–3660CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Development Core Team 2009 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
Roche, JR, Friggens, NC, Kay, JK, Fisher, MW, Stafford, KJ & Berry, DP 2009 Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 92 5769–5801CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal, MD, Darwash, AO, Flint, AP, Webb, R, Woolliams, JA & Lamming, GE 2000 Declining fertility in dairy cattle: changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of fertility. Animal Science 70 487–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal, MD, Flint, APF & Woolliams, JA 2002 Genetic and phenotypic relationships among endocrine and traditional fertility traits and production traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85 958–967CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veerkamp, RF, Oldenbroek, JK, van der Gaast, HJ & van der Werf, JHJ 2000 Genetic correlation between days until start of luteal activity and milk yield, energy balance, and live weights. Journal of Dairy Science 83 577–583CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verkerk, GA, Morgan, SR & Kolver, ES 2000 Comparison of selected reproductive characteristics in Overseas and New Zealand Holstein-Friesian cows grazing pasture or fed a total mixed ration. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 60 270–274Google Scholar
Wegmann, S, Chavaz, J, Hitz, M, Roulin, A & Savary, D 1999 100 Years in black and white. Holstein Association of Switzerland, Posieux, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Weiss, D, Reist, M & Bruckmaier, RM 2004 The acyclic period postpartum in automatic and conventional milking. Journal of Veterinary Medicine 268–272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yenikoyé, A, Mariana, JC, Ley, JP, Jolivet, E, Terqui, M & Lemon-Resplandy, M 1981 [A mathematical model of the cow progesterone pattern : application and proof of breed differences.] Reproduction Nutrition Development 21 561–575Google Scholar