Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T08:56:53.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Innovative Securities under Asymmetric Information: Why Do Some Firms Pay with Contingent Value Rights?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Sris Chatterjee  and
An Yan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper provides the first theoretical explanation and the first empirical analysis of contingent value rights (CVRs), which have been used as a means of payment in acquisitions, exchange offers, debt restructurings, Chapter 11 reorganizations, and lawsuit settlements. A CVR is a put option committing to pay additional cash or securities to CVR holders, contingent on the issuer's share price falling below a prespecified reference level. In this paper, we develop a model to show that CVRs can help a higher-intrinsic-value firm to reveal its firm type when the firm faces an asymmetric information problem. Our model predicts that i) when CVRs are offered along with cash or stock, the announcement period abnormal stock return is greater than that in stock offers, ii) firms facing more severe asymmetric information problems are more likely to offer CVRs to signal their firm type, and iii) firms that are relatively more cash-constrained are more likely to offer CVRs rather than cash. We test all three predictions using a sample of mergers and acquisitions. Our empirical results are consistent with the predictions of the model.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 1001 - 1035
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berkovitch, E., and Narayanan, M.. “Competition and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers.” Review of Financial Studies, 3 (1989), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D., and Ryngaert, M.. “The Mode of Acquisition in Takeovers: Taxes and Asymmetric Information.” Journal of Finance, 46 (1991), 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, R. F. “Technical Note on Structuring and Valuing Incentive Payments in M&A: Earnouts and Other Contingent Payments to the Seller.” Darden Case UVA-F-1322–S (2001).Google Scholar
Bruner, R. F. “Applied Mergers and Acquisitions.” Hoboken, NJ.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2004).Google Scholar
Cantale, S., and Russino, A.. “Putable Common Stock.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 10 (2004), 753–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemmanur, T., and Fulghieri, P.. “Why Include Warrants in New Equity Issues? A Theory of Unit IPOs.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 32 (1997), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, I. K., and Kreps, D.. “Signalling Games and Stable Equilibria.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102 (1987), 179–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantinides, G., and Grundy, B.. “Optimal Investment with Stock Repurchase and Financing Signals.” Review of Financial Studies, 2 (1989), 445–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckbo, B. E.; Giammarino, R. M.; and Heinkel, R. L.. “Asymmetric Information and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers: Theory and Tests.” Review of Financial Studies, 3 (1990), 651–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, M. J. “Preemptive Bidding and the Role of the Medium of Exchange in Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, M. J. “Asymmetric Information and Risky Debt Maturity Choice.” Journal of Finance, 41 (1986), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, D., and Tirole, J.. “Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium and Sequential Equilibrium.” Journal of Economic Theory, 53 (1991), 236–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, K. P. “Why Some Firms Use Collar Offers in Mergers.” Financial Review, 38 (2003), 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, A., and Ruland, W.. “Managerial Ownership, the Method of Payment for Acquisitions, and Executive Job Retention.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 785–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, S., and Singh, R.. “Using Put Warrants to Reduce Corporate Financing Costs.” Working Paper, University of Minnesota (2001).Google Scholar
Hansen, R. G. “A Theory for the Choice of Exchange Medium in the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Business, 60 (1987), 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hietala, P.; Kaplan, N. K.; and Robinson, D. T.. “What is the Price of Hubris? Using Takeover Battles to Infer Overpayments and Synergies.” Financial Management, 32 (2003), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillion, P., and Vermaelen, T.. “Death Spiral Convertibles.” Journal of Financial Economics, 71 (2004), 381–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohers, N., and Ang, J. S.. “Earnouts in Mergers: Agreeing to Disagree and Agreeing to Stay.” Journal of Business, 73 (2000), 445–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnaswami, S., and Subramaniam, V.. “Information Asymmetry, Valuation, and the Corporate SpinOff Decision.” Journal of Financial Economics, 53 (1999), 73–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughran, T., and Ritter, J. R.. “The Operating Performance of Firms Conducting Seasoned Equity Offerings.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 1823–1850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K. J. “The Method of Payment in Corporate Acquisitions, Investment Opportunities, and Management Ownership.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 1227–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Officer, M. “Collars and Renegotiations in Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 2719–2743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. A. “Institutional Markets, Financial Marketing, and Financial Innovation.” Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, J. C. “Convertible Bonds as Backdoor Equity Financing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 32 (1992), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. E. “Firm Diversification and Asymmetric Information: Evidence from Analysts Forecasts and Earnings Announcements.” Journal of Financial Economics, 64 (2002), 373–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travlos, N. G. “Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms’ Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 943–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufano, P. “Financial Innovation and First-Mover Advantages.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25 (1989), 213–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufano, P. “Financial Innovation.” Working Paper, Harvard University (2002).Google Scholar