Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:39:45.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lenisquilla californiensis, a new species of stomatopod crustacean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

John A. Cunningham ,
Cees H. J. Hof  and
Simon J. Braddy
John A. Cunningham
Affiliation:
1Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GP, United Kingdom, 3Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen's Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, United Kingdom
Cees H. J. Hof
Affiliation:
2Zoological Museum Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Simon J. Braddy
Affiliation:
3Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen's Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Stomatopods, or mantis shrimps, are malacostracan crustaceans. Known as “lean, mean, killing machines” (Watling et al., 2000, p. 1), modern stomatopods are obligate carnivores, feeding exclusively on live prey (Schram, 1986). Characteristically, their second thoracic appendages are enlarged to form powerful, raptorial claws. Modern stomatopods are divided into two broad functional groups based on the shape and usage of their raptorial claws: ‘spearing’ and ‘smashing’ stomatopods (Caldwell and Dingle, 1976).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , March 2008 , pp. 431 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahyong, S. T. 2001. Revision of the Australian stomatopod Crustacea. Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement, Number 26, 326 p.Google Scholar
Ahyong, S. T. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of the Squilloidea (Crustacea: Stomatopoda). Invertebrate Systematics, 19:189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahyong, S. T. and Harling, C. 2000. The phylogeny of the stomatopod Crustacea. Australian Journal of Zoology, 48:607–642.Google Scholar
Brooks, W. K. 1886. Report on the Stomatopoda collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-76. The Voyage of the H.M.S. Challenger. Zoology, 16:1–116.Google Scholar
Caldwell, R. L. and Dingle, H. 1976. Stomatopods. Scientific American, 234(1):80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calman, W. T. 1904. On the classification of the Crustacea Malacostraca. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7(13): 144–158.Google Scholar
Hof, C. H. J. and Briggs, D. E. G. 1997. Decay and mineralization of mantis shrimps (Stomatopoda: Crustacea)—a key to their fossil record. Palaios, 12:420–438.Google Scholar
Hof, C. H. J. and Schram, F. R. 1998. Stomatopods (Crustacea: Malacostaca) from the Miocene of California. Journal of Paleontology, 72:317–331.Google Scholar
Jenner, R. A., Hof, C. H. J., and Schram, F. R. 1998. Palaeo- and Archaeostomatopods (Hoplocarida, Crustacea) from Bear Gulch Limestone, Mississippian (Namurian), of Central Montana. Contributions to Zoology, 67:155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, S. 1911. Preliminary descriptions of new species and varieties of Crustacea Stomatopoda of the Indo-Pacific region, based on the collection in the Indian Museum. Records of the Indian Museum, 6:93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, S. 1913. An account of the Crustacea Stomatopoda of the Indo-Pacific region, based on the collection in the Indian Museum. Memoirs of the Indian Museum, 4:1–217.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1802-1803. Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière, des Crustacés et des Insectes, Volume 3. F. Dufart, Paris, 468 p.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1806. Genera Crustaceorum et Insectorum Secundum Ordinem Naturalem in Familias Disposita, Iconibus Exemplisque Plurimis Explicata, Volume 1, Parisiis et Argenorati (Amand Koenig), 302 p.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1817. Les crustacés, les arachnides et les insectes. In Cuvier, G., La Règne Animal Distribué d'après son Organisation, pour Servir de Base à l'Histoire Naturelle des Animaux et d'Introduction à l'Anatomie Comparée, edition 1, Pt. 3. Déterville, Paris, 653 p.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1825. Families Naturelles du Règne Animal, Exposées Succinctement et dans un Ordre Analytique, avec l'Indication de leurs Genres. J. B. Baillière, Paris, 570 p.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B. 1968. A revision of the family Squillidae (Crustacea: Stomatopoda), with the description of eight new genera. Bulletin of Marine Science, 18:105–142.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B. 1969. Stomatopod Crustacea of the Western Atlantic. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida, 380 p.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B. 1977. Preliminary accounts of five new genera of stomatopod crustaceans. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 90:420–423.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B. 1980. The superfamilies, families, and genera of Recent stomatopod Crustacea, with diagnoses of six new families. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 93:362–372.Google Scholar
Manning, R. B. 1995. Stomatopod Crustacea of Vietnam: The Legacy of Raoul Serène. Crustacean Research, Special Number 4. The Carcinological Society of Japan, Tokyo, 339 p.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1932. Fossil Pinnotherids from the California Miocene. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 22:411–413.Google Scholar
Rowell, H. C. 1981. Biostratigraphy of Monterey Formation, Palos Verde Hills, Southern California. Association of American Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 65:982.Google Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1986. Crustacea. Oxford University Press, New York, 606 p.Google Scholar
Watling, L., Hof, C. H. J., and Schram, F. R. 2000. The place of the Hoplocarida in the malacostracan pantheon. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 20:1–11.Google Scholar