Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:38:27.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cushions, cigars and diamonds: an area-perimeter problem for symmetric ovals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

H. T. Croft
Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge

Extract

P. R. Scott (1) has asked which two-dimensional closed convex set E, centro-symmetric in the origin O, and containing no other Cartesian lattice-point in its interior, maximizes the ratio A/P, where A, P are the area, perimeter of E; he conjectured that the answer is the ‘rounded square’ (‘cushion’ in what follows), described below. We shall prove this, indeed in a more general setting, by seeking to maximize

where κ is a parameter (0 < κ < 2); the set of admissible E is those E centro-symmetric in 0 that do not contain in their interior certain fixed lattice-points. There are two problems, the unrestricted one , where there is no given upper bound on A (it will become apparent that this problem only has a finite answer when κ ≥ 1) and the restricted one , when one is given a bound B and we must have AB. Special interest attaches to the case B = 4, both because of Minkowski's theorem: any E symmetric in O and containing no other lattice-point has area at most 4; and because it turns out that it is a ‘natural’ condition: the algebraic expressions simplify to a remarkable extent. Hence in what follows, the ‘restricted case ’ shall mean A ≤ 4.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Scott, P. R.An area-perimeter problem. Amer. Math. Monthly 81 (1974), 884885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Besicovitch, A. S.Variants of a classical isoperimetric problem. Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2) 3 (1952), 4249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar