Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:39:37.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The acute effect of dietary monounsaturated fatty acids on arterial stiffness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2012

F. E. Lithander ,
L. K. Herlihy ,
D. Walsh ,
E. Burke  and
A. Mahmud
F. E. Lithander
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
L. K. Herlihy
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
D. Walsh
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
E. Burke
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
A. Mahmud
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 70 , Issue OCE6: Winter Meeting, 6–7 December 2011, 70th Anniversary: Body weight regulation – food, gut and brain signalling , 2011 , E366
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Arterial stiffness is an established cardiovascular (CV) risk factor and associated with overall and CV mortality(Reference Laurent, Boutouyrie, Asmar and Gautier1). Acute dietary interventions such as alcohol reduce arterial stiffness(Reference Mahmud and Feely2) while caffeine increases it(Reference Swampillai, Rakebrandt, Morris and Jones3). Only one study has investigated the acute effect of dietary fat on arterial stiffness(Reference Nestel, Shige, Pomeroy and Cehun4)whereas the differential effect of dietary fatty acids on arterial stiffness has received little attention. The aim of the current study was to investigate the acute postprandial effect of dietary monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) on arterial stiffness.

Twenty healthy males (BMI 24, 2 kg/m2; age 37.7, 14.4 y (mean, SD)) participated in this single-blind, randomised, cross-over study. All subjects had normal fasting plasma glucose, were normotensive with no evidence of hyperlipidaemia. Each subject was given a high-fat test-meal (3 MJ; 54, 1 g fat (mean, SD); 67.5% of energy as fat) at breakfast on 2 occasions, one rich in MUFA (MUFAhigh) and one low in MUFA (MUFAlow). Blood pressure and arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx)) were measured in the supine position using applanation tonometry at baseline (0 minutes) and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210 and 240 minutes after the start of the ingestion of the test-meals. Subjects remained sedentary during each dietary intervention period.

There was no significant difference in PWV, AIx or blood pressure at baseline between the two dietary treatments (P>0.05). Overall, there was a small but significant increase in PWV (time, P<0.05) and a significant decrease in AIx over time (time, P<0.05). There were no differential effects of fatty acid saturation over time on PWV, AIx, AIx75 (AIx corrected for heart rate of 75 bpm) or blood pressure (treatment*time, P>0.05).

Whilst there was no evidence in the current study to suggest that a meal rich in MUFA improves arterial stiffness compared to an isoenergetic meal with lower MUFA content, further research is necessary to understand the interaction between dietary fatty acids and arterial stiffness in the postprandial state.

This work was supported by an Irish Heart Foundation Noel Hickey Research Bursary.

References

1.Laurent, S, Boutouyrie, P, Asmar, R, Gautier, I et al. (2001) Hypertension 37, 1236–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mahmud, A & Feely, J (2002) Am J Hypertens 15, 240–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Swampillai, J, Rakebrandt, F, Morris, K, Jones, CJ et al. (2006) Eur J Clin Invest 36, 844–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Nestel, PJ, Shige, H, Pomeroy, S, Cehun, M et al. (2001) J Am Coll Cardiol 37, 1929–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar