Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:51:18.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing nutritional intake of Sensory Panellists during sensory evaluation sessions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2024

L.R. Durrant
Affiliation:
Marlow Foods Ltd, Stokesley, UK
V.H. Moran
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
C. Readman
Affiliation:
Marlow Foods Ltd, Stokesley, UK
S.E. Caton
Affiliation:
Marlow Foods Ltd, Stokesley, UK
E.G. Howard
Affiliation:
Marlow Foods Ltd, Stokesley, UK
F. Wardle
Affiliation:
Marlow Foods Ltd, Stokesley, UK
A. Kapparis
Affiliation:
Marlow Foods Ltd, Stokesley, UK
H.E Theobald
Affiliation:
Marlow Foods Ltd, Stokesley, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Food manufacturers often employ highly trained Sensory Panellists to conduct sensory evaluations, such as profiling, discrimination and rating testing to understand the impact of any reformulation/process/pack changes and new product launches on consumer experiences. At Marlow Foods, 8-12 Panellists work four days/wk evaluating meat, mycoprotein, and plant-based alternatives for up to four hours/day, between 09:00 and 13:00. As part of Marlow Foods commitment to supporting the wellbeing of all employees, the energy, macronutrients and sodium consumed during evaluation sessions need to be considered within the context of habitual (threedaily) meal patterns. Consequently, these daily tasting sessions should be regarded as an interlude between meals, or as a 'snack period’. The UK government’s recommended calorie guidelines, assuming an energy intake of 2000kcal and weight maintenance, suggests 400kcal for snacks and beverages.(1) This project aimed to determine the Panellists nutritional intake during these evaluation sessions, to compare against energy and nutrient recommendations, and to monitor consumption of nutrients of public health concern (e.g, salt and saturated fat).(2)

To assess average dietary intake during evaluation sessions, details of the foods consumed by the 11 panellists (7 female, 4 male, mean age 51yrs, range 41-63yrs) were collected over 5-weeks. Average daily intakes for energy, total fat, saturated fat, sugar, fibre and salt were calculated from declared back of pack nutrition information and theoretical nutritional values for products in development using FoodChain ID.[3]

Over the 5-week period, the Panellist average daily intake (range,± SDs, % of reference intake (RI)) during evaluation sessions were 192kcal energy (93-292,± 85, 9.6%), 7.3g total fat (2.7-14.5,± 4.5, 10.4%), 1.1g saturated fat (0.6-2.2,± 0.6, 5.7%), 1.5g sugar (0.4-2.3,± 0.9, 1.7%), 7.1g fibre (4.0-12.6,± 4.0, 23.6%) and 1.0g salt (0.4-1.9,± 0.6, 16.6%).

The average daily energy intakes recorded during the tasting period comfortably fell within the UK government’s recommended allowance for snacks, thereby supporting the notion that Panellists can maintain a healthy, balanced diet whilst consuming this category of food. However, salt intakes in Panellists averaged 16.6% of the RI, reflective of the added salt content in many meat and meat alternative products. This signals the need for a panel nutrition policy, establishing specific nutritional guidelines to ensure responsible balance of projects and thus consumption of nutrients of public health concern (e.g., salt and saturated fat) during evaluation sessions. As next steps, Marlow Foods is developing such a policy and guidelines, to ensure the wellbeing of Panellists while maintaining delivery of robust sensory evaluations.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Public Health England (2018) A Quick Guide to the Government’s Healthy EatingRecommendations. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/742746/A_quick_guide_to_govt_healthy_eating_update.pdf (last accessed 26th May 2024).Google Scholar
IFST Guidelines for Ethical and Professional Practices for the Sensory Analysis of Foods (2020) Available at https://www.ifst.org/membership/networks-and-communities/special-interestgroups/sensory-science-group/ifst-guidelines (last accessed 26th May 2024).Google Scholar
Alessandrini et al. (2021) Nutrients 13 (12), 4225. Available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34959777/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar