Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:43:54.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy and nutrient intake in patients undergoing haemodialysis on a dialysis and non-dialysis day: a pilot study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2009

R. Odedra
Affiliation:
School of Human and Life Sciences, Roehampton University, LondonSW15 5JD, UK and
T. Dassanayake
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, LondonW12 0HS, UK
Y. M. Jeanes
Affiliation:
School of Human and Life Sciences, Roehampton University, LondonSW15 5JD, UK and
M. Kelly
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, LondonW12 0HS, UK
M. Hickson
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, LondonW12 0HS, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Inadequate energy and nutrient intake in patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) has been associated with malnutrition and increased morbidity. A US study has been shown that there is a greater dietary intake on a non-dialysis day (NDD) compared with a dialysis day (DD)(Reference Burrowes, Larive and Cockram1). The present study aimed to investigate whether energy and nutrient intake differs between a DD and a NDD in two UK renal satellite units.

Thirty clinically-stable patients undergoing HD were opportunistically recruited. Patients were on HD three times per week for >3 months. Patients completed a 2-d food diary followed by a dietary interview. Malnutrition was assessed with the malnutrition audit assessment tool(Reference O'Flynn, Peake and Hickson2).

Patients were aged between 26 and 80 years, fourteen were males and sixteen females and 50% were Caucasian and 30% Asian. Time spent on dialysis (h/d) ranged from 3 to 5.5 and time travelling to the dialysis unit (min) ranged from 8 to 90, although these factors were not related to dietary intake. Energy intakes were similar on DD and NDD; however, there was a significantly greater protein intake on NDD compared with DD (P=0.03) (See Table). There was a large inter-individual variation observed in both energy and protein intake on both days. Mean energy and protein intakes (mean 89.5 (sd 41.4) kJ/kg per d and mean 0.8 (sd 0.3) g protein/kg per d) were below clinical practice guidelines(3) of 146 kJ/kg per d and 1.2 g protein/kg per d respectively. However, only one patient was scored at risk of malnutrition.

Values for DD were significantly different from those for NDD (Wilcoxon signed ranks test):

* P=0.03.

The present pilot study is limited by the small sample size and limited period included in the food diary; nevertheless, the study does highlight the reduced intake of protein on a DD, which could influence risk of malnutrition in the long term. It is important to recognise medical interventions that can have a negative impact on nutrient intake and this population warrants further investigation. A larger study would be able to identify factors that influence dietary intake, which would enable dietitians to provide appropriate advice in order to optimise the dietary intake of patients undergoing HD.

References

1. Burrowes, JD, Larive, B, Cockram, DB et al. . (2003) J Ren Nutr 13, 191198.Google Scholar
2. O'Flynn, J, Peake, H, Hickson, M et al. (2005) Clin Nutr 24, 10781088.Google Scholar
3. K/DOQI: Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (2000) Am J Kidney Dis 36, Suppl. 2, S17S104.Google Scholar
Figure 0

*