Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:22:06.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incremental effects of feeding a rumen-inert MUFA supplement to dairy cows on milk trans fatty acid isomer composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

K. E. Kliem ,
C. K. Reynolds ,
R. Kirkland ,
D. J. Humphries ,
C. E. Barratt  and
D. I. Givens
K. E. Kliem
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Group, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, UK
C. K. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Group, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, UK
R. Kirkland
Affiliation:
Volac International Ltd., Royston, Hertfordshire, UK
D. J. Humphries
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Group, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, UK
C. E. Barratt
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Group, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, UK
D. I. Givens
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Group, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 70 , Issue OCE4: Summer Meeting, 4–6 July 2011, 70th Anniversary: From plough through practice to policy , 2011 , E228
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Milk and dairy products contribute to about 20% of the average daily intake of trans-fatty acids (TFA) in UK adults(Reference Henderson, Gregory and Irving1). The evidence of their effects on human subjects health are equivocal, but at current intakes and food compositional levels TFA from ruminant products are thought not to be a significant risk factor for CVD. However, there is concern that current strategies to reduce milk SFA will lead to substantial increases in TFA concentrations. Feeding rumen-protected sources of cis-MUFA to dairy cows would minimise the appearance of TFA in milk fat, but research to date has been inconsistent(Reference Chouinard, Girard and Brisson2). The aim of the present study was to measure the effect of feeding incremental amounts of a novel calcium salt (CS) of cis-MUFA on TFA isomer composition of milk fat.

Four multiparous, late-lactation Holstein–Friesian cows were randomly allocated to one of four dietary treatments in a 4×4 Latin Square design with 21 d experimental periods. Treatments were a control diet (control) containing no supplemental fat, or the same basal diet with CS of cis-MUFA (Volac International Ltd.) fed at 20, 40 and 60 g/kg DM (CS2, CS4 and CS6, respectively). Milk composition was analysed during the last 3 d of each experimental period(Reference Givens, Kliem and Humphries3).

P (LIN) represents linear effect. CS2, CS4 and CS6 – treatment diets containing 20, 40 or 60 g/kg DM calcium salts.

Incremental inclusion of CS linearly (P<0.001) decreased milk fat SFA and increased cis-MUFA concentrations. However, there were also significant increases (P<0.001) in all trans-18:1 isomers measured, some trans-PUFA, and total conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), leading to an overall increase in total TFA (16 g/100 g fatty acids for CS6). This indicates CS of cis-MUFA were at least partially metabolised in the rumen and that alternative rumen-protection methods for MUFA are needed to minimise increases in TFA concentrations that accompanied decreased SFA in milk fat.

This research was supported by BBSRC DRINC project BB/1006087/1, and Volac International Ltd., Royston, UK.

References

1.Henderson, L, Gregory, J, Irving, K et al. (2003) NDNS vol. 2, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
2.Chouinard, PY, Girard, V & Brisson, GJ (1998) J Dairy Sci 81, 471–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Givens, DI, Kliem, KE, Humphries, DJ et al. (2009) Animal 3, 1067–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar