Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:24:38.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Systematic review of the evidence for sustained efficacy of dietary interventions for reducing appetite or energy intake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2020

Jason C. G. Halford
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Una Masic
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Cyril F. M. Marsaux
Affiliation:
ILSI Europe, Brussels, Belgium
Andrew J. Jones
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Anne Lluch
Affiliation:
Centre Daniel Carasso, Danone Nutricia Research, Palaiseau, France
Luca Marciani
Affiliation:
NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Monica Mars
Affiliation:
Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
Sophie Vinoy
Affiliation:
R&D, Nutrition Department, Mondelēz International, Clamart, France
Margriet Westerterp-Plantenga
Affiliation:
NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
David J. Mela
Affiliation:
Formerly with Unilever R&D Vlaardingen, Vlaardingen, Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

In the broad literature on the effects of ingredients, foods and diets on appetite and energy intake (EI), most trials involve a single acute intervention. It is unclear whether these acute results are generally sustained over longer periods. Researchers and regulators therefore lack an objective basis to judge the appropriate duration of efficacy trials in appetite control, to have confidence that acute effects are likely to be maintained. This gap creates uncertainty in requirements and study designs for the substantiation of satiety-enhancing approaches to help in controlling eating behaviour.

Materials and Methods:

A systematic search of literature (Prospero registration number CRD42015023686) identified studies testing both the acute and chronic effects of food-based interventions aimed at reducing appetite or EI. From 9680 unique records identified from titles and abstracts, 178 papers were selected for full screening. Twenty-six trials met the inclusion criteria and provided data sufficient for use in this analysis, and were also scored for risk of bias (RoB) indicators.

Results:

Most of these trials (21/26) measured appetite outcomes and over half (14/26) had objective measures of EI. A significant acute effect of the intervention was retained in 10 of 12 trials for appetite outcomes, and six of nine studies for EI. Initial effects were most likely retained where these were more robust and studies adequately powered. Where the initial, acute effect was not statistically significant, a significant effect was later observed in only two of nine studies for appetite and none of five studies for EI. The main sources of RoB were lack of a priori power calculations and failure to report analyses based on intention-to-treat. Furthermore, 12/26 studies were not adequately powered to detect a meaningful reduction in appetite (~10%).

Discussion:

Maintenance of acute intervention effects on appetite or EI need to be confirmed, but seems likely where the initially observed effects are robust and replicable in adequately powered studies.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2020

References

Halford, JCG, Masic, U, Marsaux, CFM, Jones, AJ, Lluch, A, Marciani, L, Mars, M, Vinoy, S, Westerterp-Plantenga, M, Mela, DJ (2018) Systematic review of the evidence for sustained efficacy of dietary interventions for reducing appetite or energy intake. Obesity Reviews 19, 13291339.10.1111/obr.12712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed