Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:53:56.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tracking of fruit and vegetable consumption from early- to mid-adolescence: The Gateshead Millennium Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

W.L Wrieden
Affiliation:
Institute of Health & Society, Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
J.K. Reilly
Affiliation:
Institute of Health & Society, Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
X. Janssen
Affiliation:
Physical Activity for Health Group, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
L. Basterfield
Affiliation:
Institute of Health & Society, Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
K.N. Parkinson
Affiliation:
Institute of Health & Society, Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
A.R. Jones
Affiliation:
Institute of Health & Society, Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
J.J. Reilly
Affiliation:
Physical Activity for Health Group, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
E. Foster
Affiliation:
Institute of Health & Society, Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
A.J. Adamson
Affiliation:
Institute of Health & Society, Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

The Gateshead Millennium Study (GMS) is a population-based birth cohort(Reference Parkinson, Pearce and Dale1) with observational data on lifestyles and their determinants, including dietary intake, measured at average ages of 12 and 15 years. Fruit and vegetable consumption of adolescents is known to be limited and was reported at around 3 portions per day in the recent National Diet and Nutrition Survey compared with current UK guidelines of at least ‘5-a-day’ (2, 3). The aim of this study was to compare fruit and vegetable consumption in the GMS participants and to determine the degree of tracking from early- to mid-adolescence.

Dietary intake was measured using computer-based self-completion 24-hour recall, called SCRAN24(Reference Foster, Hawkins and Delve4) in 2011–2012 (age 12y) and renamed INTAKE24(Reference Delve, Simpson and Adamson5) in 2014–2015 (age 15y). Participants who completed two records at both follow-ups were included in the analysis. Daily portions of fruit and vegetables consumed were calculated and adherence to UK 5-a-day recommendations assessed. Fruit juice and baked beans were included in the calculation but capped at one portion per day each. Spearman's rank order correlation was performed to assess tracking.

Data from 203 adolescents (44 % boys) were available from both 12y and 15y follow-ups. Fruit and vegetable consumption showed positive tracking (Spearman's rho = 0·3, p < 0·001). Median daily portions of fruit and vegetables consumed at 12y were similar to those at 15y; 1·6 (IQR 0·9–2·6) compared with 1·4 (IQR 0·8–2·6). Although the number of children who met the 5-a-day target increased from 2·5 % to 4·9 % the number consuming no fruit or vegetables also increased. There were no children who met the 5-a-day target at both age 12 y and age 15y. The table summarises portions of fruit and vegetables consumed at age 12y and 15y in relation to UK 5-a-day guidelines.

This study provides evidence of a degree of tracking of fruit and vegetable consumption from early- to mid-adolescence, but also a small, but not statistically significant, increase in the percentage of those who consumed no fruit and vegetables in the two days recorded. The proportion of young people consuming less than optimal fruit and vegetables remains a cause for concern, and this study suggests that in this population in the north east of England consumption is considerably lower than the average for adolescents in the UK.

This work was funded by The Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government, the University of Strathclyde, Gateshead Council, the Mental Health Foundation and Breathe North.

References

1.Parkinson, KN, Pearce, MS, Dale, A et al. (2011) Int J Epidemiol 40, 308317.10.1093/ije/dyq015Google Scholar
2.NHS Choices (2016) 5 A DAY portion sizes. http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/5ADAY/Pages/Portionsizes.aspx (accessed 23/03/2016).Google Scholar
3.Public Health England and Food Standards Agency (2014). National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Results from Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 (combined) of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009–2011/2012).Google Scholar
4.Foster, E, Hawkins, A, Delve, J et al. (2014) J Hum Nutr Diet, 27(Supplement 1), 2635.10.1111/jhn.12108Google Scholar
5.Delve, J, Simpson, E, Adamson, AJ et al. (2015) P Nutr Soc, 74 (OCE1), E62.10.1017/S0029665115000774Google Scholar