Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T16:18:29.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Use of Bisection Procedures in Animal Psychophysical Scaling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Thomas G. Raslear
Thomas G. Raslear*
Affiliation:
The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
*
Requests for reprints should be addressed to the author, Department of Medical Neurosciences, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, D. C., 20012.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability of bisection procedures to specify the form of the psychophysical scale depends upon the precision of the technique. It is demonstrated that the precision of bisection techniques is a function of the stimulus interval bisected. Consequently, the choice of stimuli in a bisection experiment may predispose the ability of the experiment to distinguish between alternative psychophysical scales. The testing of interval scale properties of derived scales and the assessment of context effects in bisection experiments was also discussed.

Keywords

measurement error
Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 1982 , pp. 95 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This material has been reviewed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, and there is no objection to its presentation and/or publication. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the author and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the view of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

References

Reference Note

Raslear, T.G. Context effects in the bisection of a temporal interval by rats. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, April, 1975.Google Scholar

References

Beers, Y. Introduction to the theory of error, 1957, Reading, Ma: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Boakes, R. A. The bisection of a brightness interval by pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969, 12, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Church, R. M., & Deluty, M. Z. Bisection of temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1977, 3, 216–228.Google ScholarPubMed
Eisler, H. Psychophysical similarities between rats and humans. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980, 16, 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagot, R. F. On the psychophysical law and estimation procedures in psychophysical scaling. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagot, R. F., & Stewart, M. R. Test of a response bias model of bisection. Perception & Psychophysics, 1970, 7, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helson, H. Adaptation level theory, 1964, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., & Suppes, P., Tversky, A. Foundations of measurement, 1971, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pfanzagl, J. Baumann, V. and Huber, H. Theory of measurement, 1968, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Raslear, T. G. The effect of varying the distribution of generalization stimuli within a constant range upon the bisection of a sound intensity interval by rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975, 23, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, M. R., Fagot, R. F., & Eskildsen, P. R. Invariance tests for bisection and fractionation scaling. Perception & Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar