Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T14:54:09.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

25 years after the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant: Radioecological lessons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2012

J. Barescut ,
D. Lariviere ,
T. Stocki ,
R.M. Alexakhin  and
S.A. Geras’kin
R.M. Alexakhin
Affiliation:
Russian Institute of Agricultural Radiology & Agroecology, Obninsk, Kaluga region, Russia
S.A. Geras’kin
Affiliation:
Russian Institute of Agricultural Radiology & Agroecology, Obninsk, Kaluga region, Russia
Get access

Abstract

The area affected by the Chernobyl accident has become a unique test site where long-term ecological and biological consequences of a drastic change in a range of environmental factors as well as trends and intensity of selection are studied in natural settings. The consequences of the Chernobyl accident for biota varied from an enhanced rate of mutagenesis to damage at the ecosystem level. The severity of radiation effects was strongly dependent on the dose received in the early period after the accident. The most exposed phytocenoses and soil animals’ communities exhibited dose dependent alterations in the species composition and reduction in biological diversity. These findings make a valuable contribution to scientific and public understanding of the environmental risks of ionizing radiation and to debates on the environmental costs, benefits and risks of nuclear energy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radioprotection , Volume 46 , Issue 6: ICRER 2011 – International Conference on Radioecology & Environmental Radioactivity: Environment & Nuclear Renaissance , 2011 , pp. S595 - S600
Copyright
© Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexakhin R.M. Radioprotection 44 (2009) 821-824.
Fesenko S.V., Alexakhin R.M., Geras’kin S.A., et al. J Environ Radioact 80 (2005) 1-25.
Alexakhin R.M. Pochvovedenie 12 (2009) 1487-14-89. (in Russian)
Krivolutsky D., Pokarzhevsky A. Sci Total Environ 112(1992) 69-77.
Alexakhin R.M., Buldakov L.A., Gubanov V.A., et al. Large radiation accidents: consequences and protective countermeasures. Moscow: IzdAT Publisher; 2004.
Geras’kin S.A., Fesenko S.V., Alexakhin R.M. Environment International 34(2008) 880-897.
Sokolov V.E., Ryabov I.N., Ryabtsev I.A., et al. Sov Sci Rev F Physiol Gen Biol 8 (1994)1-124.
Krivolutsky D.A. Rus. J. Ecology 31 (2000) 257-262.
Dmitriev A., Krizanovskaya M., Guscha N., Grodzinsky D. In: Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the European Radiation Research Society. Kiev, Ukraine; 2007. p. 109-117.
Kovalchuk I., Abramov V., Pogribny I., Kovalchuk O. Plant Physiology 135 (2004) 357-363.
Fedotov I.S., Kal’chenko V.A., Igonina E.V., Rubanovich A.V. Radiation Biology. Radioecology 46 (2006) 283-288. (in Russian)
Glazko T.T., Grodzinsky D.M., Glazko V.I. Radiation Biology. Radioecology 46 (2006) 488-493. (in Russian)
Tsytsugina V.G., Polikarpov G.G. Radiation biology. Radioecology 46 (2006) 200-207. (in Russian)
Glazko V.I. Animal Science Papers and Reports 19 (2001) 95-109.
Chesser R.K., Sugg D.W., Lomakin M.D., et al. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 19 (2000) 305-312.
Ryabokon N.I., Smolich I.I., Kudryashov V.P., Goncharova R.I. Radiat. Environ. Biophys 44 (2005) 169-181.
Geras’kin S.A., Oudalova A.A., Dikareva N.S. et al. Ecotoxicology (2011) DOI 10.1007/s10646-011-0664-7