Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:41:16.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MIMESIS AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: A Sociocultural Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2008

Steven G. McCafferty
Steven G. McCafferty
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Donald (2001) argued that mimesis is fundamental to communication and culture. The basic level of mimetic action is mime—as found, for example, in the imaginative, expressive play of children, who typically imitate aspects of the world around them, including the actions of their parents, and pretend to be those they will become. Mimesis has a prominent position in the lives of children in relation to language acquisition as well; for example, Nelson (1996) found that mimetic portrayals of events, such as in play, largely precede language and are key to its development. According to Donald, mimesis is also central to tribal identity (culture), in how emotions are expressed and understood. This article argues that mimesis plays two prominent roles in acquiring another language. The first relates to how people materialize aspects of their second language discourse through gesture as a means of making meaning for themselves as well as for interlocutors. This perspective is grounded in the Vygotskian branch of Soviet psychology, particularly the work of Gal'perin (1989). The so-called tribal aspect of mimesis (identity) in the form of gesture is also taken up in relation to SLA, again from a sociocultural perspective. Overall, it is argued that our material being impacts the way we live and learn and that sound theories of SLA will need to take this into account.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 147 - 167
Copyright
© 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, T.W. (1998). Gesture in foreigner talk. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: Quill.
Allen, L. (2000). Nonverbal accommodations in foreign language teacher talk. Applied Language Learning, 11, 155–176.Google Scholar
Arievitch, I. & van der Veer, R. (1995). Furthering the internalization debate: Gal'perin's contribution. Human Development, 38, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D.F., Stokoe, W.C., & Wilcox, S.E. (1995). Gesture and the nature of language. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Barnett, M.A. (1983). Le langage des gestes [The language of gestures]. Canadian Modern Language Review, 41, 543–550.Google Scholar
Bordieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Bruner, J. (1983). Child's talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.
Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2007). The gestural communication of apes and monkeys. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Caselli, M.C. (2002). Communicative gestures and first words. In V. Volterrra & C. J. Erting (Eds.), From gesture to language (pp. 56–67). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Cassell, J. (1998). A framework of gesture generation and interpretation. In R. Cipolla & A. Pentland (Eds.), Computer vision for human-machine interaction (pp. 191–216). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Corballis, M.C. & Lea, S.E.G. (1999). Phylogeny from apes to humans. In M. C. Corballis & S. E. G. Lea (Eds.), The descent of mind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution (pp. 1–15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DaSilva Iddings, A.C. & Jang, E.Y., (in press). The mediational role of classroom practices during the silent period: New immigrant children learning the English language in the mainstream classroom. TESOL Quarterly.
DaSilva Iddings, A.C. & McCafferty, S.G. (2005). Creating zones of proximal development in a third-grade multilingual classroom. In A. E. Tyler, M. Takada, Y. Kim, & D. Marinova (Eds.), Language in use: Cognitive and discourse perspectives on language and language learning (pp. 112–123). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Di Pelegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Donald, M. (1998). Commentary on Michael Tomasello's ‘Uniquely primate, uniquely human.’ Developmental Science, 1, 17–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare. New York: Norton.
el Kaliouby, R. & Robinson, P. (2005). The emotional hearing aid: An assistive tool for children with Asperger syndrome. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M.A. & Rubin, K.H. (1979). Hand gestures as a communicative mode in school-aged children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 135, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frawley, W. & Lantolf, J.P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskian perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6, 9–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V. & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal'perin, P.I. (1989). Mental actions as the basis for the formation of thoughts and images. Soviet Psychology, 27, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebauer, G. & Wulf, C. (1995). Mimesis: Culture, art, society (D. Reneau, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Givon, T. (2002). Bio-linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M.W., & Church, R.B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100, 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. & McNeill, D. (1999). The role of gesture and mimetic representation in making language the province of speech. In M. C. Corballis & S. E. G. Lea (Eds.), The descent of mind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution (pp. 155–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gullberg, M. (1998). Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.
Gullberg, M. (2003). Gestures, reference, and anaphoric linkage in learner varieties. In C. Dimroth & M. Starren (Eds.), Information structure, linguistic structure, and the dynamics of language acquisition (pp. 311–328). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Gullberg, M. (2008). A helping hand? Gestures, L2 learners, and grammer. In S. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 185–210). London: Routledge.
Hadar, U., Dar, R., & Teitelman, A. (2001). Gesture during speech in first and second language: Implications for lexical retrieval. Gesture, 1, 151–165.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2002). The aesthetics of mimesis: Ancient texts and modern problems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Harris, R. (1998). Introduction to integrational linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.
Harris, R. (2003). On redefining linguistics. In H. G. Davis & T. J. Taylor (Eds.), Integrational linguistics: A first reader (pp. 27–49). New York: Pergamon.
Haught, J.R. & McCafferty, S.G. (2008). Embodied language performance: Drama and the ZPD in the second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 139–162). Bedforshire, UK: Equinox.
Henzl, V. (1979). Foreigner talk in the classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 159–167.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jungheim, N.O. (1995). Assessing the unsaid: The development of tests of nonverbal ability. In J. D. Brown & S. O. Yamashita (Eds.), Language testing in Japan (pp. 149–165). Tokyo: The Japan Association for Language Teaching.
Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. In A. Siegman & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–210). New York: Pergamon.
Kida, T. (2005). Appropriation du geste par les étrangers: Le cas d'étudiants japonais apprenant le français [Appropriation of gesture by foreigners: The case of Japanese students learning French]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France.
King, A. (2000). Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘practical’ critique of the habitus. Sociological Theory, 18, 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. (1993). Language and thought interface: A study of spontaneous gestures and Japanese mimetics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kulick, D. & Schieffelin, B.B. (2004). Language socialization. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 349–368). Oxford: Blackwell.
Lantolf, J.P. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics—A sociocultural perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27, 717–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning, 54, 79–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leont'ev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Liberman, P. (1991). Uniquely human: The evolution of speech, thought, and selfless behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Luria, A.R. (1979). The making of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Maran, T. (2003). Mimesis as a phenomenon of semiotic communication. Sign Systems Studies, 31, 191–215.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1967). Capital (Vol. 1). New York: International Publishers.
Marx, K. (1973). Theses on Feurback. In K. Marx & F. Engels, The German ideology (pp. 121–123). New York: International Publishers.
McCafferty, S.G. (1998). Nonverbal expression and L2 private speech. Applied Linguistics, 19, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, S.G. (2002). Gesture and creating zones of proximal development for second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 86, 192–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, S.G. (2004). Space for cognition: Gesture and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 148–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, S.G. (2006). Gesture and the materialization of second language prosody. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 44, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, S.G. (2008). Material foundations for second language learning: Gesture, metaphor, and internalization. In S. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 47–65). London: Routledge.
McCafferty, S.G. & Ahmed, M.K. (2000). The appropriation of gestures of the abstract by L2 learners. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 201–218). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Neu, J. (1990). Assessing the role of nonverbal communication in the acquisition of communicative competence in L2. In R. Scarcella, E. S. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 121–138). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Newman, F. & Holzman, L. (1993). Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary scientist. London: Routledge.
Nobe, S. (1993). Cognitive process of speaking and gesturing: A comparison between first language speakers and foreign language speakers. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Chicago.
Palmer, G. (2006). Energy through fusion at last: Synergies in cognitive anthropology and cognitive linguistics. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Foundations and fields of application (pp. 263–304). Berlin: New Mouton Series.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton.CrossRef
Ramachandran, V.S. & Blakeslee, S. (1998). Phantoms in the brain. New York: Fourth Estate.
Ratner, C. (2006). Cultural psychology: A perspective on psychological functioning and social reform. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rizzolatti, G. & Arbib, M.A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience, 21, 188–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. & Gallese, V. (1997). From action to meaning. In J.-L. Petit (Ed.), Les neurosciences et la philosophie de l'action (pp. 217–229). Paris: Vrin.
Roth, W.-M. (2002). From action to discourse: The bridging function of gestures. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, W.-M. (2003). From epistemic (ergotic) actions to scientific discourse: Do gestures obtain a bridging function? Pragmatics and Cognition, 11, 139–168.Google Scholar
Roth, W.-M. & Lawless, D. (2002). How does the body get into the mind? Human Studies, 25, 333–358.Google Scholar
Ryalls, B.O. & Gul, R.E. (2000). Infant imitation of peer and adult models: Evidence for a peer model advantage. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40, 188–202.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D.L. & Black, J.B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20, 457–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taranger, M.-C. & Coupier, C. (1984). Recherche sur l'acquisition des langues secondes: Approche du gestuel [Research on the acquisition of second languages: A gestural approach]. In A. Giacomi & D. Véronique (Eds.), Acquisition d'une langue étrangère: Perspectives et recherches [Acquisition of a foreign language: Perspectives and research] (pp. 169–183). Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.
Tartaro, A. & Cassell, J. (2006, August). Authorable virtual peers for autism spectrum disorders. Paper presented at the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI06), Riva del Garda, Italy.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. & Call, J. (2007). Ape gestures and the origins of language. In J. Call & M. Tomasello (Eds.), The gestural communication of apes and monkeys (pp. 221–240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Vandenabeele, B. (2002). No need for essences: On non-verbal communication in first inter-cultural contacts. South African Journal of Philosophy, 21, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Raffler-Engel, W. (1976). Linguistic and kinesic correlates in code switching. In W. C. McCormack & S. A. Wurm (Eds.), Language and man: Anthropological issues (pp. 269–286). The Hague: Mouton.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zhao, J. (2006). The communicative functions of gestures in L2 speech. SLAT Arizona Working Papers, 13, 1–18.Google Scholar
Zhao, J. (2007). Metaphors and gestures for abstract concepts in English academic writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Zinchenko, V.P. (1994). Cultural-historical psychology and the psychological theory of activity: Retrospect and prospect. In J. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 37–55). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zlatev, J. (2002). Mimesis: The “missing link” between signals and symbols in phylogeny and ontology? In A. Pajunen (Ed.), Mimesis, sign and language evolution (pp. 93–122). Turku: University of Turku Press.
Zlatev, J. (2006). Embodiment, language, and mimesis. In T. Ziemke, J. Zlatev, & R. Frank (Eds.), Body, language and mind: Vol. 1. Embodiment (pp. 297–337). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zlatev, J., Persson, T., & Gardenfors, P. (2005). Bodily mimesis as “the missing link” in human cognitive evolution. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Cognitive Studies.